#2757084
Imscrúdú agus pionóis riaracháin
Administrative investigation and penalties
Filter results
Collections
8 results in 6 documents
#512361
Tarraingíonn an Chúirt aird ar an gcaoi go bhfuil sainmhíniú an choincheapa "imscrúdú riaracháin" atá sonraithe in Airteagal 2 molta ar neamhréir le foclaíocht mholta Airteagail 3(2).
The Court draws attention to the fact that the definition of the notion of "administrative investigation" given in the proposed Article 2 is inconsistent with the proposed wording of Article 3(2).
#1898824
I gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) 2017/1939, níor cheart don Oifig, i bprionsabal, imscrúdú riaracháin a oscailt i gcomhthráth le himscrúdú arna dhéanamh ag OIPE ar na fíricí céanna.
In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the Office should in principle not open an administrative investigation in parallel with an investigation conducted by the EPPO into the same facts.
#290350
3. Gan dochar do na costais a bhaineann le hoibriú an CEC ná do na méideanna dá bhforáiltear mar chúiteamh de bhun Airteagal 40, tarscaoilfidh na Ballstáit agus an Coimisiún gach uile éileamh ar aisíoc caiteachais a bhaineann le soláthar faisnéise nó a bhaineann le soláthar doiciméad nó a bhaineann le himscrúdú riaracháin nó a bhaineann le haon ghníomhaíocht oibríochtúil eile a chur chun feidhme de bhun an Rialacháin seo agus a chuirtear i gcrích ar iarraidh ó Bhallstát nó ón gCoimisiún, seachas a mhéid a bhaineann leis na liúntais, más ann dóibh, a íocfar le saineolaithe.
3. Without prejudice to the expenses relating to the operation of the CIS and the amounts provided for by way of compensation pursuant to Article 40, the Member States and the Commission shall waive all claims for the reimbursement of expenditure relating to the supply of information or of documents or to the implementation of an administrative investigation or of any other operational action pursuant to this Regulation which are carried out at the request of a Member State or the Commission, except as regards the allowances, if any, paid to experts.
#1898817
Gnéithe lena léireofaí gurbh fhéidir go raibh iompar coiriúil ar siúl a thiocfadh faoi inniúlacht OIPE, d’fhéadfaidís a bheith sna líomhaintí tosaigh a fhaigheann an Oifig nó d’fhéadfadh sé nach dtiocfaidís chun cinn ach amháin le linn imscrúdú riaracháin arna oscailt ag an Oifig ar na forais go raibh amhras ann maidir le neamhrialtacht riaracháin.
Elements pointing to possible criminal conduct falling within the competence of the EPPO may be present in initial allegations received by the Office or emerge only in the course of an administrative investigation opened by the Office on the grounds of a suspicion of administrative irregularity.
#1898825
Mar sin féin, i gcásanna áirithe, d'fhéadfadh sé a bheith riachtanach chun leasanna airgeadais an Aontais a chosaint go ndéanfadh an Oifig imscrúdú riaracháin comhlántach sula gcuirfí deireadh le himeachtaí coiriúla arna dtionscnamh ag OIPE, chun a fháil amach an bhfuil bearta réamhchúraim riachtanach, nó ar cheart gníomhaíocht airgeadais, araíonachta nó riaracháin a dhéanamh.
However, in certain cases, the protection of the financial interests of the Union may require that the Office carry out a complementary administrative investigation before the conclusion of criminal proceedings initiated by the EPPO, with the purpose of ascertaining whether precautionary measures are necessary, or whether financial, disciplinary or administrative action should be taken.
#1977893
féadfaidh sé nó sí aird Údarás Ceapacháin ARC a tharraingt ar aon mhainneachtain ag ball foirne de chuid ARC na hoibleagáidí faoi Rialachán (AE) 2018/1725 a chomhlíonadh agus a mholadh go seolfar imscrúdú riaracháin i bhfianaise an fhéidearthacht na smachtbhannaí dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 69 den Rialachán sin a chur i bhfeidhm;
may bring to the attention of the Appointing Authority of the GSC any failure of a GSC staff member to comply with the obligations under Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and suggest that an administrative investigation be launched with a view to the possible application of the sanctions provided for in Article 69 of that Regulation;
#3046848
á athdhearbhú go bhfuil APAnna i staid an-leochaileach ó thaobh calaois a thuairisciú agus cosaint do sceithirí a iarraidh mar gheall ar a staid shonrach fostaíochta; á iarraidh, dá bhrí sin, ar an Ard-Rúnaí na rialacha inmheánacha maidir le sceithireacht a glacadh an 4 Nollaig 2015 agus atá sna Rialacháin Foirne a oiriúnú go hiomlán chun iad a ailíniú le Treoir (AE) 2019/1937 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle chomh maith le cosaint threisithe a sholáthar do sceithirí ar APAnna iad agus do bhaill foirne, lena n-áirítear trí bhealaí slána tuairiscithe a bhunú, sar an gcaoi chéanna le híospartaigh ciaptha, go háirithe maidir le bearta sealadacha le linn an imscrúdaithe riaracháin, gach beart cosanta iomchuí eile agus gach cúnamh chun caingean dlí a ghlacadh i leith damáiste a fulaingíodh; á iarraidh ar an bParlaimint feasacht a ardú, nuair is féidir, i measc na forine parlaimintí maidir leis an gcosaint atá ar fáil dóibh mar sceithirí; á iarraidh, thairis sin, go gcuirfí oiliúint sceithireachta éigeantach ar na Feisirí agus ar aon bhall foirne uachtarach, laistigh den riarachán agus de ghrúpaí polaitiúla araon, a gheobhadh tuarascálacha sceithireachta féideartha;
Reiterates that APAs are in a particularly vulnerable position when it comes to reporting fraud and requesting whistleblower protection due to their specific employment situation; therefore calls on the Secretary-General to fully adapt the internal rules on whistleblowing adopted on 4 December 2015 and contained in the Staff Regulations to align them to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as to provide whistleblower APAs and staff with reinforced protection, including by setting up secure channels for reporting, in the same line as for victims of harassment, in particular with regard to provisional measures during the administrative investigation, all other appropriate protection measures and assistance to take legal action for damage suffered; requests Parliament to raise awareness, where possible, among parliamentary staff on the whistleblower protection available to them; further calls for mandatory whistleblowing training for MEPs and for any superior, both within the administration and political groups, that would receive potential whistleblowing reports;