#2154841
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach agus an nós imeachta ina dhiaidh sin
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
Filter results
Collections
47 results in 22 documents
#2179450
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach
Non-imposition of provisional measures
#2192350
Clárú allmhairí, neamh-fhorchur beart sealadach agus nós imeachta ina dhiaidh sin
Registration of imports, non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
#2282153
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach agus an nós imeachta ina dhiaidhsin
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
#2299812
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach
Non imposition of provisional measures
#2333758
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach agus an nós imeachta ina dhiaidh sin
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
#2344440
Clárú allmhairí, neamh-fhorchur beart sealadach agus nós imeachta ina dhiaidh sin
Registration of imports, non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
#2504572
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach
Non-imposition of provisional measures
#2703394
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach
Non-imposition of provisional measures
#2717415
Neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach
Non-imposition of provisional measures
#3180114
NEAMH-FHORCHUR PRAGHSANNA ROCHTANA MÓRDHÍOLA RIALÁILTE AR LÍONRAÍ FÍOR-ARDACMHAINNEACHTA
NON-IMPOSITION OF REGULATED WHOLESALE ACCESS PRICES ON VHCNs
#3180340
an éifeacht a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ag neamh-fhorchur praghsanna rochtana mórdhíola rialáilte ar líonraí fíor-ardacmhainneachta;
the potential effect of the non-imposition of regulated wholesale access prices on VHCNs;
#1684694
Chomh maith leis sin, i ndáil le himscrúduithe nach bhfuil sé oiriúnach bearta sealadacha a fhorchur ina leith, tá sé inmhianaithe go dtuigeann páirtithe roimh ré go bhfuil neamh-fhorchur den sórt sin i gceist.
In addition, in investigations where it is not appropriate to impose provisional measures, it is desirable that parties are aware sufficiently in advance of such non-imposition.
#1911061
Mura bhforchuirfí bearta, d’fhágfadh sin go mbeadh caillteanais ní ba mhó ann laistigh de thionscal an Aontais, go gcuirfí a inmharthanacht i mbaol agus is dócha go ndúnfaí na saoráidí táirgthe dá dheasca sin agus go leanfadh dífhostuithe as.
The non-imposition of measures would mean heavier losses within the Union industry, endanger its viability and probably lead to the closure production facilities and dismissals.
#2071003
Ar an gcéad dul síos, mura ndéanfaí bearta a fhorchur, d’fhágfadh sé go scoirfeadh na gearánaigh den táirgeadh le haghaidh an mhargaidh oscailte, rud a laghdódh na foinsí soláthair atá ar fáil ar mhargadh an Aontais.
First, non-imposition of measures would lead complainants to discontinue production for the open market, thus reducing the available sources of supply on the Union market.
#2071086
Mura bhforchuirfear na bearta, tiocfaidh allmhairí in ionad táirgeadh laistigh den Aontas ar fad agus, dá bhrí sin, tiocfaidh méadú níos mó fós ar an athrú sa trádáil.
The non-imposition of measures will completely replace domestic production with imports and therefore the shift in trade will increase even more.
#2141984
I gcás nach ndéanfaí bearta a fhorchur, d’fhéadfadh dúnadh saoráidí táirgthe agus dífhostuithe a bheith ann dá thoradh, rud a chuirfeadh inmharthanacht thionscal de chuid an Aontais i mbaol.
The non-imposition of measures could lead to the closure of production facilities and dismissals thus endangering the viability of the Union industry.
#2154747
Le linn éisteachta a bhí ann tar éis neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach, chuir CCCME sraith barúlacha isteach maidir le díobháil, cúisíocht agus anailís ar leas an Aontais atá sa ghearán.
During a hearing which took place following to the non-imposition of provisional measures, CCCME submitted a series of comments concerning the injury, causation and Union interest analysis contained in the complaint.
#2194292
Tá an léirmhíniú sin ar Rialachán (AE) 2021/983 mícheart ós rud é nár luaigh an Coimisiún ach go mbeadh neamh-fhorchur na mbeart i bhfabhar úsáideoirí neamh-chomhtháite.
This interpretation of Regulation (EU) 2021/983 is incorrect as the Commission merely stated that the non-imposition of measures would favour non-integrated users.
#2301456
Tá an staid bhunúsach fíorasach éagsúil freisin sa dá chás, áit, murab ionann agus an t-imscrúdú reatha, inar forchuireadh dleachtanna sealadacha agus, dá bhrí sin, nár tugadh aghaidh ar an tsaincheist maidir le neamhfhorchur na mbeart sealadach.
The underlying factual situation is also different in both cases, where, unlike the current investigation, provisional duties were imposed and therefore the issue of non-imposition of provisional measures was not addressed.
#2505457
Mura bhforchuirfí bearta, d’fhágfadh sin go mbeadh caillteanais mhóra ann laistigh de thionscal an Aontais, go gcuirfí a inmharthanacht i mbaol agus is dócha go ndúnfaí na saoráidí táirgthe dá dheasca sin agus go leanfadh dífhostuithe as.
The non-imposition of measures would entail heavy losses within the Union industry, endanger its viability and possibly trigger the closure of production facilities and dismissals.
#2702508
Is dócha go dtiocfadh meath breise ar an mbrabúsacht mura ndéanfaí na bearta a fhorchur, brabúsacht a bhí diúltach cheana féin.
The non-imposition of measures would likely lead to further deterioration of profitability, which was already negative.
#2702509
I gcás nach ndéanfaí bearta a fhorchur, d’fhéadfadh dúnadh saoráidí táirgthe agus dífhostuithe a bheith ann dá thoradh, rud a chuirfeadh inmharthanacht thionscal an Aontais i mbaol.
The non-imposition of measures could lead to the closure of production facilities and dismissals thus endangering the viability of the Union industry.
#2718550
Maidir leis an tionchar indíreach ar thionscail eile, agus cé nár chuir Netto & Cortina aon fhianaise ná aon chainníochtú isteach, tugann an Coimisiún dá aire go ndéanfaí difear do thionscail eile mura bhforchuirfí dleachtanna.
Regarding the indirect impact on other industries, and while Netto & Cortina submitted no evidence or quantification, the Commission notes the non-imposition of duties would also affect other industries.
#2718561
Ina theannta sin, laghdóidh neamh-fhorchur na mbeart maidir le dhá tháirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin sampláilte (Lavish Group agus Vitra Group) aon bhrú breise a chuirtear ar shlabhraí soláthair mar gheall ar an gcogadh.
In addition, the non-imposition of the measures on two sampled exporting producers (Lavish Group and Vitra Group) will reduce any additional pressure put on supply chains due to the war.
#2860119
Is dócha go gcaillfí tuilleadh sciar den mhargadh agus meath ar an mbrabúsacht as neamh-fhorchur beart, rud a bhí diúltach cheana féin le linn na tréimhse faoi bhreathnú.
The non-imposition of measures would likely lead to a further loss of market share and deterioration of profitability, which was already negative throughout the period considered.
#1684879
Nuair nach bhfuil sé beartaithe dleachtanna sealadacha a fhorchur ach leanúint leis an imscrúdú, cuirfear neamh-fhorchur na ndleachtanna in iúl do pháirtithe leasmhara trí seachtaine roimh dhul in éag an spriocdháta atá luaite in Airteagal 7(1) d’fhorchur na ndleachtanna sealadacha.”.
In cases where it is intended not to impose provisional duties but to continue the investigation, interested parties shall be informed of the non-imposition of duties three weeks before the expiry of the deadline mentioned in Article 7(1) for the imposition of provisional duties.’.
#1684974
Nuair nach bhfuil sé beartaithe dleachtanna sealadacha a fhorchur ach leanúint leis an imscrúdú, cuirfear neamh-fhorchur na ndleachtanna in iúl do pháirtithe leasmhara trí seachtaine roimh dhul in éag an spriocdháta atá luaite in Airteagal 12(1) d’fhorchur na ndleachtanna sealadacha.”.
In cases where it is intended not to impose provisional duties but to continue the investigation, interested parties shall be informed of the non-imposition of duties three weeks before the expiry of the deadline mentioned in Article 12(1) for the imposition of provisional duties.’.
#1846431
Nuair nach bhfuil sé beartaithe dleachtanna sealadacha a fhorchur ach leanúint leis an imscrúdú, cuirfear neamh‑fhorchur na ndleachtanna in iúl do pháirtithe leasmhara coicís roimh dhul in éag an spriocdháta atá luaite in Airteagal 7(1) d’fhorchur na ndleachtanna sealadacha.'
In cases where it is intended not to impose provisional duties but to continue the investigation, interested parties shall be informed of the non-imposition of duties two weeks before the expiry of the deadline mentioned in Article 7(1) for the imposition of provisional duties.'
#1846468
Nuair nach bhfuil sé beartaithe dleachtanna sealadacha a fhorchur ach leanúint leis an imscrúdú, cuirfear neamh‑fhorchur na ndleachtanna in iúl do pháirtithe leasmhara coicís roimh dhul in éag an spriocdháta atá luaite in Airteagal 12(1) d’fhorchur na ndleachtanna sealadacha.'
In cases where it is intended not to impose provisional duties but to continue the investigation, interested parties shall be informed of the non-imposition of duties two weeks before the expiry of the deadline mentioned in Article 12(1) for the imposition of provisional duties.'
#1846538
Socraítear an tréimhse sin in Airteagal 3(3) de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 182/2011.Chomh maith leis sin, i ndáil le himscrúduithe nach bhfuil sé oiriúnach bearta sealadacha a fhorchur ina leith, tá sé inmhianaithe go dtuigeann páirtithe roimh ré go bhfuil a leithéid sin de neamh‑fhorchur i gceist.
This period is fixed in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Also, in investigations where it is not appropriate to impose provisional measures, it is desirable that parties are aware sufficiently in advance of such non-imposition.
#2071047
Ar aon nós, i gcás na dtionchar thuasluaite a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann sa ghearrthéarma, níor mhór iad a chothromú le trí riosca a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ann sa mheántéarma mura bhforchuirtear na bearta (agus an dóchúlacht go scoirfear gníomhaíochtaí thionscail an Aontais toisc nach inbhuanaithe an staid reatha): foinsí soláthair níos lú, cobhsaíocht soláthair níos ísle, agus praghsanna MEG níos airde.
At any rate, the aforementioned possible impacts in the short term would have to be balanced against three risks in the medium term associated with non-imposition of measures (and the likely discontinuation of Union industry activity as the current situation is not sustainable): less sources of supply, lower stability of supply, and higher MEG prices.
#2071072
Mar a mhínítear in aithrisí (290) go (297), ní mheastar gur leor ar an iomlán an tionchar diúltach a d’fhéadfadh tarlú, ar an drochuair, do tháirgeoirí PET sa ghearrthéarma chun stad a chur le forchur na mbeart.
As explained in recitals (290) to (297), the potential negative impact that could unfortunately occur in the short term for PET producers is not considered overall as sufficient to justify the non-imposition of measures.
#2140909
Dá mba rud é nach bhforchuirfí bearta, chuirfí an tionscal de chuid an Aontais i mbaol toisc go mbeadh táirgeadh an tsileacain chailciam san Aontais faoi bhagairt amach anseo dá leanfaí d’aon chuid den staid neamh-inbhuanaithe a bhí sa mhargadh in 2019 agus 2020.
The non-imposition of measures would put the Union industry in jeopardy because any continuation of the unsustainable situation on the market in 2019 and 2020 would threaten future production of calcium silicon in the Union.
#2141983
I gcás nach ndéanfaí bearta a fhorchur, is dócha go dtiocfadh tuilleadh meatha ar an mbrabúsacht a bhí diúltach do gach táirgeoir seachas táirgeoir amháin sampláilte de chuid an Aontais atá cosanta go sealadach ar éifeachtaí allmhairí dumpáilte toisc gur thug sé LTAnna i gcrích lena chustaiméirí le linn na tréimhse 2017-2018.
The non-imposition of measures would likely lead to further deterioration of profitability, which was already negative for all but one sampled Union producer who is temporarily shielded from the effects of dumped imports because it concluded LTAs with its customers in the period 2017–2018.
#2152931
Fiú más cuid de ghrúpaí móra iad táirgeoirí sampláilte de chuid an Aontais, bheadh tionchar diúltach ag neamh-fhorchur na mbeart orthu agus ar tháirgeoirí eile de chuid an Aontais agus rachadh an tionchar sin thar bhrabúsacht, mar a mhínítear in aithris (247) den Rialachán sealadach.
Even if the sampled Union producers are part of large groups, the non-imposition of measures would impact them and other Union producers negatively and this impact would go beyond profitability, as explained in recital (247) of the provisional Regulation.
#2156263
Nuair nár forchuireadh bearta sealadacha, d’iarr an Coimisiún ar tháirgeoirí sampláilte an Aontais faisnéis mhionsonraithe bhreise faoi na tairiscintí uile inar ghlac siad páirt le linn na tréimhse a measadh lenar áiríodh faisnéis ar thairiscintí, praghsanna agus iomaitheoirí.
After the non-imposition of provisional measures, the Commission requested from the sampled Union producers additional, detailed information on all tenders in which they participated during the period considered including information on bids, prices and competitors where available.
#2156598
Ina achoimre a cuireadh isteach tar éis neamh-fhorchur na mbeart, mhaígh CCCME go raibh comhghaol soiléir idir an cor chun donais i ndíolacháin don tionscal IC (agus domhanda) agus tús na paindéime agus gur ghá aghaidh a thabhairt ar an staid sin trí chur i bhfeidhm na mbeart frithdhumpála a chur ar fionraí go ceann naoi mí nó trí thréimhse na mbeart a theorannú go dhá bhliain.
In its brief submitted after the non-imposition of measures, CCCME claimed that there was a clear correlation between the downturn in sales for the Union (and global) OFC industry and the beginning of the pandemic, and that this situation would need to be addressed by either a suspension of the application of the anti-dumping measures for nine months, or by limiting the duration of the measures to two years.
#2174799
Is míthuiscint é sin ar an Rialachán sealadach ós rud é nár luaigh an Coimisiún ach go mbeadh neamh-fhorchur na mbeart i bhfabhar úsáideoirí neamh-chomhtháite, mar in éagmais bearta is féidir leo ACF dumpáilte a cheannach, ach ní bhainfeadh úsáideoirí comhtháite a tháirgeann ACF san Aontas tairbhe as an mbuntáiste éagórach sin.
This is a misinterpretation of the provisional Regulation as the Commission merely stated that the non-imposition of measures would favour non-integrated users, as in the absence of measures they can purchase dumped ACF, whereas integrated users producing ACF in the Union would not benefit from this unfair advantage.
#2180386
Thug an Coimisiún dá aire freisin nach raibh barúil faoi aighneacht nuashonraithe EWTA an 7 Meitheamh 2021 tugtha ag aon pháirtí roimh an nochtadh deiridh, ná tar éis páirtithe a chur ar an eolas an 18 Meitheamh 2021 nach mbeadh bearta sealadacha á bhforchur agus tar éis gur iarraidh orthu go sainráite barúil a thabhairt faoi aighneachtaí a rinne páirtithe leasmhara eile.
The Commission also noted that prior to the final disclosure, no party had provided comments on the updated EWTA submission of 7 June 2021, also not after parties had been informed on 18 June 2021 on the non-imposition of provisional measures and explicitly invited to comment on submissions made by other interested parties.
#2283836
Tar éis neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach, d’iarr an Coimisiún ar na táirgeoirí sampláilte de chuid an Aontais faisnéis bhreise mhionsonraithe ar na tairiscintí uile a ghlac siad páirt iontu le linn na tréimhse faoi bhreathnú, lena n-áirítear faisnéis ar thairiscintí, praghsanna agus iomaitheoirí i gcás a bhfuil fáil ar an bhfaisnéis sin.
After the non-imposition of provisional measures, the Commission requested from the sampled Union producers additional, detailed information on all tenders in which they participated during the period considered including information on bids, prices and competitors where available.
#2299497
D’éiligh EFDA ar deireadh, i gcás nár fhorchuir an Coimisiún bearta sealadacha, go mbeadh an Rialachán clárúcháin ar neamhní agus gur cheart é a tharraingt siar, agus é á rá gurb é an t-aon chuspóir amháin a bheadh leis an Rialachán clárúcháin bearta cinntitheacha a fhorchur go cúlghabhálach agus i gcás nach bhforchuirfí bearta sealadacha, nach bhfuil cur i bhfeidhm cúlghabhálach beart cinntitheach indéanta a thuilleadh faoi Airteagal 10(4) den bhun-Rialachán.
EFDA finally claimed that in case the Commission did not impose provisional measures, the registration Regulation would become void and should be withdrawn, arguing that the sole purpose of the registration Regulation would be to impose definitive measures retroactively and that in case of non-imposition of provisional measures, the retroactive application of definitive measures is not feasible anymore under Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation.
#2344444
Tar éis an nochta maidir le rún an Choimisiúin gan bearta sealadach a fhorchur, bhí éisteachtaí leis an dá tháirgeoir shampláilte de chuid an Aontais (BASF Antwerpen NV (‘BASF’) agus Nippon Shokubai Europe NV (BE) (‘Nippon Shokubai Europe’ nó ‘NSE’), táirgeoir aitheanta de chuid an Aontais (Evonik Operations GmbH (‘Evonik’)), chomh maith leis an táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin, LG Chem, inar thug na páirtithe sin a mbarúlacha maidir le neamh-fhorchur na mbeart sealadach. Sholáthar na páirtithe a gcur i láthair agus barúlacha breise iar-éisteachta don chomhad.
Following the disclosure of the Commission’s intention not to impose provisional measures, hearings took place with the two sampled Union producers (BASF Antwerpen NV (‘BASF’) and Nippon Shokubai Europe NV (BE) (‘Nippon Shokubai Europe’ or ‘NSE’), a known Union producer (Evonik Operations GmbH (‘Evonik’)), , as well as with the exporting producer LG Chem, in which those parties commented on the non-imposition of provisional measures. The parties provided their presentations and additional post-hearing comments to the file.
#2562213
Sa sampla den fhaireachán i gcás na mbiorán agus na stáplaí a thug an t-iarratasóir chun cinn, baineadh úsáid as chun faireachán a dhéanamh ar staid na n-allmhairí i gcás nach ndéanfaí bearta frithdhumpála a fhorchur.
In the example of the pins and staples case monitoring brought forward by the applicant, it was used to monitor the situation of the imports in a case of a non-imposition of anti-dumping measures.
#2718436
Mura bhforchuirfí bearta d’éireodh cás díobhála ábhartha thionscal an Aontais níos measa fós dá bharr, tionscal nach bhfuil láidir go leor méadú ar allmhairí dumpáilte ar phraghsanna atá faoi bhun chostas táirgthe thionscal an Aontais a sheasamh.
The non-imposition of measures would worsen the already materially injured situation of the Union industry, which is not strong enough to further withstand an increase of dumped imports at prices even below the Union industry’s costs of production.
#2718554
Mar achoimre, níl aon fhianaise curtha isteach ag páirtithe leasmhara go n-imreofaí tionchar níos fearr ar thionscal an Aontais mura bhforchuirfí na dleachtanna le hais iarmhairtí dearfacha fhorchur na mbeart do thionscal an Aontais, mar a mhínítear in aithrisí (424) go (428).
In sum, the interested parties have not submitted any evidence that the non-imposition of duties would outweigh the positive consequences for the Union industry of imposing measures, as explained in recitals (424) to (428).
#3180414
Le forchur leigheasanna difreáilte laistigh de mhargadh geografach ar leith níor cheart toimhdí fothaca an NRA a athrú maidir leis an modheolaíocht chostála mholta a chur chun feidhme agus dá bhrí sin níor cheart toradh éagsúil teacht as sin i gcomparáid leis an gcás malartach a bhaineann le neamh-fhorchur leigheasanna difreáilte.
The imposition of differentiated remedies within a particular geographic market should not alter the NRAs’ underpinning assumptions for implementing the recommended costing methodology and therefore should not lead to a divergent outcome compared to the alternative scenario of non-imposition of differentiated remedies.