#1859597
Cinneadh ón mBiúró an 12 Aibreán 1999 maidir le saoráidí arna ndeonú d’iarFheisirí Pharlaimint na hEorpa.
Bureau Decision of 12 April 1999 on facilities granted to former Members of the European Parliament.
Filter results
Collections
32 results in 15 documents
#2005127
I gcás cinneadh dearfach a fháil ón mBiúró, cuirfear na dréachtleasuithe isteach gan cheist mar leasuithe.
Upon a positive Bureau decision draft amendments will be automatically submitted as amendments.
#2005128
I gcás cinneadh diúltach a fháil ón mBiúró, bainfear na dréachtleasuithe as an gcóras gan cheist.
Upon a negative Bureau decision the draft amendments will be automatically removed from the system.
#2805817
I gcás cinneadh dearfach a fháil ón mBiúró, cuirfear na dréachtleasuithe isteach gan cheist mar leasuithe.
Upon a positive Bureau decision draft amendments will be automatically submitted as amendments.
#2805818
I gcás cinneadh diúltach a fháil ón mBiúró, bainfear na dréachtleasuithe as an gcóras gan cheist.
Upon a negative Bureau decision the draft amendments will be automatically removed from the system.
#3047008
Rialacha maidir le hÉisteachtaí Poiblí, Cinneadh ón mBiúró an 18 Meitheamh 2003.
Rules on Public Hearings, Bureau Decision of 18 June 2003.
#1883677
Leis an gCinneadh seo aisghairtear Cinneadh Uimh. 64/2003 ó Bhiúró Choiste na Réigiún an 11 Feabhra 2003 maidir le rochtain phoiblí ar dhoiciméid de chuid Choiste na Réigiún agus Cinneadh Uimh. 128/2003 ó Bhiúró Choiste na Réigiún an 17 Meitheamh 2003 maidir le rochtain phoiblí ar dhoiciméid de chuid Choiste na Réigiún tríd an gclár leictreonach doiciméad.
This Decision repeals Committee of the Regions Bureau Decision No 64/2003 of 11 February 2003 on public access to Committee of the Regions documents and Committee of the Regions Bureau Decision No 128/2003 of 17 June 2003 on public access to Committee of the Regions documents via the electronic document register.
#321502
ag féachaint d’Airteagal 20 den Chinneadh ón mBiúró an 28 Samhain 2001 maidir le rochtain phoiblí ar dhoiciméid na Parlaiminte [9],
having regard to Article 20 of the Bureau Decision of 28 November 2001 on public access to Parliament documents [9],
#513186
Ag féachaint don chinneadh ón mBiúró i ndáil leis an Údarás Ceapacháin a shocrú, arna leasú go deireanach an 26 Deireadh Fómhair 2004,
Having regard to the Bureau decision concerning the designation of the Appointing Authority, as last amended on 26 October 2004,
#1859596
Féach Cinneadh ón mBiúró an 12 Meán Fómhair 2016 maidir le cur chun feidhme an Chomhaontaithe Idirinstitiúidigh maidir leis an gClár Trédhearcachta
See Bureau Decision of 12 September 2016 on the implementation of the Inter-Institutional Agreement on the Transparency Register.
#1883601
ag féachaint do Chinneadh Uimh. 64/2003 ó Bhiúró Choiste na Réigiún an 11 Feabhra 2003 maidir le rochtain phoiblí ar dhoiciméid de chuid Choiste na Réigiún,
Having regard to Committee of the Regions Bureau Decision No 64/2003 of 11 February 2003 on public access to Committee of the Regions documents,
#1883602
ag féachaint do Chinneadh Uimh. 128/2003 ó Bhiúró Choiste na Réigiún an 17 Meitheamh 2003 maidir le rochtain phoiblí ar dhoiciméid de chuid Choiste na Réigiún tríd an gclár leictreonach doiciméad,
Having regard to Committee of the Regions Bureau Decision No 128/2003 of 17 June 2003 on public access to Committee of the Regions documents via the electronic document register,
#2005107
Mura n-aontaíonn coimisiún le cinneadh ón Uachtarán arna dhéanamh faoi Riail 42(1) agus (2), féadfaidh sé iarratas a chur isteach trína chathaoirleach le haghaidh cinneadh ón mBiúró.
If a commission does not agree with a decision of the President taken under Rule 42(1) and (2), it may via its chair submit an application for a Bureau decision.
#2218262
Cód dea-chleachtais maidir le fostú daoine faoi mhíchumas, arna ghlacadh le Cinneadh ó Bhiúró Pharlaimint na hEorpa an 22 Meitheamh 2005.
Code of good practice for the employment of people with disabilities, adopted by European Parliament Bureau Decision of 22 June 2005.
#2271113
I gcásanna a bhfuil údar cuí leo, féadfaidh cathaoirligh na ngrúpaí a mholadh go n-athrófaí méid an ghrúpa staidéir tar éis chinneadh an Bhiúró ina leith.
In duly justified cases, the presidents of the groups may propose that the size of the study group be modified subsequent to the bureau decision.
#2386233
ag féachaint do chinneadh ón mBiúró an 10 Nollaig 2018 maidir leis na Rialacha Inmheánacha maidir le cur chun feidhme bhuiséad Pharlaimint na hEorpa, agus go háirithe Airteagal 34 de,
having regard to the Bureau decision of 10 December 2018 on the Internal Rules on the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget, and in particular Article 34 thereof,
#2440973
Ina cinneadh ón mBiúró an 13 Eanáir 2020, tháinig Parlaimint na hEorpa ar chomhaontú maidir le spriocanna a leagan síos don chothromaíocht inscne i bpoist bainistíochta sinsearaí agus mheánbhainistíochta do 2024.
The European Parliament, in its Bureau decision of 13 January 2020, has agreed on setting targets for gender balance in senior and middle management positions for 2024.
#2450213
I gcásanna a bhfuil údar cuí leo, féadfaidh cathaoirligh na ngrúpaí a mholadh go n-athrófaí méid an ghrúpa staidéir tar éis chinneadh an Bhiúró ina leith.
In duly justified cases, the presidents of the groups may propose that the size of the study group be modified subsequent to the bureau decision.
#2625588
ag tabhairt le fios go ndearna roinnt comhaltaí den chiste agóid i gcoinne chinneadh an Bhiúró os comhair na Cúirte Breithiúnais; á chur i bhfáth sna breithiúnais uaithi an 15 Meán Fómhair 2021 i gcásanna uamtha T-720/19 go T-725/19, Richard Ashworth agus Daoine Eile v Parlaimint na hEorpa, gur chinn an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais nach raibh tionchar ag an gcinneadh atá á chonspóid ag an mBiúró ar chearta a fuarthas cheana féin agus gur dheimhnigh an Chúirt ina theannta sin inniúlacht an Bhiúró maidir le cinntí a ghlacadh lena ndírítear ar inbhuanaitheacht an chiste a fheabhsú; ag tabhairt dá haire gur chinn an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais freisin gur urramaíodh prionsabal na comhréireachta leis an gcinneadh ón mBiúró an 10 Nollaig 2018; ag tabhairt dá haire gur tugadh na breithiúnais an 15 Meán Fómhair 2021, agus go bhfuil scrúdú á dhéanamh ag an bParlaimint ar a n-impleachtaí d’fhonn tograí breise a chur faoi bhráid an Bhiúró chun feabhas a chur ar inbhuanaitheacht an chiste;
Points out that the Bureau’s decision was challenged before the Court of Justice by a number of members of the fund; stresses that in its judgements of 15 September 2021 in joined cases T-720/19 to T-725/19, Richard Ashworth and Others v Parliament, the Court of Justice concluded that already acquired rights were not impacted by the contested Bureau decision and that the Court of Justice further confirmed the Bureau’s competence to adopt decisions aiming to improve the sustainability of the fund; notes that the Court of Justice also concluded that the Bureau decision of 10 December 2018 respected the principle of proportionality; notes that the judgments were delivered on 15 September 2021, and that Parliament is in the process of examining their implications with a view to submitting additional proposals to improve the sustainability of the fund to the Bureau;
#2625702
Tá sé comhdhéanta den dara cuid de chistiú deiridh 2019 agus den chéad chuid de chistiú deiridh 2020 i gcomhréir leis an gCinneadh ón mBiúró an 14 Feabhra 2022.
Composed of second part of 2019 final funding and first part of 2020 final funding according to the Bureau Decision of 14 February 2022.
#2805798
Mura n-aontaíonn coimisiún le cinneadh ón Uachtarán arna dhéanamh faoi Riail 42(1) agus (2), féadfaidh sé iarratas a chur isteach trína chathaoirleach le haghaidh cinneadh ón mBiúró.
If a commission does not agree with a decision of the President taken under Rule 42(1) and (2), it may via its chair submit an application for a Bureau decision.
#2898461
ag féachaint do chinneadh ón mBiúró an 10 Nollaig 2018 maidir leis na Rialacha Inmheánacha maidir le cur chun feidhme bhuiséad Pharlaimint na hEorpa, agus go háirithe Airteagal 34 de,
having regard to the Bureau decision of 10 December 2018 on the Internal Rules on the implementation of the European Parliament’s budget, and in particular Article 34 thereof,
#3046922
á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di gurbh ionann easnamh achtúireach an Chiste Pinsin Deonaigh (VPF) an 31 Nollaig 2021 agus EUR 379 milliún (i gcomparáid le EUR 371.3 milliún an 31 Nollaig 2020); á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di go bhfuiltear ag súil leis an ídiú iomlán faoi dheireadh 2024 nó 2025 ar a dhéanaí agus idir an dá linn go leanfaidh VPF de shócmhainní a dhíol chun a oibleagáidí pinsin a chomhlíonadh, rud a chiallaíonn gur dócha go laghdófar an caipiteal atá fágtha; á mheabhrú an cinneadh ón mBiúró an 10 Nollaig 2018 lena méadaítear an aois scoir ó 63 bliana go 65 bliana agus lena dtugtar isteach tobhach 5 % ar íocaíochtaí pinsin do phinsinéirí amach anseo d’fhonn inbhuanaitheacht VPF a fheabhsú; ag tabhairt dá haire, ina breithiúnas an 15 Meán Fómhair 2021 i gcásanna T-720/19 go T-725/19, Ashworth agus Daoine Eile v Parlaimint na hEorpa, gur chinn an Chúirt Ghinearálta nach raibh tionchar ag an gcinneadh ón mBiúró an 10 Nollaig 2018 ar cuireadh go láidir ina choinne ar chearta a fuarthas cheana agus gur dheimhnigh sí inniúlacht an Bhiúró cinntí a ghlacadh arb é is aidhm dóibh inbhuanaitheacht an chiste a fheabhsú ar choinníoll go n-urramaíonn siad prionsabal na comhréireachta; ag tabhairt dá haire gur taisceadh achomharc os comhair na Cúirte Breithiúnais i gcoinne a breithiúnais an 15 Meán Fómhair 2021 agus, idir an dá linn, go bhfuil scrúdú á dhéanamh ag Biúró na Parlaiminte ar na himpleachtaí do thograí amach anseo do roghanna chun inbhuanaitheacht an chiste a fheabhsú agus dliteanas na Parlaiminte á laghdú ag an am céanna; ag tathant ar an Ardrúnaí, dá bhrí sin, bearta indéanta breise a mholadh don Bhiúró maidir le módúlachtaí an chiste a choigeartú;
Is concerned that the actuarial deficit of the Voluntary Pension Fund (VPF) on 31 December 2021 amounted to EUR 379 million (compared to EUR 371,3 million on 31 December 2020); is concerned that the complete exhaustion is expected by the end of 2024 or 2025 at the latest and that in the meantime the VPF continues to sell assets in order to meet its pension obligations, which probably means that the remaining capital is being reduced; recalls the Bureau decision of 10 December 2018 increasing the retirement age from 63 to 65 years and introducing a levy of 5 % to pension payments for future pensioners with a view to improving the VPF sustainability; notes that in its judgment of 15 September 2021 in Joined Cases T-720/19 to T-725/19, Ashworth and Others v Parliament, the General Court concluded that already acquired rights were not impacted by the contested Bureau decision of 10 December 2018 and confirmed the Bureau’s competence to adopt decisions aiming to improve the sustainability of the fund provided that they respect the principle of proportionality; notes that an appeal was lodged before the Court of Justice against its judgment of the 15 September 2021 and that in the meantime Parliament’s Bureau is in the process of examining the implications for future proposals for options to improve the sustainability of the fund while reducing Parliament`s liability; urges the Secretary-General therefore to propose further feasible measures to the Bureau on adjusting the modalities of the fund;
#3047009
Cruinniú den Bhiúró an 13 Márta 2023 (PE-9/BUR/PV/2023-03) agus cinneadh ón mBiúró 17/04/2023 PE 422.534/BUR)
Bureau Meeting of 13 March 2023 (PE-9/BUR/PV/2023-03) and Bureau decision 17/04/2023 (PE 422.534/BUR).
#619638
Ag féachaint don chinneadh ón mBiúró an 3 Bealtaine 2004 maidir le tarmligean chumhachtaí an údaráis cheapacháin agus an údaráis a chumhachtaítear chun conarthaí fostaíochta a thabhairt i gcrích (ÚCCTC), arna leasú is déanaí ag an mBiúró an 4 Bealtaine 2009,
Having regard to the Bureau decision of 3 May 2004 on delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), as last amended by the Bureau on 4 May 2009,
#2625474
ag tabhairt dá haire go bhfuil sé mar aidhm ag oifigigh na Parlaiminte i dtoscaireachtaí an Aontais nó i gcomhlachtaí eile caidreamh na Parlaiminte le heagraíochtaí réigiúnacha a neartú; ag athdhearbhú, áfach, gur cúis bhuartha di an cinneadh ón mBiúró an 11 Feabhra 2019 maidir le tacaíocht pharlaiminteach do Mhisean an Aontais Eorpaigh chuig ASEAN i Iacárta, do Thoscaireacht an Aontais Eorpaigh chuig an Aontas Afracach in Ādis Ābeba agus do Thoscaireacht an Aontais Eorpaigh chuig na Náisiúin Aontaithe i Nua-Eabhrac; á iarraidh go ndéanfaí anailís chríochnúil costais is tairbhe, a bheadh mar údar le haon chinneadh nua, go mbeadh táscairí intomhaiste ann chun feidhmíocht bhliantúil a mheasúnú, agus go gcoinneofaí an Coiste um Rialú Buiséadach de chuid na Parlaiminte ar an eolas;
Notes that the presence of Parliament’s officials in Union delegations or other bodies aims to strengthen Parliament’s relations with regional organisation; reiterates, however, the concern about the Bureau decision of 11 February 2019 regarding parliamentary support to the European Union Mission to ASEAN in Jakarta, the Delegation of the European Union to the African Union in Addis Ababa and the Delegation of the European Union to the United Nations in New York; calls for a thorough cost-benefit analysis to justify any new decision, measurable indicators to assess annual performance, and that Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control be kept informed;
#2625522
á thabhairt chun suntais go sonraítear i gCinneadh 2018 ón mBiúró maidir leis an liúntas ginearálta caiteachais go gcoinneoidh an Biúró an cinneadh sin go dtí deireadh 2022 agus go ndéanfaidh sé é a mheas ar bhonn na taithí a fuarthas le linn an 9ú téarma parlaiminteach;
Highlights the fact that the 2018 Bureau decision on the general expenditure allowance stipulates that the Bureau will maintain this decision until the end of 2022 and will evaluate it on the basis of the experience gained during the 9th parliamentary term;
#2625528
ag athdhearbhú a héilimh ar son APAnna go bhfaighidís an liúntas cothaithe céanna leis an bpearsanra reachtúil dá misin chun freastal ar na páirtseisiúin in Strasbourg; ag aithint go mbeadh gá leis na rialacha is infheidhme a athbhreithniú mar thoradh ar aon athrú ar an gcreat dlíthiúil, eadhon an cinneadh ón mBiúró an 2 Deireadh Fómhair 2017, agus dá bhrí sin, á threorú don Ard-Rúnaí an iarraidh seo ar chinneadh a chur faoi bhráid an Bhiúró;
Reiterates its demand for APAs to receive the same subsistence allowance as the statutory personnel for their missions to attend the part-sessions in Strasbourg; acknowledges that any change to the legal framework, namely the Bureau decision on 2 October 2017, would require a revision of the applicable rules and thus, instructs the Secretary-General to submit this request for decision to the Bureau;
#2625587
á mheabhrú gur chinn an Biúró, ag an gcruinniú a bhí aige an 10 Nollaig 2018, na rialacha is infheidhme maidir leis an scéim pinsean a mhodhnú tríd an aois scoir a ardú ó 63 bliana go 65 bliana agus trí thobhach 5 % a thabhairt isteach ar íocaíochtaí pinsin do phinsinéirí sa todhchaí d’fhonn a inbhuanaitheacht a fheabhsú, chun aghaidh a thabhairt ar fhadhb mhéadaitheach na leachtachta agus chun an t-easnamh achtúireach agus na hiarmhairtí diúltacha do cháiníocóirí an Aontais a laghdú; á mheabhrú nach bhfuil feidhm ag an gcinneadh ón mBiúró an 10 Nollaig 2018 ach amháin maidir le pinsin a bunaíodh tar éis an 1 Eanáir 2019, agus mar sin, nach ndéanann sé difear do thairbhithe a chuaigh ar scor roimh an dáta sin;
Recalls that, at its meeting of 10 December 2018, the Bureau decided to modify the rules applicable to the pension scheme by increasing the retirement age from 63 to 65 years and introducing a levy of 5 % to pension payments for future pensioners with a view to improving its sustainability, to addressing the increasing liquidity problem and to reducing the actuarial deficit and the negative consequences for Union taxpayers; recalls that the Bureau decision of 10 December 2018 applies only to pensions established after 1 January 2019, and that as such, it does not affect beneficiaries who retired before that date;
#3046797
á chur in iúl gur cúis bhuartha di an cinneadh ón mBiúró an 21 Samhain 2022, bunaithe ar thogra ón Ardrúnaí, maidir le Forálacha Ginearálta Cur Chun Feidhme lena dtugtar éifeacht d’Airteagal 27 de na Rialacháin Foirne; á áitiú a thábhachtaí atá sé cothromaíocht gheografach chóir a bhaint amach i measc fhoireann na Parlaiminte ar choinníoll go bhfuil na bearta “oiriúnach”, mar a cheanglaítear le hAirteagal 27, agus á chur i bhfáth nach mór do chomórtais prionsabail bhunúsacha a chumhdaítear sna Rialacháin Foirne agus sa Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha a urramú, amhail prionsabail an chomhionannais, an neamh-idirdhealaithe agus na comhréireachta; á mheabhrú thairis sin go luaitear in Airteagal 27 “nach mór údar maith a thabhairt maidir leis na bearta iomchuí sin agus nach mbunófar critéir earcaíochta choíche orthu cé is moite de chritéir a bheidh bunaithe ar thuillteanas”; á iarraidh go ndéanfaí na Forálacha Ginearálta Cur Chun Feidhme sin a tharchur láithreach chuig Seirbhís Dlí na Parlaiminte le haghaidh measúnú comhlíontachta;
Is concerned about the Bureau decision of 21 November 2022, based on the Secretary-General’s proposal on General Implementing Provisions, giving effect to Article 27 of the Staff Regulations; insists on the importance of achieving a fair geographical balance among Parliament’s staff provided that the measures are ‘appropriate’, as required by Article 27, and stresses that competitions must respect fundamental principles enshrined in the Staff Regulations and Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, such as the principles of equality, non-discrimination and proportionality; recalls furthermore that Article 27 states that ‘those appropriate measures must be justified and shall never result in recruitment criteria other than those based on merit’; calls for an immediate referral of the General Implementing Provisions to Parliament’s legal service for a compliance assessment;
#3046860
ag tabhairt dá haire go bhfuil sé mar aidhm ag oifigigh na Parlaiminte i láthair ag toscaireachtaí an Aontais nó i gcomhlachtaí eile caidreamh na Parlaiminte le heagraíochtaí idirnáisiúnta a neartú; á athdhearbhú, áfach, gur cúis imní di an cinneadh ón mBiúró an 11 Feabhra 2019 maidir le tacaíocht pharlaiminteach do Mhisean an Aontais Eorpaigh do ASEAN in Iacárta, do Thoscaireacht an Aontais Eorpaigh chuig an Aontas Afracach in Addis Ababa agus do Thoscaireacht an Aontais Eorpaigh chuig na Náisiúin Aontaithe i Nua-Eabhrac; ag tabhairt dá haire nár imscaradh aon fhoireann in 2020, agus gur tugadh beirt oifigeach ar iasacht chuig Nua-Eabhrac agus duine amháin chuig Addis Ababa in 2022; ag meabhrú do riarachán na Parlaiminte a tiomantas táscairí intomhaiste a bhunú chun measúnú a dhéanamh ar a bhfeidhmíocht bhliantúil; ag tarraingt aird ar an bhfíoras go bhfuil aonad curtha ar bun ag riarachán na Parlaiminte atá i gceannas ar an gcaidreamh le ASEAN agus go bhfuil sé molta aige an chuid is mó dá fhoireann a imscaradh in Iacárta, agus nach bhfuil ach comhaltaí sinsearacha foirne roghnaithe ag an riarachán don dá cheann scríbe eile; ag athdhearbhú a hiarrata go ndéanfaí próisis cheapacháin thrédhearcacha na foirne lena mbaineann agus an Coiste um Rialú Buiséadach i bParlaimint na hEorpa a choinneáil ar an eolas;
Notes that the presence of Parliament’s officials in Union delegations or other bodies aims to strengthen inter-parliamentary relations with international organisations; reiterates, however, the concern regarding the Bureau decision of 11 February 2019 regarding parliamentary support to the European Union Mission to ASEAN in Jakarta, the Delegation of the European Union to the African Union in Addis Ababa and the Delegation of the European Union to the United Nations in New York; notes that no staff were deployed in 2020, while two officials were seconded to New York and one to Addis Ababa in 2022; reminds Parliament’s administration of its commitment to establish measurable indicators to assess their annual performance; draws attention to the fact that Parliament’s administration has set up a unit in charge of relations with ASEAN and has proposed most of its staff to be deployed in Jakarta, while for the other two destinations the administration has simply selected senior members of staff; reiterates its call for transparent appointment processes of the staff involved and for Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control to be kept informed;
#3047014
á mheabhrú gur iarr an Pharlaimint, i rúin maidir le hurscaoileadh roimhe seo, go ndéanfaí athchóiriú ar an GEA chun caiteachas na cnapshuime sin a dhéanamh níos trédhearcaí agus níos cuntasaí; ag tabhairt dá haire an fógra ag cruinniú an Bhiúró an 7 Márta 2022 maidir le meitheal ad hoc den Bhiúró maidir le GEA a bhunú, a bhfuil sé de chúram uirthi meastóireacht a dhéanamh ar oibriú chinneadh ón mBiúró an 2 Iúil 2018 lena mbunaítear liosta speansas a d’fhéadfaí a íoc ó GEA ar bhonn na taithí a fuarthas le linn an 9ú téarma parlaiminteach; ag tabhairt faoi deara gur ghlac an Biúró, ag cruinniú an 17 Deireadh Fómhair 2022, sraith leasuithe ar IMMS lena soiléirítear na rialacha is infheidhme maidir le teidlíocht agus úsáid GEA agus bearta atá dírithe ar thrédhearcacht a mhéadú agus deimhneacht dhlíthiúil níos mó a sholáthar maidir le teideal chun an liúntais; á thabhairt chun suntais gur iarradh ar an Meitheal ad hoc aird chuí a thabhairt ar ghnéithe de thrédhearcacht, de chuntasacht agus de bhainistíocht fhónta airgeadais na gcistí a chuirtear ar fáil do na Feisirí, agus aird á tabhairt ar phrionsabal na saoirse agus neamhspleáchas an tsainordaithe pharlaimintigh agus ar an gcuspóir gan ualaí riaracháin nach bhfuil gá leo a chruthú d’Fheisirí, dá n-oifigí agus do sheirbhísí na Parlaiminte; á thabhairt chun suntais go bhfuil sé saorchead ag na Feisirí an úsáid a bhaineann siad as na cistí faoi GEA a dhoiciméadú, go mion nó de réir cineál costais, astu féin nó le tacaíocht ó iniúchóir seachtrach, agus an fhaisnéis sin a fhoilsiú go hiomlán nó go páirteach ar a leathanach ar líne ar shuíomh gréasáin na Parlaiminte i gcomhréir le mír 4 agus mír 5 de Rialacha Nós Imeachta Pharlaimint na hEorpa; á chur in iúl gur geal léi go ndéantar liosta simplithe de chineálacha costas a chomhtháthú in IMMS agus go nglactar freisin leasú lena soiléirítear an fhéidearthacht do na Feisirí GEA a úsáid i gcás go n-ídeofar lamháltais eile;
Recalls that in previous discharge resolutions Parliament requested a reform of the GEA to make the expenditure of this lump sum more transparent and accountable; notes the announcement at the Bureau meeting of 7 March 2022 regarding the setting up of a Bureau ad hoc working group on the GEA, which is tasked with evaluating the operation of the Bureau decision of 2 July 2018 establishing a list of expenses which may be defrayed from the GEA on the basis of the experience gained during the 9th parliamentary term; observes that the Bureau, at is meeting of 17 October 2022, adopted a set of amendments to the IMMS, clarifying the rules applicable to the entitlement and use of the GEA and measures aimed at increasing transparency and providing more legal certainty regarding the entitlement to the allowance; highlights, that the ad-hoc Working Group was asked to take duly into account aspects of transparency, accountability and sound financial management of funds made available to Members, bearing in mind the principle of freedom and independence of the parliamentary mandate and the objective to avoid creating unnecessary administrative burdens for Members, their offices and Parliament’s services; highlights, that Members are free to document their use of the funds under the GEA, in detail or by type of cost, on their own or with the support of an external auditor, and to have this information published in whole or in part on their online page on Parliament’s website in accordance with Rule 11, paragraphs 4 and 5, of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament; welcomes that a simplified list of types of costs is integrated into the IMMS and that an amendment clarifying the possibility for Members to use the GEA in case of exhaustion of other allowances is also adopted;