Níor chomhoibrigh Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd ná Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ná san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd and Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd neither cooperated in the anti-dumping nor in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Tar éis imscrúdú frithchúitimh, le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1628/2004 d’fhorchuir an Chomhairle dleachtanna frithchúitimh cinntitheacha freisin ar allmhairí córas leictreoidí graifíte áirithe de thionscnamh na hIndia.
The Council, following an anti-subsidy investigation, by Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004, also imposed definitive countervailing duties on imports of certain graphite electrodes systems originating in India.
Tar éis imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 1628/2004 d’fhorchuir an Chomhairle dleacht frithchúitimh chinntitheach ar allmhairí córas leictreoidí graifíte áirithe de thionscnamh na hIndia.
Following an anti-subsidy investigation, by Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004, the Council imposed definitive countervailing duties on imports of certain graphite electrodes systems originating in India.
Go sonrach, rinne CISA tagairt do na torthaí a rinne an Coimisiún ina imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais a mhéid a bhaineann le HRF.
In particular, CISA referred to the findings made by the Commission in its anti-subsidy investigation as regards HRF.
Le Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/870 ón gCoimisiún, tar éis imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, d’fhorchuir an Coimisiún dleacht frithchúitimh chinntitheach ar allmhairí táirgí áirithe de shnáithín gloine filiméadach leanúnach de thionscnamh na hÉigipte.
By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/870 following an anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt.
Faoi mar a suíodh san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, dírítear na táirgí ó na saoráidí táirgthe sin ar mhargadh an Aontais agus tá sciar substaintiúil den mhargadh baint amach acu freisin.
As established in the anti-subsidy investigation the products from these production facilities are directed to Union market and have also gained a substantial market share.
Dá réir sin, ós rud é nach ndéanann an t-imscrúdú seo difear don imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, ní mór an ráta fóirdheonaithe a suíodh ar dtús a asbhaint ó na corrlaigh dhumpála a bunaíodh i dtréimhse an imscrúdaithe ionsúcháin.
Accordingly, as the anti-subsidy investigation remains unaffected by the present investigation, the subsidisation rate originally established needs to be deducted from the dumping margins established in the AIP.
Cuideachtaí eile a chomhoibríonn in imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais ach nach gcomhoibríonn in imscrúdú frithdhumpála atá liostaithe in Iarscríbhinn II de Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2022/72
Other companies cooperating in anti-dumping investigation but not in anti-subsidy investigation listed in the Annex II of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/72
(2) I ndiaidh imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, le Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) Uimh. 452/2011, d'fhorchuir an Chomhairle dleacht frithchúitimh chinntitheach ar allmhairí páipéir mhín bhrataithe áirithe de thionscnamh Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne.
(2) Following an anti-subsidy investigation, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2011, the Council also imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain coated fine paper originating in the PRC.
An t-imscrúdú ar forchuireadh an dleacht frithchúitimh mar thoradh air, tabharfar ‘an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais bunaidh’ anseo feasta air.
The investigation that led to the imposition of this countervailing duty will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original anti-subsidy investigation’.
Dá bhrí sin, laghdaigh an Coimisiún an corrlach dumpála leis na méideanna fóirdheontais a fuarthas i ndáil leis na scéimeanna teagmhasacha onnmhairiúcháin san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais bunaidh.
Thus, the Commission reduced the dumping margin by the subsidy amounts found in relation to the export contingent schemes in the original anti-subsidy investigation.
Mar a mhínítear san aithris (4), d’fhorchuir an Coimisiún dleacht frithchúitimh 9 % le haghaidh ECL tar éis imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais ar leithligh, as a raibh 6,04 % bunaithe ar fhóirdheontais theagmhasacha onnmhairiúcháin.
As explained in recital (4), the Commission imposed a countervailing duty of 9 % for ECL following a separate anti-subsidy investigation, out of which 6,04 % was based on export contingent subsidies.
Le Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) Uimh. 1379/2014 ón gCoimisiún, tar éis imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais agus athbhreithniú eatramhach páirteach ar na bearta frithdhumpála, rinne an Coimisiún an dleacht frithdhumpála bhunaidh a leasú go luachanna ó 0 % go 19,9 % agus d’fhorchuir sé dleacht frithchúitimh bhreise idir 4,9 % agus 10,3 %.
By Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1379/2014 following an anti-subsidy investigation and a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures, the Commission amended the original anti-dumping duty to values ranging from 0 % to 19,9 % and imposed an additional countervailing duty ranging from 4,9 % to 10,3 %.
Sular tionscnaíodh an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, chuir an Coimisiún in iúl do Rialtas na Síne go raibh iarraidh chuí-dhoiciméadaithe faighte aige, agus d’iarr sé ar Rialtas na Síne comhairliúcháin a dhéanamh leis i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 10(7) den bhun-Rialachán.
Prior to the initiation of the anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission notified the Government of China (‘GOC’) that it had received a properly documented request, and invited the GOC for consultations in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation.
D’ainneoin na éifeachta móire diúltaí ar allmhairí a bhíonn ag an imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais de ghnáth maidir le hallmhairí ó thíortha atá faoi imscrúdú, d’fhan na hallmhairí ón Éigipt ar leibhéal comhchosúil 141809 dtona le linn thréimhse imscrúdaithe an athbhreithnithe seo i gcomparáid le 144169 dtona sa tréimhse dar críoch an 31 Márta 2019.
Despite the usual chilling effect on imports the anti-subsidy investigation usually have on the imports from countries under investigation, the imports from Egypt remained on the similar level of 141809 tonnes in the review investigation period of this review compared to 144169 tonnes for the period ending 31 March 2019.
An 12 Meitheamh 2020, thionscain an Coimisiún Eorpach (“an Coimisiún”) imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais i ndáil le táirgí comhréidhe teorollta áirithe déanta as iarann, cruach neamh-chóimhiotail nó cruach cóimhiotail eile (“an táirge faoi imscrúdú”) ar táirgí de thionscnamh na Tuirce iad.
On 12 June 2020, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-subsidy investigation with regard to imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel (‘the product under investigation’) originating in Turkey.
ní torthaí ar fhórsaí an mhargaidh shaoir iad costais amhábhar agus fuinnimh i nDaon-Phoblacht na Síne toisc go ndéanann idirghabhálacha substainteacha rialtais difear dóibh, faoi mar a deimhníodh in imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais le déanaí a bhain le táirgí comhréidhe teorollta;
the costs of raw-materials and energy in the PRC are not the result of free market forces as they are affected by substantial government interventions, as was confirmed also in recent anti-subsidy investigation concerning hot-rolled flat products;
Ar deireadh, rinne na gearánaigh tagairt d’imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais a rinne Roinn Tráchtála na Stát Aontaithe (“DOC”) ar scragall alúmanaim na Síne, a tugadh i gcrích in 2018, lena ndearnadh amach gur thug rialtas na Síne tacaíocht do thionscal scragaill alúmanaim na Síne agus fóirdheonú alúmanaim phríomhúil.
Lastly, the complainants refer to an anti-subsidy investigation by the United States Department of Commerce ("DOC") on Chinese aluminium foil, concluded in 2018, which established the existence of Chinese government support for the Chinese aluminium foil industry and subsidisation of primary aluminium.
D’ainneoin cibé an raibh nó nach raibh an fhianaise a seoladh isteach i rith an imeachta seo ina fianaise tacaíochta leordhóthanach chun anailís a dhéanamh ar shubstaint an éilimh, thug an Coimisiún faoi deara go raibh éileamh den chineál céanna ar thionchar shaobhadh amhábhar i soláthar earraí á scrúdú i gcomhthéacs imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Irrespective of whether the evidence submitted in the course of this proceeding constituted sufficient supporting evidence to analyse in substance the claim, the Commission noted that a similar claim about the impact of raw material distortions in the provision of goods was being examined in the context of the anti-subsidy investigation.
Toisc go bhfuil imscrúdú á dhéanamh ar roinn eintiteas sa Jindal Group san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais mar fhóirdheontais in-fhrithchúitithe féideartha, ba cheart go n-áiritheodh an Coimisiún go gcoigeartaítear na haisíocaíochtaí dleachta seo sa chás reatha nó nach bhfrithchúitítear iad sa chás frith-fhóirdheontais.
As some Jindal group entities’ duty drawbacks are being investigated in the anti-subsidy investigation as potential countervailable subsidies, the Commission should ensure that these duty drawbacks are adjusted in the present case or not countervailed in the anti-subsidy case.
Sular tionscnaíodh an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, chuir an Coimisiún in iúl do Rialtas na Síne go raibh iarraidh chuí-dhoiciméadaithe faighte aige, agus d’iarr sé ar Rialtas na Síne comhairliúcháin a dhéanamh leis i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 10(7) den bhun-Rialachán.
Prior to the initiation of the anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission notified the Government of China (‘GOC’) that it had received a properly documented complaint, and invited the GOC for consultations in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation.
Tá na hanailísí a rinneadh ar an díobháil, ar an gcúisíocht agus ar leas an Aontais san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais seo agus an t-imscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leithligh comhionann, mutatis mutandis, ós rud é gurb ionann an sainmhíniú ar thionscal an Aontais, na táirgeoirí sampláilte de chuid an Aontais, an tréimhse faoi bhreathnú agus IP sa dá imscrúdú.
The injury, causation and Union interest analyses performed in the present anti-subsidy investigation and the separate anti-dumping investigation are mutatis mutandis identical, since the definition of the Union industry, the sampled Union producers, the period considered and the investigation period are the same in both investigations.
Ina theannta sin, d’áitigh Xiamen Xiashun, mar thoradh ar thíolacadh déanach fianaise ag an ngearánach maidir leis an iarratas ar eisiamh scragall ceallraí san imeacht frithdhumpála go bhfuil amhras ann maidir le cén fianaise a mheas an Coimisiún san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Xiamen Xiashun further argued that a late submission of evidence by the complainant in respect of the battery foil exclusion request in the anti-dumping proceeding raises doubts as to what evidence was actually considered by the Commission in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Chuige sin, chloígh an Coimisiún leis an modheolaíocht ríofa do mhaoiniú fabhrach trí iasachtaí arna mbunú san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais ar tháirgí cruach comhréidh teorollta de thionscnamh na Síne, chomh maith leis na himscrúduithe frith-fhóirdheontais ar bhoinn de thionscnamh na Síne agus snáithíní gloine fite agus/nó fuaite áirithe de thionscnamh na Síne, mar a mhínítear sna haithrisí thíos.
In this respect, the Commission followed the calculation methodology for preferential financing through loans established in the anti-subsidy investigation on hot-rolled flat steel products originating in the PRC, as well as in the anti-subsidy investigations on tyres originating in the PRC and certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the PRC, as explained in the recitals below.
D’iarr cuibhreannas na n-allmhaireoirí go ndéanfaí a bharúlacha a rinneadh san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leithligh a ionchorprú san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais sin, agus thug sé barúil freisin ar an nochtadh deiridh sa nós imeachta sin.
The consortium of importers requested that its comments made in the separate anti-dumping investigation should be incorporated into this anti-subsidy investigation, and also commented on the final disclosure in this procedure.
Rinneadh an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais i gcomhthráth le himscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leith maidir leis an táirge céanna lena mbaineann de thionscnamh Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne, inar fhorchuir an Coimisiún bearta frithdhumpála ar leibhéal an chorrlaigh díobhála.
The anti-subsidy investigation was carried out in parallel with a separate anti-dumping investigation concerning the same product concerned originating from the PRC, in which the Commission imposed anti-dumping measures at the level of the injury margin.
Sular tionscnaíodh an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, thug an Coimisiún fógra do Rialtas na Síne á rá go raibh gearán cuí-dhoiciméadaithe faighte aige, agus d’iarr sé ar Rialtas na Síne comhairliúcháin a dhéanamh leis i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 10(7) den bhun-Rialachán.
Prior to the initiation of the anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission notified the Government of China (‘GOC’) that it had received a properly documented complaint, and invited the GOC for consultations in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation.
Tá na hanailísí ar dhíobháil, cúisíocht agus leas an Aontais a dhéantar san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais seo agus san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leithligh comhionann mutatis mutandis, ós rud é go bhfuil an sainmhíniú ar thionscal an Aontais, na táirgeoirí sampláilte de chuid an Aontais, an tréimhse a mheastar agus tréimhse an imscrúdaithe mar an gcéanna sa dá imscrúdú.
The injury, causation and Union interest analyses performed in the present anti-subsidy investigation and the separate anti-dumping investigation are mutatis mutandis identical, since the definition of the Union industry, the sampled Union producers, the period considered and the investigation period are the same in both investigations.
I ndáil leis sin, lean an Coimisiún an mhodheolaíocht ríomha le haghaidh airgeadas fabhrach trí iasachtaí a suíodh san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais ar tháirgí cruach teorollta de thionscnamh Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne, chomh maith le sna himscrúduithe frith-fhóirdheontais ar bhoinn de thionscnamh Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne agus ar fhabraicí snáithíní gloine fite agus/nó fuaite de thionscnamh Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne agus mar a mhínítear sna haithrisí thíos.
In this respect, the Commission followed the calculation methodology for preferential financing through loans established in the anti-subsidy investigation on hot-rolled flat steel products originating in the PRC, as well as in the anti-subsidy investigations on tyres originating in the PRC and certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the PRC and explained in the recitals below.
Rinneadh an t-imscrúdú frithfhóirdheontais i gcomhthráth le himscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leithligh maidir leis an táirge céanna lena mbaineann atá de thionscnamh Dhaon-Phoblacht na Síne, ina ndearna an Coimisiún bearta frithdhumpála a fhorchur ar leibhéal an chorrlaigh dumpála.
The anti-subsidy investigation was carried out in parallel with a separate anti-dumping investigation concerning the same product concerned originating from the PRC, in which the Commission imposed anti-dumping measures at the level of the dumping margin.
I mí an Mheithimh 2020, le Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/776 ón gCoimisiún, d’fhorchuir an Coimisiún dleacht frithchúitimh chinntitheach ar allmhairí fabraicí snáithíní gloine fite agus/nó fuaite áirithe (“GFF”) de thionscnamh na Síne agus na hÉigipte, faoi seach (“an t-imscrúdú bunaidh frith-fhóirdheontais”).
In June 2020, by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/776, the Commission imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics (‘GFF’) originating in the PRC and in Egypt, respectively (‘the original anti-subsidy investigation’).
De réir na tuarascála sin, ba é príomhchuspóir bhunú PGTEX Morocco SARL “freagairt go gníomhach d’imscrúdú frithdhumpála an Aontais i gcoinne na Síne, tuilleadh barr feabhais a chur ar a straitéis um idirnáisiúnú agus an straitéis sin a choigeartú, an sciar mhargaidh de tháirgí a chomhdhlúthú agus a mhéadú san Eoraip agus i Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá, freastal ar an éileamh ó chustaiméirí, agus an soláthar do chustaiméirí a chosaint” agus go háirithe gur chinn PGTEX “fochuideachta ar lánúinéireacht a thógáil i Maracó chun briseadh trí imscrúduithe frithdhumpála an Aontais, chun teagmháil a dhéanamh le custaiméirí, freastal ar an éileamh margaidh, agus dul in oiriúint don fhorbairt inbhuanaithe”. An t-imscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leithligh dá dtagraítear go sainráite, rinneadh é go comhthreomhar leis an imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, imscrúdú as ar eascair forchur na ndleachtanna frithchúitimh imchéimnithe.
According to this report, the main purpose of the establishment of PGTEX Morocco SARL was “to actively respond to the EU’s anti-dumping investigation against China, further optimize and adjust its internationalization strategy, consolidate and increase the market share of products in Europe and the United States, meet customer demand, and protect customer supply” and in particular that PGTEX “decided to build a wholly-owned subsidiary in Morocco to break through the EU’s anti-dumping investigations, approach customers, meet market demand, and adapt to sustainable development”.. The separate anti-dumping investigation explicitly referred to was conducted in parallel with the anti-subsidy investigation, which led to the imposition of the countervailing duties.
ar cuireadh tús leis an oibríocht chóimeála, nó ar tháinig méadú mór uirthi, ón tráth a tionscnaíodh an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, nó díreach roimhe, agus an ón tír atá faoi réir na mbeart na páirteanna ábhartha, agus
whether the assembly operation started or substantially increased since, or just prior to, the initiation of the anti-subsidy investigation and whether the parts concerned are from the country subject to measures, and
De réir thíolacadh údaráis Mharacó dá dtagraítear in aithris (15), is ar an 20 Márta 2019 a tharla an chéad teagmháil le Grúpa PGTEX chun monarcha a chur ar bun i Maracó, mí amháin tar éis thionscnamh an imscrúdaithe frithdhumpála bhunaidh agus 2 mhí roimh thionscnamh an imscrúdaithe frith-fhóirdheontais bhunaidh.
According to the submission of the Moroccan authorities referred to in recital (15), the first contact with the PGTEX Group for the set-up of a plant in Morocco dated back to 20 March 2019, one month after the initiation of the original anti-dumping investigation and two months before the initiation of the original anti-subsidy investigation.
Dá bhrí sin, tháinig an Coimisiún ar an gconclúid gur tosaíodh an oibríocht chóimeála tar éis thionscnamh an imscrúdaithe frith-fhóirdheontais thosaigh mar a cheanglaítear le hAirteagal 13(2)(a) den bhun-Rialachán frithdhumpála, agus gur as an tSín don chuid is mó de na páirteanna lena mbaineann, tír atá ar cheann amháin den dá thír atá faoi réir na mbeart frith-fhóirdheontais bunaidh.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that the assembly operation started since the initiation of the original anti-subsidy investigation as required by Article 13(2)(a) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, while the parts concerned are mainly from China, one of the two countries subject to the original anti-subsidy measures.
Maidir le praghsanna, rinne an Coimisiún comparáid idir an meánphraghas neamhdhíobhálach mar a suíodh san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais bunaidh agus na meánphraghsanna ualaithe onnmhairiúcháin CAL a cinneadh ar bhonn na faisnéise arna soláthar ag PGTEX Morocco SARL, arna gcoigeartú mar is cuí chun costais iar-imréitigh a chur san áireamh.
Regarding prices, the Commission compared the average non-injurious price as established in the original anti-subsidy investigation with the weighted average export CIF prices determined on the basis of the information provided by PGTEX Morocco SARL, duly adjusted to include post clearance costs.
Ar an gcéad dul síos, ní raibh baint ag an imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais (féach aithris (1)) le fóirdheonú caisirníní agus snátha snáithíní gloine, ach níor bhain sé ach le fóirdheonú GFF, ar táirge eile é.
First, the original anti-subsidy investigation (see recital (1)) did not relate to the subsidisation of glass fibre rovings and yarns, but related only to the subsidisation of GFF, which is a different product.
An 17 Feabhra 2021 thionscain an Coimisiún Eorpach (‘an Coimisiún’) imscrúdú frithdhumpála i ndáil le hallmhairí táirgí cruach dosmálta cothroma fuar-rollta (‘SSCRanna’ nó ‘an táirge faoi imscrúdú’) de thionscnamh na hIndia agus na hIndinéise (dá ngairtear ‘na tíortha lena mbaineann’ le chéile anseo feasta).
On 17 February 2021 the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-subsidy investigation with regard to imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products (‘SSCR’ or ‘the product under investigation’) originating in India and Indonesia (together referred to as ‘the countries concerned’).
Sular tionscnaíodh an t-imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais, chuir an Coimisiún in iúl do Rialtas na hIndia (‘GOI’) agus do Rialtas na hIndinéise ( ‘GOID’) go bhfuair sé gearán a bhí doiciméadaithe i gceart, agus d’iarr sé ar GOI agus ar dhul i mbun comhairliúcháin i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 10(7) den bhun-Rialachán.
Prior to the initiation of the anti-subsidy investigation, the Commission notified the Government of India (‘GOI’) and the Government of Indonesia ( ‘GOID’) that it had received a properly documented complaint, and invited the GOI and GOID for consultations in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation.
Tá na hanailísí a rinneadh ar an díobháil, ar an gcúisíocht agus ar leas an Aontais san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais seo agus an t-imscrúdú frithdhumpála ar leithligh comhionann, mutatis mutandis, ós rud é gurb ionann an sainmhíniú ar thionscal an Aontais, na táirgeoirí sampláilte de chuid an Aontais, an tréimhse faoi bhreathnú agus IP sa dá imscrúdú.
The injury, causation and Union interest analyses performed in the present anti-subsidy investigation and the separate anti-dumping investigation are mutatis mutandis identical, since the definition of the Union industry, the sampled Union producers, the period considered and the investigation period are the same in both investigations.
Dá bhrí sin, bhain an Coimisiún leas as forálacha Airteagal 28 den bhun-Rialachán d’fhonn measúnú a dhéanamh ar iompar na mbanc Síneach atá luaite thuas mar chomhlachtaí poiblí trí dhul i muinín na bhfíoras atá ar fáil, eadhon faisnéis ábhartha ó imscrúduithe a rinneadh roimhe sin lena gcumhdaítear an tréimhse 2015 go 2020, lena n-áirítear imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF le déanaí agus Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/870 ón gCoimisiún an 24 Meitheamh 2020 lena bhforchuirtear dleachtanna cinntitheacha frithchúitimh agus lena mbailítear go cinntitheach an dleacht shealadach frithchúitimh a forchuireadh ar allmhairí táirgí snáithíneach leanúnach gloine de thionscnamh na hÉigipte, agus lena ngearrtar dleachtanna cinntitheacha ar allmhairí táirgí snáithíneacha leanúnacha de thionscnamh na hÉigipte.
Therefore, the Commission resorted to the provisions of Article 28 of the basic Regulation in order to assess the conduct of the Chinese banks mentioned above as public bodies by relying on facts available, namely relevant information from previous investigations covering the period 2015 to 2020, including most recently the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/870 of 24 June 2020 imposing definitive countervailing duties and definitively collecting the provisional countervailing duty imposed on imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt, and levying the definitive countervailing duty on the registered imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt (‘GFR investigation’).
Mar atá luaite i Ranna 3.4.1.2 go 3.4.1.5 den imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF, chomh maith le Ranna 3.3.1.2 go 3.3.1.4 den imscrúdú GFR, Eximbank (EXIM), Banc Forbartha na Síne (CDB), Banc na Síne (BOC), Banc Tionscail agus Tráchtála na Síne (ICBC) is bainc Stát-úinéireachta iad agus tá indicia foirmiúil rialaithe an GOC ar na bainc sin.
As mentioned in Sections 3.4.1.2 to 3.4.1.5 of the GFF anti-subsidy investigation, as well as Sections 3.3.1.2 to 3.3.1.4 of the GFR investigation, Eximbank (EXIM), China Development Bank (CDB), Bank of China (BOC), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) are Chinese State-owned banks and there are formal indicia of control of the GOC over these banks.
Ina theannta sin, sna Ranna céanna d’imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus d’imscrúdú GFR, chinn an Coimisiún go bhfuil creat normatach cruthaithe ag an GOC ar ghá do na bainisteoirí agus do na maoirseoirí cloí leis, arna gceapadh ag an GOC agus freagrach don GOC.
Furthermore, in the same Sections of the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation, the Commission concluded that the GOC has created a normative framework that had to be adhered to by the managers and supervisors, appointed by the GOC and accountable to the GOC.
Chomh maith leis an gcreat dlíthiúil ginearálta a leagtar amach in imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus in imscrúdú GFR, an comhthéacs dlíthiúil ina iomláine a luaitear faoi chuimsiú an chomhair dhéthaobhaigh a leagtar amach i roinn 4.6.3.1, chomh maith leis an bpointe sonrach a ardaíodh sa chéad aithris eile do CDB, cuireadh i bhfeidhm é ar na hiasachtaí a chuir na bainc sin ar fáil do Ghrúpa IRNC.
In addition to the general legal framework set out in the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation, the entire legal context stated in the framework of the bilateral cooperation set out in section 4.6.3.1, as well as the specific point for CDB raised in the next recital, applied to the loans provided by these banks to IRNC Group.
Ar bhonn na bhfíoras atá ar fáil de bhun Airteagal 28(1) den bhun-Rialachán, áfach, agus bunaithe ar an bhfianaise thuasluaite maidir le maoiniú tionscadal faoi BRI lasmuigh den tSín, lena n-áirítear an Indinéis, chomh maith leis na torthaí i gcás Tyres, imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus imscrúdú GFR, tháinig an Coimisiún ar an gconclúid go bhfuair máthairchuideachtaí na Síne ranníocaíocht airgeadais i bhfoirm deontas nó maoiniú fabhrach a úsáideadh ansin chun iasachtaí scairshealbhóirí agus caipiteal comhchineáil a sholáthar dá bhfochuideachtaí chun a n-inniúlachtaí airgeadais a éascú.
However, on the basis of the facts available pursuant to Article 28(1) of the basic Regulation and based on all the above evidence on the funding under the BRI of projects outside of China including Indonesia, as well as on the findings in the Tyres case, the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation, the Commission concluded that the Chinese parent companies received a financial contribution in the form of grants or preferential financing that were then used to provide shareholder loans and capital in kind to their subsidiaries to facilitate their financial capabilities and operations in Indonesia.
In imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus in imscrúdú GFR, in ainneoin an chomhpháirtíocht pháirtigh, bhí an Coimisiún in ann an maoiniú fabhrach ón tSín a rianú agus iad a réiteach leis an maoiniú a cuireadh ar fáil ar deireadh leis na heintitis a tháirgeann an Éigipt.
In the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation, despite partial cooperation, the Commission was able to trace the preferential funding originating in China and reconcile them to the funding finally contributed into the Egyptian producing entities.
Dá bhrí sin, bhí ar an gCoimisiún tátail a bhaint ar bhonn Airteagal 28(1) bunaithe ar chás Tyres, imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus imscrúdú GFR, a bhfuil cás an-chosúil acu leis an gcás seo toisc go mbaineann siad le tionscadail arna maoiniú faoi thionscnamh BRI ag leanúint den phatrún ceannann céanna.
Therefore, the Commission needed to draw inferences on the basis of Article 28(1) based on the Tyres case, the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation, which have very similar situation to this case because they involve projects financed under the BRI initiative following exactly the same pattern.
Ina theannta sin, tá roinnt cosúlachtaí idir imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus imscrúdú GFR sa tSín mar gur thug siad maoiniú fabhrach trína mbeartas agus trína mbainc faoi úinéireacht Stáit d’fhochuideachtaí na hÉigipte i gcomhthéacs BRI agus an chomhair dhéthaobhaigh le rialtas na hÉigipte.
Furthermore, the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation have a number of similarities in that China provided preferential financing via their policy and State-owned banks to the Egyptian subsidiaries in the context of the BRI and the bilateral cooperation with the Egyptian government.
In éagmais aon fhianaise a chuir na cuideachtaí Síneacha nó GOC ar fáil, agus bunaithe ar an bhfianaise atá ar fáil go poiblí eadhon i gcás Tyres, imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF agus imscrúdú GFR, chinn an Coimisiún mar sin nach raibh soláthar trealaimh agus iasachtaí scairshealbhóirí ag na scairshealbhóirí ach bealach eile chun na fochuideachtaí Indinéisis a mhaoiniú agus chinn sé iad a fhrithchúitliú mar instealltaí cothromais le tacaíocht ón Stát, agus é mar aidhm saoráidí táirgthe Ghrúpa IRNC san Indinéis a bhunú agus a leathnú.
In the absence of any evidence provided by the Chinese companies or GOC, and based on the publicly available evidence namely in the Tyres case, the GFF anti-subsidy investigation and the GFR investigation, the Commission thus concluded that the provision of equipment and shareholder loans by the shareholders was just another means of financing the Indonesian subsidiaries and decided to countervail these as equity injections supported by the State, with the aim of setting up and expanding the production facilities of the IRNC Group in Indonesia.
Ar an taobh eile, i gcomhthéacs cosúil leis an gceann atá idir lámha, faoi mar a bhí in imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais GFF, níor measadh go raibh tacaíocht maoinithe a bronnadh faoin gcomhar déthaobhach idir an tSín agus an Éigipt ag brath ar onnmhairiú.
On the other hand, in a context similar to the one at hand, as was the case in the GFF anti-subsidy investigation, financing support awarded under the bilateral cooperation between China and Egypt was not considered to be export contingent.