#2414427
An Biúró Eorpach Comhshaoil (EEB)
European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
13 toradh in 2 dhoiciméad
#2415001
Chuir EEB a bharúlacha isteach an 15 Aibreán 2021.
The EEB submitted its comments on 15 April 2021.
#2415008
Mar a áitíonn EEB, fuair rialtas na Rómáine maoluithe faoi theorainn ama maidir le leibhéil NOx.
As the EEB submits, the Romanian government obtained time-limited derogations concerning the NOx levels.
#2414267
Fuair an Coimisiún barúlacha maidir leis an ábhar sin laistigh den tréimhse fhorordaithe ó na tríú páirtithe seo a leanas: an Biúró Eorpach Comhshaoil (EEB), Bankwatch na Rómáine/ClientEarth, agus Greenpeace.
The Commission received comments on this subject within the prescribed period from the following third parties: the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), Bankwatch Romania/ClientEarth, and Greenpeace.
#2414425
Le linn an nóis imeachta imscrúdaithe fhoirmiúil, fuair an Coimisiún barúlacha ó na tríú páirtithe a leanas: EEB, Bankwatch na Rómáine/ClientEarth, agus Greenpeace.
In the course of the formal investigation procedure, the Commission received comments from the following third parties: the EEB, Bankwatch Romania/ClientEarth, and Greenpeace.
#2414428
Chuir EEB in aghaidh úsáid Státchabhrach chun dlí an Aontais a chomhlíonadh ó thaobh astaíochtaí CO2, luatha, NOx agus SO2.
The EEB objected to allowing the use of State aid for complying with Union law in terms of CO2, ash, NOx and SO2 emissions.
#2414431
Níor comhlíonadh an méid sin i gcás CE Oltenia, ós rud é, de réir EEB, go raibh comhlíontacht le teorainneacha astaíochtaí le haghaidh truailliú aeir mar chuid den phlean athstruchtúrúcháin tosaigh féin.
This was not complied with in the case of CE Oltenia, as according to the EEB, the compliance with emission limits for air pollution was part of the initial restructuring plan itself.
#2414432
Tharraing EEB ábhair imní anuas freisin maidir le caighdeáin astaíochta a bheith á neamhchomhlíonadh ag CE Oltenia le blianta beaga anuas (NOx, SO2, ábhair cháithníneacha, etc.).
The EEB also raised concerns about CE Oltenia's non-compliance with emission standards in recent years (NOx, SO2, particulate matters, etc.).
#2414433
Léirigh EEB gur sháraigh gléasraí ligníte CE Oltenia na leibhéil astaíochta faoi chóras Threoir 2010/75/AE.
The EEB pointed out that CE Oltenia's lignite plants exceeded the emission levels under the regime of Directive 2010/75/EU.
#2714792
sa Liotuáinis: Reglamento (EEB, Euratomas) Nr. 1182/71 3 straipsnio 4 dalis netaikoma
In Lithuanian: Reglamento (EEB, Euratomas) Nr. 1182/71 3 straipsnio 4 dalis netaikoma
#2414434
D’áitigh EEB thairis sin go bhféadfadh sé go dtabharfadh CE Oltenia conarthaí déthaobhacha i gcrích ag praghsanna seasta i gcónaí, ach nach gcomhaontódh aon fhiontar príobháideach le conradh den sórt sin a d’fhágfadh go mbeadh air an iomarca a íoc ar fhuinneamh a ghintear le breoslaí iontaise costasacha.
The EEB further submitted that CE Oltenia might always conclude bilateral contracts at fixed prices, but no private enterprise would agree to such a contract that would make it overpay energy generated by expensive fossil fuels.
#2414436
Léirigh EEB freisin go leanfadh CE Oltenia de bheith gaibhnithe i mbreoslaí iontaise i bhfad i ndiaidh 2026, rud a d’fhágfadh go mbeadh cuid mhór amhrais ann i dtaobh an mbeadh nó nach mbeadh plean athstruchtúrúcháin den sórt sin inmharthana sa mheántéarma i bhfianaise na bpraghsanna méadaitheacha CO2.
The EEB also pointed out that CE Oltenia would remain locked-in in fossil fuels well after 2026, making it highly disputable that such a restructuring plan would be viable on the medium term in view of the increasing CO2 prices.
#2414456
Mar fhreagairt ar bharúlacha EEB nach gcomhlíonfaí “prionsabal an infheisteora phríobháidigh i ngeilleagar an mhargaidh” le haon chonradh déthaobhach ó CE Oltenia, thug an Rómáin dá haire go dtugtar conarthaí CE Oltenia i gcrích ar ardáin OPCOM agus go bhfuil siad margadhbhunaithe dá bhrí sin.
In response to the EEB’s comments that any bilateral contracts by CE Oltenia with other public companies would not meet the ‘market economy investor principle’, Romania noted that CE Oltenia’s contracts are concluded on OPCOM platforms and so are market-based.