#2300293
Fachtóir na Táirgeachta (“FOP”)
Factor of Production (‘FOP’)
Filter results
Collections
50 results in 16 documents
#2339584
Toisc Tháirgeachta
Factor of Production (FOP)
#2447939
Scoith FOP
FOP cut-off
#2841510
Thairis sin, ní bhfuarthas aon bharúil nuair a cuireadh an Nóta FOP ar an gcáschomhad maidir le difríochtaí idir praghsanna na dtosca táirgeachta idir an Nóta FOP agus an iarraidh.
Moreover, no comments were received upon placing of the FOP Note on the case file regarding differences between prices of the factors of production between the FOP Note and the request.
#3128548
Tosca táirgeachta
Factors of production (‘FOP’)
#2331599
Mar a mhínítear in aithrisí (32) go (33), d’eisigh an Coimisiún dhá nóta i ndáil leis an gcomhad maidir leis na foinsí chun an gnáthluach a chinneadh: An Chéad Nóta FoP agus an Dara Nóta FoP.
As explained in recitals (32) to (33), the Commission issued two notes to the file on the sources for the determination of the normal value: the First FoP Note and the Second FoP Note.
#2331615
Maidir leis an Rúis, cé go raibh sonraí airgeadais ó na trí tháirgeoir scragaill teaghlaigh alúmanaim a sainaithníodh sa Chéad Nóta FoP ar fáil go poiblí, sa Dara Nóta FoP, chinn an Coimisiún nach bhféadfaí an Rúis a mheas mar thír ionadaíoch iomchuí.
With regard to Russia, although financial data of the three producers of aluminium household foils identified in the First FoP Note were publicly available, in the Second FoP Note the Commission concluded that Russia could not be considered an appropriate representative country.
#2078824
D’iarr an Coimisiún ar na páirtithe leasmhara a mbarúlacha a thabhairt agus faisnéis atá ar fáil go poiblí a mholadh faoi luachanna neamhshaofa do gach ceann de FOPanna a luaitear sa Nóta sin.
The Commission invited the interested parties to comment and propose publicly available information on undistorted values for each of the FOP mentioned in the First Note.
#2078855
I gcás líon beag FOPanna, b’ionann na costais iarbhír arna dtabhú ag táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin comhoibríocha agus sciar diomaibhseach de na costais amhábhar iomlána i dtréimhse imscrúdaithe an athbhreithnithe.
For a small number of FOP, the actual costs incurred by the cooperating exporting producers represented a negligible share of total raw material costs in the investigation period.
#2078859
Ar deireadh, mhaígh Zhongji gur theip ar an gCoimisiún luachanna nuashonraithe a nochtadh sa Dara Nóta a bhí beartaithe lena n-úsáid le haghaidh gach FOP chomh maith leis na bunsonraí foinseacha agus na ríomhanna foinseacha a rinneadh.
Lastly, Zhongji claimed that the Commission failed to disclose in the Second Note updated values intended to be used for each FOP as well as the underlying source data and calculations performed.
#2138354
Thug an Coimisiún aghaidh ar na barúlacha sin sa dara nóta uaidh maidir le comhad an 7 Eanáir 2021 (“an dara Nóta FoP”).
The Commission addressed these comments in its second note for the file of 7 January 2021 (‘the second FoP Note’).
#2331528
An 28 Bealtaine 2021, d’eisigh an Coimisiún an dara nóta don chomhad (“an Dara Nóta FoP”).
On 28 May 2021, the Commission issued a second note for the file (‘the Second FoP Note’).
#2331608
Maidir leis an mBrasaíl, d’aithin an Coimisiún sa Chéad Nóta FoP dhá tháirgeoir AHF, eadhon Companhia Brasileira de Aluminio (“CBA”) agus Novelis do Brasil Ltda (“Novelis”).
With regard to Brazil, the Commission identified in the First FoP Note two producers of AHF, namely Companhia Brasileira de Aluminio (‘CBA’) and Novelis do Brasil Ltda (‘Novelis’).
#2331614
Dá bhrí sin, chinn an Coimisiún sa Dara Nóta FoP nach bhféadfaí a mheas gur tír ionadaíoch iomchuí í an Bhrasaíl.
Therefore, the Commission concluded in the Second FoP Note that Brazil could not be considered an appropriate representative country.
#2331617
Maidir leis an Tuirc, ó na trí tháirgeoir scragall tí alúmanaim a aithníodh sa Chéad Nóta FoP, ní raibh sonraí airgeadais ar fáil le déanaí ach amháin do chuideachta amháin, is é sin Asaș Aluminyum.
With regard to Turkey, of the three producers of aluminium household foil identified in the First FoP Note, recent financial data were available only for one company, namely Asaș Aluminyum.
#2331623
Chinn an Coimisiún sa Dara Nóta FoP go raibh saintréithe teicniúla ag táirgí easbhrúite alúmanaim atá cosúil go dlúth leis na saintréithe a bhaineann leis an táirge atá faoi athbhreithniú, agus go bhfuil comhdhéanamh ábhair fhoinseach den chineál céanna ag baint leo.
The Commission concluded in the Second FoP Note that aluminium extrusion products had technical characteristics closely resembling those of the product under review, and that they shared a similar source material composition.
#2468295
Dá bhrí sin, mhol sé cuideachtaí a bhfuil modhanna táirgthe comhchosúla acu, FOP agus eilimintí monaraíochta bunaithe ar chód NACE Rev2 2599.
Therefore, it had proposed companies with similar production methods, FOP and manufacturing elements based on NACE Rev2 code 2599.
#2806465
Sa Chéad Nóta, sholáthair an Coimisiún liosta sealadach de na tosca táirgeachta (‘FOP’) uile amhail amhábhair, saothar agus fuinneamh a úsáidtear chun HTYP a tháirgeadh.
In the First Note, the Commission provided a preliminary list of all known factors of production (‘FOP’) such as raw materials, labour and energy, used in the production of HTYP.
#2807210
D’iarr an Coimisiún ar na páirtithe leasmhara a mbarúlacha a thabhairt agus faisnéis atá ar fáil go poiblí a mholadh faoi luachanna neamhshaofa do gach ceann de FOPanna a luaitear sa Chéad Nóta sin.
The Commission invited the interested parties to comment and propose publicly available information on undistorted values for each of the FOP mentioned in the First Note.
#2807688
Sa nóta sin, sholáthair an Coimisiún liosta sealadach de na tosca táirgeachta (‘FOP’) aitheanta uile amhail amhábhair, saothar agus fuinneamh a úsáidtear chun HTYP a tháirgeadh.
In that note, the Commission provided a preliminary list of all known factors of production (‘FOP’) such as raw materials, labour and energy, used in the production of HTYP.
#2808000
D’iarr an Coimisiún ar na páirtithe leasmhara a mbarúlacha a thabhairt agus faisnéis atá ar fáil go poiblí a mholadh faoi luachanna neamhshaofa le haghaidh gach ceann de na tosca táirgeachta (‘FOP’) a luaitear sa Chéad Nóta.
The Commission invited the interested parties to comment and propose publicly available information on undistorted values for each of the factors of production (‘FOP’) mentioned in the First Note.
#2841403
Mar a léirítear in aithris (38), an 29 Lúnasa 2022, d’eisigh an Coimisiún nóta don chomhad ar na foinsí chun an gnáthluach a chinneadh (‘Nóta ar Thosca Táirgeachta’).
As indicated in recital (38), on 29 August 2022, the Commission issued a note for the file on the sources for the determination of the normal value (the ‘FOP Note’).
#2841436
Mar a mhínítear sa nóta ar thosca táirgeachta, bhí an brabús thar a bheith ard sa bhliain airgeadais 2021, i.e. 58.25 %, rud a léiríonn téarnamh i ndiaidh COVID-19 is dócha.
As explained in the FOP note, in financial year 2021 the profit was exceptionally high, i.e. 58,25 %, likely reflecting the post COVID-19 recovery.
#2841440
Luaigh an Coimisiún gur sholáthair sé praghsanna tagarmhairc ar i.e. luachanna aonaid na bpríomhthosca táirgeachta sa Nóta FOP ón 29 Lúnasa 2022 chomh maith lena bhfoinsí.
The Commission noted that it provided benchmark prices i.e. unit values of the main factors of production in the FOP Note from 29 August 2022 as well as their sources.
#2841441
Tugadh fógra do CISA, mar pháirtí leasmhar, nuair a cuireadh an Nóta FOP ar an gcomhad agus nuair a bhí rochtain aige air.
CISA, as an interested party, was notified when the FOP Note was placed on the file and had access to it.
#2841508
Sa Nóta FOP an 29 Lúnasa 2022 nocht an Coimisiún luachanna aonaid na ‘bpríomhthosca táirgeachta’.
In the FOP Note of 29 August 2022 the Commission disclosed the unit values of the main ‘factors of production’.
#3128493
Mar a mhínítear in aithris (48), d’eisigh an Coimisiún Nóta faoi na foinsí chun an gnáthluach a shuí (‘nóta FOP’), an 10 Márta 2023.
As explained in recital 48, the Commission issued a Note on the sources for the determination of the normal value (the ‘FOP note’), on 10 March 2023.
#3128528
Fuarthas tuairimí ó na páirtithe leasmhara ar roinnt pointí sa nóta FOP thuasluaite, mar a thuairiscítear thíos.
Comments were received from the interested parties on a number of points in the above-mentioned FOP note, as described below.
#2014560
Ar bhonn na faisnéise a chuir na páirtithe leasmhara isteach agus ar bhonn aon fhaisnéise ábhartha eile ar fáil sa chomhad, bhunaigh an Coimisiún, sa Chéad Nóta, liosta tosaigh de thosca táirgeachta amhail ábhair, fuinneamh agus saothar a úsáidtear chun an táirge atá faoi imscrúdú a tháirgeadh.
On the basis of the information submitted by interested parties and other relevant information available on the file, the Commission established, in the First Note, an initial list of factors of production (FOP) such as materials, energy and labour used for the production of the product under investigation.
#2078820
Ar bhonn na faisnéise a chuir na páirtithe leasmhara isteach agus ar bhonn faisnéis ábhartha eile atá ar fáil sa chomhad, leag an Coimisiún síos, sa Chéad Nóta, liosta tosaigh de thosca táirgeachta (“FOP”) amhail ábhair, fuinneamh agus saothar a úsáidtear chun an táirge atá faoi imscrúdú a tháirgeadh.
On the basis of the information submitted by interested parties and other relevant information available on the file, the Commission established, in the First Note, an initial list of factors of production (‘FOP’) such as materials, energy and labour, used for the production of the product under investigation.
#2138348
An 25 Samhain 2020 d’eisigh an Coimisiún an chéad nóta i gcomhair an chomhaid (“an chéad nóta FoP”), nóta inar lorg sé tuairimí ó na páirtithe leasmhara i leith na bhfoinsí ábhartha a bhféadfadh an Coimisiún úsáid a bhaint astu chun an gnáthluach a chinneadh, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 2(6a)(e) an dara fleasc den bhunRialachán.
On 25 November 2020, the Commission issued a first note for the file (‘the first FoP Note’) seeking the views of the interested parties on the relevant sources that the Commission may use for the determination of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(6a)(e) second indent of the basic Regulation.
#2138459
Ar bhonn an chinnidh Peiriú a úsáid ar an tír ionadaíoch, chuir an Coimisiún in iúl do na páirtithe leasmhara sa dara Nóta FoP go n-úsáidfeadh sé GTA chun costais neamhshaofa an chuid is mó de thosca an táirgthe a shuí.
Based on the decision to use Peru as the representative country, the Commission informed the interested parties in the second FoP Note that it would use GTA to establish the undistorted costs of most of the factors of production.
#2138487
Faoi mar a míníodh sa chéad Nóta FoP, léiríonn an fhaisnéis atá ar fáil don Choimisiún ón iarratas ar athbhreithniú agus ó na himscrúduithe dul in éag a bhí ann roimhe seo, sin agus ó na himscrúduithe bunaidh, go bhfuil dhá phróiseas ar leith ag táirgeoirí slat sreinge na Síne i gcoitinne chun slat sreinge a tháirgeadh.
As explained in the first FoP Note, the information available to the Commission from the review request and the previous expiry and original investigations indicates that Chinese wire rod producers generally have two distinct processes to produce wire rod.
#2331523
An 29 Eanáir 2021, chuir an Coimisiún na páirtithe leasmhara ar an eolas le nóta (“an Chéad Nóta FoP”) ar na foinsí ábhartha a bhí beartaithe aige a úsáid chun an gnáthluach a chinneadh.
On 29 January 2021, the Commission issued a first note for the file (‘the First FoP Note’) and informed interested parties on the relevant sources it intended to use for the determination of the normal value.
#2331600
Sa Dara Nóta FoP, chuir an Coimisiún páirtithe leasmhara ar an eolas gur roghnaíodh an Tuirc mar thír ionadaíoch iomchuí sa chás seo dá mba rud é go ndeimhneofaí saobhadh suntasach de bhun Airteagal 2(6a) den bhun-Rialachán.
In the Second FoP Note, the Commission informed interested parties of the selection of Turkey as appropriate representative country in the present case if the existence of significant distortions pursuant to Article 2(6a) of the basic Regulation would be confirmed.
#2331602
Sa Chéad Nóta FoP, shainaithin an Coimisiún an Airméin, an Bhrasaíl, an Rúis agus an Tuirc mar thíortha lena mbaineann leibhéal forbartha eacnamaíche mar atá ag Daon-Phoblacht na Síne de réir an Bhainc Dhomhanda, i.e. d’aicmigh an Banc Domhanda iad go léir ina dtíortha “ard-mheánioncaim” ar bhonn ollioncam náisiúnta le linn thréimhse an imscrúdaithe athbhreithniúcháin, óna bhfuil a fhios ag an gCoimisiún gur táirgeadh an táirge faoi athbhreithniú iontu.
In the First FoP Note, the Commission identified Armenia, Brazil, Russia and Turkey as countries with a similar level of economic development as the PRC according to the World Bank, i.e. they were all classified by the World Bank as ‘upper-middle income’ countries on a gross national income basis during the RIP, where production of the product under review was known to take place.
#2331610
Maidir le Novelis, cé go raibh a chuid sonraí airgeadais ar fáil agus go raibh brabús ag baint leis an gcuideachta le linn na tréimhse imscrúdaithe athbhreithnithe, chinn an Coimisiún sa Dara Nóta FoP nach bhféadfaí an chuideachta a bhreithniú ar na cúiseanna seo a leanas: Ar an gcéad dul síos, thug an Coimisiún dá aire go raibh imeacht frithdhumpála ann maidir le hallmhairiú táirgí alúmanaim ón tSín, lena n-áirítear AHF, atá fós ar siúl sa Bhrasaíl.
As regards Novelis, even though its financial data was available and the company was profitable during the review investigation period, in the Second FoP Note the Commission concluded that the company could not be considered for the following reasons: first, the Commission noted that there was an anti-dumping proceeding on Chinese imports of aluminium products, including AHF, ongoing in Brazil.
#2331613
Ina theannta sin, sa Dara Nóta FoP chuir an Coimisiún i bhfios go láidir go bhfuil srianta ar onnmhairiú táirgí alúmanaim sa Bhrasaíl, go háirithe cuóta onnmhairiúcháin ar phríomhionchur (cóimhiotail alúmanaim) agus seachtháirge (sruthanna alúmanaim) i dtáirgeadh scragall tí alúmanaim.
In addition, in the Second FoP Note the Commission stressed the existence of export restrictions on aluminium products in Brazil, notably an export quota on a key input (Aluminium alloys) and a by-product (Aluminium scraps) in the production of aluminium household foils.
#2331620
Dá bhrí sin, thug an Coimisiún le fios sa Dara Nóta FoP nach bhféadfaí sonraí airgeadais Asaș Aluminyum a úsáid mar bhonn chun SG&A agus brabús a chinneadh de réir Airteagal 2(6a)(a) den bhun-Rialachán, lena bhforáiltear “go n-áireofar sa ghnáthluach tógtha méid réasúnta neamhshaofa do chostais riaracháin, díola agus ghinearálta agus do bhrabúis”.
Therefore, the Commission concluded in the Second FoP Note that Asaș Aluminyum’s financial data could not be used as a basis to determine SG&A and profit according to Article 2(6a)(a) of the basic Regulation, which provides that “the constructed normal value shall include an undistorted and reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits”.
#2331634
Sa Chéad Nóta FoP, liostaigh an Coimisiún na tosca táirgeachta amhail ábhair, fuinneamh agus saothar a úsáidtear i dtáirgeadh an táirge faoi athbhreithniú agus d’iarr sé ar na páirtithe leasmhara a mbarúil a thabhairt agus faisnéis atá ar fáil go poiblí a mholadh maidir le luachanna neamhshaofa le haghaidh gach ceann de na tosca táirgeachta.
In the First FoP Note, the Commission listed the factors of production such as materials, energy and labour used in the production of the product under review, and invited the interested parties to comment and propose publicly available information on undistorted values for each of the factors of production mentioned in that note.
#2331636
Sa Dara Nóta FoP, rinne an Coimisiún nuashonrú ar liosta na bhfachtóirí táirgthe a úsáideadh chun an gnáthluach a bhunú bunaithe ar an bhfaisnéis chros-seiceáilte a sholáthair duine de na hiarratasóirí a measadh, de réir na n-iarratasóirí agus in éagmais aon fhaisnéise eile, go bhfuil fachtóirí táirgthe acu agus próiseas táirgthe atá ionadaíoch do tháirgeoirí onnmhairithe na Síne.
In the Second FoP Note the Commission updated the list of factors of production used to establish the normal value based on the crosschecked information provided by one of the applicants that was, according to the applicants and in absence of any other information, considered to have factors of production and a production process representative of the Chinese exporting producers.
#2331637
Sa Dara Nóta FoP, chuir an Coimisiún in iúl freisin, d’fhonn an gnáthluach a chruthú i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 2(6a)(a) den bhun-Rialachán, go mbainfeadh sé úsáid as sonraí ón Atlas Trádála Domhanda (“GTA”) chun costas neamhshaofa na bpríomhthosca táirgthe a bhunú, go háirithe na hamhábhair.
In the Second FoP Note the Commission also stated that in order to construct the normal value in accordance with Article 2(6a)(a) of the basic Regulation, it would use data from the Global Trade Atlas (‘GTA’) to establish the undistorted cost of the main factors of production, notably the raw materials.
#2331683
Chun méid neamhshaofa agus réasúnta a bhunú do SG&A agus don bhrabús, bhí an Coimisiún ag brath ar na sonraí airgeadais is déanaí a bhí ar fáil ó na cúig chuideachta sa Tuirc a sainaithníodh sa Dara Nóta FoP mar tháirgeoirí gníomhacha brabúsacha táirge sa chatagóir ghinearálta chéanna i.e. táirgí easbhrúcháin alúmanaim, mar a mhínítear in aithris (63) thuas.
For establishing an undistorted and reasonable amount for SG&A and profit, the Commission relied on the most recent available financial data of the five companies in Turkey that had been identified in the Second FoP Note as active and profitable producers of a product in the same general category i.e. aluminium extrusion products, as explained in recital (63) above.
#2705130
Chun méid neamhshaofa agus réasúnta a shuí le haghaidh costais SGA agus brabúis, bhí an Coimisiún ag brath ar na sonraí airgeadais is déanaí a bhí ar fáil ó chuideachtaí sa Bhrasaíl a sainaithníodh sa Nóta FoP mar tháirgeoirí gníomhacha brabúsacha rothaí bóthair alúmanaim áirithe.
For establishing an undistorted and reasonable amount for SG&A and profit, the Commission relied on the most recent available financial data companies in Brazil that had been identified in the FoP Note as active and profitable producers of certain aluminium road wheels.
#2841263
An 29 Lúnasa 2022, chuir an Coimisiún na páirtithe leasmhara ar an eolas, trí Nóta ar Thosca Táirgeachta, faoi na foinsí ábhartha a raibh sé beartaithe aige iad a úsáid chun an gnáthluach a chinneadh, agus gurb é Meicsiceo an tír ionadaíoch.
On 29 August 2022, the Commission informed the interested parties, by means of a Factors of Production (FOP) Note of the relevant sources it intended to use for the determination of the normal value, with Mexico as the representative country.
#2841264
Sa Nóta ar Thosca Táirgeachta, sholáthair an Coimisiún liosta de na tosca táirgeachta uile amhail amhábhair, saothar agus fuinneamh a úsáidtear chun cineálacha táirgí comhréidhe teorollta, d’iarann, de chruach neamh-chóimhiotail nó de chruach chóimhiotail eile a tháirgeadh.
In the FOP Note the Commission provided a list of all factors of production such as raw materials, labour and energy used in the production of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel.
#2841418
Sa Nóta ar Thosca Táirgeachta thug an Coimisiún le fios, maidir leis an tír a sainaithníodh mar an tír ina bhfuil táirge faoi athbhreithniú á tháirgeadh, i.e. Meicsiceo, gur shainaithin an Coimisiún an chuideachta Ternium S.A. mar tháirgeoir an táirge faoi athbhreithniú, agus léirítear i sonraí airgeadais poiblí le déanaí brabúis agus suim réasúnta do chostais SGA chun an gnáthluach neamhshaofa a shuí.
In the FOP Note the Commission indicated that for the country identified as country where product under review is being produced, i.e. Mexico, the Commission identified the company Ternium S.A. as a producer of the product under review, with recent public financial data showing profits and reasonable amount for SG&A for establishing the undistorted normal value.
#3043757
I bhfianaise na faisnéise go léir a chuir na páirtithe leasmhara isteach agus a bailíodh le linn na gcuairteanna fíorúcháin, sainaithníodh na tosca táirgeachta seo a leanas agus a bhfoinsí chun an gnáthluach a chinneadh i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 2(6a)(a) den bhun-Rialachán:
Considering all the information submitted by the interested parties and collected during the verification visits, the following factors of production (‘FOP’) and their sources have been identified in order to determine the normal value in accordance with Article 2(6a)(a) of the basic Regulation:
#3220171
Cinneadh praghas allmhairiúcháin le haghaidh gach toisce táirgeachta sa tír ionadaíoch mar mheán ualaithe phraghsanna aonaid na n-allmhairí ó gach tríú tír seachas Daon-Phoblacht na Síne ná tíortha nach comhaltaí de EDT iad, a liostaítear in Iarscríbhinn 1 de Rialachán (AE) 2015/755 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle.
An import price for each FoP in the representative country was determined as a weighted average of unit prices of imports from all third countries excluding the PRC and countries which are not members of the WTO, listed in Annex 1 of Regulation (EU) 2015/755.
#3241691
D’athdhearbhaigh Xiangtan an maíomh nárbh iomchuí an mhodheolaíocht a úsáideadh chun an tagarmharc don mhian mhangainéise a d’úsáid an Coimisiún a ríomh, agus mhol sé arís go n-úsáidfí ceann den dá mhodheolaíocht mhalartacha a chuir sé isteach ina bharúlacha maidir leis an Dara nóta FOP.
Xiangtan reiterated the claim that the methodology used for the calculation of the benchmark of manganese ore used by the Commission was not appropriate and suggested again using one of two alternative methodologies submitted in its comments to the Second FOP note.