#1759464
Féach Dréachtmholadh deiridh SCOEL/REC/404.
See final draft Recommendation SCOEL/REC/404.
Féach Dréachtmholadh deiridh SCOEL/REC/404.
See final draft Recommendation SCOEL/REC/404.
Ba cheart a áireamh ar na caighdeáin sin treoir a chabhraíonn le rialtais agus le lucht ceaptha beartas ina gcuid iarrachtaí trádáil neamhdhleathach a dhéantar trí chriosanna saorthrádála agus laistigh díobh a laghdú agus a dhíspreagadh, amhail mar atá sa dréacht-Mholadh ón Eagraíocht um Chomhar agus Forbairt Eacnamaíochta (ECFE) maidir le Comhrac na Trádála Neamhdhleathaí: Feabhas a Chur ar an Trédhearcacht i gCriosanna Saorthrádála (an “Dréacht-mholadh”).
Such standards should include guidance that assists governments and policymakers in their efforts to reduce and deter illicit trade conducted through and inside free trade zones, such as in the draft Recommendation of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on Countering Illicit Trade: Enhancing Transparency in Free Trade Zones (the ‘draft Recommendation’).
Féadfaidh an coiste dréachtmholadh arna dhíriú ar institiúidí nó ar chomhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh nó ar na Ballstáit a chur faoi bhráid na Parlaiminte freisin.
The committee may also submit to Parliament a draft recommendation addressed to institutions or bodies of the European Union or the Member States.
Féach freisin sa nasc seo an dréachtmholadh ón Ombudsman Eorpach an 9 Nollaig 2010 ina fhiosrúchán ar ghearán 856/2008/BEH i gcoinne OLAF, míreanna 92 go 104.
See also in this connection the draft recommendation by the European Ombudsman of 9 December 2010 in his enquiry into complaint 856/2008/BEH against OLAF, paragraphs 92 to 104.
Féadfaidh an coiste dréachtmholadh arna dhíriú chuig institiúidí nó comhlachtaí an Aontais Eorpaigh nó chuig na Ballstáit a chur faoi bhráid na Parlaiminte freisin.
The committee may also submit to Parliament a draft recommendation addressed to institutions or bodies of the European Union or to the Member States.
Meastar go gcuirfear an dréacht-Mholadh faoi bhráid Choiste Rialachais Phoiblí ECFE ar dtús lena fhormheas agus ansin faoi bhráid Chomhairle ECFE lena ghlacadh.
The draft Recommendation is expected to be first presented to the OECD Public Governance Committee for approval and then to the OECD Council for adoption.
Tá iarmhairtí leathana eacnamaíocha, sóisialta, comhshaoil agus fiú polaitiúla ag baint leis an trádáil neamhdhleathach agus tá sé ríthábhachtach go dtacaíonn an tAontas le glacadh an dréacht-Mholta i gComhairle ECFE.
Illicit trade has broad adverse economic, social, environmental and even political impacts and it is essential that the Union supports the adoption of the draft Recommendation in the OECD Council.
Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, seasamh an Aontais laistigh de Choiste Rialachais Phoiblí ECFE agus de Chomhairle ECFE a bhunú ar an dréacht-Mholadh atá i gceangal leis seo,
The position of the Union within the OECD Public Governance Committee and the OECD Council should therefore be based on the attached draft Recommendation,
Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, seasamh an Aontais laistigh den Chomhairle Comhlachais a bhunú ar an dréacht-Mholadh ón gComhairle Comhlachais,
The position of the Union within the Association Council should therefore be based on the draft Recommendation of the Association Council,
Le linn an chomhairliúcháin phoiblí a rinne an Ghníomhaireacht maidir lena dréachtmholadh, níor cuireadh aon bharúil shonrach isteach maidir le díolúintí a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann le haghaidh taighde agus forbairt atá dírithe ar tháirgí agus ar phróisis.
During the public consultation conducted by the Agency on its draft recommendation, no specific comments were submitted with regard to possible exemptions for product and process orientated research and development.
Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, seasamh an Aontais sa Chomhairle Comhlachais a bheith bunaithe ar an dréacht-Mholadh atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo,
The position of the Union within the Association Council should therefore be based on the attached draft Recommendation,
Rinne an Ghníomhaireacht comhairliúchán poiblí maidir leis an dréachtmholadh uaithi, comhairliúchán inar iarradh ar pháirtithe leasmhara barúlacha a thíolacadh.
The Agency conducted a public consultation on its draft recommendation where interested parties were invited to submit comments.
Le linn an chomhairliúcháin phoiblí a rinne an Ghníomhaireacht maidir lena dréachtmholadh, níor cuireadh aon bharúil shonrach isteach maidir le díolúintí a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann le haghaidh taighde agus forbairt atá dírithe ar tháirgí agus ar phróisis.
During the public consultation conducted by the Agency on its draft recommendation, no specific comments were submitted with regard to possible exemptions for product and process orientated research and development.
Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, go mbeadh seasamh an Aontais laistigh de Chomhairle Comhlachais AE-an Éigipt bunaithe ar an dréachtmholadh atá i gceangal leis seo,
The position of the Union within the EU-Egypt Association Council should therefore be based on the attached draft recommendation,
Gan dochar do chur i bhfeidhm na chéad mhíre, beidh rochtain dhíreach ag Feisirí agus ag grúpaí polaitiúla ar chóras ríomhaireachta inmheánach Pharlaimint na hEorpa chun féachaint ar aon doiciméad ullmhúcháin neamhrúnda (dréacht-tuarascáil, dréachtmholadh, dréacht-tuairim, doiciméad oibre, leasuithe arna gcur síos i gcoiste).
Without prejudice to the application of the first paragraph, Members and political groups shall have direct access to the European Parliament’s internal computer system for the consultation of any non-confidential preparatory document (draft report, draft recommendation, draft opinion, working document, amendments tabled in committee).
Pléadh socrú den sórt sin sa mhalartú litreacha idir Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh agus an Íoslainn agus an Iorua maidir le coistí a thugann cúnamh don Choimisiún Eorpach i bhfeidhmiú a chumhachtaí feidhmiúcháin, atá i gceangal leis an gComhaontú thuasluaite [11] Chuir an Coimisiún dréachtmholadh faoi bhráid na Comhairle d’fhonn caibidlíocht a dhéanamh maidir leis an socrú seo.
Such an arrangement has been contemplated in the Exchange of Letters between the Council of the European Union and Iceland and Norway concerning committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers [11], annexed to the abovementioned Agreement. The Commission has submitted to the Council a draft recommendation with a view to negotiating this arrangement.
Rún ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa maidir leis an Tuarascáil Speisialta ó Ombudsman na hEorpa a lean as an dréacht-mholadh chuig Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh i ngearán 2395/2003/GG i dtaobh oscailteacht chruinnithe na Comhairle le linn di gníomhú ina cáil reachtach (2005/2243(INI)).
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ON THE SPECIAL REPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN FOLLOWING THE DRAFT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN COMPLAINT 2395/2003/GG CONCERNING THE OPENNESS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL WHEN ACTING IN ITS LEGISLATIVE CAPACITY (2005/2243(INI)).
Tá an iontráil a bhaineann le “hidreacarbóin iltimthriallacha aramatacha ina bhfuil beinsi[a]piréin ar carcanaiginí iad de réir bhrí na Treorach” bunaithe ar Dhréachtmholadh deiridh SCOEL Uimh. 404 a thugann aghaidh ar mheascáin de hidreacarbóin iltimthriallacha aramatacha ina bhfuil beinsi[a]piréin mar chomhdhúil táscaire mar gheall ar an neart ard atá i mbeinsi[a]piréin.
The entry concerning "polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons mixtures containing benzo[a]pyrene which are carcinogens within the meaning of the Directive" is based on the final draft Recommendation from SCOEL No. 404 which addresses mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons containing benzo[a]pyrene as indicator compound due to the high potency of benzo[a]pyrene.
Ní tháirgtear meascáin de hidreacarbóin iltimthriallacha aramatacha casta (PAH) ina bhfuil beinsi[a]piréin nó meascáin de PAH a bhfuil meáchan móilíneach íseal iontu le fírinne, ach foirmítear go sonrach agus go huileláithreach iad le linn próisis dócháin agus phirealaithe ábhar orgánach (féach sa chiall seo, dréachtmholadh deiridh ón gCoiste Eolaíoch um Theorainneacha Nochta Ceirde do Mheascáin de Hidreacarbóin Iltimthriallacha Aramatacha ina bhfuil beinsi[a]piréin (PAH), Uimh. 404.
Complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures (PAH) containing benzo[a]pyrene or low molecular weight PAH mixtures, are not produced and used as such, but are specifically and ubiquitously formed during combustion and pyrolysis processes of organic materials (see in this sense, final draft Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Mixtures containing benzo[a]pyrene (PAH), No. 404.
Pléadh socrú den sórt sin sa mhalartú litreacha idir Comhairle an Aontais Eorpaigh agus an Íoslainn agus an Iorua maidir le coistí a thugann cúnamh don Choimisiún Eorpach i bhfeidhmiú a chumhachtaí feidhmiúcháin, atá i gceangal leis an gComhaontú thuasluaite[21] Chuir an Coimisiún dréachtmholadh faoi bhráid na Comhairle d’fhonn caibidlíocht a dhéanamh maidir leis an socrú seo.
Such an arrangement has been contemplated in the Exchange of Letters between the Council of the European Union and Iceland and Norway concerning committees which assist the European Commission in the exercise of its executive powers[22], annexed to the abovementioned Agreement. The Commission has submitted to the Council a draft recommendation with a view to negotiating this arrangement.
Gan dochar do chur i bhfeidhm na chéad mhíre, beidh rochtain dhíreach ag Feisirí agus ag grúpaí polaitiúla ar chóras ríomhaireachta inmheánach Pharlaimint na hEorpa chun féachaint ar aon doiciméad ullmhúcháin neamhrúnda (dréacht-tuarascáil, dréachtmholadh, dréacht-tuairim, doiciméad oibre, leasuithe arna gcur síos i gcoiste).
Without prejudice to the first paragraph, Members and political groups shall have direct access to the European Parliament's internal computer system for the purpose of consulting any non-confidential preparatory document (draft report, draft recommendation, draft opinion, working document, amendments tabled in committee).
I gcás ina bhfuil comhionannas vótaí ann i ndáil le dréachtmholadh faoi Riail 149(4) gan idirghabháil a dhéanamh in imeachtaí os comhair Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh, tá Riail 189(3) le léirmhíniú ar bhealach nach gciallaíonn comhionannas den sórt sin go bhfuil moladh glactha ar dá réir gur cheart don Pharlaimint idirghabháil a dhéanamh sna himeachtaí sin.
Rule 189(3) is to be interpreted as meaning that, where there is a tied vote on a draft recommendation under Rule 149(4) not to intervene in proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union, such a tie does not signify the adoption of a recommendation according to which Parliament should intervene in those proceedings.
Maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa Choiste Custaim arna bhunú faoin gComhaontú Saorthrádála idir an tAontas Eorpach agus a Bhallstáit, de pháirt, agus Poblacht na Cóiré, den pháirt eile, bunófar é ar an dréachtmholadh ón gCoiste Custaim sin.
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the Customs Committee established under the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, shall be based on the draft recommendation of that Customs Committee.
maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh laistigh de Choiste Rialachais Phoiblí na hEagraíochta um Chomhar agus Forbairt Eacnamaíochta (ECFE) agus de Chomhairle ECFE i ndáil leis an dréacht-Mholadh maidir le comhrac na trádála neamhdhleathaí: Feabhas a Chur ar an Trédhearcacht i gCriosanna Saorthrádála
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the OECD Public Governance Committee and the OECD Council on the draft Recommendation on Countering Illicit Trade: Enhancing Transparency in Free Trade Zones
Rinneadh dianphlé ar an dréacht-Mholadh maidir le comhrac na Trádála Neamhdhleathaí i dTascfhórsa ECFE, fochomhlacht den Fhóram Ardleibhéil um Rioscaí de Choiste Rialachais Phoiblí ECFE, ar bhonn 6 bliana anailíse agus comhairliúchán le saineolaithe, lena n-áirítear leis an Eagraíocht Dhomhanda Chustaim agus leis an Eagraíocht Dhomhanda Trádála.
Extensive discussions on the draft Recommendation have taken place in the OECD Task Force on Countering Illicit Trade, a subsidiary body of the High Level Risk Forum of the OECD Public Governance Committee, on the basis of six years of analysis and expert consultation including with the World Customs Organization and the World Trade Organization.
Is iomchuí an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais i gCoiste Rialachais Phoiblí ECFE agus i gComhairle ECFE a bhunú ós rud é go bhféadfadh an dréacht-Mholadh tionchar a imirt ar an anailís riosca arna déanamh ag údaráis chustaim na mBallstát i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 952/2013 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle i gcomhar leis an gcreat comhchoiteann bainistithe riosca i dtaca le rialú custaim.
It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the OECD Public Governance Committee and in the OECD Council as the draft Recommendation is capable of influencing the risk analysis carried out by customs authorities of the Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with the common risk management framework for customs control.
An seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais laistigh de Choiste Rialachais Phoiblí ECFE agus de Chomhairle ECFE maidir le feabhas a chur ar an trédhearcacht i gcriosanna saorthrádála, beidh sé bunaithe ar an dréacht-Mholadh maidir le Comhrac na Trádála neamhdhleathaí: Feabhas a chur ar an Trédhearcacht i gCriosanna Saorthrádála, atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo.
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the OECD Public Governance Committee and within the OECD Council with regard to enhancing transparency in free trade zones shall be based on the draft Recommendation on Countering Illicit Trade: Enhancing Transparency in Free Trade Zones, attached to this Decision.
Féadfaidh ionadaithe an Aontais i gCoiste Rialachais Phoiblí ECFE agus i gComhairle ECFE comhaontú le mionathruithe ar an dréacht-Mholadh gan cinneadh eile ón gComhairle.
Minor changes to the draft Recommendation may be agreed to by the representatives of the Union in the OECD Public Governance Committee and in the OECD Council without further decision of the Council.
An seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais laistigh den Chomhairle Comhlachais a cuireadh ar bun leis an gComhaontú Eora-Mheánmhara lena mbunaítear Comhlachas idir na Comhphobail Eorpacha agus a mBallstáit, de pháirt, agus Poblacht Arabach na hÉigipte, den pháirt eile, a mhéid a bhaineann le síneadh a chur le bailíocht Thosaíochtaí Comhpháirtíochta an Aontais Eorpaigh agus na hÉigipte go dtí go nglacfaidh an Chomhairle Comhlachais Tosaíochtaí Comhpháirtíochta nua atá tugtha cothrom le dáta, beidh sé bunaithe ar an dréacht-Mholadh ón gComhairle Comhlachais.
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Association Council set up by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, as regards the extension of the validity of the EU-Egypt Partnership Priorities until new updated Partnership Priorities are adopted by the Association Council, shall be based on the draft Recommendation of the Association Council.
Maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa Chomhairle um Chomhar a bunaíodh leis an gComhaontú Comhpháirtíochta agus Comhair idir na Comhphobail Eorpacha agus a mBallstáit, de pháirt, agus Poblacht na hAsarbaiseáine, den pháirt eile, a mhéid a bhaineann le moladh a ghlacadh maidir le síneadh a chur le Tosaíochtaí Comhpháirtíochta AE-na hAsarbaiseáine go dtí 2024, beidh an seasamh sin bunaithe ar an dréachtmholadh ón gComhairle um Chomhar.
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Cooperation Council established by the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, of the other part as regards the adoption of a Recommendation on the extension of the EU-Azerbaijan Partnership Priorities until 2024 shall be based on the draft Recommendation of the Cooperation Council.
Chun na críche sin, scaipfidh Cathaoirleach na Comhairle Comhpháirtíochta an dréachtchinneadh nó an dréachtmholadh i scríbhinn ar ionadaithe na bPáirtithe i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 7, laistigh den teorainn ama 21 lá féilire.
For this purpose, the draft decision or draft recommendation shall be circulated in writing by the Chair of the Partnership Council to the representatives of the Parties in accordance with Article 7, with a time limit of 21 calendar days.
Maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais sa Chomhairle Comhlachais arna bhunú leis an gComhaontú Comhlachais idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach agus a mBallstáit, de pháirt, agus an tSeoirsia, den pháirt eile, a mhéid a bhaineann le Clár Oibre Comhlachais AE-an tSeoirsia 2021-2027, beidh sé bunaithe ar an dréachtmholadh ón gComhairle Comhlachais atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo.
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the EU-Georgia Association Agenda 2021-2027, shall be based on the draft Recommendation of the Association Council attached to this Decision.
Ina theannta sin, fuair an Coimisiún aighneachtaí ó pháirtithe leasmhara mar fhreagra ar ghlaonna ar fhaisnéis i ndáil leis na tionchair eacnamaíocha, shóisialta, shláinte agus chomhshaoil a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann (costais agus sochair) dá gcuimseofaí in Iarscríbhinn XIV a ghabhann le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1907/2006 na substaintí arna moladh ag an nGníomhaireacht sa dréachtmholadh uaithi.
In addition, the Commission received submissions from interested parties to calls for information on the possible economic, social, health and environmental impacts (costs and benefits) of the inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the substances proposed by the Agency in its draft recommendation.
An seasamh atá le glacadh thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh le linn an naoú cruinniú de Chomhairle Comhlachais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus na hÉigipte, beidh sé bunaithe ar an dréachtmholadh ó Chomhairle Comhlachais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus na hÉigipte atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo.
The position to be taken on behalf of the Union during the ninth meeting of the EU-Egypt Association Council shall be based on the draft recommendation of the EU-Egypt Association Council attached to this Decision.
Dá bhrí sin, ba cheart seasamh an Aontais sa Chomhairle Comhlachais, maidir le Chlár Oibre Comhlachais AE-Poblacht na Moldóive 2021-2027 a ghlacadh, a bheith bunaithe ar an dréachtmholadh ón gComhairle Comhlachas,
The position of the Union within the Association Council on the adoption of the EU-Republic of Moldova Association Agenda for 2021-2027 should therefore be based on the draft recommendation of the Association Council,
Maidir leis an seasamh atá le glacadh, thar ceann an Aontais Eorpaigh, sa Chomhairle Comhlachais a bunaíodh leis an gComhaontú Comhlachais idir an tAontas Eorpach agus an Comhphobal Eorpach do Fhuinneamh Adamhach agus a mBallstáit, de pháirt, agus Poblacht na Moldóive, den pháirt eile, maidir le Clár Oibre Comhlachais AE-Poblacht na Moldóive 2021-2027 a ghlacadh, beidh sé bunaithe ar an dréachtmholadh ón gComhairle Comhlachais atá i gceangal leis an gCinneadh seo.
The position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the EU-Republic of Moldova Association Agenda for 2021-2027 shall be based on the draft recommendation of the Association Council attached to this Decision.
Rachaidh an Coimisiún i mbun comhairle leis an mBord Stiúrtha maidir leis an dréachtmholadh arna sholáthar ag an gCoimisiún de bhun Airteagal 3(2), go háirithe faoi cé acu a chuireann nó nach gcuireann na ceannacháin gháis ábhartha nó na tairisceana le haghaidh gás a cheannach le slándáil an tsoláthair san Aontas agus cé acu atá nó nach bhfuil siad comhoiriúnach le prionsabal na dlúthpháirtíochta fuinnimh.
The Commission shall consult the ad hoc Steering Board on the draft recommendation provided by the Commission pursuant to Article 3(2), in particular as to whether the relevant gas purchases or a tender for the purchase of gas enhance security of supply in the Union and are compatible with the principle of energy solidarity.
An fhaisnéis a thíolaic an Rúnaíocht (páipéar tionscanta) a thabhairt dá haire agus a mheabhrú go gcumhdaítear an t-ábhar, i gcás an Aontais, le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 910/2014 maidir le ríomh-shainaitheantas agus seirbhísí iontaoibhe le haghaidh ríomh-idirbheart sa mhargadh inmheánach; Tacú le dréachtmholadh a ullmhú, de rogha Rúnaíocht OTIF, maidir le síniú leictreonach a úsáid i gcumarsáid oifigiúil idir OTIF agus a Bhallstáit, lena bhreithniú agus lena ghlacadh ag an gcéad seisiún eile den Choiste ad hoc; Maidir le prionsabail ghinearálta, ba cheart leibhéal éagsúil taithí Bhallstáit OTIF le ríomhshínithe a mheas, agus dá bhrí sin is cosúil gurb iomchuí go gcumhdaítear leis an moladh, ag an gcéad chéim, cumarsáid ‘simplí’ amháin.
Take note of the information presented by the Secretariat (inception paper) and recall that, for the EU, the matter is covered by the Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market; Support the preparation of a draft recommendation, preferably by the OTIF Secretariat, on the use of electronic signature in official communications between OTIF and its members, for consideration and possible adoption at the next session of the ad hoc Committee; As regards general principles, the different level of experience of OTIF members with electronic signatures should be considered, and therefore it appears appropriate that the recommendation, in a first phase, covers ‘simple’ communications only.
Ag tabhairt dá haire, agus é ina ábhar imní di, gur chinn an Chúirt ina Tuarascáil Speisialta Uimh. 13/2021 dar teideal ‘Tá iarrachtaí an Aontais chun sciúradh airgid a chomhrac san earnáil baincéireachta ilroinnte agus níl an cur chun feidhme leordhóthanach’, go ndearna foireann an Údaráis imscrúduithe críochnúla ar sháruithe a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann ar dhlí an Aontais, ach tháinig an Chúirt ar fhianaise i scríbhinn maidir le hiarrachtaí chun brústocaireacht a dhéanamh ar chomhaltaí den phainéal le linn na tréimhse ina raibh an painéal ag plé moladh féideartha; ag tabhairt dá haire freisin gur dhiúltaigh an bord maoirseoirí don dréachtmholadh sa deireadh; á athdhearbhú a hiarrata ar an Údarás na rialacha a threisiú chun neamhspleáchas chomhaltaí an phainéil a ráthú le linn a bpléití agus tuarascáil a thabhairt don údarás um urscaoileadh maidir leis na gníomhaíochtaí a rinneadh i ndáil leis an ábhar sin;
Notes with concern that in the Court’s Special Report No 13/2021 ‘EU efforts to fight money laundering in the banking sector are fragmented and implementation is insufficient’, the Court found that Authority’s staff carried out thorough investigations of potential breaches of Union law, but the Court found written evidence of attempts to lobby panel members during the period when the panel was deliberating on a potential recommendation; also notes that in the end the board of supervisors rejected the draft recommendation; reiterates its call on the Authority to reinforce the rules to guarantee the independence of panel members during their deliberations and report to the discharge authority on the actions taken on this matter;