De réir na faisnéise a cuireadh isteach, sa tréimhse tar éis an imscrúdaithe, tá méadú suntasach tar éis teacht ar ECP MEG, chomh maith leis an leathadh idir ECP MEG agus ECP na heitiléine (leathadh ECP eitiléine).
According to the information submitted, the ECP of MEG, as well as the spread between the ECP of MEG and the ECP of ethylene (the MEG-ethylene ECP spread), have increased considerably post-IP.
Níl hiad táirgeoirí MEG an Aontais a shocraíonn an Praghas Conartha Eorpach (“ECP”).
The Union MEG producers do not set the European Contract Price (‘ECP’).
Is éard atá in ECP léiriú ar phraghas san Aontas ag am áirithe, eadhon innéacs.
The ECP is an indication of a price in the EU at a given time, an index.
Go praiticiúil, tá roinnt soláthraithe ann a thuairiscíonn ECP.
In practice, several data providers report the ECP.
Sna díolacháin chonartha, tá an fhoirmle praghsanna bunaithe ar ECP lúide lascaine.
In the contract sales, the price formula is based on the ECP minus a discount.
Thairis sin, meabhraítear nach bhfuil in ECP ach gné amháin den phraghas deiridh agus go bhfuil an iomaíocht idir páirtithe bunaithe ar na lascaine a chuirtear i bhfeidhm maidir le ECP.
Furthermore, it is recalled that ECP is only one element of the final price and that the competition between parties is based on the discounts applied to the ECP.
Cé gur laghdaigh ECP le haghaidh MEG níos mó ná praghas na heitiléine agus go raibh laghdú ar an gcorrlach idir ECP le haghaidh MEG agus eitiléin, rud a mhíníonn cuid den chaillteanas brabúsachta i dtionscal an Aontais, i margadh trédhearcach amhail margadh MEG, ar a bhfuil na páirtithe go léir ag nascadh an phraghais díola le EPC, bíonn an iomaíocht ar siúl ar leibhéal na lascainí a chuirtear i bhfeidhm ar ECP.
While indeed the ECP for MEG decreased more than the ethylene price and there was a reduction in the margin between ECP for MEG and ethylene, which explains part of the loss in profitability of the Union industry, in a transparent market such as the MEG market, on which all players are linking the selling price to the EPC, the competition takes place at the level of the discounts applied to the ECP.
Cinntear praghas MEG le ECP agus an lascaine.
The price of MEG is determined by the ECP and the discount.
Léirigh sé ECP réamh-mheasta ar MEG go dtí mí na Nollag 2022.
It showed forecasted ECP of MEG up to December 2022.
Thug sé cairt ar aird freisin a léiríonn an leathadh idir ECP ar MEG agus ECP ar an eitiléin.
It also submitted a chart showing the spread between ECP for MEG and ECP for ethylene.
Slánófar EC agus ECp go dtí an chéad ionad deachúil.
EC and ECp shall be rounded to the first place of decimal.
Slánófar EC agus ECp go dtí an tslánuimhir is gaire.
EC and ECp shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
ECp,críochnaitheach, Wh/km;
ECp,final, Wh/km;
Slánófar ECind agus ECp,ind go dtí an tslánuimhir is gaire.
ECind and ECp,ind shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Slánófar ECcathrach agus ECp go dtí an chéad ionad deachúil.
ECcity and ECp shall be rounded to the first place of decimal.
Slánófar ECcathrach agus ECp go dtí an tslánuimhir is gaire.
ECcity and ECp shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Slánófar ECind, ECcathrach agus ECp,ind go dtí an tslánuimhir is gaire.
ECind, ECcity and ECp,ind shall be rounded to the nearest whole number.
Conclúidí an Choimisiúin in aithris (243) den Rialachán sealadach go ndearna onnmhaireoirí na hAraibe Sádaí agus SAM praghas díola MEG a bhrú síos tríd an lascaine a chur siad ar fáil do cheannaitheoirí a mhéadú, fiú más rud é go ndearna siad a bpraghas díola a nascadh ar mhargadh an Aontais le ECP, is amhlaidh a mhaígh SABIC agus MEGlobal Americas nach raibh feidhm ag na conclúidí sin maidir lena ndíolacháin MEG agus nach raibh san athraithe praghais ach toradh ar luaineacht ECP.
SABIC and MEGlobal Americas also stated that the Commission’s conclusions in recital (243) of provisional Regulation that the US and Saudi exporters, even if they linked their selling price on the Union market to the ECP, depressed the selling price of MEG by increasing the discount offered to the buyers, did not apply to their sales of MEG and that price changes were only the consequence of the fluctuation of the ECP.
Dá bhrí sin, níl ach cuid den scéal ag baint le leibhéal ECP maidir le leibhéil praghsanna ar mhargadh an Aontais, agus is príomheilimint í na lascainí a chuireann na díoltóirí i bhfeidhm maidir le ECP MEG ó thaobh an bhrú praghsanna a chuireann allmhaireoirí ar mhargadh an Aontais.
Therefore, the level of ECP tells only part of the story of the price levels on the Union market and the discounts applied by the sellers to the ECP of MEG is the key element in the price pressure exercised by the exporters on the Union market.
Cé go ndéanann leibhéal ECP difear do na páirtithe uile, fiú má thagann méadú ar ECP le haghaidh MEG, fad a leanfaidh na honnmhaireoirí ó na tíortha lena mbaineann de bheith ag díol ar mhargadh an Aontais ar phraghsanna dumpáilte le lascainí níos airde ná tionscal an Aontais, leanfaidh táirgeoirí an Aontais de bheith ag cailleadh a sciar den mhargadh mura socróidh siad a bpraghsanna, tríd an lascaine, ar an leibhéal céanna leis na praghsanna díobhálacha a bhfuil siad in iomaíocht leo, atá faoi bhun a gcostas táirgthe.
While the level of the ECP affects all parties, even if the ECP of MEG increases, as long as the exporters from the countries concerned continue to sell on the Union market at dumped prices with higher discounts than the Union industry, the Union producers will continue to lose market share unless they set their prices, through the discount, at the same level as the injurious prices with which they compete, which are below their cost of production.
Níor chuir CPME aon fhianaise ar fáil go bhfuil feabhas tagtha ar staid eacnamaíoch tháirgeoirí an Aontais de bharr méadú den sórt sin ar ECP agus ar leathadh ECP ó MEG go eitiléin.
CPME has not provided any evidence that such increase in the ECP of MEG and the MEG-ethylene ECP spread has led to improvements in the economic situation of the Union producers.
Tá rannpháirtíocht i suirbhéanna ECP oscailte freisin d’aon pháirtí a dhíolann nó a cheannaíonn MEG ar bhealach ábhartha ar an margadh, lena n-áirítear na hallmhaireoirí.
Participation in the ECP surveys is also open to any party selling or buying MEG in a material way in the marketplace including the importers.
Cé gur innéacs míosúil a fhoilsíonn faisnéis mhargaidh atá in ECP mar a mhínítear in aithris (242), tá an lascaine faoi rún.
While ECP is a monthly index published by market intelligence as explained in recital (242), the discount is confidential.
Dá bhrí sin, ní féidir na héifeachtaí díobhálacha ar mhargadh an Aontais a chur i leith an innéacs ECP ann féin.
Therefore, the injurious effects on the Union market cannot be attributable to the ECP index as such.
Ó tharla go mbíonn gach cineál díoltóra ag nascadh a bpraghas díola le ECP, is é an lascaine a chuireann an bhrú, mar a mhionsonraítear in aithris (213).
As all types of sellers are linking their selling price to the ECP, the price pressure is made through the discount as explained in detail in recital (213).
Tharla sé sin toisc gur thug tionscal an Aontais lascainí níos ísle dá chuideachtaí gaolmhara ná dá chustaiméirí neamhghaolmhara maidir leis an bPraghas Conartha Eorpach (“ECP”) ar MEG.
This was due to the Union industry applying lower discounts to the ECP of MEG to its related companies than to unrelated customers.
D’athdhearbhaigh CMPE a maíomh freisin, tar éis thréimhse an imscrúdaithe, gur tháinig méadú ar ECP ar MEG.
CPME also reiterated their claim that, post-IP, the ECP for MEG increased.
D’áitigh sé gur théarnaimh tionscal an Aontais ón díobháil ábhartha a bhain dó le linn thréimhse an imscrúdaithe i ngeall ar threocht ECP ar MEG agus ar eitiléin.
It argued that because of the trend of the ECP for MEG and ethylene the Union industry recovered from the material injury suffered during the investigation period.
An praghas díola ar MEG ar mhargadh an Aontais, is praghas é a shocraítear ar bhonn ECP lúide lascaine.
The selling price on the Union market for MEG is set up based on ECP minus a discount.
Tá na lascainí faoi thionchar ag an iomaíocht ar mhargadh an Aontais agus níl siad nasctha le leibhéal ECP ná leis na praghsanna san Áise.
The discounts are influenced by the competition on the Union market and are not linked to the level of ECP or the prices in Asia.
Cé gur faisnéis phoiblí atá sa leibhéal ECP, tá na lascainí a úsáideann na díoltóirí faoi rún.
While the level of ECP is public, the discounts used by the sellers are confidential.
Ina theannta sin, mar a mhínítear in aithris (213), agus praghas MEG á mheasúnú, ní leor féachaint ar threocht ECP amháin.
Furthermore, as explained in recital (213), when assessing the price of MEG, it is not sufficient to look only at the trend of ECP.
Ina theannta sin, mar a míníodh go fairsing, is í an lascaine a chuireann an díoltóir ar ECP MEG an eilimint a chruthaigh an brú praghsanna ar mhargadh an Aontais.
Furthermore, as extensively explained, the discount applied to the ECP of MEG by the seller is the element that created the price pressure on the Union market.
Mheas CPME gur rud struchtúrach marthanach a bhí sa mhéadú ar ECP ar MEG tar éis an imscrúdaithe.
CPME considered that the increase in the ECP for MEG post-IP are of a structural and lasting nature.
Thug sé cairt ar aird a léiríonn ECP ar MEG idir mí Eanáir 2014 agus mí Dheireadh Fómhair 2021.
It submitted a chart showing the ECP for MEG between January 2014 and October 2021.
5. MEABHRAÍONN SÍ DI an Comhthuarascáil maidir le Córais Sláinte a d’ullmhaigh an Coimisiún Eorpach (CE) agus an Coiste um Beartas Geilleagair (EPC) a cuireadh i gcrích an 23 Samhain 2010, chomh maith leis na Conclúidí ón gComhairle i ndáil leis an gComhthuarascáil CE-ECP maidir le Córais Sláinte, a glacadh an 7 Nollaig 2010;
5. RECALLS the Joint Report on Health Systems prepared by the European Commission (EC) and the Economic Policy Committee (EPC) finalised on 23 November 2010, as well as the Council conclusions on the EC-EPC Joint Report on Health Systems, adopted on 7 December 2010;
Mhaígh Arteco agus Oxyde nach raibh tionchar ag na hallmhairí ó na Stáit Aontaithe agus ó Ríocht na hAraibe Sádaí san Aontas ar an sásra um shocrú praghsanna ar MEG de bhrí gur táirge a thrádáiltear ar fud an domhain a bhí ann agus gur shocraigh an gearánach an Praghas Conartha Eorpach (“ECP”).
Arteco and Oxyde claimed that the imports from the US and the KSA into the Union did not influence the price-setting mechanism for MEG, as it was a globally traded product and that the complainant set the European Contract Price (‘ECP’).
Go deimhin, leanann ECP praghas MEG san Áise go pointe áirithe, agus bíonn tionchar ag an éabhlóid ar phraghas na heitiléine ar phraghas díola MEG toisc gur príomh-amhábhar MEG í an t-eitiléin.
Indeed, the ECP follows to a certain extent the MEG price in Asia and the evolution of the price of ethylene, as the main raw material, has an influence on the selling price of MEG.
Fiú má nascann allmhaireoirí na Stát Aontaithe agus na hAraibe Sádaí a bpraghas díola ar mhargadh an Aontais le ECP, tá praghas díola MEG brúite síos acu i ngeall ar an lascaine a chuireann siad ar fáil do na ceannaitheoirí.
The US and the Saudi exporters, even if they link their selling price on the Union market to ECP, depressed the selling price of MEG by increasing the discount offered to the buyers.
Shonraigh SABIC agus MEGlobal Americas nár aontaigh siad le conclúid an Choimisiúin in aithris (168) den Rialachán sealadach toisc, dar leo, gurbh iad na táirgeoirí agus na húsáideoirí de chuid an Aontais seachas na hallmhaireoirí a shocraigh na praghsanna MEG agus gur ar chaibidlíocht idir táirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais agus a gcustaiméirí a cinneadh an Praghas Conartha Eorpach (“ECP”).
SABIC and MEGlobal Americas also stated that they disagreed with the Commission’s conclusion in recital (168) of the provisional Regulation as, according to them, prices of MEG were set by Union producers and users and not exporters and that the European Contract Price (‘ECP’) was determined upon negotiations between Union producers and their customers.
Is amhlaidh nach n-aithníonn SABIC agus MEGlobal Americas gur fiú amháin mura nglacann ach na táirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais páirt sna suirbhéanna leis an gnólachtaí comhairliúchán a agus a thugann an fhaisnéis is ga dóibh maidir lena gconarthaí chun ECP a shocrú, nuair a dhéanann táirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais an praghas a chaibidliú lena gcustaiméirí ar mhargadh an Aontais, tá tionchar ag an iomaíocht leis na honnmhaireoirí ar chaibidlíocht na bpraghsanna.
SABIC and MEGlobal Americas fail to recognise that even if only the Union producers participate in the surveys with the consultancy firms and provide them with the necessary information regarding their selling contracts for setting up the ECP, when the Union producers negotiate the price on the Union market with their customers, the competition with the exporters has a bearing on the price negotiations.
Sna barúlacha a thug sé tar éis an nochta deiridh, athdhearbhaigh SABIC a mhaíomh gur chloígh sé le ECP agus nár shocraigh sé é, agus gur leantóir praghsanna seachas socraitheoir praghsanna ar mhargadh an Aontais a bhí ann toisc gurbh iad táirgeoirí agus úsáideoirí de chuid an Aontais a shocraigh na praghsanna.
In their comments following final disclosure, SABIC reiterated their claim that it followed the ECP and did not set it, that SABIC was a price follower and not price-setter on the Union market as the prices were set by Union producers and users.
D’áitigh SABIC, MEGlobal Americas agus CMPE gur cheart don Choimisiún na sonraí iar-imscrúdaithe a chur san áireamh toisc gur mhéadaigh ECP ar MEG tar éis thréimhse an imscrúdaithe, agus líomhnaítear gur rud é sin a chruthaigh feabhsuithe suntasacha ó thaobh bhrabúsacht tháirgeoirí an Aontais de, agus go raibh tréimhse an imscrúdaithe faoi thionchar ag paindéim COVID-19 agus ag na praghsanna ísle ar fud an domhain.
SABIC, MEGlobal Americas and CPME argued that the Commission should take into account post-IP data as the ECP of MEG increased post-IP which allegedly led to significant improvements in the profitability of the Union producers and the investigation period was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and low prices worldwide.
Cé gur go raibh an laghdú ar ECP MEG ina chúis leis an laghdú ar chuid de bhrabúsacht thionscal an Aontais, an brú ar phraghsanna ó phraghsanna dumpáilte na dtáirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin, táirgeoirí a mhéadaigh a gcuid lascainí ar mhargadh an Aontais, chuir an brú sin iallach ar thionscal an Aontais a gcuid lascainí a mhéadú chomh maith, rud a d’fhág gur brúdh síos phraghsanna mar a léiríodh in aithris (203) den Rialachán sealadach.
While the decrease in the ECP of MEG reduced part of the profitability of the Union industry, the price pressure exercised by the exporting producers at dumped prices, and who increased their discounts on the Union market, forced the Union industry to increase their discounts as well, leading to price suppression as found in recital (203) of the provisional Regulation.
Tá ról suntasach ag an lascaine a chuirtear i bhfeidhm ar ECP sa bhrú praghsanna a chuireann onnmhaireoirí i bhfeidhm ar mhargadh an Aontais agus níl an leibhéal lascaine nasctha le haon treocht dhomhanda.
The discount applied to the ECP plays a significant role in the price pressure exercised by the exporters on the Union market and the level of discount is not linked to any global trend.
Fiú má thagann méadú ar leibhéal ECP sa tréimhse iar-imscrúdaithe, leanfaidh tionscal an Aontais de bheith ag cailleadh a sciar den mhargadh i bhfabhar na n-onnmhaireoirí ó na tíortha lena mbaineann má leanann siad de bheith ag díol ar mhargadh an Aontais ar phraghsanna díobhálacha.
Even if the level of the ECP increases post-IP, the Union industry will continue to lose market share in favour of the exporters from the countries concerned if they continue to sell on the Union market at injurious prices.