#471160
forléireofar “an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine” de réir alt 4;
‘‘European Court of Human Rights’’ shall be construed in accordance with section 4;
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
Foirmeacha na bhfocal
99 toradh in 38 doiciméad
#471303
European Court of Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
#635920
Tá roinnt samplaí de sháruithe den sórt sin i mbreithiúnais ón gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine:
The following judgements of the European Court of Human Rights provide some examples of such violations:
#1232442
ciallaíonn “An Chúirt” an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine a bunaíodh faoi Airteagal 19 den Choinbhinsiún;
"the Court" means the European Court of Human Rights established under Article 19 of the Convention;
#1639965
An Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine (La Cour Européenne des Droits de l'Homme)
The European Court of Human Rights
#1639966
an Chúirt Eorpach um Cheárta an Duine comhaltaí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine
the European Court of Human Rights
#724738
Athdhaingníonn an Chairt seo, ag féachaint go cuí d'inniúlachtaí agus do chúraimí an Aontais agus do phrionsabal na coimhdeachta, na cearta a leanann go háirithe as na traidisiúin bhunreachtúla agus as na hoibleagáidí idirnáisiúnta is coiteann do na Ballstáit, as an gCoinbhinsiún Eorpach chun Cearta an Duine agus Saoirsí Bunúsacha a Chosaint, as na Cairteanna Sóisialta arna nglacadh ag an Aontas agus ag Comhairle na hEorpa, agus as cásdlí Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
This Charter reaffirms, with due regard for the powers and tasks of the Union and for the principle of subsidiarity, the rights as they result, in particular, from the constitutional traditions and international obligations common to the Member States, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Social Charters adopted by the Union and by the Council of Europe and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights.
#1758670
Dá bhrí sin, níor cheart difear a dhéanamh leis an Rialachán seo do chumas na mBallstát idircheapadh dleathach a dhéanamh ar chumarsáid leictreonach nó bearta eile a ghlacadh, más gá agus má tá siad comhréireach, chun na leasanna poiblí a luadh thuas a chosaint, i gcomhréir le Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh agus an Coinbhinsiún Eorpach chun Cearta an Duine agus Saoirsí Bunúsacha a chosaint, arna léiriú ag Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine.
Therefore, this Regulation should not affect the ability of Member States to carry out lawful interception of electronic communications or take other measures, if necessary and proportionate to safeguard the public interests mentioned above, in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights.
#2266512
Ba cheart a áireamh ann treoir phraiticiúil maidir le conas dlí an Aontais, cásdlí náisiúnta, cásdlí Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus cásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine a chur i bhfeidhm, maidir lena fháil amach go gcomhlíonann srianta ar fheidhmiú na saoirse chun tuairimí a nochtadh na ceanglais dá bhforáiltear, faoi seach, in Airteagal 52 den Chairt agus in Airteagal 10(2) den Choinbhinsiún Eorpach um Chearta an Duine chomh maith leis an tsaoirse chun tuairimí a nochtadh agus faisnéis a fháil, agus le cearta bunúsacha eile.
It should include practical guidance on how to apply Union law, national case law, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the case law of the European Court of Human Right, on ascertaining that restrictions to the exercise of the freedom of expression meet the requirements provided for, respectively, by Article 52 of the Charter and by Article 10(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights as well as on the articulation of freedom of expression and information, and with other fundamental rights.
#329510
Sa chomhthéacs sin, tugann an Chomhdháil dá haire go bhfuil agallamh ann go tráthrialta idir Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine;
In this connection, the Conference notes the existence of a regular dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights;
#723981
Sa chomhthéacs sin, tugann an Chomhdháil dá haire go bhfuil agallamh ann go tráthrialta idir Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine;
In this connection, the Conference notes the existence of a regular dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights;
#1644304
—an rochtain leanúnach ar institiúidí AE a chosaint, lena n-áirítear Cúirt Bhreithiúnais na hEorpa, an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine, agus comhaontuithe earnála AE;
—TO PROTECT ONGOING ACCESS TO EU INSTITUTIONS INCLUDING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, AND EU SECTORAL AGREEMENTS;
#1724929
Is coincheap uathrialach de chuid dlí an Aontais é “imeachtaí in ábhair coiriúla” arna léiriú ag Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh, d'ainneoin cásdlí Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine.
‘Proceedings in criminal matters’ is an autonomous concept of Union law interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, notwithstanding the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
#2195828
faisnéis maidir le cásdlí ábhartha Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh (“CBAE”) agus an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine.
information on relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘CJEU’) and of the European Court of Human Rights.
#1645177
Sraith Conarthaí, 20/2000. Comhaontú Eorpach a bhaineann le Daoine atá Rannpháirteach in Imeachtaí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
TREATY SERIES, 20/2000. EUROPEAN AGREEMENT RELATING TO PERSONS PARTICIPATING IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
#2691351
Rialaigh an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine freisin ar thionchar na ndroch-choinníollacha coinneála ar oibriú an bharántais ghabhála Eorpaigh.
The European Court of Human Rights has also ruled on the impact of poor detention conditions on the operation of the European arrest warrant.
#2266586
Staidéar ar chásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine (2012) https://rm.coe.int/study- on-the-alignment-of-laws-and-practices-concerning-alignment-of-l/16804915c5, agus an ceann is déanaí, staidéar Chomhairle na hEorpa ar chásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine (2016) https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806ac95b.
A study of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (2012) https://rm.coe.int/study-on-the-alignment-of-laws-and-practices-concerning-alignment-of-l/16804915c5, and most recently the Council of Europe’s study of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (2016) https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806ac95b
#706552
Mar sin féin, ba cheart bunús dlí den sórt sin nó beart reachtach den sórt sin a bheith soiléir cruinn agus ba cheart a chur chun feidhme a bheith intuartha do na daoine sin a bheadh faoina réir, i gcomhréir le cásdlí Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh (“an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais”) agus cásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
However, such a legal basis or legislative measure should be clear and precise and its application should be foreseeable to persons subject to it, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights.
#1758789
Maidir le raon feidhme Airteagal 7 den Chairt, deimhníonn cásdlí Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh ("CJEU") 9 agus na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine 10 nach féidir gníomhaíochtaí gairmiúla daoine dlítheanacha a eisiamh ó chosaint an chirt a ráthaítear le hAirteagal 7 den Chairt agus le hAirteagal 8 de CECD.
As regards the scope of Article 7 of the Charter, the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") 9 and of the European Court of Human Rights 10 confirm that professional activities of legal persons may not be excluded from the protection of the right guaranteed by Article 7 of the Charter and Article 8 of the ECHR.
#2435364
Sa Pholainn, tá an smacht reachta ag dul in olcas, agus is cúis mhór imní i gcónaí é neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna, mar thoradh ar roinnt rialuithe ó Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus ón gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine.
In Poland, the rule of law has deteriorated, and judicial independence remains a serious concern, as follows from several rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights.
#2933815
Tá dochar á dhéanamh i gcónaí don timpeallacht infheistíochta sa Pholainn mar gheall ar ábhair imní thromchúiseacha a bhaineann leis an dlí, lena n-áirítear neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna, mar a sainaithníodh i rialuithe ó Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh (“an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais”) agus ón gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine.
The investment climate in Poland continues to be impaired by serious concerns related to the rule of law, including the independence of the judiciary, as identified in rulings by the Court of Justice of the European Union (the ‘Court of Justice’) and the European Court of Human Rights.
#471179
(a) ar aon dearbhú, cinneadh, tuairim chomhairleach nó breithiúnas ón gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine, a bunaíodh faoin gCoinbhinsiún, maidir le haon cheist a bhfuil dlínse ag an gCúirt sin ina leith,
(a) any declaration, decision, advisory opinion or judgment of the European Court of Human Rights established under the Convention on any question in respect of which that Court has jurisdiction,
#635907
Is léir ó chásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine gur gá athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar an sainmhíniú i Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1236/2005.
The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights indicates that the definition in Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 needs to be reconsidered.
#1763970
An Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine, Osman in aghaidh na Ríochta Aontaithe, Uimh. 87/1997/871/1083, 28 Deireadh Fómhair 1998, mír 116.
European Court of Human Rights, Osman v United Kingdom, No. 87/1997/871/1083, 28 October 1998, para. 116.
#1766003
An Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine, Osman in aghaidh na Ríochta Aontaithe, Uimh. 87/1997/871/1083, 28 Deireadh Fómhair 1998, mír 116.
European Court of Human Rights, Osman v United Kingdom, No. 87/1997/871/1083, 28 October 1998, para. 116.
#2195861
cásdlí ábhartha na gcúirteanna náisiúnta, CBAE agus na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine agus forbairtí ábhartha eile i réimse an dlí tearmainn;
relevant case law of national courts, the CJEU and the European Court of Human Rights and other relevant developments in the field of asylum law;
#2266568
Féach breithiúnas na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine an 7 Nollaig 1976, Handyside v. An Ríocht Aontaithe (iarratas uimh. 5493/72), mír 49.
See European Court of Human Rights’ judgement of 7 December 1976, Handyside v. The United Kingdom (application No 5493/72), paragraph 49.
#2266569
Féach breithiúnas na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine an 15 Feabhra 2005, Steel and Morris v. An Ríocht Aontaithe (iarratas uimh. 68416/01), mír 89.
See European Court of Human Rights’ judgement on 15 February 2005, Steel and Morris v. The United Kingdom (application No 68416/01), paragraph 89.
#2382937
Áiritheoidh Poblacht na Moldóive forghníomhú éifeachtach bhreithiúnais na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine agus cruthóidh sí sásra éifeachtúil rialaithe Pharlaimintigh ar an bhforghníomhú sin.
The Republic of Moldova will ensure the effective execution of judgments made by the European Court of Human Rights and create an efficient mechanism of Parliamentary control over such execution.
#2382959
Feabhas suntasach a chur ar an gcuntas teiste maidir le forghníomhú chinntí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
Significantly improve the track record in the execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.
#2422645
An 17 Feabhra 2021, d'ordaigh an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine do Rialtas na Rúise Alexei Navalny a scaoileadh saor.
On 17 February 2021, the European Court of Human Rights ordered the Government of Russia to release Alexei Navalny.
#2422713
In 2018, bhí an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine tar éis a chinneadh go raibh an ciontú sin treallach agus éagórach.
That fraud conviction had been found arbitrary and unfair by the European Court of Human Rights in 2018.
#2572019
An 17 Feabhra 2021, d'ordaigh an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine do Rialtas na Rúise Alexei Navalny a scaoileadh saor.
On 17 February 2021, the European Court of Human Rights ordered the Government of Russia to release Alexei Navalny.
#2572091
In 2018, bhí an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine tar éis a chinneadh go raibh an ciontú sin treallach agus éagórach.
That fraud conviction had been found arbitrary and unfair by the European Court of Human Rights in 2018.
#2691371
Thairis sin, bíonn an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine fós ag cinneadh go bhfuil Ballstáit ag sárú Airteagal 3 nó Airteagal 5 den Choinbhinsiún Eorpach um Chearta an Duine a mhéid a bhaineann le coinneáil.
In addition, the European Court of Human Rights still continues to find Member States in violation of Article 3 or 5 of the ECHR in the context of detention.
#2881871
I gcomhréir le roinn 1(2) de, ‘athchothromaíonn’ an bille an caidreamh idir cúirteanna na Ríochta Aontaithe, an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine agus parlaimint na Ríochta Aontaithe.
In accordance with its section 1(2), the bill “re-balances” the relationship between United Kingdom’s courts, the European Court of Human Rights and the United Kingdom’s parliament.
#635911
Sa bhreithiúnas uaithi an 13 Nollaig 2012, Khaled El-Masri v. FYROM (Iarratas Uimh. 39630/09), maidir le hAirteagal 3 den Choinbhinsiún Eorpach um Chearta an Duine agus ag tagairt do chásdlí a chuaigh roimhe, mheas an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine:
In its judgement of 13 December 2012, Khaled El-Masri v. FYROM (Application No 39630/09), the European Court of Human Rights held as regards Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and with reference to earlier case-law:
#674756
Ba cheart an Ciste a chur chun feidhme agus lánurraim á tabhairt do na cearta agus na prionsabail atá cumhdaithe i gCairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh agus do na cearta bunúsacha a chumhdaítear sna hionstraimí idirnáisiúnta ábhartha, lena n-áirítear cásdlí ábhartha na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
The Fund should be implemented in full respect for the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and for the fundamental rights enshrined in the relevant international instruments, including the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
#2266351
I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 52(3) den Chairt agus leis na Mínithe a bhaineann leis an gCairt, ba cheart brí agus raon feidhme Airteagal 10 maidir le saoirse chun tuairimí a nochtadh agus faisnéis a fháil sa Choinbhinsiún Eorpach um Chearta an Duine arna léiriú ag an gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine a thabhairt d’Airteagal 11 den Chairt.
In line with Article 52(3) of the Charter and with the Explanations relating to the Charter, Article 11 of the Charter should be given the meaning and scope of Article 10 on freedom of expression and information of the European Convention on Human Rights as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
#2266567
Féach freisin maidir leis na hoibleagáidí dearfacha faoi Airteagal 10 den Choinbhinsiún Eorpach um Chearta an Duine, an Tuarascáil ón Rannán Taighde den Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine, https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/research_report_article_10_eng.pdfI
See also on the positive obligations under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human rights, the Report of the Research Division of the European Court of Human Rights’, https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/research_report_article_10_eng.pdfI
#2691346
Tá na Ballstáit faoi cheangal ag ionstraimí reatha Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le cearta an duine agus toirmeasc ar chéastóireacht agus cóireáil nó pionós mídhaonna nó táireach, go háirithe an Coinbhinsiún Eorpach chun Cearta an Duine agus Saoirsí Bunúsacha a Chosaint (CECD), na prótacail a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún sin, cásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine agus Coinbhinsiún Eorpach 1987 chun Céastóireacht agus Cóireáil agus Pionós Mídhaonna nó Táireach a Chosc.
The Member States are already legally bound by existing Council of Europe instruments on human rights and the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment, in particular the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), the protocols to that Convention, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the 1987 European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
#2691388
Chun caighdeáin choinneála iomchuí a áirithiú, ba cheart do na Ballstáit íosmhéid spáis maireachtála pearsanta a thabhairt do gach duine atá á choinneáil, i gcomhréir leis na moltaí ón gCoiste Eorpach chun Céastóireacht a Chosc agus cásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
To ensure appropriate detention standards, Member States should provide each detainee with a minimum amount of personal living space in accordance with the recommendations of the European Committee for Prevention of Torture (CPT) and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
#1665400
Ar an gcéad dul síos, d’fhéadfadh imthosca teacht chun cinn ina mbeidh soláthraithe seirbhísí rochtana ar an idrlíon faoi réir reachtaíocht de chuid an Aontais nó reachtaíocht náisiúnta a chomhlíonann dlí an Aontais (mar shampla, reachtaíocht a bhaineann le dlíthiúlacht ábhair, feidhmchlár nó seirbhísí, nó reachtaíocht a bhaineann le sábháilteacht phoiblí a chomhlíonadh, lena n-áirítear dlí coiriúil, lena gceanglaítear, mar shampla, ábhar sonrach, feidhmchláir shonracha nó seirbhísí sonracha a bhlocáil, nó le bearta lena gcuirtear an reachtaíocht sin i bhfeidhm nó chun feidhme, amhail bearta a bhfuil feidhm ghinearálta leo, orduithe cúirte, cinntí ó údaráis phoiblí ag a bhfuil na cumhachtaí ábhartha, nó bearta eile lena n-áirithítear go gcomhlíontar gníomhartha reachtacha de chuid an Aontais nó reachtaíocht náisiúnta den sórt sin (mar shampla, oibleagáidí chun orduithe cúirte a chomhlíonadh nó orduithe ó údaráis phoiblí lena gceanglaítear ábhar neamhdhlíthiúil a bhlocáil). An ceanglas maidir le dlí an Aontais a chomhlíonadh, baineann sé, inter alia, le comhlíonadh cheanglais Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh (“an Chairt”) i ndáil le feidhmiú cearta agus saoirsí bunúsacha a theorannú. Mar a fhoráiltear i dTreoir 2002/21/CE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle [5], aon bhearta ar dóigh dóibh cearta bunúsacha nó shaoirsí bunúsacha a shrianadh, ní bheidh siad le forchur ach amháin má tá siad iomchuí, comhréireach agus riachtanach i sochaí dhaonlathach, agus beidh a gcur chun feidhme faoi réir coimircí leordhóthanacha nós imeachta i gcomhréir leis an gCoinbhinsiún Eorpach chun Cearta an Duine agus Saoirsí Bunúsacha a Chosaint, lena n-áirítear cosaint éifeachtach bhreithiúnach agus próis chuí.
First, situations may arise in which providers of internet access services are subject to Union legislative acts, or national legislation that complies with Union law (for example, related to the lawfulness of content, applications or services, or to public safety), including criminal law, requiring, for example, blocking of specific content, applications or services. In addition, situations may arise in which those providers are subject to measures that comply with Union law, implementing or applying Union legislative acts or national legislation, such as measures of general application, court orders, decisions of public authorities vested with relevant powers, or other measures ensuring compliance with such Union legislative acts or national legislation (for example, obligations to comply with court orders or orders by public authorities requiring to block unlawful content). The requirement to comply with Union law relates, inter alia, to the compliance with the requirements of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’) in relation to limitations on the exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms. As provided in Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], any measures liable to restrict those fundamental rights or freedoms are only to be imposed if they are appropriate, proportionate and necessary within a democratic society, and if their implementation is subject to adequate procedural safeguards in conformity with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, including its provisions on effective judicial protection and due process.
#471185
(b) ní choiscfidh sé ar pháirtí sna himeachtaí lena mbaineann aighneachtaí nó uiríll a dhéanamh i ndáil le nithe lena mbaineann an dearbhú in aon imeachtaí os comhair na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
(b) shall not prevent a party to the proceedings concerned from making submissions or representations in relation to matters to which the declaration relates in any proceedings before the European Court of Human Rights.
#471192
(5) Le linn comhairle a thabhairt don Rialtas i dtaobh mhéid an chúitimh chun críocha fho-alt (4), déanfaidh comhairleoir na prionsabail agus an cleachtas a chuireann an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine i bhfeidhm i ndáil le sásamh cóir a thabhairt do pháirtí díobhálaithe faoi Airteagal 41 den Choinbhinsiún a chur i gcuntas go cuí.
(5) In advising the Government on the amount of compensation for the purposes of subsection (4), an adviser shall take appropriate account of the principles and practice applied by the European Court of Human Rights in relation to affording just satisfaction to an injured party under Article 41 of the Convention.
#471306
To ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto, there shall be set up a European Court of Human Rights, hereinafter referred to as “the Court”.
To ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto, there shall be set up a European Court of Human Rights, hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Court’’.
#595998
Maidir leis an gcaoi ina gcaitear le daoine a thagann faoi raon feidhme an Rialacháin seo, tá Ballstáit faoi cheangal ag na hoibleagáidí atá orthu faoi ionstraimí dlí idirnáisiúnta, lena n-áirítear cás-dlí ábhartha na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Regulation, Member States are bound by their obligations under instruments of international law, including the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
#635838
Ba mhaith an t‑inchur a tháinig ón nGrúpa Saineolaithe sa phróiseas athbhreithnithe, go háirithe maidir le cásdlí ón gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine agus maidir le hearraí a cuireadh ar an margadh mar earraí a bheadh oiriúnach d'fhorfheidhmiú an dlí ach a d'fhéadfaí a úsáid le haghaidh céastóireachta nó le haghaidh íde nó pionóis eile atá cruálach, mídhaonna nó táireach.
The Group of Experts provided valuable input in the review process, mainly as regards case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and on the subject of goods marketed as suitable for law enforcement which might be used for the purpose of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
#635918
Cé gur pionós dleathach é cailliúint saoirse, i bprionsabal, measann an Chúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine gur faoin Stát ábhartha atá sé a áirithiú go mbeidh dálaí na coinneála ag teacht le meas ar dhínit an duine, nach gcuirfidh an tslí nó an modh a gcuirtear an beart i bhfeidhm anacair nó anró ar an duine a bheadh níos déine ná an leibhéal dosheachanta lena mbeifí ag súil agus duine faoi choinneáil, agus chomh maith leis sin, agus aird á tabhairt ar éilimh phraiticiúla príosúnachta, go ndeimhneofar sláinte agus folláine an duine go sásúil.
Whereas deprivation of liberty is, in principle, a lawful penalty, the European Court of Human Rights holds that it is up to the relevant State to ensure that the conditions of detention are compatible with respect for human dignity, that the manner and method of the execution of the measure do not subject the detained person to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his or her health and well-being are adequately secured.
#635951
An sainmhíniú ar 'íde nó pionós eile atá cruálach, mídhaonna nó táireach', nach bhfuil le fáil sa Choinbhinsiún, ba cheart é a leasú chun é a chur in oiriúint do chásdlí na Cúirte Eorpaí um Chearta an Duine.
The definition of ‘other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’, which is not found in the Convention, should be amended to align it with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.