Tá sé beartaithe ag an Spáinn dlí nua nuathionscanta a ghlacadh lena gcruthófar dálaí fabhracha chun gnólachtaí nuathionscanta nuálacha a chruthú agus chun go bhfásfaidh siad.
Spain is planning to adopt a new start-up law which will create favourable conditions for the creation and growth of innovative start-ups.
Teachtaireacht chuig Comhairle Eorpach an Earraigh. Ag obair le chéile i gcomhair fáis agus post – Tús nua do Straitéis Liospóin. COM (2005) 24.
COMMUNICATION TO THE SPRING EUROPEAN COUNCIL. WORKING TOGETHER FOR GROWTH AND JOBS – A NEW START FOR THE LISBON STRATEGY. COM (2005) 24.
Ina theachtaireacht dar teideal “Clár Oibre an Choimisiúin do 2015: Tús Nua”, d'fhógair an Coimisiún go raibh “an t-ualach rialála a laghdú agus ardleibhéal cosanta don timpeallacht shóisialta, sláinte agus chomhshaoil mar aon le rogha tomhaltóra a choinneáil ag an am céanna” ina thosaíocht pholaitiúil dó agus go ndéanfadh sé “ollchóiriú ar na rialacha chun a chinntiú go rannchuidíonn siad leis an gclár oibre le haghaidh fáis agus post”.
In its communication entitled ‘Commission Work Programme 2015: A New Start’, the Commission announced that ‘lightening the regulatory load while keeping high levels of social, health and environmental protection and consumer choice’ was a political priority, and that it would ‘overhaul the rules to make sure they contribute to the jobs and growth agenda’.
Ina theachtaireachtaí uaidh an 27 Deireadh Fómhair 2015 dar teideal Commission Work Programme 2016 - No time for business as usual [Clár Oibre an Choimisiúin do 2016 – Ní rogha a thuilleadh gnó mar is gnách] agus an 16 Nollaig 2014 dar teideal Commission Work Programme 2015 - A New Start [Clár Oibre an Choimisiúin do 2015 – Tús Nua], shainaithin an Coimisiún mar thosaíocht gur gá freagairt ar ghlao ó shaoránaigh an Aontais ar chothroime agus ar thrédhearcacht agus gur gá don Aontas gníomhú mar shamhail tagartha don domhan.
The Commission, in its communications of 27 October 2015 entitled ‘Commission Work Programme 2016 – No time for business as usual’ and of 16 December 2014 entitled ‘Commission Work Programme 2015 – A New Start’, identified as a priority the need to respond to the call of citizens of the Union for fairness and transparency and the need for the Union to act as a global reference model.
ag meabhrú na conclúide ó Chúirt Bhreithiúnais an Aontais Eorpaigh (CBAE) nach bhfuil cinntí um fhilleadh arna n-eisiúint ag údaráis na hUngáire ag luí le Treoir 2008/115/CE ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle agus le Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh; á iarraidh ar an nGníomhaireacht staonadh ó pháirt a ghlacadh in aon oibríochtaí atá ar neamhréir le dlí an Aontais; ag tabhairt dá haire gur ann don fhreagra ón nGníomhaireacht go chuir sí fíoruithe i gcrích agus gur tháinig sí ar an gconclúid nach raibh baint riamh aici le fillteacha a bhaineann le reachtaíocht na hUngáire a mheasann CBAE a bheith ar neamhréir le dlí an Aontais (Gníomh náisiúnta HU LXXXIX de 2007 agus Gníomh LVIII de 2020); á chur i bhfáth, más mian leis an nGníomhaireacht tús nua a dhéanamh lena n-áirítear tiomantas athnuaite don trédhearcacht, gur cheart di tuilleadh soiléireachta agus trédhearcachta a sholáthar sna cásanna sin; ag tabhairt dá haire go ndeir an Ghníomhaireacht go ceanglaíonn sí ar an Ungáir séantaí speisialta a dheimhniú maidir le gnéithe nós imeachta nuair a bhíonn tacaíocht ón nGníomhaireacht á hiarraidh aici, á áirithiú go ndéanann an Ghníomhaireacht a dícheall a áirithiú go bhfuil na nósanna imeachta uile um fhilleadh a dtacaíonn sí leo san Ungáir i gcomhréir go hiomlán le creat dlíthiúil ábhartha an Aontais maidir le filleadh agus tearmann; á thabhairt dá haire freisin gur mhéadaigh an Ghníomhaireacht gníomhaíochtaí faireacháin ar chinntí um fhilleadh de chuid na hUngáire agus gur neartaigh sí comhairliúchán agus comhar leis an Oifig um Chearta Bunúsacha maidir leis an Ungáir; á chur i bhfáth nach bhfuil nósanna imeachta ach chomh héifeachtach lena gcur chun feidhme, agus gur cúis imní ar leith é sin i bhfianaise staid ghinearálta an smachta reachta san Ungáir;
Recalls the conclusion of the CJEU, that return decisions issued by the Hungarian authorities are incompatible with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; calls on the Agency to refrain from participating in any operations that are incompatible with Union law; notes from the Agency’s reply that it performed verifications and concluded that it had never been involved in returns related to the Hungarian legislation deemed incompatible with Union law by the CJEU (HU national Act LXXXIX of 2007 and Act LVIII of 2020); stresses that if the Agency wants to make a new start including a renewed commitment to transparency, it should provide more clarity and transparency in such cases; takes note that the Agency says it requires Hungary to confirm special disclaimers concerning procedural aspects when requesting the Agency’s support, ensuring that all the Agency does its utmost to ensure that all return procedures supported by it in Hungary are fully compliant with the relevant Union legal framework on return and asylum; further notes that the Agency increased monitoring activities in Hungarian returns and strengthened consultation and cooperation with the FRO on Hungary; stresses that procedures are only as effective as their implementation, and that this is of particular concern given the general rule of law situation in Hungary;