#1726491
Coinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht, CETS Uimh. 185.
Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe, CETS No 185.
Filter results
Collections
19 results in 7 documents
#2257737
An 6 Meitheamh 2019, d’údaraigh an Chomhairle don Choimisiún a bheith rannpháirteach, thar ceann an Aontais, sa chaibidlíocht maidir leis an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann le Coinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht (CETS Uimh. 185) (“an Coinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht”).
On 6 June 2019, the Council authorised the Commission to participate, on behalf of the Union, in the negotiations on a Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No 185) (‘the Convention on Cybercrime’).
#2682269
An 6 Meitheamh 2019, d’údaraigh an Chomhairle don Choimisiún a bheith rannpháirteach, thar ceann an Aontais, sa chaibidlíocht maidir leis an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann le Coinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht (CETS Uimh. 185) (“an Coinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht”).
On 6 June 2019, the Council authorised the Commission to participate, on behalf of the Union, in the negotiations on a Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No 185) (‘the Convention on Cybercrime’).
#2257732
lena n-údaraítear do na Ballstáit, chun leas an Aontais Eorpaigh, an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht a shíniú, Prótacal i ndáil le comhar feabhsaithe agus nochtadh fianaise leictreonaí
authorising Member States to sign, in the interest of the European Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence
#2257751
Le teacht i bhfeidhm mear an Phrótacail, deimhneofar tábhacht an Coinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht mar an príomhchreat iltaobhach sa chomhrac i gcoinne na cibearchoireachta é.
The swift entry into force of the Protocol will furthermore confirm the position of the Convention on Cybercrime as the main multilateral framework for the fight against cybercrime.
#2682263
lena n-údaraítear do na Ballstáit, chun leas an Aontais Eorpaigh, an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht a dhaingniú, Prótacal i ndáil le comhar feabhsaithe agus nochtadh fianaise leictreonaí
authorising Member States to ratify, in the interest of the European Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence
#2682283
Le teacht i bhfeidhm mear an Phrótacail, deimhneofar tábhacht an Coinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht mar an príomhchreat iltaobhach sa chomhrac i gcoinne na cibearchoireachta é.
The swift entry into force of the Protocol will furthermore confirm the position of the Convention on Cybercrime as the main multilateral framework for the fight against cybercrime.
#2870730
Bheadh sé sin i gcomhréir leis na téarmaí a úsáidtear i gCoinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht (ETS Uimh 185), arna dhéanamh i mBúdaipeist an 23 Samhain 2001 (‘Coinbhinsiún Bhúdaipeist’).
This would be in line with the terms used in the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No 185), done at Budapest on 23 November 2001 (‘Budapest Convention’).
#1726362
I gcásanna den sórt sin, ba cheart do na húdaráis inniúla úsáid a bhaint as ionstraimí comhair sonracha i ndlí an Aontais nó faoi comhaontuithe idirnáisiúnta, ag brath ar an ábhar i gcás ar leith, amhail, i réimse an chomhair póilíneachta, an bhreithiúnais choiriúil nó shibhialta nó in ábhair riaracháin faoi seach, Cinneadh Réime 2006/960/CGB ón gComhairle, Treoir 2014/41/AE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle, Coinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht, Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1206/2001 ón gComhairle, Treoir 2006/112/CE ón gComhairle agus Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 904/2010 ón gComhairle.
In such cases, competent authorities should use specific cooperation instruments in Union law or under international agreements, depending on the subject matter in a given case, such as, in the area of police cooperation, criminal or civil justice or in administrative matters respectively, Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA, Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe, Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001, Council Directive 2006/112/EC and Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010.
#2257738
An 17 Samhain 2021, ghlac Coiste Airí Chomhairle na hEorpa an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht, Prótacal i ndáil le comhar feabhsaithe agus nochtadh fianaise leictreonaí (“an Prótacal”), agus tá sé beartaithe é a oscailt lena shíniú an 12 Bealtaine 2022.
The Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence (‘the Protocol’) was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2021 and is envisaged to be opened for signature on 12 May 2022.
#2257761
Leis seo, údaraítear do na Ballstáit an Dara Prótacal Breise i ndáil le comhar feabhsaithe agus nochtadh fianaise leictreonaí a shíniú chun leas an Aontais, Prótacal a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht (“an Prótacal”).
The Member States are hereby authorised to sign, in the interest of the Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence (‘the Protocol’).
#2393560
Dá réir sin, go bhfuil an Coinbhinsiún comhoiriúnach leis na hionstraimí idirnáisiúnta atá ann cheana, go háirithe, Coinbhinsiún na Náisiún Aontaithe in aghaidh Coireachta Eagraithe Trasnáisiúnta agus na prótacail a ghabhann leis (2000), Coinbhinsiún na Náisiún Aontaithe in aghaidh an Éillithe (2003), Coinbhinsiún Bhúdaipeist ó Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht agus na prótacail a ghabhann leis (2001), agus ionstraimí idirnáisiúnta agus réigiúnacha ábhartha eile, go háirithe iad sin a bhaineann le cearta an duine agus saoirsí bunúsacha a chosaint.
Accordingly, the Convention is compatible with existing international instruments, in particular the 2000 United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its protocols, the 2003 United Nations Convention against Corruption, the 2001 Council of Europe Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and its protocols, but also other relevant international and regional instruments, in particular relating to the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
#2682270
An 17 Samhain 2021, ghlac Coiste Airí Chomhairle na hEorpa an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht, Prótacal i ndáil le comhar feabhsaithe agus nochtadh fianaise leictreonaí (“an Prótacal”), agus tá sé beartaithe é a oscailt lena shíniú an 12 Bealtaine 2022.
The Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence (‘the Protocol’) was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2021 and is envisaged to be opened for signature on 12 May 2022.
#2682292
Leis seo, údaraítear do na Ballstáit an Dara Prótacal Breise i ndáil le comhar feabhsaithe agus nochtadh fianaise leictreonaí a dhaingniú chun leas an Aontais (“an Prótacal”), Prótacal a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Cibearchoireacht.
The Member States are hereby authorised to ratify, in the interest of the Union, the Second Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence (‘the Protocol’).
#2805284
Bheadh sé sin i gcomhréir leis na téarmaí a úsáidtear i gCoinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht (CETS Uimh. 185), a rinneadh i mBúdaipeist an 23 Samhain 2001, dá ngairtear Coinbhinsiún Bhúdaipeist freisin.
This would be in line with the terms used in the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No 185), done at Budapest on 23 November 2001, also referred to as the Budapest Convention.
#3140949
Ní dochar an Rialachán seo do ghníomhartha dlí de chuid an Aontais agus do ghníomhartha dlí náisiúnta lena ndéantar foráil maidir le comhroinnt sonraí, rochtain ar shonraí agus úsáid sonraí chun cionta coiriúla a chosc, a imscrúdú, a bhrath nó a ionchúiseamh, nó chun pionóis choiriúla a fhorghníomhú, nó chun críoch custaim agus cánachais, gan beann ar an mbunús dlí faoin gConradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh (CFAE) ar ar glacadh gníomhartha dlí den sórt sin de chuid an Aontais, chomh maith le comhar idirnáisiúnta sa réimse sin, go háirithe ar bhonn Choinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht, (ETS Uimh 185), arna dhéanamh i mBúdaipeist an 23 Samhain 2001.
This Regulation is without prejudice to Union and national legal acts providing for the sharing of, access to and the use of data for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or for the execution of criminal penalties, or for customs and taxation purposes, irrespective of the legal basis under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on which such Union legal acts were adopted, as well as to international cooperation in that area, in particular on the basis of the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, (ETS No 185), done at Budapest on 23 November 2001.
#2257820
Chun críocha Airteagal 14, mír 1.b, den Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann le Coinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht (“an Prótocal”), measann [Ballstát] go bhfuil feidhm ag an gComhaontú idir Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá agus an tAontas Eorpach maidir le cosaint faisnéise pearsanta a bhaineann le cionta coiriúla a chosc, a imscrúdú, a bhrath agus a ionchúiseamh (“an Scáth-Chomhaontú”) maidir le haistrithe cómhalartacha sonraí pearsanta idir údaráis inniúla faoin bPrótacal. I gcás aistrithe idir soláthraithe seirbhíse agus údaráis faoin bPrótacal, níl feidhm ag an Scáth-Chomhaontú ach amháin in éineacht le socrú sonrach breise de réir bhrí Airteagal 3, mír 1, den Scáth-Chomhaontú lena dtugtar aghaidh ar na riachtanais uathúla a bhaineann le fianaise leictreonach a bheith á haistriú go díreach ag soláthraithe seirbhíse seachas idir údaráis. In éagmais comhaontú sonrach aistrithe den sórt sin, féadfar na haistrithe sin a dhéanamh faoin bPrótacal, agus sa chás sin, tá feidhm ag Airteagal 14, mír 1.a, i gcomhar le hAirteagal 14, míreanna 2 go 15, den Phrótacal.
‘For the purposes of Article 14, paragraph 1.b, of the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (“the Protocol”), [Member State] considers that the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences (“the Umbrella Agreement”) applies to the reciprocal transfers of personal data under the Protocol between competent authorities. For transfers between service providers and authorities under the Protocol, the Umbrella Agreement applies only in combination with a further, specific agreement within the meaning of Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Umbrella Agreement that addresses the unique requirements of the transfer of electronic evidence directly by service providers rather than between authorities. In the absence of such a specific transfer agreement, such transfers may take place under the Protocol, in which case, Article 14, paragraph 1.a, in conjunction with Article 14, paragraphs 2 to 15, of the Protocol apply.’.
#2393522
Mheabhraigh an Chomhairle sna conclúidí sin go bhféadfadh baint a bheith ag roinnt gnéithe den chaibidlíocht sin le haghaidh coinbhinsiún cuimsitheach idirnáisiúnta maidir le cur i gcoinne úsáid na dteicneolaíochtaí faisnéise agus cumarsáide chun críoch coiriúil leis an gComhbheartas Eachtrach agus Slándála, trína chur i bhfios go láidir go ndéanann sí an méid seo a leanas: ‘tacaíonn sí agus cuireann sí chun cinn Coinbhinsiún Bhúdaipeist maidir leis an gCibearchoireacht agus tacaíonn sí agus cuireann sí chun cinn an obair atá ar bun ar an Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann leis an gCoinbhinsiún seo. Thairis sin, leanann sí de mhalartuithe iltaobhacha maidir leis an gcibearchoireacht a dhéanamh, lena n-áirítear sna próisis a bhaineann leis an gComhairle Eorpach, le hOifig na Náisiún Aontaithe i leith Drugaí agus Coireachta (UNODC) agus leis an gCoimisiún um Choireacht a Chosc agus um Cheartas Coiriúil, chun comhar idirnáisiúnta feabhsaithe a áirithiú chun cur i gcoinne na cibearchoireachta, lena n-áirítear dea-chleachtais agus eolas teicniúil a mhalartú agus tacú le fothú acmhainneachta agus, ag an am céanna, cearta an duine agus saoirsí bunúsacha a urramú, a chur chun cinn agus a chosaint’.
Therein, the Council recalled that several aspects of the negotiations on a comprehensive international convention on countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes could relate to the Common Foreign and Security Policy, by stressing that it ‘supports and promotes the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and the ongoing work on the Second Additional Protocol to this Convention. Furthermore, it continues to engage in multilateral exchanges on cybercrime, including in processes related to the Council of Europe, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (CCPCJ), to ensure an enhanced international cooperation to counter cybercrime, including the exchange of best practices and technical knowledge and support for capacity building, while respecting, promoting and protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms’.
#2682351
“Chun críocha Airteagal 14, mír 1.b, den Dara Prótacal Breise a ghabhann le Coinbhinsiún Chomhairle na hEorpa maidir le Cibearchoireacht (‘an Prótocal’), measann [Ballstát] go bhfuil feidhm ag an gComhaontú idir Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá agus an tAontas Eorpach maidir le cosaint faisnéise pearsanta a bhaineann le cionta coiriúla a chosc, a imscrúdú, a bhrath agus a ionchúiseamh ('an Scáth-Chomhaontú') maidir le haistrithe cómhalartacha sonraí pearsanta idir údaráis inniúla faoin bPrótacal. I gcás aistrithe idir soláthraithe seirbhíse agus údaráis faoin bPrótacal, níl feidhm ag an Scáth-Chomhaontú ach amháin in éineacht le socrú sonrach breise de réir bhrí Airteagal 3, mír 1, den Scáth-Chomhaontú lena dtugtar aghaidh ar na riachtanais uathúla a bhaineann le fianaise leictreonach a bheith á haistriú go díreach ag soláthraithe seirbhíse seachas idir údaráis. In éagmais comhaontú sonrach aistrithe den sórt sin, féadfar na haistrithe sin a dhéanamh faoin bPrótacal, agus sa chás sin, tá feidhm ag Airteagal 14, mír 1.a, i gcomhar le hAirteagal 14, míreanna 2 go 15, den Phrótacal”.
‘For the purposes of Article 14, paragraph 1.b, of the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (“the Protocol”), [Member State] considers that the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences (“the Umbrella Agreement”) applies to the reciprocal transfers of personal data under the Protocol between competent authorities. For transfers between service providers and authorities under the Protocol, the Umbrella Agreement applies only in combination with a further, specific agreement within the meaning of Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Umbrella Agreement that addresses the unique requirements of the transfer of electronic evidence directly by service providers rather than between authorities. In the absence of such a specific transfer agreement, such transfers may take place under the Protocol, in which case, Article 14, paragraph 1.a, in conjunction with Article 14, paragraphs 2 to 15, of the Protocol apply.’.