#2161437
Tá eolas maith ag an bhfoireann aeracmhainneachta ar na nósanna imeachta atá i bhfeidhm laistigh de AAK.
The airworthiness staff has a good knowledge of the procedures in force within AAK.
Tá eolas maith ag an bhfoireann aeracmhainneachta ar na nósanna imeachta atá i bhfeidhm laistigh de AAK.
The airworthiness staff has a good knowledge of the procedures in force within AAK.
Tionóladh éisteachtaí le táirgeoir bithdhíosail, Campa Iberia SAU (“Campa”) agus a chuideachta chomhlachaithe, IM Biofuel Italy S.r.l. (“Imbi”), (dá ngairtear “Campa/Imbi” le chéile), agus táirgeoir sampláilte de chuid an Aontais, AAK AB (“AAK”).
Hearings were held with a biodiesel producer, Campa Iberia SAU (‘Campa’) and its related company, IM Biofuel Italy S.r.l. (‘IMBI’), (collectively called ‘Campa/IMBI’), and a sampled Union producer, AAK AB (‘AAK’).
AAK AB, Malmö, an tSualainn
AAK AB, Malmö, Sweden
Thacaigh AAK le cur chuige an ghearánaigh.
AAK expressed its support of the complainant’s approach.
Is táirgeoir d’aigéad pailmíteach san Aontas é AAK.
AAK is a producer of palmitic acid in the Union.
Mheas AAK gurbh é 45000 tona in aghaidh na bliana an t-éileamh ar aigéad pailmíteach san Aontas.
AAK estimated that the demand in the Union of palmitic acid was 45000 tonnes per year.
Mhol AAK go bhféadfaí an t-eisiamh seo a chur chun feidhme má bhaintear C16 ón sainmhíniú ar an táirge.
AAK suggested that this exclusion could be implemented by removing C16 from the product definition.
Mar sin féin, murab ionann agus an méid a mhol AAK, níl an dara ceann teoranta d’aigéad stéarach íon.
However, contrary to what AAK suggested, the latter is not limited to pure stearic acid.
Chuir an t-aeriompróir faisnéis ar fáil freisin faoi na gníomhaíochtaí maoirseachta a rinne AAK ar Air Astana in 2021-2022, agus dheimhnigh sé feabhsuithe ar a idirghníomhú le CAC KZ agus AAK, arna iarraidh sin do Choiste Aershábháilteachta an Aontais Eorpaigh,
When queried by the EU Air Safety Committee, the air carrier also debriefed on the oversight activities that AAK has performed on Air Astana in 2021-2022, and confirmed improvements in its interaction with the CAC KZ and AAK.
Dúirt AAK, maidir le praghsanna méadaithe allmhairí féideartha d’aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia ón Indinéis, go dtiocfadh méadú, dá réir sin, ar phraghsanna úsáideoirí an Aontais i ngach catagóir d’aigéad oiléach, ón Malaeisia chomh maith, rud a dhéanfadh dochar do ghníomhaíocht AAK.
AAK stated that the increased prices of potential food grade oleic acid imports from Indonesia would as a result increase Union users’ prices for all categories of oleic acid also from Malaysia, which would negatively affect the activity of AAK.
Ina theannta sin, chuir Údarás Eitlíochta na Casacstáine i dtábhacht a thiomanta atá sé a bheartas i ndáil le feabhsú leanúnach a shaothrú a thuilleadh, lena n-áirítear an obair riachtanach atá ar bun aige maidir le maoirseacht sábháilteachta a fhorbairt.
In addition, the AAK emphasized its commitment to further pursuing its policy of continuous improvement, including its essential work on safety oversight development.
Thairis sin, chuir Údarás Eitlíochta na Casacstáine a straitéis i láthair le haghaidh na tréimhse 2021-2025, lena n-áirítear an dlí nua eitlíochta a ghlacadh agus na leasuithe iarmhartacha ar chreat reachtach náisiúnta na Casacstáine.
Furthermore, the AAK presented its strategy for 2021-2025, including adoption of the new aviation law and the consequential amendments to the Kazakh national legislative framework.
Díríodh sa chuairt mheasúnaithe ar ghníomhaíochtaí AAK mar gheall ar an ról tábhachtach atá aige agus an fhreagracht atá air maidir le gníomhaíochtaí faireacháin ar na haeriompróirí atá deimhnithe sa Chasacstáin.
The assessment visit focused its activities on AAK in view of the latter’s predominant role and responsibility for the oversight activities of the air carriers certified in Kazakhstan.
Mar sin féin, ghlac ionadaithe ó CAC KZ páirt sna gníomhaíochtaí measúnaithe uile toisc go bhfuil roinnt gníomhaíochtaí beartais, amhail glacadh nós imeachta AAK, laistigh dá sainchúram.
Representatives from CAC KZ did, however, participate in all the assessment activities as a number of policy activities, such as the adoption of AAK procedures, are in their remit.
De réir na cuairte mheasúnaithe, is léir gur cé go bhfuil láidreachtaí á léiriú ag AAK, tá laigí fós ann, amhail neamh-chomhlíonadh oibleagáidí AAK le linn phróisis deimhniúcháin na n-aeriompróirí.
From the assessment visit, it is clear that while AAK shows strengths, there are still weaknesses, such as a non-compliance with AAK’s obligations during the certification processes of the air carriers.
Ní mór do CAC KZ agus AAK a áirithiú go gcuirtear chun feidhme sásraí agus nósanna imeachta inmheánach fónta lena ndéantar an creat dlíthiúil agus teicniúil atá ann faoi láthair a aistriú ina ngnáthghníomhaíochtaí agus ina ngnáthnósanna imeachta de chuid na heagraíochta.
CAC KZ and AAK need to ensure the implementation of sound internal mechanisms and procedures translating the existing legal and technical framework into routine activities and procedures of the organisation.
An 2 Feabhra 2022, chuir AAK plean gníomhaíochta ceartaithí faoi bhráid an Choimisiúin chun aghaidh a thabhairt ar na heasnaimh a chonacthas agus a thuairiscigh an fhoireann measúnaithe.
On 2 February 2022, AAK submitted to the Commission a CAP to address the shortcomings observed and reported by the assessment team.
I gcomhar leis an nGníomhaireacht, rinne an Coimisiún measúnú ar an bplean gníomhaíochta ceartaithí, agus chuir siad barúlacha agus moltaí maidir le coigeartú ar fáil do CAC KZ agus AAK.
The Commission, together with the Agency, assessed the CAP, and provided CAC KZ and AAK with comments and adjustment suggestions.
An 27 agus an 28 Aibreán 2022, thionóil an Coimisiún, an Ghníomhaireacht, na Ballstáit agus ionadaithe CAC KZ agus AAK cruinniú teicniúil.
On 27 and 28 April 2022, the Commission, the Agency, Member States and representatives of the CAC KZ and AAK held a technical meeting.
Léiríodh sa chruinniú nach mór do CAC KZ agus AAK tuilleadh soiléirithe agus fianaise a thabhairt don Choimisiún maidir le gníomhaíochtaí agus bearta áirithe a glacadh.
The meeting showed that the CAC KZ and AAK still need to provide the Commission with further clarifications and evidence regarding certain actions and measures taken.
De réir na fianaise, tá na bearta a rinne CAC KZ agus AAK ag cur lena gcumas maoirseacht a dhéanamh ar ghníomhaíochtaí eitlíochta sa Chasacstáin cheana féin.
Evidence indicates that the measures undertaken by CAC KZ and AAK already contribute to strengthening their capabilities to oversee the aviation activities in Kazakhstan.
Ar bhonn na faisnéise arna cur i láthair, is cosúil go bhfuil dul chun cinn suntasach déanta ó mhí Dheireadh Fómhair 2021 ag CAC KZ agus AAK maidir leis na caighdeáin sábháilteachta idirnáisiúnta ábhartha a chur chun feidhme.
On the basis of the information presented, it appears that since October 2021 CAC KZ and AAK have made noteworthy progress in the implementation of the relevant international safety standards.
Thug an Coimisiún agus an Ghníomhaireacht dá n-aire go bhfuil sé ar intinn acu tuilleadh tacaíochta a thabhairt do CAC KZ agus do AAK lena n-iarrachtaí an córas sábháilteachta eitlíochta sa Chasacstáin a neartú tuilleadh.
The Commission and the Agency noted their intent to further support CAC KZ and AAK with their efforts to further strengthen the aviation safety system in Kazakhstan.
Chuir AAK eolas ar fáil freisin maidir leis na bearta a rinneadh chun reachtaíocht thánaisteach eitlíochta a fhorbairt, rud nach féidir a ghlacadh go dtí go mbeidh an Dlí Eitlíochta Príomhúil glactha.
The AAK also informed about the actions taken to develop secondary aviation legislation, which can only be adopted after the Primary Aviation Law has been adopted.
Tharla éisteachtaí maidir leis an nochtadh deiridh le Musim Mas group, Wilmar, Ecogreen, Unilever, Greven Group, Schill + Seilacher Group agus AAK.
Hearings on final disclosure took place with Musim Mas group, Wilmar, Ecogreen, Unilever, Greven group, Schill + Seilacher group and AAK.
D’iarr AAK eisiamh ola aigéid pailme ó raon feidhme an imscrúdaithe nuair a rinneadh tagairt do chód AC 38231990.
AAK requested the exclusion of palm acid oil from the scope of the investigation when reference to CN code 38231990 was made.
D’iarr AAK ar an gCoimisiún aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia ó raon táirgí an imscrúdaithe.
AAK requested the Commission to exclude food grade oleic acid from the product scope of the investigation.
Mhaígh AAK, cé go raibh aigéad oiléach cumhdaithe faoin imscrúdú, gurbh fhéidir dhá chineál aigéad oiléach a shonrú: aigéad oiléach de ghrád tionsclaíoch agus aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia.
AAK claimed that while oleic acid was covered by the investigation, two types of oleic acid could be distinguished: industrial grade oleic acid and food grade oleic acid.
Dúirt AAK nach raibh ann ach allmhairí imeallacha d’aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia ón Indinéis agus, dá bhrí sin, nárbh fhéidir leo díobháil a dhéanamh do thionscal an Aontais.
AAK stated that there were only marginal imports of food grade oleic acid from Indonesia and therefore they could not cause injury to the Union industry.
Dúirt AAK gur dócha gurbh é an t-aon allmhaireoir de mhéideanna suntasacha aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia ó thíortha eile san Aontas.
AAK stated that it was probably the only Union importer of any significant volumes of food grade oleic acid from other countries.
Dúirt AAK chomh maith, de réir an fhaisnéis a bhí acu, nach raibh aon mhonarcha san Indinéis a bhí ag táirgeadh aigéad oiléach a chomhlíon ceanglais dhiana an leibhéil uasta d’éilleáin in earraí bia.
AAK also stated that according to their information, there were no plants producing oleic acid in Indonesia that met the strict requirements of maximum level of contaminants in foodstuff.
Sna barúlacha ó AAK tar éis an nochta deiridh, d’athdhearbhaigh sé a iarraidh chun aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia a eisiamh ó raon táirge an imscrúdaithe.
In its comments following final disclosure, AAK reiterated its request to exclude food grade oleic acid from the product scope of the investigation.
Ar deireadh, mhaígh AAK go mbeadh difríochtaí cineáil, gráid agus cáilíochta aimsithe ag an gCoimisiún idir an dá chineál dá ndéanfadh sé anailís den chineál céanna ar aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia agus de ghrád tionsclaíoch.
Finally, AAK claimed that had the Commission done similar analysis for food grade and industrial grade oleic acid, it would have found differences in type, grade and quality between the two types.
Ar an dara dul síos, tá an cáineadh a chuir AAK in iúl bunaithe ar mhíthuiscint ar an staid fhíorasach agus dhlíthiúil maidir leis an iarraidh chun aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia a eisiamh.
Second, the criticism expressed by AAK is based on a misunderstanding of the factual and legal situation with regards to the exclusion request of food grade oleic acid.
Fiú dá measfaí gur dhá chineál éagsúla aigéid shailligh iad an grád tionsclaíoch agus an grád bia, mar a mhaígh AAK, ní bheadh aon tionchar ag an méid sin ar thorthaí an Choimisiúin.
Even if industrial and food grades oleic acid were considered two different types of fatty acid as claimed by AAK, that would have no bearing on the Commission’s findings.
Go háirithe, chuir AAK in iúl gur chuir an Coimisiún san áireamh é san am a chuaigh thart, i gcinntí maidir le raon táirge, más rud é gur bheag táirgeadh a bhí ar siúl san Aontas i gcás cineál áirithe táirge.
In particular, AAK stated that in product scope determinations, the Commission in the past gave weight to the fact that the Union production of a product type was limited.
I ndáil leis sin, rinne AAK tagairt don imscrúdú frithdhumpála ar allmhairí snáithíní stáplacha sintéiseacha poileistir (“PSF”) de thionscnamh na Malaeisia agus na Téaváine.
In this regard, AAK referred to the anti-dumping investigation on imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters (‘PSF’) originating in Malaysia and Taiwan.
Sa bhreis ar an dá chuideachta a luaigh AAK san aighneacht, tairgeann tríú táirgeoir de chuid an Aontais aigéad oiléach de ghrád bia do mhargadh an Aontais.
In addition to the two companies mentioned by the AAK in the submission, a third Union producer offers food grade oleic acid to the Union market.
D’iarr AAK agus Musim Mas group eisiamh aigéid phailmítigh a úsáidtear le haghaidh beatha ainmhithe ón raon táirgí.
AAK and the Musim Mas group requested the exclusion of palmitic acid used for animal feed from the product scope.
Dúirt AAK nach raibh aigéad íonghlan pailmíteach oiriúnach in éineacht le haigéid shailleacha eile, agus nárbh fhéidir aigéid shailleacha eile a úsáid in ionad aigéad pailmíteach.
AAK stated that pure palmitic acid was not substitutable with other fatty acids, nor could other fatty acids replace palmitic acid.
Dar le AAK, níl na dreasachtaí ar fáil do tháirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais aigéad pailmíteach a tháirgeadh i méideanna suntasacha de bharr an éilimh ísil ar aigéad stéarach, toisc go dtáirgtear na táirgí sin ag an am céanna.
According to AAK, Union producers lack the incentives to produce palmitic acid in significant quantities due to the low demand for stearic acid, as these products are produced in parallel.
Ina gcuid barúlacha tar éis an nochta deiridh, d’athdhearbhaigh Musim Mas group agus AAK a n-iarratas chun aigéad pailmíteach a eisiamh ón raon táirge.
In their comments following final disclosure, the Musim Mas group and AAK reiterated their request to exclude palmitic acid from the product scope.
Chuir AAK, Unilever, agus Greven Group comhfhreagras ríomhphoist ar fáil le táirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais chun tacú lena maíomh maidir le fadhbanna soláthair ar an margadh, rud a bheadh níos measa de bharr na mbeart.
AAK, Unilever, and the Greven group supplied email correspondence with Union producers to support their claim concerning supply issues on the market which would be aggravated by the measures.
Le linn an chruinnithe, thug CAC KZ agus AAK tuairisc ar an dul chun cinn a rinneadh maidir lena CBT a fheidhmiú agus a fheabhsú.
During the meeting, CAC KZ and AAK reported on the progress made in executing and improving their CAP.
An 19 Deireadh Fómhair 2023, agus arís an 7 Samhain 2023, chuir AAK faisnéis ar fáil don Choimisiún chun bunús a thabhairt lena mhaíomh gur thug siad aghaidh ar na barúlacha agus ar na moltaí uile.
On 19 October 2023, and again on 7 November 2023, AAK provided the Commission with information to substantiate their claim that they have addressed all observations and recommendations.
Maidir le creat reachtach eitlíochta na Casacstáine, thug AAK agus CAC KZ dá n-aire an t-athbhreithniú ar an bPríomhdhlí Eitlíochta, a achtaíodh go foirmiúil i mí na Nollag 2022.
In terms of the Kazakh aviation legislative framework, AAK and CAC KZ noted the revision of the Primary Aviation Law, which was formally enacted in December 2022.
Tar éis achtú an dlí sin, chuaigh AAK ar aghaidh chun athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar cheithre rialachán eitlíochta thánaisteacha is daichead le linn 2023.
Subsequent to the enactment of this law, AAK proceeded to revise forty four secondary aviation regulations throughout 2023.
Mar leanúint ar an bplé a rinne Coiste Aershábháilteachta an Aontais i mí na Samhna 2020, choinnigh an Coimisiún agus an Ghníomhaireacht teagmháil leanúnach ar bun le hÚdarás Eitlíochta Chuideachta Comhstoic na Casacstáine.
As a follow up to the November 2020 EU Air Safety Committee deliberations, the Commission and the Agency have maintained a continuous contact with the Aviation Administration of Kazakhstan Joint Stock Company (‘AAK’).
Sa chomhthéacs sin, bhí glao físchomhdhála ann an 26 Márta 2021 idir an Coimisiún, an Ghníomhaireacht, na Ballstáit agus ionadaithe ó Choiste Eitlíochta Sibhialta na Casacstáine agus ó Údarás Eitlíochta na Casacstáine araon.
In that context, a video conference call took place on 26 March 2021 between the Commission, the Agency, Member States and representatives from both the Civil Aviation Committee of Kazakhstan and the AAK.
Le linn an chruinnithe theicniúil sin, rinne Údarás Eitlíochta na Casacstáine cur i láthair cuimsitheach maidir leis na bearta a rinneadh chun feabhas a chur ar an maoirseacht sábháilteachta sa Chasacstáin, lena n-áirítear forléargas ar a ghníomhaíochtaí faireachais, a phleananna maidir le pearsanra teicniúil a earcú agus a oiliúint, agus na gníomhaíochtaí forfheidhmithe a rinneadh i leith roinnt aeriompróirí atá deimhnithe sa Chasacstáin.
During that technical meeting, the AAK provided a comprehensive presentation of the measures taken to improve the safety oversight in Kazakhstan, including an overview of its surveillance activities, its plans as regards the recruitment and training of technical personnel, and the enforcement actions taken towards some of the air carriers certified in Kazakhstan.