I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 54(2) de Rialachán (AE) 2016/794, rinne coiste roghnúcháin, arna bhunú ag an mBord Bainistíochta (an “Coiste Roghnúcháin”), gearrliosta iarrthóirí a tharraingt suas.
In accordance with Article 54(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/794, a shortlist of candidates has been drawn up by a selection committee set up by the Management Board (the ‘Selection Committee’).
Ar na cúiseanna céanna, ba cheart go ndéanfadh breathnóir ionadaíocht ar son an Bhoird Riaracháin sa choiste réamhroghnúcháin.
For the same reasons, the Administrative Board should be represented by an observer in the pre-selection committee.
rialacha inmheánacha a ghlacadh maidir le nós imeachta roghnúcháin an Stiúrthóra Feidhmiúcháin, lena n-áirítear na rialacha maidir le comhdhéanamh an choiste roghnúcháin lena n-áirithítear a neamhspleáchas agus a neamhchlaontacht;
adopt internal rules regarding the selection procedure of the Executive Director, including the rules on the composition of the selection committee ensuring its independence and impartiality;
Déanfaidh an Coimisiún cóip de na hiarratais ar fad a gheofar don fholúntas a tharchur chuig an gcoiste roghnúcháin.
The Commission shall transmit to the selection committee a copy of all applications received for the vacancy.
rialacha inmheánacha a ghlacadh maidir le nós imeachta roghnúcháin an Stiúrthóra Feidhmiúcháin, lena n-áirítear na rialacha maidir le comhdhéanamh an choiste roghnúcháin lena n-áirithítear a neamhspleáchas agus a neamhchlaontacht;
adopt internal rules regarding the procedure for the selection of the Executive Director, including rules on the composition of the selection committee which ensure its independence and impartiality;
Coiste roghnúcháin a bhunóidh an Bord Bainistíochta agus ina mbeidh comhaltaí a ainmneoidh na Ballstáit agus ionadaí ón gCoimisiún a tharraingeoidh suas an gearrliosta.
The shortlist shall be drawn up by a selection committee set up by the Management Board and composed of members designated by Member States and a Commission representative
Déanfaidh MECS comhaltaí an Ghrúpa Chomhairligh a cheapadh tar éis léiriú spéise a iarraidh agus ar bhonn na comhairle a gheofar ó choiste réamhroghnúcháin.
The members of the Advisory Group shall be appointed by the EDPS following a call for expression of interest and based on the advice of a pre-selection committee.
D’ullmhaigh an Coiste Roghnúcháin tuarascáil chuí-réasúnaithe agus thíolaic sí í chuig an mBord Bainistíochta an 25 Samhain 2020.
The Selection Committee prepared a duly reasoned report and submitted it to the Management Board on 25 November 2020.
Ceapadh coiste meastóireachta agus roghnúcháin don phróiseas roghnúcháin poiblí chun saotharlann tagartha an Aontais Eorpaigh le haghaidh heipitíteas eansótach a ainmniú.
An evaluation and selection committee was appointed for the public selection process for the designation of the European Union reference laboratory for Rift Valley fever.
á thabhairt dá haire, agus é ina ábhar imní di, gur chinn an Chúirt nár shuigh an coiste roghnúcháin i nós imeachta earcaíochta conas a dhámhfaí pointí do gach critéar roghnúcháin sula ndearnadh scrúdú ar na hiarratais agus gur dhearbhaigh cathaoirleach an choiste roghnúcháin go raibh coinbhleacht leasa ghairmiúil ann maidir le beirt iarrthóirí a bhí ag obair faoina mhaoirseacht, agus fós féin nach ndearnadh cur síos sa tuarascáil mheastóireachta deiridh ar an gcaoi ar tugadh aghaidh ar an gcoinbhleacht leasa sin; á thabhairt freagra na Gníomhaíochta dá haire go bhfuil teimpléid inmheánacha nua á n-ullmhú aici le haghaidh nósanna imeachta roghnúcháin agus gur ghlac sí rialacha inmheánacha maidir le doiciméadú a dhéanamh ar chomhlíonadh chinneadh an údaráis atá údaraithe chun na conarthaí fostaíochta a thabhairt i gcrích; á iarraidh ar an nGníomhaireacht trédhearcacht a fheabhsú agus a áirithiú agus doiciméadú cuí a dhéanamh le linn nósanna imeachta roghnúcháin, agus aon fhorbairtí ina leith sin a thuairisciú don údarás um urscaoileadh;
Notes with concern that the Court found that the selection committee in a recruitment procedure had not established how points would be awarded for each selection criterion before examining the applications and that the chair of the selection committee had declared a professional conflict of interest in connection with two candidates working under his supervision, and yet the final evaluation report did not describe how this conflict of interest had been addressed; notes the Agency’s reply that it is preparing new internal templates for selection procedures and that it adopted internal rules on documenting compliance with the decision of the authority authorised to conclude the contracts of employment; calls on the Agency to improve and ensure transparency and to properly document during selection procedures, and to report any developments in that regard to the discharge authority;
I gcás ina gcinnfidh an coiste roghnúcháin do na straitéisí um fhorbairt áitiúil faoi stiúir an phobail arna mbunú faoi Airteagal 33(3) go mbeidh gá le tacaíocht ó níos mó ná Ciste amháin chun an straitéis roghnaithe um fhorbairt áitiúil faoi stiúir an phobail a chur chun feidhme, féadfaidh sé Ciste ceannais a ainmniú i gcomhréir leis na rialacha agus nósanna imeachta náisiúnta chun tacú leis na costais reatha agus eagrúcháin uile faoi phointe (d) agus faoi phointe (e) d'Airteagal 35(1) don straitéis um fhorbairt áitiúil faoi stiúir an phobail.
Where the selection committee for the community-led local development strategies set up under Article 33(3) determines that the implementation of the community-led local development strategy selected requires support from more than one Fund, it may designate in accordance with national rules and procedures, a lead Fund to support all running and animation costs under points (d) and (e) of Article 35(1) for the community-led local development strategy.
Beidh tacaíocht ullmhúcháin den sórt sin incháilithe is cuma an ndéanann an coiste roghnúcháin arna chur ar bun faoi Airteagal 33(3) an straitéis forbartha áitiúla faoi stiúir an phobail arna ceapadh ag an ngrúpa gníomhaíochta áitiúla a thairbhíonn den tacaíocht a roghnú le haghaidh cistithe.
Such preparatory support shall be eligible regardless of whether the community-led local development strategy designed by the local action group benefitting from the support is selected for funding by the selection committee set up under Article 33(3).
Ar bhonn tograí arna ndéanamh ag coiste roghnúcháin a bheidh comhdhéanta d’Ard-Rúnaithe Pharlaimint na hEorpa, na Comhairle agus an Choimisiúin(dá dtagraítear go comhpháirteach mar “an t-údarás ceapacháin”), agus tar éis glao oscailte ar iarrthóirí, déanfaidh na hinstitiúidí sin, de thoil a chéile, Stiúrthóir an Údaráis a cheapadh ar feadh téarma neamh-inathnuaite cúig bliana.
The Director of the Authority shall be appointed for a five-year non-renewable term by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission (jointly referred to as the 'appointing authority') by common accord, on the basis of proposals made by a selection committee composed of the Secretaries-General of those institutions following an open call for candidates.
Más rud é nach gcomhlíonann Stiúrthóir an Údaráis a thuilleadh na coinníollacha atá riachtanach do chomhall a chuid nó a cuid dualgas, féadfar é nó í a dhífhostú ar chomhthoil phéire ar a laghad de na trí institiúid dá dtagraítear sa chéad fhomhír agus ar bhonn tuarascála arna tarraingt suas ag an gcoiste roghnúcháin dá dtagraítear sa chéad fhomhír, bíodh an tuarascáil sin tarraingthe suas ar thionscnamh an choiste féin nó arna iarraidh sin ag aon cheann de na trí institiúid.
If the Director of the Authority no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his or her duties, he or she may be dismissed by common accord by at least two of the three institutions referred to in the first subparagraph and on the basis of a report drawn up by the selection committee referred to in the first subparagraph on its own initiative or following a request from any of the three institutions.
rialacha inmheánacha a ghlacadh chun coinbhleachtaí leasa a chosc agus a bhainistiú i dtaobh a chuid comhaltaí agus comhaltaí an choiste roghnúcháin, chomh maith leis na comhaltaí de Choiste Eolaíochta um Oiliúint;
adopt internal rules for the prevention and management of conflicts of interest in respect of its members and the members of the selection committee, as well as the members of a Scientific Committee for Training;
Déanfaidh an Bord Bainistíochta an Stiúrthóir Feidhmiúcháin a cheapadh, i ndiaidh nós imeachta roghnúcháin a bheidh oscailte agus trédhearcach, as gearrliosta de thriúr iarrthóirí ar a laghad arna moladh ag coiste roghnúcháin a bheidh curtha ar bun ag an mBord Bainistíochta agus a bheidh comhdhéanta de chomhaltaí a bheidh ainmnithe ag na Ballstáit agus ag an gCoimisiún.
The Executive Director shall be appointed by the Management Board, following an open and transparent selection procedure, from a shortlist of at least three candidates proposed by a selection committee set up by the Management Board and composed of members designated by Member States and the Commission.
Déanfaidh an coiste roghnúcháin an gearrliosta sin a tharraingt as liosta de na hiarrthóirí uile, arna sainaithint ar mhodh trédhearcach ag an gCoimisiún, a bhfuil a bpróifíl ag teacht leis na riachtanais don fheidhm de réir mar a bheidh leagtha síos i bhfógra folúntais arna fhoilsiú in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh.
The selection committee shall draw that shortlist from a list of all candidates, identified by the Commission in a transparent manner, whose profile matches the requirements for the function laid down in a notice of vacancy published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
An Roinn Comhshaoil agus Rialtais Áitiúil. Ordú ón Aire an 27.3.2003 lena ndéantar ceapacháin chun Coiste Roghnóireachta Reachtúil faoi alt 21(3) den Acht fán nGníomhaireacht um Chaomhnú Comhshaoil, 1992.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. MINISTERIAL ORDER OF 27.3.2003 MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO STATUTORY SELECTION COMMITTEE UNDER SECTION 21(3) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1992.
Ordú ón Aire an 31 Márta 2004 lena ndéantar ceapachán chun coiste roghnóireachta reachtúil faoi alt 21 (3) den Acht fán nGníomhaireacht um Chaomhnú Comhshaoil 1992. (An Roinn Comhshaoil, Oidhreachta agus Rialtais Áitiúil).
MINISTERIAL ORDER OF 31 MARCH 2004 MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO STATUTORY SELECTION COMMITTEE UNDER SECTION 21 (3) OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ACT 1992. (DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, HERITAGE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT).
I gcás ina gcinnfidh an coiste roghnúcháin do na straitéisí forbartha áitiúla faoi stiúir an phobail arna mbunú faoi Airteagal 33(3) go mbeidh gá le tacaíocht ó níos mó ná Ciste amháin chun an straitéis forbartha áitiúil faoi stiúir an phobail atá roghnaithe a chur chun feidhme, féadfaidh sé Ciste ceannais a ainmniú i gcomhréir leis na rialacha agus nósanna imeachta náisiúnta chun tacú leis na costais ullmhúcháin, reatha agus bheochana uile faoi phointe (a), faoi phointe (d) agus faoi phointe (e) d’Airteagal 35(1) don straitéis forbartha áitiúil faoi stiúir an phobail.”;
Where the selection committee for the community-led local development strategies set up under Article 33(3) determines that the implementation of the community-led local development strategy selected requires support from more than one Fund, it may designate in accordance with national rules and procedures, a lead Fund to support all preparatory, running and animation costs under points (a), (d) and (e) of Article 35(1) for the community-led local development strategy.’;
Ar bhonn na tuarascála ón gCoiste Roghnúcháin agus i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) 2016/794 agus leis an gcinneadh ón mBord Bainistíochta an 1 Bealtaine 2017, d’eisigh an Bord Bainistíochta tuairim réasúnaithe an 10 Nollaig 2020 maidir le Leas-Stiúrthóir Feidhmiúcháin nua de chuid Europol a cheapadh, inar mhol sé don Chomhairle gearrliosta de thriúr iarrthóirí atá oiriúnach don phost.
On the basis of the report of the Selection Committee and in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/794 and the decision of the Management Board of 1 May 2017, the Management Board issued a reasoned opinion on 10 December 2020 on the appointment of a new Deputy Executive Director of Europol, in which it proposed a shortlist of three candidates suitable for the post to the Council.
Ag féachaint don liosta iarrthóirí a mhol coiste roghnúcháin arna chomhdhéanamh d’Ardrúnaithe Pharlaimint na hEorpa, na Comhairle agus an Choimisiúin an 15 Iúil 2021 tar éis glao oscailte ar iarrthóirí d’fhonn Stiúrthóir an Údaráis um páirtithe polaitiúla Eorpacha agus um fhondúireachtaí polaitiúla Eorpacha a cheapadh,
Having regard to the list of candidates proposed on 15 July 2021 by a selection committee composed of the Secretaries-General of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission following an open call for candidates with a view to the appointment of the Director of the Authority for European political parties and European political foundations,
Foráiltear le hAirteagal 6(3) de Rialachán (AE, Euratom) Uimh. 1141/2014 go bhfuil Parlaimint na hEorpa, an Chomhairle, agus an Coimisiún, de thoil a chéile, chun Stiúrthóir an Údaráis um páirtithe polaitiúla Eorpacha agus um fhondúireachtaí polaitiúla Eorpacha a cheapadh ar feadh téarma neamh-inathnuaite 5 bliana, ar bhonn tograí arna ndéanamh ag coiste roghnúcháin arna chomhdhéanamh d’Ardrúnaithe na n-institiúidí sin tar éis glao oscailte ar iarrthóirí,
Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 provides for the Director of the Authority for European political parties and European political foundations to be appointed for a non-renewable term of five years by common accord of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, on the basis of proposals made by a selection committee composed of the Secretaries-General of those institutions following an open call for candidates,
‘Sa nós imeachta roghnúcháin, tacóidh Coiste Roghnúcháin leis an Stiúrthóir, agus beidh ceathrar comhaltaí ar a laghad ar an gcoiste sin: ionadaí amháin ó Bhuanrúnaíocht an Chomhphobail Iompair, ionadaí amháin ón Uachtaránacht agus beirt ionadaithe ón gCoimisiún Eorpach.’;
‘In the selection procedure, the Director shall be supported by a Selection Committee, which shall consist of at least four members: one representative from the Permanent Secretariat of the Transport Community, one representative of the Presidency and two representatives of the European Commission.’;
An coiste meastóireachta agus roghnúcháin a ceapadh don ghlao sin, tháinig sé ar an gconclúid maidir leis an gcuibhreannas faoi stiúir Stichting Wageningen Research, Wageningen Livestock Research, an Ísiltír, agus a chuimsíonn Institut de l’Elevage, an Fhrainc agus Oifig Cónaidhme um Thalmhaíocht agus Bia na Gearmáine, go gcomhlíonann an cuibhreannas sin na ceanglais a leagtar amach i bpointe 1 d’Iarscríbhinn IV a ghabhann le Rialachán (AE) 2016/1012 agus go bhfuil sé d’acmhainn aige na cúraimí a leagtar amach i bpointe 3 den Iarscríbhinn sin a dhéanamh.
The evaluation and selection committee appointed for that call concluded that the consortium led by Stichting Wageningen Research, Wageningen Livestock Research, the Netherlands, which comprises Institut de l’Elevage, France and the Federal Office of Agriculture and Food, Germany, complies with the requirements set out in point 1 of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) 2016/1012 and has the capacity to carry out the tasks set out in point 3 of that Annex.
Tháinig an coiste meastóireachta agus roghnúcháin sin ar an gconclúid go gcomhlíonann an tsaotharlann Iodálach Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise “G. Caporale” na ceanglais a leagtar amach in Airteagal 93(3) de Rialachán (AE) 2017/625 agus go bhfuil sé in ann na cúraimí a leagtar amach in Airteagal 94 den Rialachán sin a dhéanamh.
That evaluation and selection committee concluded that the Italian laboratory Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise ‘G. Caporale’ complies with the requirements set out in Article 93(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and is capable of performing the tasks set out in Article 94 of that Regulation.
á thabhairt dá haire, tar éis ráitis na Cúirte, go ndearna an Ghníomhaireacht athbhreithniú ar a nós imeachta agus a treoirlínte a bhaineann le coinbhleachtaí leasa chomhaltaí an choiste roghnúcháin a shainaithint agus a bhainistiú; á thabhairt dá haire gur cuireadh an nós imeachta nua chun feidhme i dtús na bliana 2020 agus go gcinntítear leis tuairisciú agus bainistiú cuí ar choinbhleachtaí leasa a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann chomh mhaith le próiseas earcaíochta trédhearcach agus cóir;
Notes, following the remarks of the Court, that the Agency reviewed its procedure and guidelines related to the identification and management of conflicts of interest of selection committee members; notes that the new procedure was implemented in early 2020 and ensures a proper reporting and management of potential conflicts of interest and a fair and transparent recruitment process;
ag tabhairt dá haire, agus é ina ábhar imní di, ón méid a bhí i dtuarascáil na Cúirte go raibh easpa trédhearcachta i nósanna imeachta earcaíochta an Chomhghnóthais a rinneadh in 2020 ó thaobh an ghearrliosta deiridh d’iarrthóirí a chur le chéile a dtabharfaí cuireadh dóibh chun freastal ar an gcéad chéim mheasúnaithe eile (agallaimh agus trialacha scríofa), agus nach bhfuil sé soiléir conas a chuir an coiste roghnúcháin na critéir bhuntáisteacha faoi roghnú na n-iarrthóirí san áireamh; ag cur sonrú i bhfreagra ón gComhghnóthas gur thosaigh sé, in 2021, measúnuithe lán-chainníochtúla ar iarratais a áireamh; á iarraidh ar an gComhghnóthas athbhreithniú a dhéanamh go dícheallach ar a bheartas earcaíochta agus leanúint dá fheabhsú chun trédhearcacht agus cothroime an phróisis a mhéadú agus aon fhorbairt i ndáil leis sin a thuairisciú don údarás um urscaoileadh;
Notes with concern from the Court’s report that the Joint Undertaking’s recruitment procedures made in 2020 lacked transparency in drawing up the final shortlist of candidates to be invited for the next assessment phase (interviews and written tests), and that it is not clear how the selection committee took account of the advantageous criteria for shortlisting candidates; notes the Joint Undertaking’s reply that in 2021 it started to include fully quantitative assessments of applications; calls on the Joint Undertaking to diligently review and continue to improve its recruitment policy with the aim of increasing transparency and fairness of the process and to report to the discharge authority any development in that regard;
ag tabhairt dá haire gur ann do na barúlacha ón gCúirt maidir le laigí rialúcháin inmheánaigh na Gníomhaireachta i réimsí na nósanna imeachta earcaíochta, na nósanna imeachta soláthair agus i ndáil le cumhachtaí a tharmligean chuig oifigigh údarúcháin trí tharmligean nó trí fho-tharmligean; ag tabhairt dá haire, thairis sin, gur ann do na freagraí ón nGníomhaireacht ar thorthaí na Cúirte agus ar na bearta a cuireadh chun feidhme cheana; á chur in iúl gur geal léi gur ghlac an Ghníomhaireacht treoracha níos soiléire do chomhaltaí an choiste roghnúcháin i mí Eanáir 2022 lena n-áirithítear measúnú níos comhsheasmhaí agus nósanna imeachta comhchuibhithe; á iarraidh ar an tSeirbhís um Iniúchadh Inmheánach nósanna imeachta nuashonraithe earcaíochta na Gníomhaireachta a áireamh ina hiniúchtaí amach anseo;
Notes the Court’s observations on the Agency’s internal control weaknesses in the areas of recruitment procedures, procurement procedures and with regard to the delegation of powers to authorising officers by delegation or sub-delegation; notes further the Agency’s replies to the Court’s findings and the measures already implemented; welcomes the adoption by the Agency in January 2022 of clearer instructions to the selection committee members ensuring more consistent assessment and harmonised procedures; calls on the IAS to include the Agency’s updated recruitment procedures in its future audits;