Chun folús dlíthiúil a sheachaint, ba cheart feidhm chúlghabhálach a bheith ag an Rialachán seo ó dháta chur i bhfeidhm Rialachán (AE) 2018/848,
In order to avoid a legal vacuum, this Regulation should apply retroactively from the date of application of Regulation (EU) 2018/848,
Mar sin féin, le soiléire dhlíthiúil a áirithiú agus le folús dlíthiúil a sheachaint, ní cheart don aisghairm teacht i bhfeidhm ar an gcéad dul síos ach amháin nuair a bheidh na gníomhartha ábhartha tarmligthe agus cur chun feidhme glactha de bhun an Rialacháin seo.
However, to ensure legal clarity and avoid a legal vacuum, the repeal should in the first place take effect only when the relevant delegated and implementing acts are adopted pursuant to this Regulation.
Chun folús dlíthiúil a sheachaint mar gheall ar Threoir 91/692/CEE a aisghairm, is gá tagairt don nós imeachta dá dtagraítear i dTreoir 86/278/CEE a chur in ionad na tagartha do Threoir 91/692/CEE.
In order to avoid a legal vacuum due to the repeal of Directive 91/692/EEC, it is necessary to replace the reference to Directive 91/692/EEC with a reference to the procedure referred to in Directive 86/278/EEC.
Ag cur san áireamh go bhfuil athbhreithniú le déanamh ar Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2017/962 faoin 31 Nollaig 2020 ar a dhéanaí, ba cheart an Rialachán seo a theacht i bhfeidhm mar ábhar práinne chun aon fholús dlíthiúil atá ann a íoslaghdú.
Taking into account that Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/962 is to be reviewed by 31 December 2020 at the latest, this Regulation should enter into force as a matter of urgency in order to minimise any legal vacuum.
á aithint nach bhfuil feidhm ag na rialacha maidir le cásanna a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann maidir le ‘doras imrothlach’ agus an riosca coinbhleachtaí leasa a bhaineann leo maidir le comhaltaí de bhoird gníomhaireachtaí, coistí eolaíocha, grúpaí saineolaithe agus comhlachtaí comhchosúla eile; ag tabhairt dá haire i dtuarascáil na Cúirte nach ndearna ach ceithre ghníomhaireacht measúnú, le linn na tréimhse iniúchta (2019-2021), ar aon chásanna a bhain le comhaltaí dá mboird, a ghlac le post nua nó le gníomhaíocht sheachtrach; á chur in iúl gur saoth léi nach ndearnadh measúnú ach ar 25 chás (i.e. 3,8 %) as 659 imeacht a bhain le comhaltaí de bhoird na ngníomhaireachtaí; ag moladh ÚBE, ÚEÁPC, an Gníomhaireacht Iarnróid an Aontais Eorpaigh (EIT), EMA, ESMA, Europol agus FRA) as forálacha sonracha a bheith i bhfeidhm lena gcumhdaítear an riosca go mbeadh ‘doras imrothlach’ ann i ndáil le comhaltaí dá mbord, in ainneoin an fholúis dhlíthiúil atá ann cheana;
Acknowledges that the rules on handling potential ‘revolving door’ situations and the associated risk of conflicts of interest do not apply to the members of agencies’ boards, scientific committees, expert groups and other similar bodies; notes from the Court’s report that during the audited period (2019-2021), only four agencies assessed any cases related to members of their boards taking up a new job or an outside activity; deplores that only 25 cases (i.e. 3,8 %) out of 659 departures related to members of agencies’ boards were assessed; commends EBA, EIOPA, the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), EMA, ESMA, Europol and FRA) for having specific provisions in place covering the risk of ‘revolving door’ situations in relation to members of their boards, despite the existing legal vacuum;