#1638099
coinbhinsiún ACP-CEE Lomé
the ACP-EEC convention of Lomé
coinbhinsiún ACP-CEE Lomé
the ACP-EEC convention of Lomé
coinbhinsuín ACP-CEE Lomé
the ACP-EEC convention
Cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh
Aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP
Cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh
Aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP
Colún tábla ACP (6b):
Table column ACP (6b):
Colúin tábla DPO (7a), ACP (6b), SDE (7c); EIR (7d) agus SAS (7d):
Table columns DPO (4b); ACP (6b); SDE (7a); EIR (7c) and SAS (7d):
[Treochtaí agus Astaíochtaí Sé Shárfhluaracarbón sa Leathsféar Thuaidh agus sa Leathsféar Theas. Ceimic agus Fisic Atmaisféarach]. https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2019-873/acp-2019-873.pdf
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2019-873/acp-2019-873.pdf
D’fhreagair Cuideachta A go bhfuil foinse soláthair ráthaithe ag ceithre cinn as cúig tháirgeoir ACP mar gheall ar chúiseanna stairiúla, geografacha, conarthacha nó scairshealbhóireachta/úinéireachta agus go bhfuil leas dílsithe acu maidir le teorainn a chur le hiomaíocht ó tháirgeoir ACP eile san Aontas.
Company A replied that four of the five producers of ACP have a guaranteed source of supply due to historical, geographical, contractual or shareholding/ownership reasons and that they have a vested interest in limiting competition from another ACP producer in the EU.
Rún ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa maidir leis an teachtaireacht ón gCoimisiún chuig an gComhairle agus chuig Parlaimint na hEorpa faoi chomhar le tíortha ACP atá páirteach i gcoinbhleachtaí armtha.
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ON THE COMMISSION COMMUNICATION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON COOPERATION WITH ACP COUNTRIES INVOLVED IN ARMED CONFLICTS.
Thairis sin, is féidir a mheas gur faoi bhun 2 % a bheidh sciar ACP i ngrúpa foriomlán AFRPanna san Aontas.
Moreover, the share of ACP in the overall group of AFRPs in the Union can be estimated at below 2 %.
Ina theannta sin, léiríodh san imscrúdú go raibh tomhaltas AFRPanna in earnáil na gcornaí brataithe i bhfad níos suntasaí ná sin in earnáil ACP.
Furthermore, the investigation revealed that the consumption of AFRPs in the coated coils sector was much more significant that in the ACP sector.
Ar deireadh, d’athdhearbhaigh EA a mhaoímh go bhfuil sé dearbhaithe ag gach táirgeoir ACP eile san Aontas go bhfuil sé in ann na cainníochtaí riachtanacha a aimsiú san Aontas.
Finally, EA reiterated its claim that all other ACP producers in the Union have declared being able to source the necessary quantities in the Union.
Rátáil Nós Imeachta um Rialú Limistéir — ACP, a shainítear i bhFoscríbhinn 5 a ghabhann le hIarscríbhinn I;
Area Control Procedural Rating – ACP, defined in Appendix 5 to Annex I;
I dteannta phointe (b), leis na cuspóirí feidhmiúlachta don oiliúint rátála i ndáil leis an rátáil Faireachais um Rialú Limistéir (ACP) áiritheofar an méid seo a leanas i ndáil leis na hiarratasóirí:
In addition to point (b), rating training performance objectives for the Area Control Surveillance (ACS) rating shall ensure that applicants:
Rún ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa maidir le moltaí Pharlaimint na hEorpa don Choimisiún i dtaca leis na Comhaontuithe Comhpháirtaíochta Eacnamaíochta leis na tíortha agus leis na réigiúin ACP a chaibidil. (2002/2097(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ON THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMISSION CONCERNING THE NEGOTIATION OF ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS WITH THE ACP COUNTRIES AND REGIONS. (2002/2097(INI)).
Togra le haghaidh Cinnidh ón gComhairle lena gcoigeartaítear acmhainní airgeadais an 9ú Ciste Forbartha Eorpaigh de thoradh ar aontachas Phoblacht Dhaonlathach Thíomóir Thoir leis an gComhaontú Comhpháirtíochta ACP-EC mar aon le nóta faisnéise míniúcháin. COM(2004)610.
PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DECISION ADJUSTING THE FINANCIAL RESOURCES OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND FURTHER TO THE ACCESSION OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF TIMOR-LESTE TO THE ACP- EC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TOGETHER WITH EXPLANATORY INFORMATION NOTE. COM (2004) 610.
Togra le haghaidh Cinnidh ón gComhairle lena bhfadaítear tréimhse feidhme na mbeart i gCinneadh 2002/148/CE ag críochnú na gcomhchomhairliúchán leis an tSiombáib faoi Airteagal 96 de Chomhaontú ACP-CE mar aon le nóta faisnéise míniúcháin. Com (2004) 46.
PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DECISION EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF APPLICATION OF THE MEASURES IN DECISION 2002/148/EC CONCLUDING CONSULTATIONS WITH ZIMBABWE UNDER ARTICLE 96 OF THE ACP-EC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TOGETHER WITH EXPLANATORY INFORMATION NOTE. COM (2004) 46.
Go gceadaíonn Dáil Éireann téarmaí an Chomhaontaithe Inmheánaigh idir Ionadaithe Rialtais Bhallstáit an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh, ag cruinniú dóibh laistigh den Chomhairle, ar Mhaoiniú agus Riaradh Cúnaimh Comhphobail faoin bPrótacal Airgeadais a ghabhann le Comhaontú Comhpháirtíochta ACP-CE Cotonou, a rinneadh sa Bhruiséil an 18 Meán Fómhair, 2000, agus ar leagadh cóipeanna de faoi bhráid Dháil Éireann an 21 Márta, 2002.
THAT DÁIL ÉIREANN APPROVES THE TERMS OF THE INTERNAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCIL, ON THE FINANCING AND ADMINISTRATION OF COMMUNITY AID UNDER THE FINANCIAL PROTOCOL TO THE ACP-EC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF COTONOU, DONE AT BRUSSELS ON 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2000, COPIES OF WHICH WERE LAID BEFORE DÁIL ÉIREANN ON 21ST MARCH, 2002.
Thíolaic roinnt páirtithe iarrataí ar eisiamh táirgí a bhaineann leis na táirgí seo a leanas: stoc feadán cumhdaithe, pláta cumhdaithe, eití cumhdaithe agus stoc eití neamhchlúdaithe lena n-úsáid chun HEX alúmanaim phrásáilte mótarfheithiclí a mhonarú agus chun fuaraitheoirí ceallraí feithiclí leictreacha a mhonarú (“AFRPanna HEX”); cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus painéil chomhchodacha alúmanaim (“ACP”) a tháirgeadh; leatháin liteagrafacha; leatháin ceallraí; scragall tiontaire alúmanaim de thomhas 30 go 60 miocrón (“ACF-30-60”) agus AFRPanna lena n-úsáid chun slinne le haghaidh dallóga veinéiseacha a mhonarú.
Several parties submitted product exclusion requests concerning the following products: clad tube, clad plate, clad fin and unclad fin stock for use in the manufacture of automotive brazed aluminium HEX and the manufacturing of electrical vehicles battery coolers (‘automotive HEX AFRPs’); aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and aluminium composite panels (‘ACP’); lithographic sheets; battery sheets; aluminium converter foil of gauge 30 to 60 microns (‘ACF-30-60’) and AFRPs for use in the manufacture of slats for venetian blinds.
D’iarr úsáideoir amháin, Cuideachta A, go n-eisiafaí cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh ar an bhforas go bhfuil saintréithe fisiciúla, teicniúla agus ceimiceacha ar leith ag cornaí den sórt sin i ndáil lena leibhéalú teannais agus lena gcuma, ag cur san áireamh nach bhfuil an táirge inúsáidte le haghaidh a gceannach mar gheall ar easnamh beag neamhfhoirfe.
One user, Company A, requested the exclusion of aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP on the grounds that such coils have distinct physical, technical and chemical characteristics with regard to their tension levelling and appearance considering that even a small imperfection makes the product unusable for the purpose for which it was purchased.
Bhunaigh an Coimisiún go dtagann cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh faoin sainiú, mar a thugtar in aithrisí (55) go (58) thuas, agus is féidir iad a aicmiú trí úsáid a bhaint as códú an táirge dá bhforáiltear san imscrúdú maidir le tiús, foirm, ábhar a úsáidtear, bailchríoch agus faghairt.
The Commission established that aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP fall in the definition of the product scope as defined in recital (55) to (58) above and can be classified using the product coding foreseen by the investigation in terms of thickness, form, material used, finishing and temper.
Maidir leis an bpróiseas monaraíochta, mheas an Coimisiún go sealadach gur toradh ar an bpróiseas monaraíochta céanna é agus an próiseas a thuairiscítear in aithris (56) le haghaidh cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh, agus úsáidtear an trealamh céanna i gcás AFRPanna eile den chuid is mó.
As far as the manufacturing process is concerned, the Commission provisionally considered that aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP are the result of the same manufacturing process as described in recital (56) and use to a large extent the same equipment as other AFRPs.
Mar sin féin, thug an Coimisiún aitheantas do shainiúlacht na dtáirgí a mhonaraíonn Cuideachta A agus na deacrachtaí a bhíonn aici maidir le cornaí alúmanaim a fhoinsiú chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh san Aontas.
However, the Commission acknowledged the specificity of the products that Company A manufactures and the difficulties that it faces in sourcing aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP in the Union.
I bhfianaise na mbreithnithe thuas agus bunaithe ar an bhfianaise atá ar fáil dó, chinn an Coimisiún go sealadach gur cheart allmhairiú cornaí alúmanaim a eisiamh ó íocaíocht na ndleachtanna nuair a úsáidtear iad chun cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh.
In view of the above considerations and based on the evidence at its disposal, the Commission provisionally concluded that imports of aluminium coils should be excluded from the payment of the duties when used for the production of coated coils and ACP.
Mar a léirítear in aithrisí (61) go (105) den Rialachán sealadach, chuir roinnt páirtithe isteach iarrataí ar eisiamh táirgí maidir leis na táirgí seo a leanas: stoc feadán cumhdaithe, pláta cumhdaithe, eití cumhdaithe agus stoc eití neamhchlúdaithe lena n-úsáid chun malartóirí teasa alúmanaim phrásáilte gluaisteán a mhonarú agus chun fuaraitheoirí ceallraí feithiclí leictreacha a mhonarú (“AFRPanna HEX gluaisteán”); cornaí alúmanaim chun cornaí brataithe agus painéil chomhchodacha alúmanaim (“ACP”) a tháirgeadh; leatháin liteagrafacha; leatháin ceallraí; scragall tiontaire alúmanaim de thomhas 30 go 60 miocrón (“ACF-30-60”) agus AFRPanna lena n-úsáid chun slinne le haghaidh dallóga veinéiseacha a mhonarú.
As indicated in recitals (61) to (105) of the provisional Regulation, several parties submitted product exclusion requests concerning the following products: clad tube, clad plate, clad fin and unclad fin stock for use in the manufacture of automotive brazed aluminium heat exchangers and the manufacturing of electrical vehicles battery coolers (‘automotive HEX AFRPs’); aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and aluminium composite panels (‘ACP’); lithographic sheets; battery sheets; aluminium converter foil of gauge 30 to 60 microns (‘ACF-30-60’) and AFRPs for use in the manufacture of slats for venetian blinds.
Mar a leagtar síos i roinn 2.3.2 den Rialachán sealadach, bhí cornaí alúmanaim eisiata ag an gCoimisiún ó raon feidhme an táirge i dtaca le cornaí brataithe agus ACP a tháirgeadh.
As laid down in section 2.3.2 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission had excluded aluminium coils for the production of coated coils and ACP from the product scope.
Ina theannta sin, chuir an EA ráitis ó cheithre tháirgeoir ACP ar fáil gur féidir leo cainníochtaí leordhóthanacha den ábhar díolmhaithe a fháil agus, dá bhrí sin, nach bhfuil orthu aghaidh a thabhairt ar na saincheisteanna céanna agus atá ar Chuideachta A.
In addition, EA provided statements by four producers of ACP that they can source the exempted material in sufficient quantities and therefore do not face the same issues as Company A.
Mhaígh Cuideachta A freisin gur cheart na ráitis a chuir táirgeoirí ACP ar fáil a dhiúltú ar na forais nach páirtithe leasmhara cláraithe iad, nár chomhoibrigh siad leis an imscrúdú agus nár thug siad bunús lena gcuid ráiteas le fianaise thacaíochta.
Company A also claimed that the statements provided by the producers of ACP should be rejected on the grounds that they are not registered interested parties, that they did not cooperate with the investigation and did not substantiate their statements with supporting evidence.
Dúirt cuideachta A nach bhfreagraíonn meastachán tomhaltais an Choimisiúin don táirge díolmhaithe a úsáidtear chun ACPanna a tháirgeadh ós rud é go bhfuil gnéithe teicniúla sonracha an táirge sin an-dian agus go n-úsáideann roinnt táirgeoirí ACP AFRPanna atá brataithe.
Company A commented that the Commission’s consumption estimate does not correspond to the exempted product used for the production of ACPs as the specific technical features of that product are very strict and some ACP producers use coated AFRPs.
Ina theannta sin, tá táirgeoirí áirithe de chuid an Aontais (a tháirgeann AFRP, cornaí brataithe agus ACP araon) ag iarraidh a soláthar a theorannú do Chuideachta A ar mhaithe le hiomaíocht agus/nó le comhtháthú ingearach.
Furthermore, certain integrated Union producers (producing both AFRP, coated coils and ACP) want to limit their supply to Company A for reasons of competition and/or vertical integration.
D’athdhearbhaigh sé a mhaíomh freisin maidir le méid an mhargaidh corn brataithe dá dtagraítear cheana in aithris (177) agus chuir sé in iúl go raibh an táirge i gceist á cheannach ag Cuideachta A le blianta fada san Aontas agus gur thagair sé do na ráitis ó tháirgeoirí ACP eile dá dtagraítear cheana in aithris (170) agus a dtugtar aghaidh orthu in aithris (175)(176).
It also reiterated its claim related to the size of the coated coil market already referred to in recital (177) and indicated that Company A had been buying the product at stake for many years in the Union and referred to the statements by other ACP producers already referred to in recital (170) and addressed in recital (175)(176).
Ina theannta sin, mar a mhínítear in aithris (174) go haithris (180), cé nach ndiúltaítear go deimhin do tháirgeoirí áirithe AFRP an táirge díolmhaithe a mhonarú, is mian le táirgeoirí áirithe comhtháite de chuid an Aontais (a tháirgeann gach AFRP, cornaí brataithe agus ACP) a soláthar a theorannú do Chuideachta A ar mhaithe le hiomaíocht agus/nó comhtháthú ingearach, rud a fhágann nach bhfuil fáil leordhóthanach ar mhargadh an Aontais.
Furthermore, as explained in recitals (174) to (180), while it is not denied that certain AFRP producers are indeed able to manufacture the exempted product, certain integrated Union producers (producing all AFRP, coated coils and ACP) want to limit their supply to Company A for reasons of competition and/or vertical integration, thus leading to insufficient availability on the Union market.
I ndeireadh na dála, toisc go raibh táirgeoirí ACP eile in ann a AFRPanna a aimsiú san Aontas, níorbh ann don tuairim go raibh sin ar neamhréir le torthaí an Choimisiúin, rud a léiríonn nach bhfuil an táirge i gceist le fáil go leordhóthanach agus na riachtanais cháilíochta a bhaineann leis.
Eventually, the fact that other ACP producers could allegedly source their AFRPs in the Union was not found to contradict the Commission’s findings pointing to insufficient availability of the product at stake and its quality requirements.
Tar éis nochtadh cinntitheach a dhéanamh, mhaígh Cuideachta A go raibh deacrachtaí soláthair aici fós laistigh den Aontas agus lasmuigh de i gcás na AFRPanna díolmhaithe mar iarracht ar a cuid soláthairtí a áirithiú don bhliain 2022 agus go raibh tionchar an-diúltach ag an méadú mór ar phraghsanna de dheasca easpa soláthair AE ar a chuid gníomhaíochtaí ACP agus brataithe cornaí.
Following definitive disclosure, Company A claimed that it continued facing supply difficulties in and outside the EU for the exempted AFRPs in an attempt to secure its supplies for the year 2022 and that the sharp increase in prices due to the lack of EU supply had a very negative impact on its ACP and coated coil activities.
I bhfianaise an tionchair shuntasaigh a imrítear ar thíortha éagsúla ACC, le slógadh eisceachtúil na gcistí arna saoradh ó thionscnaimh faoin 10ú agus ón 11ú CEF ba cheart go gcuirfí ar chumas an Aontais agus a Bhallstáit dlús a chur lena bhfreagairt ar an ngéarchéim, aird ar leith á tabhairt acu ar na tíortha ACP is leochailí agus is neamhchosanta.
Given the significant impact in various ACP countries, the exceptional mobilisation of de-committed funds from projects under the 10th and 11th EDFs should enable the Union and its Member States to step up their response to the crisis, paying particular attention to the most vulnerable and exposed ACP countries.
I dteannta phointe (b), leis na cuspóirí feidhmiúlachta don oiliúint rátála i ndáil leis an rátáil Nós Imeachta um Rialú Limistéir (ACP) áiritheofar an méid seo a leanas i ndáil leis na hiarratasóirí:
In addition to point (b), rating training performance objectives for the Area Control Procedural (ACP) rating shall ensure that applicants:
Colúin tábla CVA (3); CGU (4a); TST (5); RSS (6a); ACP (6b); SDE (7a); CCL (7b); EIR (7c); SAS (7d); AWB (7e); ACT (9a); ACR (9b); ACE (9c); SSE (9d); TRD (9e); ETD (9f):
Table column CVA (3); CGU (4a); TST (5); RSS (6a); ACP (6b); SDE (7a); CCL (7b); EIR (7c); SAS (7d); AWB (7e); ACT (9a); ACR (9b); ACE (9c); SSE (9d); TRD (9e); ETD (9f):