Gaois

Search direction

Search mode

Filter results

Collections

139 results in 22 documents

  1. #1566199

    1. in England and Wales, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court on transmission by the Secretary of State;

    1. in England and Wales, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court on transmission by the Secretary of State;

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  2. #1566201

    2. in Scotland, to the Court of Session, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Sheriff Court on transmission by the Secretary of State;

    2. in Scotland, to the Court of Session, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Sheriff Court on transmission by the Secretary of State;

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  3. #1566203

    3. in Northern Ireland, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court on transmission by the Secretary of State.

    3. in Northern Ireland, to the High Court of Justice, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Magistrates' Court on transmission by the Secretary of State.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  4. #1566296

    The court with which the appeal under Article 37 (1) is lodged may, on the application of the appellant, stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal has been lodged against the judgment in the State of origin or if the time for such an appeal has not yet expired;

    The court with which the appeal under Article 37 (1) is lodged may, on the application of the appellant, stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal has been lodged against the judgment in the State of origin or if the time for such an appeal has not yet expired;

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  5. #1566299

    Where the judgment was given in Ireland or the United Kingdom, any form of appeal available in the State of origin shall be treated as an ordinary appeal for the purposes of the first paragraph.

    Where the judgment was given in Ireland or the United Kingdom, any form of appeal available in the State of origin shall be treated as an ordinary appeal for the purposes of the first paragraph.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  6. #1566379

    A foreign judgment which orders a periodic payment by way of a penalty shall be enforceable in the State in which enforcement is sought only if the amount of the payment has been finally determined by the courts of the State of origin.

    A foreign judgment which orders a periodic payment by way of a penalty shall be enforceable in the State in which enforcement is sought only if the amount of the payment has been finally determined by the courts of the State of origin. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  7. #1566387

    No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required of a party who in one Contracting State applies for enforcement of a judgment given in another Contracting State on the ground that he is a foreign national or that he is not domiciled or resident in the State in which enforcement is sought.

    No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required of a party who in one Contracting State applies for enforcement of a judgment given in another Contracting State on the ground that he is a foreign national or that he is not domiciled or resident in the State in which enforcement is sought. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  8. #1566396

    2. in the case of a judgment given in default, the original or a certified true copy of the document which establishes that the party in default was served with the document instituting the proceedings or with an equivalent document.

    2. in the case of a judgment given in default, the original or a certified true copy of the document which establishes that the party in default was served with the document instituting the proceedings or with an equivalent document. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  9. #1566442

    The provisions of this Convention shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to documents formally drawn up or registered as authentic instruments after its entry into force in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    The provisions of this Convention shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to documents formally drawn up or registered as authentic instruments after its entry into force in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  10. #1566617

    This Convention shall not prevent a Contracting State from assuming, in a convention on the recognition and enforcement of judgments, an obligation towards a third State not to recognize judgments given in other Contracting States against defendants domiciled or habitually resident in the third State where, in cases provided for in Article 4, the judgment could only be founded on a ground of jurisdiction specified in the second paragraph of Article 3.

    This Convention shall not prevent a Contracting State from assuming, in a convention on the recognition and enforcement of judgments, an obligation towards a third State not to recognize judgments given in other Contracting States against defendants domiciled or habitually resident in the third State where, in cases provided for in Article 4, the judgment could only be founded on a ground of jurisdiction specified in the second paragraph of Article 3.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  11. #1566619

    However, a Contracting State may not assume an obligation towards a third State not to recognize a judgment given in another Contracting State by a court basing its jurisdiction on the presence within that State of property belonging to the defendant, or the seizure by the plaintiff of property situated there:

    However, a Contracting State may not assume an obligation towards a third State not to recognize a judgment given in another Contracting State by a court basing its jurisdiction on the presence within that State of property belonging to the defendant, or the seizure by the plaintiff of property situated there:

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  12. #1566684

    in the case of failure to appear, a judgment given in the civil action without the person concerned having had the opportunity to arrange for his defence need not be recognized or enforced in the other Contracting States.

    in the case of failure to appear, a judgment given in the civil action without the person concerned having had the opportunity to arrange for his defence need not be recognized or enforced in the other Contracting States. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  13. #1566771

    3. in the cases provided for in Article 37 of the Convention, the courts referred to in that Article. Article 3 [EN] 1. Where a question of interpretation of the Convention or of one of the other instruments referred to in Article 1 is raised in a case pending before one of the courts listed in Article 2.1, that court shall, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court of Justice to give a ruling thereon. [EN] 2.

    —in Belgium:

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  14. #1566773

    The competent authority of a Contracting State may request the Court of Justice to give a ruling on a question of interpretation of the Convention or of one of the other instruments referred to in Article 1 if judgments given by courts of that State conflict with the interpretation given either by the Court of Justice or in a judgment of one of the courts of another Contracting State referred to in Article 2.1 or 2.2. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply only to judgments which have become res judicata. [EN] 2.

    [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  15. #1566879

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, with the amendments made by this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, with the amendments made by this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  16. #1566940

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, as amended by the 1978 Convention and this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, as amended by the 1978 Convention and this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  17. #1566991

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, as amended by the 1978 Convention, the 1982 Convention and this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, as amended by the 1978 Convention, the 1982 Convention and this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  18. #1567046

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, as amended by the 1978 Convention, the 1982 Convention, the 1989 Convention and by this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    The 1968 Convention and the 1971 Protocol, as amended by the 1978 Convention, the 1982 Convention, the 1989 Convention and by this Convention, shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to authentic instruments formally drawn up or registered after the entry into force of this Convention in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  19. #1567379

    5. in proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments, the courts of the Contracting State in which the judgment has been or is to be enforced.

    5. in proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments, the courts of the Contracting State in which the judgment has been or is to be enforced. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  20. #1567470

    4. if the court of the State of origin, in order to arrive at its judgment, has decided a preliminary question concerning the status or legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills or succession in a way that conflicts with a rule of the private international law of the State in which the recognition is sought, unless the same result would have been reached by the application of the rules of private international law of that State;

    4. if the court of the State of origin, in order to arrive at its judgment, has decided a preliminary question concerning the status or legal capacity of natural persons, rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills or succession in a way that conflicts with a rule of the private international law of the State in which the recognition is sought, unless the same result would have been reached by the application of the rules of private international law of that State;

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  21. #1567490

    A court of a Contracting State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in Ireland or the United Kingdom may stay the proceedings if enforcement is suspended in the State of origin by reason of an appeal.

    A court of a Contracting State in which recognition is sought of a judgment given in Ireland or the United Kingdom may stay the proceedings if enforcement is suspended in the State of origin by reason of an appeal. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  22. #1567495

    A judgment given in a Contracting State and enforceable in that State shall be enforced in another Contracting State when, on the application of any interested party, it has been declared enforceable there.

    A judgment given in a Contracting State and enforceable in that State shall be enforced in another Contracting State when, on the application of any interested party, it has been declared enforceable there.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  23. #1567497

    However, in the United Kingdom, such a judgment shall be enforced in England and Wales, in Scotland, or in Northern Ireland when, on the application of any interested party, it has been registered for enforcement in that part of the United Kingdom.

    However, in the United Kingdom, such a judgment shall be enforced in England and Wales, in Scotland, or in Northern Ireland when, on the application of any interested party, it has been registered for enforcement in that part of the United Kingdom. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  24. #1567652

    The court with which the appeal under Article 37 (1) is lodged may, on the application of the appellant, stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal has been lodged against the judgment in the State of origin or if the time for such an appeal has not yet expired;

    The court with which the appeal under Article 37 (1) is lodged may, on the application of the appellant, stay the proceedings if an ordinary appeal has been lodged against the judgment in the State of origin or if the time for such an appeal has not yet expired;

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  25. #1567655

    Where the judgment was given in Ireland or the United Kingdom, any form of appeal available in the State of origin shall be treated as an ordinary appeal for the purposes of the first paragraph.

    Where the judgment was given in Ireland or the United Kingdom, any form of appeal available in the State of origin shall be treated as an ordinary appeal for the purposes of the first paragraph.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  26. #1567747

    A foreign judgment which orders a periodic payment by way of a penalty shall be enforceable in the State in which enforcement is sought only if the amount of the payment has been finally determined by the courts of the State of origin.

    A foreign judgment which orders a periodic payment by way of a penalty shall be enforceable in the State in which enforcement is sought only if the amount of the payment has been finally determined by the courts of the State of origin. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  27. #1567755

    No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required of a party who in one Contracting State applies for enforcement of a judgment given in another Contracting State on the ground that he is a foreign national or that he is not domiciled or resident in the State in which enforcement is sought.

    No security, bond or deposit, however described, shall be required of a party who in one Contracting State applies for enforcement of a judgment given in another Contracting State on the ground that he [GA] is a foreign national or that he is not domiciled or resident in the State in which enforcement is sought. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  28. #1567764

    2. in the case of a judgment given in default, the original or a certified true copy of the document which establishes that the party in default was served with the document instituting the proceedings or with an equivalent document.

    2. in the case of a judgment given in default, the original or a certified true copy of the document which establishes that the party in default was served with the document instituting the proceedings or with an equivalent document. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  29. #1567810

    The provisions of this Convention shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to documents formally drawn up or registered as authentic instruments after its entry into force in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    The provisions of this Convention shall apply only to legal proceedings instituted and to documents formally drawn up or registered as authentic instruments after its entry into force in the State of origin and, where recognition or enforcement of a judgment or authentic instrument is sought, in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  30. #1567981

    In addition to the grounds provided for in Title III, recognition or enforcement may be refused if the State addressed is not a contracting party to a convention referred to in the first paragraph and the person against whom recognition or enforcement is sought is domiciled in that State, unless the judgment may otherwise be recognized or enforced under any rule of law in the State addressed.

    In addition to the grounds provided for in Title III, recognition or enforcement may be refused if the State addressed is not a contracting party to a convention referred to in the first paragraph and the person against whom recognition or enforcement is sought is domiciled in that State, unless the judgment may otherwise be recognized or enforced under any rule of law in the State addressed.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  31. #1567991

    This Convention shall not prevent a Contracting State from assuming, in a convention on the recognition and enforcement of judgments, an obligation towards a third State not to recognize judgments given in other Contracting States against defendants domiciled or habitually resident in the third State where, in cases provided for in Article 4, the judgment could only be founded on a ground of jurisdiction specified in the second paragraph of Article 3.

    This Convention shall not prevent a Contracting State from assuming, in a convention on the recognition and enforcement of judgments, an obligation towards a third State not to recognize judgments given in other Contracting States against defendants domiciled or habitually resident in the third State where, in cases provided for in Article 4, the judgment could only be founded on a ground of jurisdiction specified in the second paragraph of Article 3.

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  32. #1567993

    However, a Contracting State may not assume an obligation towards a third State not to recognize a judgment given in another Contracting State by a court basing its jurisdiction on the presence within that State of property belonging to the defendant, or the seizure by the plaintiff of property situated there:

    However, a Contracting State may not assume an obligation towards a third State not to recognize a judgment given in another Contracting State by a court basing its jurisdiction on the presence within that State of property belonging to the defendant, or the seizure by the plaintiff of property situated there:

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  33. #1568115

    [EN] 1. Switzerland reserves the right to declare, at the time of depositing its instrument of ratification, that a judgment given in another Contracting State shall be neither recognized nor enforced in Switzerland if the following conditions are met:

    Article Ia

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  34. #1568141

    in the case of failure to appear, a judgment given in the civil action without the person concerned having had the opportunity to arrange for his defence need not be recognized or enforced in the other Contracting States.

    in the case of failure to appear, a judgment given in the civil action without the person concerned having had the opportunity to arrange for his defence need not be recognized or enforced in the other Contracting States. [GA]

    Number 52 of 1998: JURISDICTION OF COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT, 1998

  35. #781165

    (3) Chun móid-scríbhinn do chlárú i dtreo go mbeadh aici éifeacht morgáiste fé alt 7 den Judgment-Mortgage (Ireland) Act, 1850, tuigfar gurb é rud aithne chláruithe ná breith a hiontráladh tar éis rithte an Achta san, i gceann de sna Cúirteanna Ard-Chéime a luaidhtear in alt 6 den Acht san no sa Chúirt dar haistríodh an t-údarás a bhíodh a fheidhmiú tráth sa Chúirt sin agus, chun crícheanna an Achta san, tuigfar gurb é rud Cúirt na gCoimisinéirí ná ceann de sna Cúirteanna Ard-Chéime sin no an Chúirt dar haistríodh an t-údarás san agus gurb í an Chúirt í inar féidir an mhóid-scríbhinn a luaidhtear san alt san 6 do chur ar fíl, agus bainfidh na forálacha den alt san 6, i dtaobh clárú, le móid-scríbhinn a cuirfar ar fíl amhlaidh.

    (3) For the purpose of the registration of any affidavit to have the effect of a mortgage under section 7 of the Judgment-Mortgage (Ireland) Act, 1850, a registered decree shall be deemed to be a judgment entered up after the passing of the said Act in one of the Superior Courts in section 6 of said Act mentioned or in the Court to which the jurisdiction formerly exercised by the said Court has been transferred, and the Court of the Commissioners shall, for the purposes of the said Act, be deemed to be one of the said Superior Courts or the Court to which this said jurisdiction was transferred and to be the Court in which the affidavit specified in said section 6 may be filed, and the provisions of said section 6 as to registration shall apply to an affidavit so filed.

    Number 32 of 1924: DAIL EIREANN COURTS (WINDING UP) ACT, 1923, AMENDMENT ACT, 1924

  36. #841830

    (a) if either such person practises as a veterinary surgeon exclusively outside the Irish Free State or such person practises as a veterinary surgeon both outside and within the Irish Free State and the disgraceful conduct is alleged to have been committed or (in the case of continuing conduct) begun outside the Irish Free State, the powers of investigating such allegation and, if such allegation is proved, of removing the name of such person from the general veterinary register shall be exercisable by the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons under the Charters and the Veterinary Surgeons Acts as heretofore and the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons shall report to the Irish Free State Veterinary Council every case in which it is determined to remove from the general veterinary register the name of any person registered in the Irish Free State veterinary register and such report shall be conclusive as to the facts but so that the Irish Free State Veterinary Council shall form their own judgment on the case independently of any opinion of the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and act accordingly;

    ( a ) if either such person practises as a veterinary surgeon exclusively outside the Irish Free State or such person practises as a veterinary surgeon both outside and within the Irish Free State and the disgraceful conduct is alleged to have been committed or (in the case of continuing conduct) begun outside the Irish Free State, the powers of investigating such allegation and, if such allegation is proved, of removing the name of such person from the general veterinary register shall be exercisable by the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons under the Charters and the Veterinary Surgeons Acts as heretofore and the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons shall report to the Irish Free State Veterinary Council every case in which it is determined to remove from the general veterinary register the name of any person registered in the Irish Free State veterinary register and such report shall be conclusive as to the facts but so that the Irish Free State Veterinary Council shall form their own judgement on the case independently of any opinion of the Council of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and act accordingly;

    Number 36 of 1931: VETERINARY SURGEONS ACT, 1931

  37. #915300

    —Tuigfear gach breithiúntas ón gCúirt Chuarda (pe'ca breithiúntas a fuarthas roimh thosach feidhme an Achta so no gheobhfar dá éis sin é) do bheith ina bhreithiúntas ar n-a iontráil i gcúirt árd-chéime i mBaile Atha Cliath do réir bhrí agus chun crícheanna ailt 6 den Judgment-Mortgage (Ireland) Act, 1850, mar a deintear san do leasú no do chur i mbaint tré achtacháin ina dhiaidh sin agus beidh feidhm agus éifeacht dá réir sin ag an Acht san, mar a deintear é leasú no do chur i mbaint amhlaidh, maidir le gach breithiúntas ón gCúirt Chuarda, ach san gus an atharú go gcomhadófar aon dearbhóid den tsórt san a luaidhtear san alt san 6, agus a déanfar maidir le haon bhreithiúntas den tsórt san, in oifig an chlárathóra chontae ina mbeidh an breithiúntas san iontrálta in ionad é chomhadú sa chúirt árd-chéime no sa chúirt eile luaidhtear san alt san.

    —Every judgment of the Circuit Court (whether obtained before or after the commencement of this Act) shall be deemed to be a judgment entered up in a superior court at Dublin within the meaning and for the purposes of section 6 of the Judgment-Mortgages (Ireland) Act, 1850, as amended or applied by subsequent enactments, and that Act as so amended or applied shall apply and have effect in relation to every judgment of the Circuit Court accordingly, but with the modification that any such affidavit as is mentioned in the said section 6 made in relation to any such judgment shall be filed in the county registrar's office in which such judgment is entered in lieu of the superior or other court mentioned in the said section.

    Number 3 of 1937: CIRCUIT COURT (REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENTS) ACT, 1937

  38. #1345353

    and all disputes and differences which may arise between the Members or the Fellows or between the Members and Fellows of the said College or between the said College and the professors nominated by the said College, or between the said professors themselves, relative to the concerns of the said College or the duties of their said professorships, which may be brought by way of appeal before any two or more of them, and to appoint certain days, times and places for the hearing and adjudging thereof, and to summon, hear, and examine upon oath, or otherwise, all and every the President, Vice-president, Censors and Fellows and other members of the said College, and the said professors, touching the matter of the said appeal, to the end that a just and clear judgment and determination may be had therein”.

    and all disputes and differences which may arise between the Members or the Fellows or between the Members and Fellows of the said College or between the said College and the professors nominated by the said College, or between the said professors themselves, relative to the concerns of the said College or the duties of their said professorships, which may be brought by way of appeal before any two or more of them, and to appoint certain days, times and places for the hearing and adjudging thereof, and to summon, hear, and examine upon oath, or otherwise, all and every the President, Vice-president, Censors and Fellows and other members of the said College, and the said professors, touching the matter of the said appeal, to the end that a just and clear judgment and determination may be had therein".

    Number 1 (Private) of 1979: THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF IRELAND (CHARTER AND LETTERS PATENT AMENDMENT) ACT, 1979

  39. #3053634

    Cás C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, mír 45, Like the protection against removal from office of the members of the body concerned (see, in particular, judgment of 19 September 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, EU:C:2006:587, paragraph 51), the receipt by those members of a level of remuneration commensurate with the importance of the functions they carry out constitutes a guarantee essential to judicial independence [Amhail an chosaint do chomhaltaí an chomhlachta lena mbaineann in aghaidh a gcur as oifig (féach, go háirithe, breithiúnas an 19 Meán Fómhair 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, EU:C:2006:587, mír 51), ráthaíocht fhíor-riachtanach don neamhspleáchas breithiúnas is ea na comhaltaí sin a bheith ag fáil leibhéal luacha saothair atá ar cóimhéid le tábhacht na bhfeidhmeanna a dhéanann siad].

    Case C-64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, para. 45, “ Like the protection against removal from office of the members of the body concerned (see, in particular, judgment of 19 September 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, EU:C:2006:587, paragraph 51), the receipt by those members of a level of remuneration commensurate with the importance of the functions they carry out constitutes a guarantee essential to judicial independence.”

    COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS 2023 EU Justice Scoreboard