#707282
neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna agus imeachtaí breithiúnacha a chosaint;
the protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings;
neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna agus imeachtaí breithiúnacha a chosaint;
the protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings;
Ní dhéanfaidh feidhmeanna eatramhacha difear do neamhspleáchas breithiúnach.
41. Interim functions not to affect judicial independence.
Ní dhéanfaidh feidhmeanna eatramhacha difear do neamhspleáchas breithiúnach.
Interim functions not to affect judicial independence.
neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna agus imeachtaí breithiúnacha a chosaint;
the protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings;
neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna agus imeachtaí breithiúnacha a chosaint;
the protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings;
Tá imní fós ann maidir le neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna.
Concerns regarding judicial independence persist.
Feabhas a chur ar an timpeallacht infheistíochta, go háirithe trí neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a chosaint.
Enhance the investment climate, in particular by safeguarding judicial independence.
Maidir le neamhspleáchas breithiúnach, níor tuairiscíodh aon easnaimh shistéamacha.
As regards judicial independence, no systemic deficiencies have been reported.
Níor tuairiscíodh aon easnamh sistéamach i neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna ().
No systemic deficiencies in judicial independence have been reported ().
Feabhas a chur ar an timpeallacht infheistíochta trí neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a chosaint.
Enhance the investment climate, including by safeguarding judicial independence.
Neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna a mheastar a bheith ann agus éifeachtacht na cosanta infheistíochta
Perceived judicial independence and effectiveness of investment protection
Achoimre maidir le neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna
Summary on judicial independence
Is gné bhunúsach de chóras ceartais éifeachtach é neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna.
Judicial independence is a fundamental element of an effective justice system.
Taispeántar treochtaí i Scórchlár 2023 i mbraistintí an phobail i gcoitinne agus na gcuideachtaí ar neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna.
The 2023 Scoreboard shows trends in the general public's and companies' perceptions of judicial independence.
I dteannta leis na táscairí um neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna a mheastar a bheith ann a thagann ó fhoinsí éagsúla, cuirtear roinnt táscairí i láthair sa Scórchlár ar an gcaoi a n-eagraítear córais cheartais le cosaint a thabhairt do neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna i gcineálacha áirithe cásanna ina bhféadfadh an neamhspleáchas a bheith i mbaol ().
In addition to indicators on perceived judicial independence from various sources, the Scoreboard presents a number of indicators on how justice systems are organised to protect judicial independence in certain types of situations where independence could be at risk ().
Gan dochar do neamhspleáchas breithiúnach ná d'aon difríochtaí in eagrú na mbreithiúna ar fud an Aontais, áiritheoidh na Ballstáit an méid seo a leanas:
Without prejudice to judicial independence and to any differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Union, Member States shall ensure that:
Chun neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna a choimeád go hiomlán, níor cheart an tarchur sin a dhéanamh ach go dtí go gcinnfear na himeachtaí breithiúnacha ábhartha go críochnaitheach agus go dtí go gcuirfear cinneadh críochnaitheach na cúirte ar fáil don phobal.
In order to fully maintain judicial independence, such transmission should take place only after the relevant judicial proceedings have been finally determined and the final court decision has become public.
Tá neamhspleáchas agus neamhchlaontacht na mbreithiúna ina mbunchuid den cheart chun triail chóir a fháil agus tá siad lárnach le haghaidh luachanna Eorpacha a chosaint.
Judicial independence and impartiality form part of the essence of the right to a fair trial and are key for the protection of European values.
An creat frith-éillithe a threisiú, lena n-áirítear trí fheabhas a chur ar iarrachtaí ionchúisitheacha agus ar rochtain ar fhaisnéis phoiblí, agus trí neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a neartú.
Reinforce the anti-corruption framework, including by improving prosecutorial efforts and access to public information, and strengthen judicial independence.
Tá dúshláin roimh an Ungáir i réimsí inter alia amhail an t-éilliú a rialú, an neamhspleáchas breithiúnach agus cáilíocht na cinnteoireachta.
Hungary inter alia faces challenges in areas such as controlling corruption, judicial independence and the quality of decision-making.
Cuirtear táscairí áirithe i láthair i Scórchlár Ceartais AE maidir le saincheisteanna áirithe atá ábhartha nuair a dhéantar measúnú ar an gcaoi a n-eagraítear córais cheartais chun coimirce a thabhairt do neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna.
The EU Justice Scoreboard presents certain indicators on issues that are relevant when assessing how justice systems are organised to safeguard judicial independence.
Is fíor-riachtanach freisin é beartais agus cleachtais a chur chun feidhme chun ionracas a chur chun cinn, agus éilliú a chosc laistigh de na breithiúna chun neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a ráthú.
Implementing policies and practices to promote integrity and prevent corruption within the judiciary are also essential to guarantee judicial independence.
Ar an gcúis sin, ba cheart go ndéanfaí an smacht reachta a chaomhnú le haon athchóiriú ar an gceartas, agus go gcomhlíonfadh sé aon chaighdeáin Eorpacha um neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna.
For this reason, any justice reform should uphold the rule of law and comply with European standards on judicial independence.
Bhí dhá Bhallstát ann (PL agus HU) dá ndearnadh moltaí tírshonracha in 2022 maidir le neamhspleáchas breithiúnach.
In 2022, there were two Member States (PL and HU) with country specific recommendations related to judicial independence.
Sa deireadh thiar, éilíonn cosaint éifeachtach neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna freisin, seachas cibé norm is gá, gurb ann do chultúr an ionracais agus na neamhchlaontachta, atá i gcoiteann i measc na mbreithiúna agus a urramaíonn an tsochaí i gcoitinne.
Ultimately, the effective protection of judicial independence also requires, beyond whatever necessary norms, a culture of integrity and impartiality shared by magistrates and respected by the wider society.
De bharr phrionsabal an neamhspleáchais bhreithiúnaigh, ní féidir ceanglais shonracha a fhorchur ar na córais bhreithiúnacha maidir leis an gcaoi a ndéantar cinntí agus ciontuithe seachas an méid dá bhforáiltear sa reachtaíocht a bhfuil na cinntí agus na ciontuithe sin bunaithe uirthi.
Due to the principle of judicial independence, it is not possible to impose upon the judicial systems specific requirements on how decisions and convictions are made other than what is provided for in the legislation upon which those decisions and convictions are based.
fáil agus acmhainneacht foirne i dtéarmaí aistriúcháin agus ateangaireachta chomh maith le hacmhainneacht foirne chun cásanna tearmainn a láimhseáil agus a bhainistiú go héifeachtúil, lena n-áirítear achomhairc a láimhseáil, gan dochar do neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna agus le lán-urraim d’eagrú na breithiúnachta i ngach Ballstát;
the availability and capacity of staff in terms of translation and interpretation and the capacity of staff to handle and manage asylum cases efficiently, including handling appeals, without prejudice to judicial independence and with full respect for the organisation of the judiciary of each Member State;
Sa Pholainn, tá an smacht reachta ag dul in olcas, agus is cúis mhór imní i gcónaí é neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna, mar thoradh ar roinnt rialuithe ó Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh agus ón gCúirt Eorpach um Chearta an Duine.
In Poland, the rule of law has deteriorated, and judicial independence remains a serious concern, as follows from several rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights.
Leis na bearta breise a mholtar sa phlean téarnaimh agus athléimneachta chun feabhas a chur ar an gcóras ceartais, ar sholáthar poiblí agus ar an gcomhrac i gcoinne sciúradh airgid, d’fhéadfaí aghaidh a thabhairt ar go leor de na dúshláin bhunúsacha, má ghlactar agus má chuirtear chun feidhme iad i gcomhréir le ceanglais dhlí an Aontais maidir le coimircí cuí agus neamhspleáchas breithiúnach agus le rannpháirtíocht chuí na ngeallsealbhóirí.
Additional measures proposed in the recovery and resilience plan to improve the justice system, public procurement and the fight against money laundering have the potential to address many of the underlying challenges, if adopted and implemented in line with Union law requirements on proper safeguards and judicial independence and with due involvement of stakeholders.
Chuir an Coimisiún san áireamh go háirithe an dul chun cinn atá déanta ag an mBulgáir ó dháta a haontachais maidir lena creat bunreachtúil agus reachtach a leasú chun coimircí do neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a fheabhsú, chomh maith le trédhearcacht agus éifeachtúlacht an phróisis bhreithiúnaigh.
The Commission notably took account of the progress made by Bulgaria since its accession in amending its constitutional and legislative framework to improve safeguards for judicial independence, as well as the transparency and the efficiency of the judicial process.
Chun an plean téarnaimh agus athléimneachta a chur chun feidhme go pras agus go rianúil, bheadh gá le 27 ngarsprioc a chomhlíonadh a bhaineann le neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a neartú agus cosaint leasanna airgeadais an Aontais a chosaint.
A swift and steady implementation of the recovery and resilience plan would require the fulfilment of 27 milestones related to strengthening judicial independence and safeguarding the protection of the financial interests of the Union.
Na garspriocanna agus na spriocanna is gá a bhaineann le neamhspleáchas breithiúnach a neartú agus cosaint leasanna airgeadais an Aontais a choimirciú a chomhlíonadh go práinneach chun gur féidir a plean téarnaimh agus athléimneachta a chur chun feidhme go pras agus go rianúil.
Urgently fulfil the required milestones and targets related to strengthening judicial independence and safeguarding the protection of the financial interests of the Union in order to allow for a swift and steady implementation of its recovery and resilience plan.
I gcás DK, IE, HU, agus PT, tagann sonraí ó cheistneoir 2021 maidir le neamhspleáchas breithiúnach, agus níl aon fhaisnéis ann faoi chumhachtaí ionchasacha na Comhairle sin maidir le meastóireacht a dhéanamh ar fheidhmiú na gcúirteanna, maidir le gearáin ó úsáideoirí cúirte a phróiseáil, agus maidir le cinneadh a dhéanamh maidir le líon na bpost breithiúnach i ngach cúirt.
For DK, IE, HU, and PT, data are from the 2021 judicial independence questionnaire, and there is no information on these Councils’ potential powers of evaluation of the functioning of the courts, of processing complaints from court users, and of deciding on number of judicial posts in each court.
‘Lawyers play an important role in protecting the rule of law and judicial independence, while respecting the separation of powers and fundamental rights.’ [‘Feidhmíonn dlíodóirí ról tábhachtach um chosaint an smachta reachta agus neamhspleáchas na mbreithiúna, agus urraim á léiriú do scaradh cumhachta agus cearta bunúsacha.’], ‘Access to a lawyer and rule of law’ [Rochtain ar dhlíodóir agus an smacht reachta], plépháipéar na hUachtaránachta le haghaidh chruinniú na Comhairle Ceartais agus Gnóthaí Baile an 3 agus 4 Márta 2022:
‘Lawyers play an important role in protecting the rule of law and judicial independence, while respecting the separation of powers and fundamental rights.’, ‘Access to a lawyer and rule of law’, Presidency discussion paper for the meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 3 and 4 March 2022:
Cé nár breithníodh laghdú sealadach ar luach saothair i gcomhthéacs bearta déine de shárú ar an bhforáil seo, tá sé ráite ag Cúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh gur ráthaíocht bhunriachtanach ar neamhspleáchas breithiúnach é leibhéal luacha saothair a fhaigheann comhaltaí na mbreithiúna agus tábhacht na bhfeidhmeanna a chuirtear i gcrích () .
While temporary reduction in remuneration in the context of austerity measures has not been considered in violation of this provision, the European Court of Justice has stated that the receipt by members of the judiciary of a level of remuneration conmensurate with the importance of the functions carried out constitutes an essential guarantee of judicial independence ().
An neamhspleáchas breithiúnach, atá ina chuid dhílis de chúram na cinnteoireachta breithiúnaí, is ceanglas é i ndlí an Aontais a eascraíonn as prionsabal na cosanta breithiúnaí éifeachtaí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 19 CAE, agus as an gceart ar leigheas éifeachtach a fháil os comhair cúirte nó binse a dhaingnítear in Airteagal 47 den Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais ().
Judicial independence, which is integral to the task of judicial decision-making, is an EU law requirement stemming from the principle of effective judicial protection referred to in Article 19 TEU, and from the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU ().
Leis an neamhspleáchas breithiúnach, ráthaítear go dtabharfar cosaint do gach ceart a dhíorthaíonn daoine aonair ó dhlí an Aontais, agus go dtabharfar coimirce do na luachanna is coiteann do na Ballstáit a leagtar amach in Airteagal 2 CAE, go háirithe luach an smachta reachta ().
Judicial independence guarantees that all the rights that individuals derive from EU law will be protected and that the values common to the Member States set out in Article 2 TEU, in particular the value of the rule of law, will be safeguarded ().
Cás C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, mír 45, Like the protection against removal from office of the members of the body concerned (see, in particular, judgment of 19 September 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, EU:C:2006:587, paragraph 51), the receipt by those members of a level of remuneration commensurate with the importance of the functions they carry out constitutes a guarantee essential to judicial independence [Amhail an chosaint do chomhaltaí an chomhlachta lena mbaineann in aghaidh a gcur as oifig (féach, go háirithe, breithiúnas an 19 Meán Fómhair 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, EU:C:2006:587, mír 51), ráthaíocht fhíor-riachtanach don neamhspleáchas breithiúnas is ea na comhaltaí sin a bheith ag fáil leibhéal luacha saothair atá ar cóimhéid le tábhacht na bhfeidhmeanna a dhéanann siad].
Case C-64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, para. 45, “ Like the protection against removal from office of the members of the body concerned (see, in particular, judgment of 19 September 2006, Wilson, C-506/04, EU:C:2006:587, paragraph 51), the receipt by those members of a level of remuneration commensurate with the importance of the functions they carry out constitutes a guarantee essential to judicial independence.”
á chur in iúl go dtuigtear di gur baol do neamhspleáchas breithiúnach é cur i bhfeidhm Rialacha Cur Chun Feidhme na Rialachán Foirne ginearálta maidir le ITEnna, ach, faoin nós imeachta a leagtar amach in Airteagal 110 de na Rialacháin Foirne, agus gan an Coimisiún a bhailíochtú roimh ré, nach lamháiltear le stádas OIPE rialacha malartacha cur chun feidhme a ghlacadh maidir le ITEnna; á mheabhrú gurb é OIPE an t-aon institiúid de chuid an Aontais a fhostaíonn ionchúisitheoirí agus go bhfuil a neamhspleáchas ríthábhachtach do dhea-fheidhmiú na hoifige ionchúisimh; á iarraidh ar an gCoimisiún aghaidh a thabhairt ar an tsaincheist sin agus an tsolúbthacht is gá a áirithiú laistigh den chreat dlíthiúil chun freastal go hiomlán ar stádas speisialta na n-ionchúisitheoirí mar fhoireann OIPE á chreidiúint go dtugann an staid sin breithnithe breise le tacú tuilleadh le Rialachán (AE) 2017/1939 agus stádas OIPE a athbhreithniu;
Understands that the application of the general Staff Regulation’s Implementing Rules with regard to EDPs represents a risk to judicial independence, but, under the procedure set out in article 110 of the Staff Regulations, and without the prior validation of the Commission, the status of the EPPO does not allow for the adoption of alternative implementing rules for EDPs; recalls that the EPPO is the only Union institution employing prosecutors and that their independence is paramount to the good functioning of the prosecution office; calls on the Commission to address this issue and to ensure the necessary flexibility within the legal framework in order to fully accommodate the special status of prosecutors as EPPO staff; believes that this situation brings additional considerations to further support a revision of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 and the EPPO status;