#332576
‘“Tuairim Sheirbhís Dlí na Comhairle an 22 Meitheamh 2007
‘“Opinion of the Council Legal Service of 22 June 2007
Filter results
Collections
51 results in 34 documents
#724023
"Tuairim Sheirbhís Dlí na Comhairle
"Opinion of the Council Legal Service
#1695237
comhalta de chuid sheirbhís dlí institiúid sin an Aontais a fhostaíonn an comhalta foirne lena mbaineann.
a member of the legal service of the Union institution employing the member of staff concerned.
#1977881
féadfaidh sé nó sí tuairimí dlíthiúla a iarraidh ar Sheirbhís Dlí na Comhairle;
may request legal opinions from the Council Legal Service;
#2269746
Tabharfaidh an tSeirbhís Dlí cúnamh don Choiste Eitice ina chuid cúraimí agus cuirfidh sí tacaíocht rúnaíochta ar fáil.
The Legal Service shall assist the Ethics Committee in its tasks and provide secretarial support.
#2270180
Tabharfaidh an tSeirbhís Dlí cúnamh don Choiste Eitice ina chuid cúraimí agus cuirfidh sí tacaíocht rúnaíochta ar fáil.
The Legal Service shall assist the Ethics Committee in its tasks and provide secretarial support.
#2626358
ag tabhairt dá haire gur glacadh Cinneadh Uimh. 078/21 ón gCoiste lena mbunaítear nós imeachta chun dul i gcomhairle lena sheirbhís dlí; á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di an fhoclaíocht lag agus mhíchruinn ina luaitear “go gcuirfear an tseirbhís dlí ar an eolas agus/nó go rachfar i gcomhairle léi sula nglacfar bearta a bhaineann le mírialtachtaí tromchúiseacha” mar nach leor faisnéis amháin; á iarraidh go láidir arís go mbeadh nósanna imeachta inmheánacha ann lena bhforálfaí do chomhairliúchán tráthúil éigeantach leis an tseirbhís dlí maidir leis na mírialtachtaí sin agus na bearta gaolmhara d’fhonn riosca dlíthiúil na gcinntí lena mbaineann a mhaolú; ag meabhrú don Choiste nach mór don tseirbhís dlí a bheith in ann measúnú neamhspleách a dhéanamh ar gach cinneadh a dhéanann bainistíocht an Choiste agus nach mór acmhainní leordhóthanacha agus na sainchumais is gá a sholáthar di chun a cuid cúraimí a chur i gcrích go rathúil chun leasa an Choiste;
Notes the adoption of Decision No 078/21 of the Committee establishing a procedure for consulting its legal service; is concerned about the weak and imprecise wording which states that the legal service ‘is informed and/or consulted before measures relating to serious irregularities are adopted’ as mere information is not sufficient; reiterates once more its firm call for internal procedures providing for the timely and mandatory consultation with the legal service on such irregularities and their related measures with the aim of mitigating the legal risk of decisions related thereto; reminds the Committee that the legal service must be able to assess independently all the decisions taken by the Committee’s management and must be provided with sufficient resources and the requisite prerogatives to perform its tasks successfully in the interest of the Committee;
#2626357
ag tabhairt dá haire gur tháinig an chairt eagrúcháin nua i bhfeidhm an 1 Eanáir 2020, ar chairt í lenar tugadh isteach athruithe tábhachtacha amhail stiúrthóireacht don chumarsáid agus don chaidreamh idirinstitiúideach a chruthú agus lena ndearnadh an tSeirbhís Dlí a chur faoi choimirce Ard-Rúnaí an Choiste; á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di nach bhfágann an t-atheagrú go dtugtar an neamhspléachas don tseirbhís dlí a theastaíonn uaithi chun go mbeidh sí ag oibriú go héifeachtúil; á iarraidh ar an gCoiste athmhachnamh a dhéanamh ar an atheagrú;
Notes that the new organisational chart entered into force on 1 January 2020, introducing important changes such as the creation of a directorate for communication and interinstitutional relations and moving the legal service to be under the secretary-general of the Committee; is concerned that the reorganisation does not provide the legal service with the independence it requires to work efficiently; asks the Committee to reconsider its reorganisation;
#2774469
á athdhearbhú gur cúis bhuartha di nach dtugtar treoir i gCinneadh Uimh. 078/21 ón gCoiste maidir le cásanna inar cheart dul i gcomhairle leis an tseirbhís dlí agus á iarraidh ar an gCoiste comhairliúchán den sórt sin a dhéanamh éigeantach i gcás na gcinntí uile, ar a laghad, lena mbaineann riosca dlíthiúil don Choiste; á mheabhrú nach mór acmhainní leordhóthanacha agus an sainordú is gá a chur ar fáil don tseirbhís dlí chun a cúraimí a dhéanamh go rathúil ar mhaithe leis an gCoiste, agus aird á tabhairt ar a ról trasnach agus ar a méid neamhleor;
Reiterates its concern regarding the fact that the Committee’s Decision No 078/21 does not provide guidance regarding situations in which the Committee’s legal service should be consulted and calls on the Committee to make such consultation compulsory for at least all decisions which entail legal risk for the Committee; recalls that its legal service must be provided with sufficient resources and the requisite mandate to perform its tasks successfully in the interest of the Committee, bearing in mind its cross-cutting role and insufficient size;
#322983
Ba cheart go mbeadh "foireann tacaíochta riaracháin", ina mbeidh rúnaíocht an choiste, comhairleoir polaitiúil an rapóirtéara, an rúnaíocht chomhchinnteoireachta agus an tseirbhís dlí, san áireamh sna hacmhainní sin.
This should include an "administrative support team" made up of the committee secretariat, political advisor of the rapporteur, the codecision secretariat and the legal service.
#1600641
An tOrdú um Chúnamh Dlíthiúil Sibhialta (Seirbhís Dlí do Dhídeanaithe), 1999 (I.R. Uimh. 74 de 1999).
CIVIL LEGAL AID (REFUGEE LEGAL SERVICE) ORDER, 1999 (S.I. NO. 74 OF 1999).
#1844680
Ar an mbonn sin, agus aird á tabhairt ar chomhairle na Seirbhíse Dlí, tá sé beartaithe ag an gCoimisiún Rialachán nua an ERA a thairiscint in ionad an bhun‑Rialachán Uimh. 881/2004.
On the basis above, and taking into account the advice of the Legal Service, the Commission intends to propose a new ERA Regulation replacing original Regulation 881/2004.
#1910418
Féadfaidh na comhaltaí dul i gcomhairle leis an gCoiste Eitice i dtaobh aon ábhar a bhaineann leis an gCód seo; ar an gcaoi chéanna, féadfaidh an Coiste Eitice comhairle a lorg ó Sheirbhís Dlí an Choiste.
Members may consult the ethical committee on any matters related to this Code; in turn, the ethical committee may seek advice from the Committee’s legal service.
#1948434
Díreofar gach fógra ar Sheirbhís Dlí an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh agus chuig Chomhairleoir Dlí Oifig Gnóthaí Eachtracha agus Chomhlathais na Ríochta Aontaithe faoi seach.
All notifications shall be addressed to the Legal Service of the European Commission and to the Legal Adviser of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office of the United Kingdom, respectively.
#1966259
Seolfar gach fógra chuig Seirbhís Dlí an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh agus chuig Comhairleoir Dlí Oifig Gnóthaí Eachtracha, Comhlathais agus Forbartha na Ríochta Aontaithe, faoi seach.
All notifications shall be addressed to the Legal Service of the European Commission and to the Legal Adviser of the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office of the United Kingdom, respectively.
#1977986
Más iomchuí, féadfaidh sé nó sí tuairim a iarraidh ar Sheirbhís Dlí na Comhairle maidir leis an tsaincheist.
If appropriate, he or she may request an opinion on the issue from the Council Legal Service.
#2213114
an costas a bhaineann le dlíodóirí seachtracha a fhostú chun ionadaíocht a dhéanamh ar Pharlaimint na hEorpa i gcúirteanna an Aontais agus sna cúirteanna náisiúnta, agus an costas a bhaineann le comhairleoirí dlí nó saineolaithe a fhostú chun cabhrú leis an tSeirbhís Dlí,
the cost of hiring outside lawyers to represent the European Parliament in Union and national courts, and the cost of hiring legal advisers or experts to assist the Legal Service,
#2269690
Scrúdóidh Uachtarán na Cúirte na dearbhuithe ó thaobh na foirmiúlachta de, le tacaíocht ón tSeirbhís Dlí.
The President of the Court shall examine the declarations from a formal point of view, with the support of the Legal Service.
#2270124
Scrúdóidh Uachtarán na Cúirte na dearbhuithe ó thaobh na foirmiúlachta de, le tacaíocht ón tSeirbhís Dlí.
The President of the Court shall examine the declarations from a formal point of view, with the support of the Legal Service.
#2271458
Beidh an tArdrúnaí freagrach as na bearta is gá a dhéanamh le ceart an phobail chun rochtain a fháil ar na doiciméid chomhfhreagracha a ráthú, tar éis dó nó di dul i gcomhairle leis an Uachtaránacht mhéadaithe agus leis an tSeirbhís Dlí.
The secretary-general shall be responsible for taking the measures necessary to guarantee the public's right of access to the corresponding documents, after consultation of the enlarged presidency and the Legal service.
#2450558
Beidh an tArdrúnaí freagrach as na bearta is gá a dhéanamh le ceart an phobail chun rochtain a fháil ar na doiciméid chomhfhreagracha a ráthú, tar éis dó nó di dul i gcomhairle leis an Uachtaránacht mhéadaithe agus leis an tSeirbhís Dlí.
The secretary-general shall be responsible for taking the measures necessary to guarantee the public's right of access to the corresponding documents, after consultation of the enlarged presidency and the Legal service.
#2450788
Féadfaidh na comhaltaí dul i gcomhairle leis an gCoiste Eitice i dtaobh aon ábhar a bhaineann leis an gCód seo; ar an gcaoi chéanna, féadfaidh an Coiste Eitice comhairle a lorg ó Sheirbhís Dlí an Choiste.
Members may consult the ethical committee on any matters related to this Code; in turn, the ethical committee may seek advice from the Committee's legal service.
#2665162
an costas a bhaineann le dlíodóirí seachtracha a fhostú chun ionadaíocht a dhéanamh ar Pharlaimint na hEorpa i gcúirteanna an Aontais agus sna cúirteanna náisiúnta, agus an costas a bhaineann le comhairleoirí dlí nó saineolaithe a fhostú chun cabhrú leis an tSeirbhís Dlí,
the cost of hiring outside lawyers to represent the European Parliament in Union and national courts, and the cost of hiring legal advisers or experts to assist the Legal Service,
#2924021
ionadaí amháin ón Ard-Oifig Iniúchóireachta, ionadaí amháin ó Sheirbhís Dlí na hAireachta Réigiúnaí, beirt ionadaithe ón roinn um Shochaí Faisnéise agus Teileachumarsáid.
one representative of the General Audit Office, one representative of the Legal Service of the Regional Ministry, two representatives of the department for Information Society and Telecommunications.
#3153617
an costas a bhaineann le dlíodóirí seachtracha a fhostú chun ionadaíocht a dhéanamh ar Pharlaimint na hEorpa i gcúirteanna an Aontais agus sna cúirteanna náisiúnta, agus an costas a bhaineann le comhairleoirí dlí nó saineolaithe a fhostú chun cabhrú leis an tSeirbhís Dlí,
the cost of hiring outside lawyers to represent the European Parliament in Union and national courts, and the cost of hiring legal advisers or experts to assist the Legal Service,
#3178249
Post/poist: Comhairleoir Dlí Sinsearach i Seirbhís Dlí na Roinne Eagraíochtúla agus Anailísí de chuid Sheirbhís Pheannaideach Chónaidhme Réigiún Vladimir
Position(s): Senior Legal Counsellor of the Legal Service of the Organisational and Analytical Department of the Vladimir Region Federal Penitentiary Service
#3250597
Post/poist: Comhairleoir Dlí Sinsearach i Seirbhís Dlí na Roinne Eagraíochtúla agus Anailísí de chuid Sheirbhís Pheannaideach Chónaidhme Réigiún Vladimir
Position(s): Senior Legal Counsellor of the Legal Service of the Organisational and Analytical Department of the Vladimir Region Federal Penitentiary Service
#329563
Tá an Chomhdháil tar éis a chinneadh freisin Tuairim Sheirbhís Dlí na Comhairle maidir leis an tosaíocht atá ag dlí CE mar a leagtar amach in 11197/07 (JUR 260) í a chur i gceangal leis an Ionstraim Chríochnaitheach seo:
The Conference has also decided to attach as an Annex to this Final Act the Opinion of the Council Legal Service on the primacy of EC law as set out in 11197/07 (JUR 260):
#724022
Tá an Chomhdháil tar éis a chinneadh freisin Tuairim Sheirbhís Dlí na Comhairle maidir leis an tosaíocht atá ag dlí CE mar a leagtar amach in 11197/07 (JUR 260) í a chur i gceangal leis an Ionstraim Chríochnaitheach seo:
The Conference has also decided to attach as an Annex to this Final Act the Opinion of the Council Legal Service on the primacy of EC law as set out in 11197/07 (JUR 260):
#1882623
Is é an Stiúrthóir an t-oifigeach tuairiscithe don Oifigeach Cosanta Sonraí, don Oifigeach Slándála Áitiúil, don Oifigeach Slándála Faisnéise Áitiúil, don Oifigeach Trédhearcachta, don Oifigeach Seirbhíse Dlí, don Oifigeach Eitice agus don Chomhordaitheoir Rialaithe Inmheánaigh maidir leis na cúraimí a bhaineann leis na feidhmeanna sin.
The Director shall be the reporting officer for the Data Protection Officer, the Local Security Officer, the Local Information Security Officer, the Transparency Officer, the Legal Service Officer, the Ethics Officer and the Internal Control Coordinator for the tasks relating to these functions.
#2222399
na costais go léir a eascraíonn as rannpháirtíocht Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa i gcásanna a thugtar os comhair chúirteanna an Aontais agus na gcúirteanna náisiúnta, an costas a bhaineann le seirbhísí dlí, le saothair dhlí agus trealamh dlí a cheannach, chomh maith le haon speansas eile dlí, cúirte nó lasmuigh den chúirt a ndéanann an tSeirbhís Dlí ranníocaíocht ina leith,
all costs deriving from the European Economic and Social Committee’s involvement in cases before Union and national courts, the cost of legal services, the purchase of legal works and equipment, and any other legal, court or out-of-court expenses to which the Legal Service contributes,
#2626384
ag tabhairt dá haire, agus é ina chúis imní di, cé go meastar go sealadach go mbeidh costas thart ar EUR 150000 ar chúiteamh agus ar tháillí dlíthiúla in 2020, nach féidir fós méid iomlán deiridh na gcistí a caitheadh i mblianta roimhe sin nó atáthar a thuar a chaithfear sa chás sin amach anseo a thomhas go díreach; á áitiú ar an gCoiste, ag obair i gcomhar lena sheirbhís dlí, gach beart is gá a ghlacadh chun an cás seo a thabhairt chun críche, lena n-áirítear na méideanna comhfhreagracha arna gcúiteamh ag an gCoiste leis na híospartaigh a éileamh ar ais ó dhéantóir na coire; á chur in iúl gurb oth léi gur beag seans atá ann go bhfaighfear an méid airgid phoiblí a caitheadh ar ais agus á iarraidh ar an gCoiste meastachán mionsonraithe a thabhairt do Pharlaimint na hEorpa maidir leis na méideanna a bhfuil súil aige iad a fháil ar ais;
Notes with concern that while it is provisionally estimated in 2020 that compensation and legal fees would cost the Committee approximately EUR 150000, it is not yet possible to exactly quantify the final total amount of funds spent in previous years or expected to be spent on this case in the future; urges the Committee, working together with its legal service, to adopt all necessary measures to finalise this case, including claiming back from the perpetrator the corresponding amounts compensated to the victims by the Committee; regrets the low expectations for recovering the amount of public money spent and asks the Committee to provide Parliament with a detailed estimate of the amounts it hopes to recover;
#2626789
á thabhairt faoi deara go bhfuair SEGS 20 iarraidh ar fhaisnéis ó OLAF maidir le cásanna féideartha calaoise, a bhaineann le foireann an Aontais nó gníomhaithe seachtracha agus, i gcás cúig cinn díobh, gur chinn OLAF imscrúdú a oscailt; á iarraidh ar SEGS torthaí na n-imscrúduithe sin a chur in iúl go tráthúil don údarás um urscaoileadh; á thabhairt faoi deara gur dhéileáil an tOmbudsman le 14 chás a bhaineann le SEGS gan aon mholadh a eisiúint; á chur in iúl gur geal léi go bhfuil fiosrú á dhéanamh i dtaobh comhar a bhunú le OIPE maidir leis an gcomhairle agus le tacaíocht ó OLAF; á chur in iúl gur díol sásaimh di go bhfuil SEGS toilteanach comhoibriú le OIPE agus an teagmháil le Seirbhís Dlí an Choimisiúin maidir leis an tsaincheist sin, agus á iarraidh ar SEGS an comhar sin a chomhtháthú mar chuid dá straitéis ghinearálta frithchalaoise;
Observes that the EEAS has received 20 requests for information from OLAF related to possible cases of fraud, involving Union staff or external actors and in the case of five of them OLAF decided to open an investigation; calls on the EEAS to timely inform the discharge authority about the outcome of those investigations; observes that the Ombudsman has handled 14 cases concerning the EEAS without issuing any recommendation; welcomes that cooperation with the EPPO is being explored on the advice and with the support of OLAF; welcomes the EEAS willingness to cooperate with EPPO and the contacts with the Commission’s Legal Service on the issue, and invites the EEAS to integrate such cooperation as a component of its general anti-fraud strategy;
#2626994
ag tabhairt dá haire go ndearnadh an Ghníomhaireacht a atheagrú tar éis theacht Stiúrthóir nua na Gníomhaireachta, a raibh mar aidhm leis méadú a dhéanamh ar shineirgí sa Ghníomhaireacht trí bhraislí a chruthú (feabhas sonraí, seirbhís dlí) agus tríd an gcomhar idir an roinn faireachais margaidh agus iompraíochta agus na foirne faireacháin margaidh sna ranna leictreachais agus gáis a fheabhsú a thuilleadh;
Notes that the Agency was reorganised following the arrival of the Agency’s new Director, aiming to increase synergies in the Agency by creating clusters (data excellence, legal service) and further enhancing cooperation between the market surveillance and conduct department and the market monitoring teams in the electricity and gas departments;
#2627133
ag tabhairt dá haire, agus é ina chúis imní di, nach bhfuil na saincheisteanna sa Lárionad maidir le seachtrú a sheirbhíse dlí, a thug an t-údarás um urscaoileadh agus an Chúirt chun suntais, réitithe fós, ach á chur in iúl gur geal léi cinneadh an Lárionaid comhairleoir dlí inmheánach a athbhunú in 2021; á iarraidh ar an Lárionad aon athruithe ar an gcás sin a thuairisciú don údarás um urscaoileadh;
Notes with concern that the Centre’s issues regarding the externalisation of its legal service highlighted by the discharge authority and the Court are still not resolved but welcomes the decision of the Centre to re-establish an internal legal advisor in 2021; calls on the Centre to continue to report to the discharge authority on any developments in that regard;
#2674053
na costais go léir a eascraíonn as rannpháirtíocht Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa i gcásanna a thugtar os comhair chúirteanna an Aontais agus na gcúirteanna náisiúnta, an costas a bhaineann le seirbhísí dlí, le saothair dhlí agus trealamh dlí a cheannach, chomh maith le haon speansas eile dlí, cúirte nó lasmuigh den chúirt a ndéanann an tSeirbhís Dlí ranníocaíocht ina leith,
all costs deriving from the European Economic and Social Committee’s involvement in cases before Union and national courts, the cost of legal services, the purchase of legal works and equipment, and any other legal, court or out-of-court expenses to which the Legal Service contributes,
#2943936
Ar iarratas dearbhúcháin a fháil, rachaidh Uachtarán na Cúirte Iniúchóirí i gcomhairle leis an tSeirbhís Dlí agus, ag brath ar ábhar an iarratais, leis an roinn lena mbaineann agus, i gcás inarb infheidhme, leis an Oifigeach Cosanta Sonraí agus/nó leis an Oifigeach Slándála Faisnéise.
On receiving a confirmatory application, the President of the ECA shall consult the Legal Service and, depending on the subject matter of the application, the department concerned and, where applicable, the Data Protection Officer and/or the Information Security Officer.
#3046806
ag athdhearbhú a tuairime gur féidir leis an gcaidreamh oibre ar leith idir Comhaltaí agus APAnna cás a chuimsiú ina gcinneann an dá pháirtí an conradh a fhoirceannadh trí chomhaontú frithpháirteach níos luaithe ná mar a bhíothas ag súil leis ach gan iontaoibh a chailleadh; ag tathant ar an mBiúró dul i gcomhairle le seirbhís dlí na Parlaiminte agus le AS PERS maidir le féidearthacht an chonartha a fhoirceannadh trí chomhaontú frithpháirteach roimh a dháta éaga agus an toradh a chur in iúl don Choiste um Rialú Buiséadach;
Reiterates its opinion that the particular working relationship between Members and APAs can encompass a situation where both parties decide to terminate the contract by mutual agreement earlier than anticipated but without loss of trust; urges the Bureau to consult with Parliament’s legal service and DG PERS on the feasibility of the contract to be terminated by mutual agreement before its expiry date and to inform the Committee on Budgetary Control of the outcome;
#3047697
Ag tabhairt dá haire gurb amhlaidh, tar éis theacht i bhfeidhm chinnidh athbhreithnithe ón gCoiste maidir le sceithireacht an 15 Nollaig 2021 (Cinneadh 297/21A), chomh maith leis an gcinneadh athbhreithnithe maidir le nósanna imeachta chun ciapadh síceolaíoch agus gnéasach ag an obair a chosc agus chun déileáil leis (Cinneadh 090/22A), a glacadh an 31 Márta 2022, a dhéanfar an creat dlíthiúil eiticiúil athnuaite a thabhairt chun críche le cinneadh athbhreithnithe lena leagtar síos forálacha ginearálta cur chun feidhme maidir le nósanna imeachta araíonachta agus maidir le fiosrúcháin riaracháin; ag spreagadh an Choiste chun a áirithiú go mbeidh comhairliúchán lena sheirbhís dlí agus lena oifigeach cosanta sonraí i gceist leis an bpróiseas sin agus go ndéanfar idirphlé lena choiste foirne agus le Coiste um Rialacháin Foirne an Aontais;
Observes that, following the entry into force of the Committee’s revised decision on whistleblowing on 15 December 2021 (Decision 297/21A), as well as of the revised decision on procedures for preventing and dealing with psychological and sexual harassment at work (Decision 090/22A), adopted on 31 March 2022, the renewed ethical legal framework will be completed with a revised decision laying down general implementing provisions on disciplinary procedures and administrative enquiries; encourages the Committee to ensure that such process entails consultation with its legal service and data protection officer and dialogue with its staff committee and the Union’s Staff Regulations Committee;
#3162983
na costais go léir a eascraíonn as rannpháirtíocht Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa i gcásanna a thugtar os comhair chúirteanna an Aontais agus na gcúirteanna náisiúnta, an costas a bhaineann le seirbhísí dlí, le saothair dhlí agus trealamh dlí a cheannach, chomh maith le haon speansas eile dlí, cúirte nó lasmuigh den chúirt a ndéanann an tSeirbhís Dlí ranníocaíocht ina leith,
all costs deriving from the European Economic and Social Committee’s involvement in cases before Union and national courts, the cost of legal services, the purchase of legal works and equipment, and any other legal, court or out-of-court expenses to which the Legal Service contributes,
#3178253
Is Comhairleoir Dlí Sinsearach i Seirbhís Dlí na Roinne Eagraíochtúla agus Anailísí de chuid Sheirbhís Pheannaideach Chónaidhme Réigiún Vladimir é, agus rinne sé ionadaíocht do choilíneacht phionósach IK-6 i gcásanna cúirte arna gcomhdú ag Alexei Navalny i gcoinne choilíneacht phionósach IK-6.
He is the Senior Legal Counsellor of the Legal Service of the Organisational and Analytical Department of the Vladimir Region Federal Penitentiary Service and represented the IK-6 penal colony in court cases filed by Alexei Navalny against the IK-6 penal colony.
#3250601
Is Comhairleoir Dlí Sinsearach i Seirbhís Dlí na Roinne Eagraíochtúla agus Anailísí de chuid Sheirbhís Pheannaideach Chónaidhme Réigiún Vladimir é, agus rinne sé ionadaíocht do choilíneacht phionósach IK-6 i gcásanna cúirte arna gcomhdú ag Alexei Navalny i gcoinne choilíneacht phionósach IK-6.
He is the Senior Legal Counsellor of the Legal Service of the Organisational and Analytical Department of the Vladimir Region Federal Penitentiary Service and represented the IK-6 penal colony in court cases filed by Alexei Navalny against the IK-6 penal colony.
#2625590
ag tabhairt dá haire, agus é ina dhíol spéise di, de réir Sheirbhís Dlí na Parlaiminte, go leanann sé ón dá bhreithiúnas go ndeimhníonn an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais go bhfuil cearta faighte acu mar sin, i gcás Feisirí a bhfuil na coinníollacha riachtanacha go léir comhlíonta acu cheana chun an ceart chun pinsean saorálach breise a fháil, go bhfuil siad faoi chosaint iomlán faoi phrionsabail ghinearálta dhlí an Aontais; ag tabhairt dá haire, áfach, go ndearbhaítear leis na breithiúnais freisin nach gcuireann sé sin cosc ar an mBiúró coinníollacha ná rialacha mionsonraithe an ghrúpa Feisirí sin a mhodhnú ar choinníoll go n-urramaítear prionsabal na comhréireachta go cuí, agus i gcás na bhFeisirí sin nach bhfuil na coinníollacha go léir chun cearta pinsin a fháil comhlíonta acu go fóill agus nach sealbhaíonn dá bhrí sin ach teidlíochtaí amach anseo faoin scéim pinsin, staid a dheimhnítear tuilleadh tríd an mbreithiúnas ón gCúirt Bhreithiúnais an 24 Meán Fomhair 2020 i gcás C-223/19, YS v NK; á iarraidh ar an lucht riaracháin agus ar an mBiúró a ráthú nach n-úsáidfear aon airgead ó cháiníocóirí le haghaidh tarrtháil amach anseo; á mheas nár leor athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar shamhail airgeadais an chiste chun nach n-úsáidfí airgead breise cáiníocóirí le haghaidh íocaíochtaí amach anseo; ag áitiú ar an Ard-Rúnaí, dá bhrí sin, bearta a mholadh freisin maidir le módúlachtaí an chiste a choigeartú, lena n-áirítear méadú breise ar an aois scoir agus laghdú ar shochair phinsin a íoctar;
Notes with interest that, according to Parliament’s Legal Service, it follows from the two judgments that the Court of Justice confirms that acquired rights as such, of Members who have already fulfilled all the necessary conditions for the acquisition of the right to the additional voluntary pension, are fully protected under the general principles of Union law; notes, however, that the judgments also confirm that this does not prevent the Bureau from modifying the conditions as well as modalities of this group of Members on the condition that the principle of proportionality is duly respected, as well as for those Members who have not yet fulfilled all the conditions for the acquisition of pension rights and who therefore only hold future entitlements under the pension scheme, a situation which is further confirmed by the judgement of the Court of Justice of 24 September 2020 in Case C-223/19, YS v NK; asks the administration and the Bureau to guarantee that no taxpayer money is used for any future bail-out; considers that a review of the financial model of the fund would not be sufficient to prevent additional taxpayer money from being used for future payments; urges the Secretary-General therefore to also propose measures on adjusting the modalities of the fund, including a further increase of the retirement age and a reduction of pension benefits paid out;
#2626278
á chur in iúl gur díol sásaimh di go bhforáiltear freisin leis an gcód iompair do chreat eagraíochtúil dá chur i bhfeidhm, eadhon coiste eitice a bhreithneoidh aon ábhar eitice a mheasann sé a bheith ábhartha do na caighdeáin a leagtar síos sa chód iompair agus don chlú atá air; á chur in iúl gur díol sásaimh di go gcuidíonn seirbhís dlí na Cúirte leis an gcoiste eitice mar go gcuideoidh an beart sin le haon rioscaí dlíthiúla a bhaineann lena chinntí a sheachaint; á thabhairt dá haire, i gcomhréir le rialacha nós imeachta reatha na Cúirte, gurb í an Chúirt a cheapann comhaltaí an choiste eitice ar bhonn togra ón uachtarán; á mheabhrú, mar a léirítear i dTuarascáil Speisialta 13/2019 ón gCúirt maidir le creataí eiticiúla institiúidí an Aontais a ndearnadh iniúchóireacht orthu, go bhféadfadh tionchar a bheith ag comhdhéanamh na gcoistí eitice ar an oibiachtúlacht agus ar an neamhspleáchas a bhraitear agus, dá bhrí sin, á iarraidh go práinneach ar an gCúirt athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar na rialacha maidir le ceapadh agus comhdhéanamh an choiste eitice agus á mholadh, ag leanúint Choiste Eitice Neamhspleách an Choimisiúin, gur daoine seachtracha a roghnófar mar chomhaltaí den choiste eitice, bunaithe ar a n-inniúlachta, a dtaithí, a neamhspleáchas agus a gcáilíochtaí gairmiúla, chomh maith lena mholadh nach gceapfar iad a thuilleadh ar thogra ó uachtarán na Cúirte;
Welcomes that the code of conduct also provides for an organisational framework for its application, namely an ethics committee that shall consider any ethics matter it deems relevant to the standards laid down in the code of conduct and to its reputation; welcomes that the ethics committee is assisted by the legal service of the Court as that measure will help to avoid any legal risks related to its decisions; notes that according to the current rules of procedure of the Court, the members of the ethics committee are appointed by the Court on the basis of a proposal from the president; recalls, as indicated in the Court’s Special Report 13/2019 on the ethical frameworks of the audited EU institutions, that the composition of ethical committees may have an impact on the perceived objectivity and independence and thus, urgently calls on the Court to reconsider the rules for appointment and composition of the ethics committee and suggests, following the Commission’s Independent Ethical Committee, that the members of the ethics committee be external persons selected for their competence, experience, independence and professional qualities, in addition to no longer be appointed on a proposal from the president of the Court;
#2626399
ag tabhairt go bhfuil ombudsman inmheánach a chur ar bun ar cheann de na príomhbhearta sa phlean gníomhaíochta a glacadh in 2021 chun creat eitice an Choiste a neartú; á chur i bhfios gur mar chomhaontú a fuair tacaíocht ón bhfoireann a cuireadh an cinneadh maidir le hombudsman inmheánach a chur ar bun i láthair, cé gurb é fírinne an scéil gur thug coiste foirne an Choiste tuairim dhiúltach ina leith; ag athdhearbhú an amhrais a chuir coiste foirne agus seirbhís dlí an Choiste in iúl maidir leis an togra a mhéid a bhaineann le neamhspleáchas, neamhchlaontacht agus rúndacht an ombudsman inmheánaigh; ag ceistiú an ghá atá le hombudsman inmheánach den sórt sin i bhfianaise, ar thaobh amháin, na srianta maidir le hacmhainní daonna agus, ar an taobh eile, an ghá atá le comhairleoirí eitice, le comhairleoirí rúnda agus, go háirithe, an leis an gcomhaontú le IDOC; ag tathant ar an gCoiste díriú ar na sásraí a bhaineann leis an eitic atá i bhfeidhm cheana a fhorfheidhmiú agus san am céanna foireann leordhóthanach a úsáid go heisiach le haghaidh a chuid oibre reachtaí, agus aird á díriú ar a éifeachtaí atá na bearta a glacadh i ndáiríre; á mheabhrú gurbh fhacthas don Ombudsman, sa Tuarascáil uaithi ar dhínit ag an obair in institiúidí agus gníomhaireachtaí AE (SI/2/2018/AMF), gur féidir dúshlán ar leith a bheith roimh institiúidí beaga teacht ar imscrúdaitheoirí a mheastar a bheith neamhchlaonta agus cóir agus á mholadh go mbainfí úsáid as imscrúdaitheoirí seachtracha agus neamhspleácha seachas acmhainní inmheánacha chun neamhspleáchas agus neodracht a ráthú;
Notes that the setting up of an internal ombudsman is one of the key measures in the action plan adopted in 2021 to strengthen the Committee’s ethical framework; points out that the decision to set up an internal ombudsman was presented as an agreement that had been welcomed by staff when, in actual fact, the Committee’s staff committee had expressed a negative opinion on it; echoes the reservations expressed by the Committee’s staff committee and legal service on the proposal with regard to the independence, impartiality and confidentiality of the internal ombudsman; questions the need for such an internal ombudsman in light of, on the one hand, the HR constrictions and, on the other hand, the existence of ethics counsellors, confidential counsellors and, in particular, the agreement with IDOC; urges the Committee to focus on enforcing the ethics-related mechanisms already in place while devoting adequate staff to its legislative work, focusing on the actual effectiveness of the measures adopted; recalls that the Ombudsman, in her Report on dignity at work in the EU institutions and agencies SI/2/2018/AMF, observes that finding investigators who are perceived to be impartial and fair can be particularly challenging in small institutions and recommends the use of external and independent investigators rather than in-house resources in order to guarantee independence and neutrality;
#2628798
ag tabhairt dá haire agus é ina ábhar imní di, de réir na tuarascála ón gCúirt, cé go raibh foireann reachtúil an Chomhghnóthais statach ó 2017 go 2020 le 42 oibrí, le linn na tréimhse céanna, gur mhéadaigh an Comhghnóthas go suntasach an úsáid a bhain sé as foireann eatramhach, ó thriúr go deichniúr coibhéisí lánaimseartha, is é sin le rá, ó 8 % go 24 % d’fhoireann reachtúil an Chomhghnóthais, nach bhfuil na cúraimí a dhéanann an fhoireann eatramhach, áfach, de chineál aonuaire nó sealadach, mar thoradh ar mhéadú eisceachtúil ar ualach oibre nó ar fheidhmiú gníomhaíochta aonuaire, ach gur poist bhuana iad ó thaobh cineáil de (e.g. cuntóir na seirbhíse dlí, tacaíocht rúnaíochta, cúntóir cumarsáide, agus cúntóir oifigigh tionscadail) agus go gcruthaíonn cleachtas an Chomhghnóthais poist bhuana de facto, sa bhreis orthu sin; ag tabhairt dá haire go gcruthaíonn cleachtas an Chomhghnóthais poist de facto, de bhreis orthu siúd dá bhforáiltear sa phlean bunaíochta, a bhféadfadh láimhdeachas foirne ard agus neamhchinnteacht foirne a bheith mar thoradh orthu agus ar féidir leo, ar deireadh, tionchar diúltach a imirt ar fheidhmíocht fhoriomlán an Chomhghnóthais;
Notes with concern that, according to the Court’s report, although the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff remained static at 42 from 2017 to 2020, during the same period, the Joint Undertaking significantly increased its use of interim staff from three to ten full-time equivalents, that is, from 8 % to 24 % of the Joint Undertaking’s statutory staff, that the tasks performed by the interim staff are however, not of a one-off or temporary nature, arising from an exceptional increase in workload or the performance of a one-off activity, but rather are permanent in nature (e.g. legal service assistant, secretarial support, communication assistant, and project officer assistant); notes that the Joint Undertaking’s practice creates de facto permanent posts, in excess of those provided for in the establishment plan, which can lead to a high staff turnover and uncertainty among contractual staff and ultimately can negatively affect the Joint Undertaking’s overall performance;
#3046797
á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di an cinneadh ón mBiúró an 21 Samhain 2022, bunaithe ar thogra ón Ardrúnaí, maidir le Forálacha Ginearálta Cur Chun Feidhme lena dtugtar éifeacht d’Airteagal 27 de na Rialacháin Foirne; á áitiú a thábhachtaí atá sé cothromaíocht gheografach chóir a bhaint amach i measc fhoireann na Parlaiminte ar choinníoll go bhfuil na bearta “oiriúnach”, mar a cheanglaítear le hAirteagal 27, agus á chur i bhfáth nach mór do chomórtais prionsabail bhunúsacha a chumhdaítear sna Rialacháin Foirne agus sa Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha a urramú, amhail prionsabail an chomhionannais, an neamh-idirdhealaithe agus na comhréireachta; á mheabhrú thairis sin go luaitear in Airteagal 27 “nach mór údar maith a thabhairt maidir leis na bearta iomchuí sin agus nach mbunófar critéir earcaíochta choíche orthu cé is moite de chritéir a bheidh bunaithe ar thuillteanas”; á iarraidh go ndéanfaí na Forálacha Ginearálta Cur Chun Feidhme sin a tharchur láithreach chuig Seirbhís Dlí na Parlaiminte le haghaidh measúnú comhlíontachta;
Is concerned about the Bureau decision of 21 November 2022, based on the Secretary-General’s proposal on General Implementing Provisions, giving effect to Article 27 of the Staff Regulations; insists on the importance of achieving a fair geographical balance among Parliament’s staff provided that the measures are ‘appropriate’, as required by Article 27, and stresses that competitions must respect fundamental principles enshrined in the Staff Regulations and Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, such as the principles of equality, non-discrimination and proportionality; recalls furthermore that Article 27 states that ‘those appropriate measures must be justified and shall never result in recruitment criteria other than those based on merit’; calls for an immediate referral of the General Implementing Provisions to Parliament’s legal service for a compliance assessment;
#3046845
ag tabhairt dá haire go bhfuil an ‘coiste comhairleach maidir le ciapadh agus a chosc san ionad oibre’ comhdhéanta de thriúr comhaltaí arna n-ainmniú ag an Údarás Ceapacháin (lena n-áirítear an cathaoirleach), beirt chomhaltaí den Choiste Foirne agus sainchomhairleoir amháin ón tseirbhís leighis; ag tabhairt dá haire go bhfuil an ‘Coiste Comhairleach a dhéileálann le gearáin faoi chiapadh a bhaineann le Comhaltaí’ comhdhéanta de thriúr Caestóirí (lena n-áirítear an cathaoirleach), cathaoirleach an chéad choiste, beirt chomhaltaí den choiste APA, comhalta amháin den choiste foirne (do chásanna a bhaineann le comhalta foirne amháin), agus beirt sainchomhairleoirí, eadhon ó na seirbhísí dlí agus leighis faoi seach; á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di an easpa saineolaithe neamhspleácha ar shaincheisteanna ciaptha sa dá choiste, chomh maith le heaspa na seirbhíse dlí sa chéad chás; á mheabhrú go bhfuil an vóta réitigh ag cathaoirleach an choiste sin agus á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di go bhféadfadh coinbhleachtaí leasa a bheith mar thoradh ar phost an Fheisire; á iarraidh ar an mBiúró athbhreithniú a dhéanamh ar chomhdhéanamh an dá choiste chomhairleacha chun an saineolas neamhspleách ábhartha a chur san áireamh, coinbhleachtaí leasa a sheachaint agus oiliúint éigeantach a éileamh maidir le ciapadh a chosc agus comhdheiseanna dá gcomhaltaí uile; á mholadh go ndéanfaí athbhreithniú iomlán ar fheidhmiú na gcoistí comhairleacha le cúnamh ó speisialtóirí maidir le cosc a chur ar chiapadh, ar speisialtóirí a roghnaítear dá n-inniúlacht, dá dtaithí, dá neamhspleáchas agus dá gcáilíochtaí gairmiúla, chun go mbeidh rialacha nós imeachta soiléire, éifeachtacha agus stóinsithe ag an bParlaimint agus ag an am céanna chun agaí freagartha leormhaithe agus na coimircí nós imeachta, faisnéis, comhairleoireacht agus bearta cosanta is gá a áirithiú do gach páirtí de réir mar is iomchuí;
Notes that the ‘advisory committee on harassment and its prevention at the workplace’ is composed of three members designated by the Appointing Authority (including the chair), two Staff Committee members and one expert advisor from the medical service; notes that the ‘advisory committee dealing with harassment complaints concerning Members’ is composed of three Quaestors (including the chair), the chair of the first committee, two APA committee members, one staff committee member (only for cases concerning a member of staff), and two expert advisors, namely from the legal and the medical services respectively; is concerned by the lack of independent experts on harassment issues in both committees, as well as the absence of the legal service in the first case; recalls that the chair of the latter committee has the casting vote and is concerned that the fact of being a Member could lead to conflicts of interest; calls on the Bureau to review the composition of both advisory committees in order to include the pertinent independent expertise, avoid conflicts of interest and to stipulate mandatory training on harassment prevention and equal opportunities for all their members; recommends a complete review of the functioning of the advisory committees with the assistance of specialists on harassment prevention selected for their competence, experience, independence and professional qualities, so that Parliament is equipped with clear, effective and robust rules of procedure while ensuring adequate response times and the necessary procedural safeguards, information, counselling and protection measures for all parties as appropriate;
#3047545
Ag tabhairt faoi deara gur bhain an caiteachas breise in 2021 i gcomparáid le 2020 le trealmhú áitribh (+ 294,55 %), slándáil (+ 167,55 %), TF (+ 12,34 %) agus trealamh agus suiteáil theicniúil (+ 31,85 %), de bhrí go ndearnadh an coigealtas ar laghdú ar chaiteachas ar mhisin (– 48,83 %), foilseacháin (– 41,29 %), comhsheirbhís ateangaireachta agus comhdhála (– 61,54 %) agus seirbhís dlí (– 75 %); á chur i bhfáth go raibh ráta úsáide 25,03 % de na leithreasuithe críochnaitheacha le haghaidh misin foirne ann in 2021, i gcomparáid le 23,94 % in 2020, de bharr ghéarchéim phaindéim COVID-19 a chuir cosc ar iniúchóirí taisteal; á mheabhrú don Chúirt gach beart is féidir a dhéanamh chun a áirithiú go n-úsáidtear leithreasuithe misin i ndianchomhlíonadh phrionsabail na barainneachta, na héifeachtúlachta agus na héifeachtachta;
Observes that the additional expenditure in 2021 compared to 2020 was related to fitting-out of premises (+ 294,55 %), security (+ 167,55 %), IT (+ 12,34 %) and technical equipment and installation (+ 31,85 %), whereas the savings were made on a reduction in spending on missions (– 48,83 %), publications (– 41,29 %), joint interpreting and conference service (– 61,54 %) and the legal service (– 75 %); stresses that the rate of utilisation for staff missions appropriations in 2021 was 25,03 % of final appropriations, compared to 23,94 % in 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic preventing auditors from travelling; reminds the Court to take every possible measure to ensure that mission appropriations are used in strict compliance with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness;
#3047692
Ag tabhairt dá haire go ndearna an Coiste, in 2021, 52 oiliúnaí a óstáil ar feadh téarma cúig mhí, ceathrar oiliúnaithe ar feadh téarma trí mhí agus beirt oiliúnaithe a bhí ar dheontais arna ndámhachtain ag comhlachtaí poiblí seachtracha; ag tabhairt dá haire go bhfuair na hoiliúnaithe a raibh téarma cúig mhí acu deontas agus liúntais mhíosúla agus nach raibh na hoiliúnaithe gearrthéarmacha i dteideal aon ranníocaíocht airgeadais; á chur in iúl gur geal léi, tar éis an ghlao ón bParlaimint le linn nós imeachta 2020 um urscaoileadh, go bhfuil machnamh inmheánach fós ar siúl chun a áirithiú go bhfaighidh gach oiliúnaí luach saothair cuibhiúil agus gur dréachtaíodh creat nua lena soiléirítear cearta agus oibleagáidí na n-oiliúnaithe, go bhfuil sé ag dul i gcomhairle faoi láthair le seirbhís dlí an Choiste agus ag a choiste foirne agus go meastar go mbeidh sé i bhfeidhm don chéad seisiún oiliúna eile a gcuirfear tús leis i mí an Mhárta 2023
Notes that, in 2021, the Committee hosted 52 trainees for a five month term, 4 trainees for a three month term and 2 trainees who were on grants awarded by external public bodies; notes that the trainees with a term of five months received a monthly grant and allowances while the shorter term trainees were not entitled to any financial contribution; welcomes that, following also the call from Parliament during the 2020 discharge procedure, an internal reflection is ongoing to ensure that all trainees receive a decent remuneration and that a new framework clarifying the rights and obligations of trainees has been drafted, is currently undergoing consultation with the Committee’s legal service and its staff committee and is expected to be in place for the next traineeship session starting in March 2023;