#562322
An Coinbhinsiún ar Chosc agus Pionósú Choir an Chinedhíothaithe (1948)
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
An Coinbhinsiún ar Chosc agus Pionósú Choir an Chinedhíothaithe (1948)
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
AN COINBHINSIUN AR CHOSC AGUS PIONOSU CHOIR AN CHINEDHIOTHAITHE.
CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE.
An Coinbhinsiún ar CHosc agus Pionósú CHoir an CHinedhíothaithe
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
An Coinbhinsiún maidir le Coir an Chinedhíothaithe a Chosc agus a Phionósú (1948)
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)
[An tiontú oifigiúil] ACHT DO THABHAIRT ÉIFEACHTA DON CHOINBHINSIÚN AR CHOSC AGUS PIONÓSÚ CHOIR AN CHINEDHÍOTHAITHE AGUS DO DHÉANAMH SOCRÚ I dTAOBH NITHE EILE A BHAINEANN LEIS SIN.
AN ACT TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE AND TO PROVIDE FOR OTHER MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH.
CBI, ORDÚ an 16 Márta 2022 sa chás a bhaineann le Líomhaintí maidir le Cinedhíothú faoin gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Coir an Chinedhíothaithe a Chosc agus a Phionósú (an Úcráin v. Cónaidhm na Rúise), ag mír 74.
ICJ, ORDER of 16 March 2022 in case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v Russian Federation), at paragraph 74.
CBI, ORDÚ an 16 Márta 2022 sa chás a bhaineann le Líomhaintí maidir le Cinedhíothú faoin gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Coir an Chinedhíothaithe a Chosc agus a Phionósú (An Úcráin v. Cónaidhm na Rúise), ag mír 74.
ICJ, ORDER of 16 March 2022 in case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v Russian Federation), at paragraph 74.
Sraith Conarthaí, 1/19783 an Coinbhinsiún ar CHosc agus Pionósú CHoir an CHinedhíothaithe. Arna DHéanamh i nua Eabhrac, 9 Nollaig, 1948
Treaty Series, 1/1978. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. done at New York, 9 December, 1948
Chinn an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais Idirnáisiúnta (CBI), ina hordú cheangailteach an 16 Márta 2022 maidir le bearta sealadacha a léiriú sa chás a bhaineann le Líomhaintí maidir le Cinedhíothú faoin gCoinbhinsiún maidir le Coir an Chinedhíothaithe a Chosc agus a Phionósú (an Úcráin v. Cónaidhm na Rúise), (i mír 60 den ordú) ‘go bhfuil ceart dosháraithe ag an Úcráin gan a bheith faoi réir oibríochtaí míleata ag Cónaidhm na Rúise’, agus (i mír 74 den ordú) go bhfuil aon dochar a dhéanfar don cheart sin ‘in ann a bheith ina chúis le dochar doleasaithe’.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in its binding order of 16 March 2022 on the indication of provisional measures in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v Russian Federation), found (at paragraph 60 of the order) ‘that Ukraine has a plausible right not to be subjected to military operations by the Russian Federation’, and (at paragraph 74 of the order) that prejudice to that right ‘is capable of causing irreparable harm’.
Chinn an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais Idirnáisiúnta (CBI), ina hordú cheangailteach an 16 Márta 2022 maidir le bearta sealadacha a léiriú sa chás a bhaineann le Líomhaintí maidir le Cinedhíothú faoin gcoinbhinsiún maidir le Coir an Chinedhíothaithe a Chosc agus a Phionósú (An Úcráin v. Cónaidhm na Rúise), (i mír 60 den ordú) ‘go bhfuil ceart inchreidte ag an Úcráin gan a bheith faoi réir oibríochtaí míleata ag Cónaidhm na Rúise’, agus (i mír 74 den ordú) go bhfuil aon dochar a dhéanfar don cheart sin ‘in ann a bheith ina chúis le dochar doleasaithe’.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), in its binding order of 16 March 2022 on the indication of provisional measures in the case concerning Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v Russian Federation), found (at paragraph 60 of the order) ‘that Ukraine has a plausible right not to be subjected to military operations by the Russian Federation’, and (at paragraph 74 of the order) that prejudice to that right ‘is capable of causing irreparable harm’.