#2360894
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, an Bhrasaíl (‘CSN’)
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Brazil (‘CSN’).
Filter results
Collections
44 results in 5 documents
#2361188
Chun méid neamhshaofa agus réasúnta a bhunú le haghaidh SG&A agus brabúis, bhí an Coimisiún ag brath ar na sonraí airgeadais le haghaidh 2020 le haghaidh CSN 2020 atá i dTuarascáil Chomhtháite CSN 2020.
For establishing an undistorted and reasonable amount for SG&A and profit, the Commission relied on the financial data for 2020 for CSN contained in the CSN 2020 Integrated Report.
#2560537
Deimhníodh an méid sin i ráitis ó CSN le linn cros-seiceáil chianda.
This was confirmed by statements made by CSN during the RCC.
#2561179
Tar éis an fhoilsithe deiridh, rinne CSN agus CISA na maímh chéanna.
Following final disclosure, the same claims were made by CSN and CISA.
#2617966
A sn, Bsn agus Csn
A sn, Bsn and Csn
#3129330
Ba é an chúis a bhí leis sin, de réir CSN, go mbíonn praghsanna aistrithe níos ísle de ghnáth ná praghsanna an mhargaidh shaoir.
This was because according to CSN, transfer prices are generally lower that free market prices.
#3129332
Bunaithe ar mhodheolaíocht den sórt sin, mhaígh CSN go mbeadh dumpáil fós ann ach beagán níos ísle.
Based on such methodology, CSN claimed that there would still be dumping but slightly lower.
#3129333
Thug an Coimisiún dá aire nár thug CSN bunús leis an maíomh maidir leis an bpraghas aistrithe.
The Commission noted that CSN did not substantiate the claim regarding the transfer price.
#2560525
Mar a mhínigh CSN le linn an phróisis easnaimh agus le linn an CC, díolann ECCS den dara grád den sórt sin le custaiméirí ó thríú tír i mbulc trí nós imeachta atá cosúil le próiseas tairisceana beag, ina ndíoltar an táirge leis an tairgeoir is mó.
As explained by CSN during the deficiency process and the RCC, such second quality ECCS is sold by CSN to third country customers in bulk via a small tender-like procedure, where the product is sold to the highest bidder.
#2560538
Ós rud é (i) go raibh difríochtaí sa phraghas idir an chéad ghrád agus an dara grád neamhréireach agus corrach, (ii) níor léirigh siad an difríocht uile sa phraghas a luaigh CSN ina fhreagra ar an litir easnamh agus (iii) níor thug CSN aon fhianaise nua lenar léiríodh go raibh bunús lena maíomh, mheas an Coimisiún nár léiríodh aon luach margaidh réasúnach ar an difríocht mar a éilítear le hAirteagal 2(10)(a) agus níorbh fhéidir í a mheas.
Since (i) the price differences between first and second quality were inconsistent and erratic, (ii) they did not reflect the overall price difference mentioned by CSN in their deficiency letter reply and (iii) CSN did not provide any new evidence substantiating their claim, the Commission considered that no reasonable market value of the difference as required by Article 2(10)(a) had been demonstrated or could be estimated.
#3129789
Dúirt CSN freisin nach dtiocfadh méadú ar mhéideanna allmhairí HRF na Brasaíle mar gheall ar na coimircí cruach, agus nach bhféadfadh allmhairí ón mBrasaíl a bheith ina gcúis díobhála, toisc go raibh an dleacht iarmharach ón mBrasaíl faoi réir a bheith níos airde ná an dleacht frithdhumpála ad valorem reatha is infheidhme maidir le CSN.
CSN added that because of the steel safeguards, Brazilian HRF import volumes would not increase, and that imports from Brazil could not cause injury, as the residual duty Brazil was subject to was higher than the current ad valorem anti-dumping duty applicable to CSN.
#2361087
Iarradh ar pháirtithe leasmhara a mbarúlacha a thabhairt ar oiriúnacht na Brasaíle mar thír ionadaíoch agus ar SCN mar tháirgeoir sa tír ionadaíoch.
Interested parties were invited to comment on the appropriateness of Brazil as a representative country and of CSN as a producer in the representative country.
#2361088
Ní bhfuarthas aon bharúil ó pháirtithe leasmhara a d’fhill ar oiriúnacht na Brasaíle mar thír ionadaíoch agus ar CSN mar tháirgeoirí sa tír ionadaíoch
No comment were received from interested parties refuting the appropriateness of Brazil as a representative country and of CSN as a producer in the representative country
#2361196
Maidir leis na costais táirgeachta a suíodh mar a thuairiscítear san aithris roimhe seo, chuir an Coimisiún SG&A agus brabús CSN i bhfeidhm mar atá nótáilte in aithris (104).
To the costs of production established as described in the previous recital, the Commission applied SG&A and profit of CSN as noted in recital (104).
#2555135
Iarradh ar pháirtithe leasmhara a mbarúlacha a thabhairt ar oiriúnacht na Brasaíle mar thír ionadaíoch agus ar oiriúnacht na dtrí chuideachta (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, agus Usiminas) mar tháirgeoirí sa tír ionadaíoch.
Interested parties were invited to comment on the appropriateness of Brazil as a representative country and of the three companies (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, and Usiminas) as producers in the representative country.
#2555217
D’úsáid an Coimisiún sonraí airgeadais thrí chuideachta Bhrasaíleacha (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, agus Usiminas), ar táirgeoirí sa tír ionadaíoch iad, dá dtagraítear in aithris (90).
The Commission used the financial data of three Brazilian companies (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, and Usiminas), producers in the representative country, as referred to in recital 90.
#2555227
Cinneadh costais díola, ghinearálta agus riaracháin agus brabús bunaithe ar shonraí airgeadais thrí chuideachta Bhrasaíleacha (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, agus Usiminas), mar a chuirtear in iúl in aithris (111).
SG&A and profit were determined based on the financial data of three Brazilian companies (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, and Usiminas) as noted in recital 111.
#2560437
Ní bhfuarthas aon bharúil ó pháirtithe leasmhara a d’fhill ar oiriúnacht na Brasaíle mar thír ionadaíoch agus ar CSN mar tháirgeoirí sa tír ionadaíoch.
No comments were received from interested parties refuting the appropriateness of Brazil as a representative country and of CSN as a producer in the representative country.
#2560513
Tar éis an nochta shealadaigh, fuair an Coimisiún barúlacha i scríbhinn ón táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin comhoibríoch, CSN, maidir leis na torthaí sealadacha dumpála.
Following provisional disclosure, the Commission received written comments from the cooperating exporting producer, CSN, on the provisional dumping findings.
#2560519
Dá bhrí sin, d’iarr an CSN ar an gCoimisiún na difríochtaí maidir le cáilíocht a chur san áireamh ina ríomhanna dumpála, mar tá tionchar ag difríochtaí den sórt sin ar inchomparáideacht praghsanna.
CSN therefore requested the Commission to consider in its dumping calculations the differences in quality, as such differences impact price comparability.
#2560522
Seachas an iarraidh ar mheastachán a dhéanamh ar dhifríochtaí ó thaobh na cáilíochta de, níor chuir CSN aon fhaisnéis bhreise ná sonraí ar fáil tar éis an nochta shealadaigh.
Apart from the request to consider quality differences, no additional information or data was provided by CSN after provisional disclosure.
#2560527
Mheas an Coimisiún nach raibh aon mheastachán réasúnach ar luach margaidh na difríochta sin curtha ar fáil ag CSN.
The Commission considered that no reasonable estimate of the market value of the difference was provided by CSN.
#2560528
Mar fhreagairt ar cheann de cheisteanna an Choimisiúin le linn an phróisis easnaimh, luaigh CSN go mbíonn, de ghnáth, ECCS den dara grád céatadán éigin níos ísle ná ECCS den chéad ghrád.
In reply to one of the Commission’s questions during the deficiency process, CSN had mentioned that second quality ECCS is usually a certain percentage lower than first quality.
#2560814
Chuir CSN i dtábhacht gurbh amhlaidh, laistigh de Chomhaontú AE-Mercosur, go ndearna an Bhrasaíl gealltanais láidre maidir leis an bhforbairt inbhuanaithe, go hairithe maidir le caighdeáin agus comhaontuithe saothair iltaobhacha, comhaontuithe comhshaoil iltaobhacha, agus an trádáil agus an athrú aeráide.
CSN underlined that within the EU-Mercosur Agreement, Brazil made strong commitments regarding sustainable development, in particular regarding multilateral labour standards and agreements, multilateral environmental agreements, and trade and climate change.
#2561008
Tar éis an nochta shealadaigh, d’iarr CSN, Eviosys, Baosteel agus Aireacht Ghnóthaí Eachtracha na Gréige ar an gCoimisiún breithniú a dhéanamh ar chur i bhfeidhm praghais allmhairiúcháin íosta (“MIP”) in ionad dleachtanna ad valorem.
Following provisional disclosure, CSN, Eviosys, Baosteel and the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs requested the Commission to consider the application of a minimum import price (‘MIP’) instead of ad valorem duties.
#2561081
Thagair CISA agus CSN do mhéaduithe praghais na tréimhse tar éis an imscrúdaithe, don bhrú ar shlabhraí soláthair agus d’infhaighteacht theoranta ECCS agus a amhábhair de bharr forbairtí geopholaitiúla le déanaí.
CISA and CSN referred to the post-investigation period price increases, the pressure on supply chains and the limited availability of ECCS and its raw materials due to recent geopolitical developments.
#3129328
Ina mbarúlacha maidir leis an nochtadh deiridh, mhaígh CSN gur dócha go ndéanfaí rómheastachán ar a chorrlach dumpála arna ríomh ag an gCoimisiún.
In their comments to the final disclosure CSN claimed that its dumping margin as calculated by the Commission was likely to be overstated.
#3129790
Dá bhrí sin, d’áitigh CSN go bhfuil sé míréasúnta a mheas gur dócha go dtarlóidh díobháil arís mar gheall ar allmhairí ón mBrasaíl.
Hence, CSN argued that it is unreasonable to deem that injury is likely to recur because of imports from Brazil.
#2360944
Chuir sé in iúl freisin do pháirtithe leasmhara go leagfadh sé síos costais díolacháin, costais ghinearálta agus costais riaracháin agus na brabúis bunaithe ar fhaisnéis a bhí ar fáil go héasca don chuideachta CSN, an t-aon táirgeoir aitheanta ECCS sa Bhrasaíl.
It also informed interested parties that it would establish selling, general and administrative costs (‘SG&A’) and profits based on readily available information for the company CSN, the only known producer of ECCS in Brazil.
#2361081
Shainaithin an Coimisiún dhá chuideachta a raibh an chuma air gur táirgeoirí iad ar an táirge a bhí faoi imscrúdú agus a raibh brabús ag baint leo in 2020 (tréimhse a bhí ag forluí go páirteach le IP): Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN) ón mBrasaíl agus ó Ereğli Demir ve • elik Fabrikaları (Erdemir) ón Tuirc.
The Commission identified two companies that appeared to be producers of the product under investigation and that were profitable in 2020 (a period partially overlapping with the IP): Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN) from Brazil and Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları (Erdemir) from Turkey.
#2361083
Ina gcuid tuairimí ar an gCéad nóta, chuir páirtithe leasmhara in iúl go raibh sonraí airgeadais ar fáil, i gcás Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN), ní hamháin ar leibhéal an ghrúpa ach go háirithe don earnáil “déanamh cruach”.
In their comments on the First note, interested parties pointed out that, for Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (CSN), financial data were available not only at group level but also specifically for the “steel making” sector.
#2361086
I bhfianaise na mbreithnithe thuas, chuir an Coimisiún na páirtithe leasmhara ar an eolas leis an Dara Nóta go raibh sé beartaithe aige an Bhrasaíl a úsáid mar thír ionadaíoch iomchuí agus an chuideachta CSN a úsáid chun praghsanna nó tagarmharcanna neamhshaofa a aimsiú ar mhaithe leis an ngnáthluach a ríomh, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 2(6a)(a), an chéad fhleasc den bhun-Rialachán.
In light of the above considerations, the Commission informed the interested parties with the Second note that it intended to use Brazil as an appropriate representative country and the company CSN, in accordance with Article 2(6a)(a), first indent of the basic Regulation in order to source undistorted prices or benchmarks for the calculation of normal value.
#2555134
I bhfianaise na mbreithnithe thuas, chuir an Coimisiún na páirtithe leasmhara ar an eolas leis an Dara Nóta go raibh sé beartaithe aige an Bhrasaíl a úsáid mar thír ionadaíoch iomchuí agus trí chuideachta Bhrasaíleacha (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, agus Usiminas), i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 2(6a)(a), an chéad fhleasc den bhun-Rialachán chun praghsanna nó tagarmharcanna neamhshaofa a fhoinsiú chun gnáthluach a ríomh.
In the light of the above considerations, the Commission informed the interested parties with the Second Note that it intended to use Brazil as an appropriate representative country and three Brazilian companies (ArcelorMittal Brazil, CSN, and Usiminas), in accordance with Article 2(6a)(a), first ident of the basic Regulation in order to source undistorted prices or benchmarks for the calculation of normal value.
#2560319
Tar éis foilsiú na bhfíoras fíor-riachtanach agus na gceisteanna fíor-riachtanacha ar forchuireadh dleachtanna sealadacha frithdhumpála (“an nochta shealadaigh”) ar a mbonn, chuir Eurofer (gearánach), Eviosys (úsáideoir Aontais), CANPACK, mar ionadaí ar CANPACK an tSlóvaic s.r.o., Can-Pack Food and Industrial Packaging Sp. z o.o. agus Tapon France S.A.S. (úsáideoirí Aontais), Astir Vitogiannis Bros Single Member S.A. (“Astir Vitogiannis”) (Úsáideoir Aontais), Baosteel (táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin ón tSín), Jintai (táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin ón tSín), Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (“CSN”) (táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin ón mBrasaíl), Cumann Iarainn agus Cruach na Síne (“CISA”), Rialtas Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne (“Rialtas na Síne”) agus Rialtas na Brasaíle (“GOB”) aighneachtaí scríofa isteach lena léirítear a gcuid tuairimí ar na torthaí sealadacha laistigh den sprioc-am a fhoráiltear le hAirteagal 2(1) den Rialachán sealadach.
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which provisional anti-dumping duties were imposed (‘provisional disclosure’), Eurofer (complainant), Eviosys (Union user), CANPACK, representing CANPACK Slovakia s.r.o., Can-Pack Food and Industrial Packaging Sp. z o.o. and Tapon France S.A.S. (Union users), Astir Vitogiannis Bros Single Member S.A. (‘Astir Vitogiannis’) (Union user), Baosteel (exporting producer from China), Jintai (exporting producer from China), Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (‘CSN’) (exporting producer from Brazil), the China Iron and Steel Association (‘CISA’), the Government of the PRC (‘GOC’) and the Government of Brazil (‘GOB’) filed written submissions making their views known on the provisional findings within the deadline provided by Article 2(1) of the provisional Regulation.
#2560518
Tar éis an nochta shealadaigh, mhaígh an táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin CSN gur leag sé béim ina fhreagra ceistneora gur cheart don Choimisiún aghaidh a thabhairt ar shaincheisteanna cáilíochta, gur léirigh sé saincheisteanna den sórt sin ina sonraí díolachán onnmhairí agus intíre agus gur chuir sé tuilleadh léiriú breise ar fáil maidir leis sin le linn na RCCanna.
After provisional disclosure, the exporting producer CSN claimed that in its questionnaire reply it had emphasized that quality issues should be considered by the Commission, that it had indicated such issues in its domestic and export sales data and that it had provided further demonstration in this sense during the RCCs.
#2560520
Mheas an Coimisiún, cé gur chuir CSN faisnéis ar fáil maidir le difríochtaí ó thaobh na cáilíochta de maidir leis an táirge faoi imscrúdú, ní dhearna sé aon mhaíomh maidir le coigeartú ar an mbonn sin ina fhreagra ceistneora, ná le linn na gcros-seiceálacha cianda.
The Commission considered that, although CSN had indeed provided information regarding quality differences of the product under investigation, it had not made a claim for an adjustment on this basis in its questionnaire reply, nor during the RCC.
#2560813
Tar éis an nochta shealadaigh, d’áitigh CSN maidir leis an gcostas todhchaí EUR/tona [10-20)] a luaitear in aithris (228) den Rialachán sealadach, costas a chuirtear leis an bpraghas neamhdhíobhálach, gur chostas treallach, amhantrach a bhí ann lenar saobhadh an inchomparáideacht praghais idir díolacháin an Aontais agus na Brasaíle.
Following provisional disclosure, CSN submitted that the additional future cost of EUR/tonne [10-20] mentioned in recital (228) of the provisional Regulation, which is added to the non-injurious price, was arbitrary, speculative and distorted the price comparability between Union and Brazilian sales.
#2560815
Dar le CSN, tá cosaint á tairiscint ag an gCoimisiún do tháirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais de bhreis ar an méid is gá chun an dumpáil dhíobhálach a bhaint agus d’iarr ar an gCoimisiún gan costas breise todhchaíoch a chur leis i leith na Brasaíle.
According to CSN, the Commission is offering to Union producers a protection in excess of what is necessary to remove injurious dumping and requested the Commission not to add an additional future cost with respect to Brazil.
#2561009
Mhaigh CSN go gceadófar le MIP do tháirgeoirí an Aontais téarnamh ó éifeachtaí na dumpála díobhálaí líomhnaithe agus ag an am céanna, cosc a chur ar aon éifeacht dhíobhálach maidir le méaduithe praghais míchuí tar éis na tréimhse imscrúdúcháin a bhféadfadh tionchar suntasach diúltach a bheith acu ar ghnó na n-úsáideoirí.
CSN claimed that a MIP would allow the Union producers to recover from the effects of alleged injurious dumping while preventing any adverse effect of undue price increases after the investigation period which could have a significant negative impact on the users’ business.
#3129162
Fuair an Coimisiún barúlacha maidir leis an tionscnamh ón Aireacht um Fhorbairt Eacnamaíoch i gCónaidhm na Rúise agus ón Aireacht Tionscail agus Trádála i gCónaidhm na Rúise (‘GOR’), ó Rialtas Cónaidhme na Brasaíl (‘GBR’), arna n-ionadú ag Misean na Brasaíle den Aontas Eorpach, agus ó na táirgeoirí Brasaíleacha Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A (‘USIMINAS’) agus ón gComhluadar Siderúrgica Nacional (‘CSN’),
The Commission received comments on initiation from the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation (‘GOR’), the Federal Government of Brazil (‘GBR’), represented by the Mission of Brazil of the European Union, and the Brazilian producers Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A (‘USIMINAS’) and Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (‘CSN’).
#3129212
Ina theannta sin, d’áitigh Usiminas, CSN, agus GBR nach raibh gá le measúnú carnach ar éifeachtaí na n-allmhairí ó na tíortha lena mbaineann, i bhfianaise na gcoinníollacha éagsúla iomaíochta idir allmhairí ón mBrasaíl agus na hallmhairí ó na tíortha eile a ndearnadh imscrúdú orthu, na méideanna diomaibhseacha allmhairí, agus forbairt praghsanna na n-allmhairí ón mBrasaíl.
Furthermore, USIMINAS, CSN, and the GBR submitted that a cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports from the countries concerned was not warranted, in light of the different conditions of competition between imports from Brazil and the imports from the other investigated countries, the negligible import volumes, and the price development of imports from Brazil.
#3129334
Ina theannta sin, fiú dá nglacfaí leis an modheolaíocht chun dumpáil a ríomh a mhol CSN, bheadh an difríocht sa chorrlach dumpála beag agus, dá bhrí sin, ní athródh sí na conclúidí maidir le leanúint den dumpáil.
Furthermore, even if the dumping calculation methodology suggested by CSN would be accepted, the difference in the dumping margin would be small and therefore would not change the conclusions on the continuation of dumping.
#3129539
Chuir CSN an maíomh céanna ar aghaidh, ag cur leis go gcruthaíonn sé neamhshiméadracht i measúnú an Choimisiúin ar an sciar den mhargadh, ag féachaint ar dhíolacháin uile na Brasaíle agus iad á gcur i gcomparáid le tomhaltas saormhargaidh amháin, toisc ní hamháin go ndéanann sé margadh allmhairí na Brasaíle san Aontas a bhoilsciú go saorga, ach is é an toradh a bhíonn air freisin measúnú carnach gan údar ar allmhairí na Brasaíle le hallmhairí na Rúise.
The same claim was put forward by CSN, adding that looking at all Brazilian sales and comparing them to only free market consumption, creates an asymmetry in the Commission assessment of the market share, as not only it artificially inflates the Brazilian imports market in the EU, but it also results in an unjustified cumulative assessment of Brazilian imports with Russian imports.
#3129764
Ina theannta sin, d’áitigh Usiminas agus CSN araon nach bhféadfadh aon dóchúlacht go dtarlódh díobháil arís, ós rud é gur tháinig méadú ar bhrabúsacht thionscal an Aontais d’ainneoin méadú ar allmhairí ó na tíortha lena mbaineann.
In addition, both USIMINAS and CSN argued that there could be no likelihood of recurrence of injury, since the profitability of the Union industry increased despite an increase in imports from the countries concerned.