Gaois

Treo cuardaigh

Modh cuardaigh

Scag na torthaí

Bailiúcháin

Foirmeacha na bhfocal

work

working

party

question

3 thoradh in 3 dhoiciméad

  1. #2403461

    Déanfar an chaibidlíocht i gcomhairle le Meitheal na Comhairle um Cheisteanna Cánach.

    The negotiations shall be conducted in consultation with the Council Working Party on Tax Questions.

    Cinneadh (AE) 2022/1311 ón gComhairle an 17 Meitheamh 2022 lena n-údaraítear tús a chur le caibidlíocht le Ríocht na hIorua chun leasú a dhéanamh ar an gComhaontú idir an tAontas Eorpach agus Ríocht na hIorua maidir le comhar riaracháin, comhrac na calaoise agus aisghabháil éileamh i réimse na cánach breisluacha

  2. #458750

    (b) Má thagann costais maoinithe is airde roimh iasachtóir, féadfaidh sé, trí fhógra i scríbhinn mar aon le faisnéis thaca atá sásúil do na hIasachtóirí eile, a iarraidh ar na Páirtithe (maille le cóip don Choimisiún agus do Chathaoirleach Ghasra Oibre an Euro) glacadh leis nach mbeidh an tIasachtóir atá i gceist páirteach sna hIasachtaí a bheidh le déanamh.

    (b) If a Lender encounters higher funding costs, it may by written notice together with supporting information satisfactory to the other Lenders request the Parties (with a copy to the Commission and the Euro Working Group Chairman) to accept that the Lender in question does not participate in the Loans to be made.

    AN tACHT UM SHAORÁID IASACHTA AN LIMISTÉIR EURO 2010

  3. #2627683

    ag tabhairt dá haire go raibh in 2020 an Institiúid ag baint leas i gcónaí as an gcreatchonradh chun pearsanra eatramhach a sholáthar; ag tabhairt dá haire gur chuir roinnt oibrithe eatramhacha i gcoinne a ndálaí oibre leis an gcuideachta ar conradh ag tús na bliana 2018 agus gur dhéileáil coiste díospóide saothair na Liotuáine leis an gcás, a rinne cinneadh i bhfabhar na foirne eatramhaí; ag tabhairt dá haire gur chuir an chuideachta atá ar conradh in aghaidh chinneadh choiste díospóide saothair na Liotuáine; á chur i bhfios gur ghníomhaigh an Institiúid mar thríú páirtí sa chás sin; á chur i bhfios, ina theannta sin, maidir le Treoir 2008/104/CE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle, nár tugadh soiléireacht dhlíthiúil a priori maidir le cé acu an dtagann gníomhaireachtaí de chuid an Aontais faoina raon feidhme maidir le hoibrithe sealadacha a fhostú; ag tabhairt dá haire gur dhírigh Cúirt Uachtarach na Liotuáine ceisteanna ar Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh (CBAE) ar an 30 Nollaig 2019, i gCás C-948/19; ag tabhairt dá haire, maidir lena bhfuil sa tuarascáil ón gCúirt go mb’fhéidir, ó tá CBAE ag rialú ar an ábhar, go mbeadh tionchar aige ar sheasamh na Cúirte maidir le leas a bheith á bhaint ag an Institiúid as oibrithe eatramhacha agus go gcuirfear na barúlacha ar an ábhar ar fáil nuair a eiseoidh CBAE rialú críochnaitheach sa chás; ag tabhairt dá haire gur réitíodh an cás i mí na Samhna 2021, mar a rialaigh CBAE go dtagann gníomhaireachtaí an Aontais faoi raon feidhme Threoir 2008/104/CE nuair a fhostaíonn siad oibrithe gníomhaireachta sealadacha trí ghníomhaireachtaí fostaíochta sealadaí;

    Notes that in 2020 the Institute continued using the framework contract for the provision of interim personnel; notes that, at the beginning of 2018, some interim workers challenged their working conditions with the contracted company and that the case was dealt with by the Lithuanian labour dispute committee, which decided in favour of the interim staff; notes that the decision of the Lithuanian labour dispute committee was contested by the contracted company; remarks that the Institute acted as a third party in that case; remarks moreover that Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council did not provide a priori legal clarity about whether Union agencies fall under its scope as regards employing temporary workers; notes that on 30 December 2019 the Lithuanian Supreme Court addressed questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-948/19; notes that, according to the Court’s report, the fact that the CJEU was ruling on the matter might have an impact on the Court’s position concerning the Institute’s use of interim workers and that observations on the matter would be provided when the CJEU issued a final ruling in the case; notes that the case was resolved in November 2021, as the CJEU ruled that Union agencies fall under the scope of Directive 2008/104/EC when they employ temporary agency workers through temporary employment agencies;

    Rún (AE) 2022/1756 ó pharlaimint na Heorpa an 4 Bealtaine 2022 ina bhfuil barúlacha atá in gcuid dhílis den chinneadh maidir le hurscaoileadh i ndáil le cur chun feidhme bhuiséad na hInstitiúide Eorpaí um Chomhionannas Inscne (EIGE) don bhliain airgeadais 2020