#2480187
Chuir an Coimisiún ceistneoir chuig Jushi Egypt agus Hengshi Egypt, a d’fhreagair siad.
The Commission sent a questionnaire to Jushi Egypt and Hengshi Egypt, to which they replied.
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
27 toradh in 2 dhoiciméad
#2480174
Bhain an t-ath-imscrúdú leis an dleacht frithdhumpála 20 % atá ann faoi láthair agus atá á forchur ar Jushi Egypt For Fiberglass Industry S.A.E (“Jushi Egypt”), Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics S.A.E. (“Hengshi Egypt”) (dá ngairtear “CNBM Group” i dteannta a chéile) agus “Gach cuideachta eile” mar a leagtar amach in Airteagal 1(2) de Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2020/492.
The reinvestigation concerned the current anti-dumping duty of 20 % imposed on Jushi Egypt For Fiberglass Industry S.A.E (‘Jushi Egypt’), Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics S.A.E. (‘Hengshi Egypt’) (collectively referred to as ‘CNBM group’) and on ‘All other companies’ as set out in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492.
#463693
Egypt 45
Egypt 45
#2480182
Mar sin féin, ós rud é nár tháinig aon táirgeoir eile chun tosaigh ach Jushi Egypt agus Hengshi Egypt, ní raibh gá le sampláil.
However, since only Jushi Egypt and Hengshi Egypt came forward, sampling was not necessary.
#2480189
I bhfianaise ráig COVID-19, ní raibh an Coimisiún in ann cuairteanna fíorúcháin a thabhairt de bhun Airteagal 16 den bhun-Rialachán ar áitreabh Jushi Egypt, Hengshi Egypt agus ar áitreabh an trádálaí a bhaineann le Hengshi Egypt, Huajin Capital Limited i Hong Cong.
In view of the outbreak of COVID-19, the Commission could not carry out verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation at the premises of Jushi Egypt, Hengshi Egypt and trader related to Hengshi Egypt, Huajin Capital Limited in Hong Kong.
#2480191
Ina theannta sin, tugadh cuairteanna fíorúcháin de bhun Airteagal 16 den bhun-Rialachán ar áitreabh na n-allmhaireoirí/na trádálaithe seo a leanas a bhaineann le Jushi Egypt/Hengshi Egypt:
Furthermore, verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following importers/traders related to Jushi Egypt/Hengshi Egypt:
#2480241
I gcás Hengshi Egypt, níor díoladh dhá chineál táirge a dhíoltar in AIP in OIP.
For Hengshi Egypt, two product types sold in the AIP were not sold in the OIP.
#2480246
Níor chonspóid Hengshi Egypt aon cheann de na cinntí sin san imscrúdú bunaidh.
None of these determinations were contested by Hengshi Egypt in the original investigation.
#2480252
I bhfianaise an méid thuas, ní mór diúltú don mhaíomh a d’ardaigh Hengshi Egypt.
In light of the above, the claim raised by Hengshi Egypt has to be rejected.
#2480253
Mar fhreagra ar an nochtadh deiridh, níor chomhaontaigh Jushi Egypt caitheamh le Jushi Egypt chomh maith le Hengshi Egypt i gcomhpháirt chun críocha Airteagal 12(5) den bhun-Rialachán maidir le hathbhreithniú gnáthluachanna a chur i bhfeidhm.
In response to the final disclosure, Jushi Egypt disagreed to treat both Jushi Egypt as well as Hengshi Egypt jointly for the purposes of applying Article 12(5) of the basic Regulation on revision of normal values.
#2480258
Thairis sin, de réir Jushi Egypt, ba cheart an corrlach aonair dumpála do ghrúpa na cuideachta a bheith bunaithe ar an gcorrlach dumpála athbhreithnithe do Jushi Egypt agus ar an gcorrlach dumpála bunaidh do Hengshi Egypt.
Moreover, according to Jushi Egypt, the single dumping margin for the company group should have been based on the revised dumping margin for Jushi Egypt and the original dumping margin for Hengshi Egypt.
#2480266
Ar na cúiseanna a leagtar amach thuas, ní mór diúltú do mhaíomh Jushi Egypt.
For the reasons set out above, Jushi Egypt’s claim has to be rejected.
#2480326
Jushi Egypt For Fiberglass
Jushi Egypt For Fiberglass Industry S.A.E;
#2480327
Industry S.A.E; Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics S.A.E.
Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics S.A.E.
#2480255
Chuir Jushi Egypt in iúl go raibh praghsanna onnmhairiúcháin Hengshi Egypt ag an leibhéal céanna fós le linn OIP cé gur chuir sé féin leis an laghdú ar phraghas onnmhairiúcháin líomhnaithe do CNBM Group iomlán.
Jushi Egypt submitted that while it itself contributed to the alleged export price decrease for the whole CNBM group, Hengshi Egypt’s export prices remained at the same level as during the OIP.
#2480256
Mar thoradh ar iarracht Jushi Egypt a chostais in AIP a laghdú, tharla laghdú ar praghsanna onnmhairiúcháin Jushi Egypt, áfach, agus dá bhrí sin bheadh éifeacht chomhionann leis an laghdú ar na costais ar an ngnáthluach.
The decrease in Jushi Egypt’s export prices, however, would be the result of Jushi Egypt’s effort in lowering its costs in the AIP, and there would therefore be an equal effect of the decrease in costs on the normal value.
#2480259
Ar an gcéad dul síos, mar a leagtar amach in aithris (29), tugtar faoi deara gur bunaíodh laghdú 12 % ar phraghas na n-onnmhairí do CNBM Group ina bhfuil Jushi Egypt agus Hengshi Egypt, arbh é an toradh a bhí air sin na corrlaigh dhumpála a athríomh don dá eintiteas táirgeoirí de bhun Airteagal 12(2) den bhun-Rialachán.
First, as outlined in recital (29), it is noted that an export price decrease of 12 % was established for the CNBM group comprising both Jushi Egypt and Hengshi Egypt, which led to the recalculation of dumping margins for both producing entities pursuant to Article 12(2) of the basic Regulation.
#2480260
Ar an dara dul síos, meabhraítear gur luaigh CNBM Group go sainráite nach mbeadh sé ag iarraidh athbhreithniú ar an ngnáthluach le haghaidh a gcuid táirgeoirí onnmhairithe gaolmhara, Jushi Egypt agus Hengshi Egypt.
Second, it is recalled that the CNBM group explicitly stated that it would not seek revision of the normal value for their related exporting producers, Jushi Egypt and Hengshi Egypt.
#2480265
Tugtar faoi deara freisin maidir le cóireáil Jushi Egypt agus Hengshi Egypt mar a bhaineann leis an ngrúpa corparáideach céanna, tá an cur chuige a ghlac an Coimisiún san ath-imscrúdú seo ag teacht go hiomlán leis an gcur chuige a glacadh san imscrúdú bunaidh.
It is further noted with regards to the treatment of Jushi Egypt and Hengshi Egypt as pertaining to the same corporate group that the approach taken by the Commission in this reinvestigation is fully consistent with the approach adopted in the original investigation.
#2480240
I gcás Jushi Egypt, díoladh gach cineál táirge a dhíoltar in AIP freisin in OIP agus dá bhrí sin bhí na gnáthluachanna uile ar fáil go héasca.
For Jushi Egypt, all product types sold in the AIP were also sold in the OIP and hence all normal values were readily available.
#2480242
Dá bhrí sin, cuireadh an gnáthluach do na cineálacha táirgí is mó a bhí cosúil le chéile a dhíolann Hengshi Egypt in ionad an ghnáthluacha don dá tháirge sin san imscrúdú bunaidh.
Normal value for those two products was therefore replaced by the normal value for the most closely resembling product types sold by Hengshi Egypt in the original investigation.
#2480244
Ina ionad sin, mhol Hengshi Egypt go n-úsáidfí an gnáthluach ó OIP do cheann eile, a líomhnaítear gurb é an cineál táirge is gaire é.
Instead, Hengshi Egypt suggested that the normal value from the OIP for another, allegedly nearest product type be used.
#2480254
Creideann Jushi Egypt gur cheart go mbeadh a hiarraidh aonair ar athmheasúnú ar an ngnáthluach glactha ag an gCoimisiún.
Jushi Egypt suggests that the Commission should have accepted its individual request for reassessment of the normal value.
#2480257
Mar fhocal scoir, áitíonn Jushi Egypt nach raibh a chuid praghsanna onnmhairiúcháin ionsúite, agus dá bhrí sin, ná na praghsanna onnmhairiúcháin CNBM Group ach an oiread.
In conclusion, Jushi Egypt argues that therefore its export prices were not absorbed and consequently neither the export prices of the CNBM group.
#2480271
Ina theannta sin, le linn AIP, d’onnmhairigh Hengshi Egypt GFF chuig an Aontas freisin trí thrádálaí gaolmhar atá suite lasmuigh den Aontas, i Hong Cong.
Furthermore, during the AIP, Hengshi Egypt exported GFF to the Union also through a related trader located outside the Union, in Hong Kong.
#2480243
Mhaígh Hengshi Egypt ina fhreagra ar an nochtadh deiridh nach iomchuí, i gcás ceann amháin de na cineálacha táirgí, an gnáthluach a úsáid ó OIP, ós rud é nach ndearnadh an cineál táirge sin ach mar chuid de tháirgeadh trialach agus gur díoladh i gcainníocht bheag é mar shampla.
Hengshi Egypt claimed in its reply to the final disclosure that for one of the product types, it is inappropriate to use the normal value from the OIP, given that such product type was only made as part of a trial production and sold in a small quantity as a sample.
#2480250
Ina theannta sin, cé go bhféadfadh Hengshi Egypt athbhreithniú a iarraidh ar an ngnáthluach bunaithe ar Airteagal 12(5) den bhun-Rialachán, dá mba rud é gur mheas sé gur tharla athruithe ar ghnáthluachanna in AIP a raibh athscrúdú tuillte acu, ní dhearna sé amhlaidh.
In addition, although Hengshi Egypt could have requested a revision of the normal value based on Article 12(5) of the basic Regulation, if it considered that changes in normal values occurred in the AIP that merited re-examination, it did not do so.