Níor cheart don údarás réitigh leas a bhaint as cumhacht an fhorfheidhmithe mhoillithe ach amháin sa mhéid nach sáraítear an prionsabal gan creidiúnaí ar bith a bheith níos measa as i leith an gheallsealbhóra a bheidh faoi réir an fhorfheidhmithe mhoillithe.
The resolution authority should use this power of delayed enforcement only to the extent that the ‘no creditor worse off’ safeguard is not breached with respect to the stakeholder that will be subject to the delayed enforcement.
Agus méid agus foirm an chúitimh á measúnú aige, féadfaidh an t-údarás réitigh, mar shampla, fóntacht airgeadais an CPL, cáilíochtaí na n-ionstraimí atá ar fáil mar chúiteamh, agus an coimirce nach ceart go mbeadh creidiúnaí ar bith níos measa as a bhreithniú.
When assessing the amount and the form of compensation, the resolution authority can consider, for example, the financial soundness of the CCP, and the quality of instruments available for compensation and for meeting the ‘no creditor worse off’ safeguard.