#2915495
Ina theannta sin, measann SLD gur tairbhe ollmhór í an uileláithreacht do Post Danmark.
In addition, SLD considers that ubiquity is a huge benefit for Post Danmark.
Filter results
Collections
31 results in 1 document
#2915527
Tugann SLD dá aire thairis sin nach mbeadh formhór na soláthraithe USO in ann maireachtáil gan USO.
SLD further notes that most USO providers would not be able to survive without the USO.
#2915447
Specialforeningen for Logistik og Distribution (‘SLD’), comhlachas trádála de chuid na Danmhairge a mbíonn na comhaltaí uile dá chuid i mbun seirbhísí a sholáthar chun lasta agus pailléid a iompar.
Specialforeningen for Logistik og Distribution (‘SLD’), a Danish trade association of which all members are engaged in the provision of services for cargo transport and pallet transport.
#2915457
Measann ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD, i bhfianaise nach féidir muinín a chur i gcuntasaíocht chostála Post Danmark, go bhfuil riosca ann go bhfuil róchúiteamh á thabhairt do Post Danmark.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD consider that given that Post Danmark’s cost accounting cannot be trusted, there is a risk that Post Danmark is being overcompensated.
#2915481
Tugann ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD dá n-aire maidir leis an dáileadh litreacha gnó ar fud na tíre, go dtoimhdítear go gcuirfí dáileadh litreacha gnó i gcathracha móra 1 lá amháin go seachtainiúil ina ionad.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD note that the countrywide business-letter distribution is assumed to be replaced by a business-letter distribution in large cities one day weekly.
#2915497
Tagraíonn SLD ina leith sin do na tuarascálacha céanna ó ARCEP agus Frontier Economics a liostaítear in aithris (49) agus do thuarascáil ó ERGP ó 2011.
SLD in this respect refers to the same reports from ARCEP and Frontier Economics listed in recital (49) and a report from ERGP from 2011.
#2915502
Maíonn SLD freisin nach le dáileadh litreacha amháin atá luach feabhsaithe branda an USO bainteach.
SLD also claim that the brand-enhancing value of the USO is not only associated with letter distribution.
#2915515
Maíonn SLD go dtugann an sciar den mhargadh atá ag Post Danmark, toisc é a bheith mar an soláthraí USO, cumhacht mhargála dó.
SLD claims that Post Danmark’s market share through being the USO provider alone gives it bargaining power.
#2915516
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1, JJD agus SLD go dtaispeánann tuarascálacha go mbaineann tionchar breise le tuairimí an tsoláthraí USO ar cheapadh na mbeartas ag an rialtas.
ITD, Undertaking 1, JJD and SLD claim that reports show that the views of the USO provider carry extra weight in the formation of policy by the government.
#2915526
Ar an gcaoi chéanna, measann ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD gur buntáiste seachas míbhuntáiste an USO a bheith curtha de chúram ar chomhlacht.
In the same vein, ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD consider that being entrusted with the USO is an advantage and not a disadvantage.
#2915530
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1, JJD agus SLD gurb amhlaidh, sa chás frithfhíorasach, nach mbeadh Post Danmark in ann stampaí a eisiúint.
ITD, Undertaking 1, JJD and SLD claim that, in the counterfactual scenario, Post Danmark would not be able to issue stamps.
#2915549
De réir ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD, tá ceart eisiach ag Post Danmark stampaí a eisiúint agus na hioncaim ó dhíol stampaí a choimeád.
According to ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD, Post Danmark has an exclusive right to issue and keep the revenues from selling stamps.
#2915454
Measann ITD, Gnóthas 1, JJD agus SLD nach raibh an mhaoirseacht a rinne an Aireacht Iompair ar Post Danmark leormhaith, rud as a n-eascraíonn neamhchinnteacht maidir le cé acu atá nó nach bhfuil cleachtas cuntasaíochta Post Danmark ceart.
ITD, Undertaking 1, JJD and SLD consider that the supervision of Post Danmark by the Transport Ministry has been inadequate, which leads to uncertainty as to whether Post Danmark’s accounting practice is correct.
#2915456
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD go mbaineann róchúiteamh le cuntasaíocht chostála Post Danmark toisc go gceanglaítear ar Post Danmark, le cleachtas cuntasaíochta inmheánach Post Danmark féin, beagnach a gcostais choiteanna uile a leithdháileadh ar an gcuntas USO seachas iad a roinnt go hiomchuí idir an cuntas USO agus an cuntas nach cuntas USO é.
ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD claim that Post Danmark’s cost accounting involves overcompensation because Post Danmark’s own internal accounting practice requires Post Danmark to allocate almost all of its common costs to the USO account instead of dividing them appropriately between the USO and the non-USO accounts.
#2915466
Tugann ITD, Gnóthas 1, JJD agus SLD dá n-aire gurb amhlaidh, dar leo, gur eascair an tuairim freisin, nach cinnte cé acu a chláraigh nó nár chláraigh Post Danmark na sonraí uile chun a chuid cuntas a ullmhú, as maoirseacht lochtach ag an Aireacht Iompair ar Post Danmark, agus go ndícháilítear leis sin na hiniúchtaí uile a rinneadh ar Post Danmark roimhe agus go gciallaíonn sé nach iontaofa ach oiread aon athbhreithniú seachtrach breise a rinne iniúchóirí neamhspleácha a bhí ag brath ar iniúchtaí bliantúla Post Danmark.
ITD, Undertaking 1, JJD and SLD note that the, in their view, flawed supervision of Post Danmark by the Transport Ministry has also given rise to the belief that it is uncertain whether Post Danmark registered all data for the purposes of preparing its accounts and that this disqualifies all previous audits of Post Danmark and means that any additional external review by independent auditors that have relied on Post Danmark’s annual audits are also not reliable.
#2915467
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD, JJD agus Danske Medier i dtaca le folú na méideanna uile ar cuid iad de ríomh an ghlanchostais sheachanta sa chinneadh tosaigh, go gcuireann an folú sin cosc ar na gearánaigh measúnú a dhéanamh ar aon earráid a d’fhéadfadh a bheith déanta ag údaráis na Danmhairge ina gcuid ríomhanna agus go gcuireann sé cosc orthu freisin na cásanna fíorasacha agus frithfhíorasacha a chur i gcomparáid le chéile.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD, JJD and Danske Medier claim that the redaction of all the amounts that form part of the NAC calculation in the opening decision prevent the complainants from assessing any errors that might have been made by the Danish authorities in their calculations and from comparing the factual and counterfactual scenarios.
#2915468
Ag féachaint d’amhras an Choimisiúin nár léiríodh i gceart sa chás frithfhíorasach (aithrisí (149) agus (150) den chinneadh tosaigh) na toimhdí atá nasctha le laghdú Post Danmark agus dúnadh lárionaid sórtála agus mol dáileacháin, measann ITD, Gnóthas 1, JJD agus SLD nach bhfuil sé sochreidte toimhdiú nach n-eascródh méadú ar chostais aonaid Post Danmark as an laghdú ar an méid gnó le haghaidh litreacha sa chás frithfhíorasach.
With reference to the Commission’s doubts that the assumptions linked to the downsizing of Post Danmark and the closure of a sorting centre and distribution hubs were not properly reflected in the counterfactual scenario (recitals (149) and (150) of the opening decision), ITD, Undertaking 1, JJD and SLD consider that it is not plausible to assume that the reduction in the business volume for letters in the counterfactual scenario would not result in an increase in Post Danmark’s unit costs.
#2915469
Ina theannta sin, measann ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD thairis sin gur gá go n-eascródh costais aonaid níos airde sa chás frithfhíorasach as dúnadh lárionaid sórtála agus mol dáileacháin éagsúil sa chás frithfhíorasach.
In addition, ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD further consider that the closure of a sorting centre and various distribution hubs in the counterfactual scenario would necessarily result in higher unit costs in the counterfactual scenario.
#2915474
Tugann ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD dá n-aire gur thoimhdigh an Danmhairg agus Post Danmark maidir le dáileadh na míreanna poist sa chás frithfhíorasach, go mbraithfear go páirteach ar rochtain ar ‘Líonra DPD’ atá faoi úinéireacht La Poste (cuideachta poist náisiúnta na Fraince) ar bhonn comhaontú comhair atá ann cheana idir DPD agus PostNord AB.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD note that Denmark and Post Danmark have assumed that the distribution of postal items in the counterfactual scenario will partly rely on access to La Poste (the French national postal company) owned ‘DPD network’ on the basis of an existing cooperation agreement between DPD and PostNord AB.
#2915491
Tugann ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD dá n-aire gur mheas an Coimisiún in aithrisí (164) agus (165) den chinneadh tosaigh nach gá an uileláithreacht a chuimsiú mar shochar doláimhsithe sa chás fíorasach i ríomh an ghlanchostais sheachanta.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD note that the Commission considered in recitals (164) and (165) of the opening decision that it is not necessary to include ubiquity as an intangible benefit in the factual scenario in the NAC calculation.
#2915500
Líomhnaíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD gurb amhlaidh i ngeall ar an USO a bheith ag Post Danmark, go bhfágann sé sin go mbíonn sé i dteideal stampaí a phriontáil ar a mbíonn an focal ‘Danmark’ agus siombail an bhonnáin chóiste ar a bhfuil coróin óir a úsáid in oifigí poist poiblí, rud a fhágann go mbíonn muinín ag custaiméirí as na seirbhísí a sholáthraítear.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD allege that having the USO entitles Post Danmark to print stamps with the word ‘Danmark’ and to use the symbol of the golden crowned coach horn in public post offices, which gives customers confidence in the services provided.
#2915503
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD gur cheart an cumas, chun praghsanna níos airde a ghearradh ar sheirbhísí poist i ngeall ar an luach branda, a chur san áireamh ach go ndearna an Danmhairg agus Post Danmark neamhaird de sin i ríomh an ghlanchostais sheachanta.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD claim that the ability to charge higher prices for postal services because of brand value should be taken into account but that this has been ignored by Denmark and Post Danmark in the NAC calculation.
#2915505
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1, SLD agus JJD gur cheart an ceart, le boscaí poist (dhearga) a shuiteáil ag áitribh de chuid na hearnála poiblí gan mhuirear, agus an luach a bhaineann leis an úinéireacht a bheith ag Post Danmark ar na boscaí poist uile, a chur san áireamh ach go ndearna an Danmhairg agus Post Danmark neamhaird den cheart agus den luach sin i ríomh an ghlanchostais sheachanta.
ITD, Undertaking 1, SLD and JJD claim that the right to install (red) mailboxes at public sector premises without charge and the value of having ownership of all mailboxes should be taken into account, while that right and that value have been ignored by Denmark and Post Danmark in the NAC calculation.
#2915507
Measann ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD go mbaineann luach breise le heisiúint na stampaí toisc gur siombail iontaoibhe, uileláithreachta agus cáil chorparáideach atá iontu mar aon leis an eisiúint sin a bheith nasctha leis an rochtain ar líonra idirnáisiúnta de sholáthraithe iompair ar fud an domhain, rud ba cheart a chur san áireamh.
ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD consider that the issuing of stamps has an additional value by being a symbol of trust, ubiquity and corporate reputation as well as being linked to the access to an international network of worldwide transport providers, which should be taken into account.
#2915511
Maíonn SLD go bhfuil barainneachtaí scála ag Post Danmark mar an soláthraí USO ní hamháin tríd an gcumas atá aige a líonra USO a úsáid le haghaidh gníomhaíochtaí nach gníomhaíochtaí USO iad ach trí líon ollmhór na mbeartán a bhíonn aige freisin.
SLD claims that Post Danmark as the USO provider has economies of scale not only through being able to use its USO network for non-USO activities but also through its sheer volume of parcels.
#2915518
Maíonn JJD agus SLD go dtairbhíonn Post Danmark de bheith in ann foirgnimh, gluaisteáin agus éadaí oibrithe poist ar a bhfuil a lógó a úsáid chun críoch fógraíochta, ach go mbíonn ar iomaitheoirí íoc as fógraíocht den sórt sin.
JJD and SLD claim that Post Danmark benefits from being able to use buildings, cars and postal workers’ clothing with its logo for advertising purposes, while competitors have to pay for such advertising.
#2915522
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD agus JJD go gceadaítear do Post Danmark mar an soláthraí USO páirceáil agus stopadh gan fíneálacha ná táillí a íoc, rud lena mbaineann luach nach beag i gcathracha móra mar nach mór d’iomaitheoirí íoc as an bpáirceáil.
ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD and JJD claim that Post Danmark as the USO provider is allowed to park and stop without paying fines or fees which is of considerable value in bigger cities where competitors must pay for parking.
#2915524
Measann ITD, Gnóthas 1, JJD agus SLD go bhfuil rochtain ag an soláthraí USO ar fhaisnéis faoi chustaiméirí agus éilimh ó chláir phoiblí, lenar féidir iad a úsáid chun margaíocht níos fearr a dhéanamh ar tháirgí poist agus leis sin, custaiméirí a fháil agus a choimeád.
ITD, Undertaking 1, JJD and SLD consider that the USO provider has access to customer and demand information from public registers which can be used to better market postal products and thereby acquire and keep customers.
#2915537
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD nach bhfuil na cuideachtaí a úsáideann údaráis na Danmhairge le haghaidh na tagarmharcála, i.e. Danske Fragtmænd, Posten Norge agus Deutsche Post, inchomparáide le Post Danmark agus nach dtugann an cleachtadh tagarmharcála údar cuí le hioncaim Post Danmark sa chás frithfhíorasach.
ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD claim that the companies used by the Danish authorities for benchmarking, i.e. Danske Fragtmænd, Posten Norge and Deutsche Post, are not comparable to Post Danmark and thus the benchmarking exercise does not justify Post Danmark’s revenues in the counterfactual scenario.
#2915538
Tugann ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD dá n-aire gur cuideachtaí brabúsacha iad na trí chuideachta uile ag a raibh EBIT (tuilleamh roimh ús agus cáin) a bhí dearfach go comhsheasmhach le haghaidh na tréimhse 2017-2019 ach go raibh EBIT diúltach ag Post Danmark le haghaidh na tréimhse sin i dtaca lena ghníomhaíochtaí USO mar aon lena ghníomhaíochtaí nach gníomhaíochtaí USO iad.
ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD note that all three companies are profitable companies with consistently positive EBIT (earnings before interest and tax) for the 2017-2019 period while Post Danmark has had a negative EBIT for that period both for its USO and non-USO activities.
#2916504
Maíonn ITD, Gnóthas 1 agus SLD go bhfuil an cleachtadh tagarmharcála lochtach (aithrisí (311) agus (315)) toisc go líomhnaítear nach mbeadh Post Danmark inchomparáide le Posten Norge, Deutsche Post DHL Group agus Danske Fragtmænd.
ITD, Undertaking 1 and SLD claim that the benchmarking exercise is flawed (recitals (311) and (315)) as Post Danmark would allegedly not be comparable to Posten Norge, Deutsche Post DHL Group and Danske Fragtmænd.