#2916618
ERGP, Draft ERGP Report on Net Cost Calculation and Evaluation of a Reference Scenario,, 24 Samhain 2011, leathanach 29.
ERGP, Draft ERGP Report on Net Cost Calculation and Evaluation of a Reference Scenario, 24 November 2011), page 29.
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
15 toradh i ndoiciméad amháin
#2916623
Ó ARCEP, ERGP, agus Frontier Economics (féach aithris (49)).
From ARCEP, ERGP, and Frontier Economics (see recital (49)).
#2915497
Tagraíonn SLD ina leith sin do na tuarascálacha céanna ó ARCEP agus Frontier Economics a liostaítear in aithris (49) agus do thuarascáil ó ERGP ó 2011.
SLD in this respect refers to the same reports from ARCEP and Frontier Economics listed in recital (49) and a report from ERGP from 2011.
#2915520
Tuairiscíonn JJD, ag féachaint don tuarascáil ó ERGP go n-úsáideann soláthraithe USO a líonra USO chun seirbhísí nach seirbhísí USO iad a sholáthar, rud atá ina thairbhe nach beag.
JJD, with reference to the ERGP report claims that USO providers use their USO network for providing non-USO services, which constitute a considerable benefit.
#2916457
Ar an gcéad dul síos, luaitear sna tuarascálacha ‘go mb’fhéidir’ (Frontier Economics) nó ‘go bhféadfadh sé’ (ERGP) go mbeadh sochair ann atá bainteach le comhlacht a bheith ina sholáthraí seirbhíse uilíche.
First, the reports state that there ‘might’ (Frontier Economics) or ‘may’’ (ERGP) be benefits associated with being the universal service provider.
#2916458
Luaitear freisin i dtuarascáil ERGP gur beag fianaise atá ann maidir leis na sochair a bhaineann le cumhacht mhargála a bheith ann vis-à-vis polaiteoirí agus údaráis rialála.
The ERGP report also states that there is little evidence as to the benefits of having bargaining power vis-à-vis politicians and regulatory authorities.
#2916616
Grúpa na Rialálaithe Eorpacha um Sheirbhísí Poist (ERGP), Exploration of challenges to overcome when implementing a net cost calculation methodology based on a reference scenario - Benchmark of experiences, 13 Bealtaine 2014.
European Regulators Group for Postal Services (ERGP), Exploration of challenges to overcome when implementing a net cost calculation methodology based on a reference scenario - Benchmark of experiences, 13 May 2014.
#2916626
Déantar tagairt do thrí thuarascáil ARCEP (2010), leathanach 10; Frontier Economics (2013), leathanach 111 (féach aithris (49)); agus ERGP (2011), leathanach 30 (féach fonóta 41).
Reference is made to three reports ARCEP (2010), page 10; Frontier Economics (2013), page 111 (see recital (49)); and ERGP (2011), page 30 (see footnote 41).
#2916677
Féach freisin tuarascáil ERGP leathanach 17 agus tuarascáil ó Frontier Economics, leathanach 58, ar chuir na páirtithe leasmhara iad araon isteach.
See also ERGP report page 17 and Frontier economics report, page 58, both submitted by the interested parties.
#2915494
Chun bunús a thabhairt lena ráitis, tagraíonn na páirtithe leasmhara do thuarascálacha ó na húdaráis rialála sa Bheilg (IBPT) ó 2014, sa Fhrainc (ARCEP) ó 2010, tuarascáil ó Frontier Economics a ullmhaíodh don Choimisiún in 2013, tuarascáil ó Ghrúpa na Rialálaithe Eorpacha um Sheirbhísí Poist (ERGP) ó 2014, agus staidéar ó WIK Consult a ullmhaíodh le haghaidh AS um an Margadh Inmheánach, Tionsclaíocht, Fiontraíocht agus FBManna.
To substantiate their statements, the interested parties refer to reports from the regulatory authorities in Belgium (IBPT) from 2014, France (ARCEP) from 2010, a report from Frontier Economics prepared for the Commission in 2013, a report from the European Regulators Group for Postal Services (ERGP) from 2014 and a study from WIK Consult prepared for DG GROW.
#2915898
Maidir leis an argóint a thógtar ó thuarascáil ERGP 2011 agus ó thuarascáil Frontier Economics 2013 go raibh, i ngeall ar USO, rochtain níos éasca ag Post Danmark ar pholaiteoirí agus tionchar níos láidre aige ar an gcóras rialála ná mar a bhí ag a iomaitheoirí, tugann an Danmhairg dá haire go bhfuil na tuarascálacha sin idir 9 mbliana agus 11 bhliain d’aois agus as dáta toisc nach gcuirtear san áireamh iontu bunathrú digiteach mhargadh poist na Danmhairge.
Concerning the argument taken from the 2011 ERGP report and the 2013 Frontier Economics report that, because of the USO, Post Danmark has easier access to politicians and stronger influence over the regulatory regime than its competitors, Denmark notes that those reports are 9 to 11 years old and outdated as they do not take the major digital disruption of the Danish postal market into account.
#2916428
Staidéar ERGP ó 2014, dá dtagraíonn na páirtithe leasmhara, ní féidir é a úsáid chun tacú le líomhain an iarratasóra: cé is moite den staidéar féin a bheith 6 bliana d’aois cheana féin (i gcomparáid le 2020, arb í bliain chúiteamh USO í is ábhar don chinneadh seo), tá sé ag brath ar thuarascáil atá níos sine fós ó Copenhagen Economics ó 2008.
A ERGP study from 2014, referred to by the interested parties cannot be used to support the applicants allegation: apart from the study itself already being six years old (compared to 2020, which is the year of the USO compensation subject of this decision), it relies upon an even older report from Copenhagen economics from 2008.
#2916455
Déanann na páirtithe leasmhara tagairt do dhá thuarascáil a líomhnaítear go dtacófaí leo gur sochar doláimhsithe í an chumhacht mhargála (i dtreo polaiteoirí agus na n-údarás rialála) (tuarascáil ERGP ó 2011 agus tuarascáil ó Frontier Economics ó 2013).
The interested parties refer to two reports that allegedly would support that bargaining power (towards politicians and the regulatory authorities) is an intangible benefit (an ERGP report from 2011 and a Frontier Economics report from 2013).
#2916624
Is iad seo a leanas na tuarascálacha dá dtagraítear: Postcomm An assessment of the costs and benefits of Consignia’s current Universal Service Provision, Meitheamh 2001; agus an tuarascáil ó ERGP agus ó Frontier Economic (aithris (49)).
The reports referred to are: Postcomm, An assessment of the costs and benefits of Consignia’s current Universal Service Provision, June 2001; and the ERGP and Frontier Economic report (recital (49)).
#2916625
Luaitear sa tuarascáil ó ERGP, ar leathanach 28: ‘tugann comhlántachtaí éilimh le tuiscint go bhféadfadh díolacháin mhéadaithe de tháirgí (brabúsacha) eile ar táirgí USO iad eascairt as na díolacháin sin de tháirgí neamhbhrabúsacha áirithe ar táirgí USO iad. D’fhéadfadh sé tarlú freisin go mbeidh tionchar ar dhíolacháin táirgí brabúsacha nach táirgí USO iad agus fiú ar tháirgí nach táirgí poist iad’.
The ERGP report, on page 28, states: ‘demand complementarities imply that those sales of some loss-making USO products may result in increased sales of other (profitable) USO products. It is also possible that there is an impact on sales of profitable non-USO products and even non-mail products’.