#158015
Taraxacum got/andicum (Dahlst.) Dahlst.
Taraxacum gotlandicum (Dahlst.) Dahlst.
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
77 toradh in 2 dhoiciméad
#2091200
Bhí éisteachtaí ann leis na trí tháirgeoir easpórtála a sampláladh agus le GOT (Rialtas na Tuirce).
Hearings took place with the three sampled exporting producers and the GOT.
#2091853
Thug an Coimisiún míchruinneas ráitis GOT dá aire.
The Commission noted the inaccuracy of the GOT’s statements.
#2091946
Níor chuir GOT aon fhianaise ar fáil chun bunús a thabhairt lena mhaíomh.
The GOT provided no evidence to substantiate its claim.
#2091910
Maidir leis an gcomparáid praghsanna a rinne GOT idir praghsanna allmhairiúcháin ón Tuirc agus allmhairiúcháin iompórtála ó fhoinsí eile, tugann an Coimisiún dá aire nach gcuirtear faisnéis iomlán in iúl maidir leis na hallmhairí bhfoinsí eile, ós rud é gur thug GOT neamhaird ar an bhfíoras go bhfuil praghsanna dleachtanna frithdhumpála agus frithchúitimh a íocadh gan áireamh i sonraí Eurostat.
As to the price comparison made by the GOT between import prices from Turkey and import prices from other sources, the Commission notes that the latter are understated as the GOT disregarded the fact that Eurostat data on prices do not include anti-dumping and countervailing duties paid.
#2091564
Mheas GOT (Rialtas na Tuirce) nár mhínigh an Coimisiún go sásúil cén fáth gur ghá scrúdú ar leithligh a dhéanamh ar an margadh saor agus ar na figiúirí faoi chuing.
The GOT considered that the Commission did not satisfactorily explain why it was necessary to examine free market and captive figures separately.
#2091635
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, mheas GOT nach bhféadfadh praghsanna allmhairí Turcach díobháil a dhéanamh do tháirgeoirí an Aontais.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT considered that prices of Turkish imports could have not caused injury to Union producers.
#2091642
Thairis sin, faoi mar a d’admhaigh GOT é féin, is difríocht bheag sna praghsanna a thug ann do mhéadú ar sciar an mhargaidh d’allmhairí na Tuirce.
Moreover, as the GOT itself had admitted, a small price difference entailed the increase in the market share of Turkish imports.
#2091686
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, mheas GOT gur léirigh an méadú ar acmhainneacht thionscal an Aontais gach bliain ó 2016 i leith go bhfuil caoi mhaith air.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT considered that the fact that the Union industry increased its capacity every year since 2016 showed that it was in in good condition.
#2091688
Cháin GOT easpa anailíse ar leith idir an margadh faoi chuing agus margadh saor faoin mír seo, easpa nach bhféadfaí údar an laghdaithe iomláin sa táirgeacht a aithint dá bharr.
The GOT criticised the absence of a separate analysis between captive and free market under this paragraph, an absence that would not allow the identification of the origin of the overall decrease in production.
#2091721
Tar éis nochtadh deireanach, rinne GOT an maíomh sin a athdhearbhú agus cheistigh sé oibiachtúlacht na slí ina bhfuarthas amach cé mar a tháinig athrú ar sciar thionscal an Aontais den mhargadh.
The GOT reiterated its claim after final disclosure and questioned the objectivity of the way the evolution of the Union industry’s market share was established.
#2091726
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, dúirt GOT nach raibh aon anailís ann maidir le méid táirgeachta na línte táirgeachta a díoladh mar a mhínítear in aithris (111) den Rialachán sealadach.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT stated that there was no analysis regarding the production volume of the production lines that were sold as explained in recital (111) of the provisional Regulation.
#2091736
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, dúirt GOT gur líomhaintí gan taca a bhí in aithris (112) den Rialachán sealadach, agus cháin sé cuid den fhoclaíocht.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT stated that recital (112) of the provisional Regulation consisted of unsupported allegations and criticised some of the wording.
#2091763
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, chuir GOT in aghaidh bharúlacha an Choimisiúin maidir le téarnamh thionscal an Aontais in 2017 mar thoradh ar leigheasanna trádála.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT contested the Commission’s comments regarding the recovery of the Union industry in 2017 as a result of trade remedies.
#2091787
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, dúirt GOT nach bhféadfaí an méadú ar chostais saothair a leagan ar allmhairí ón Tuirc agus orthu sin amháin.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT stated that the increase of labour costs could not be single-handedly linked to imports from Turkey.
#2091807
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, cheistigh GOT barúlacha an Choimisiúin maidir leis an laghdú ar na stoic dheiridh mar chéatadán den táirgeadh.
Following final disclosure, the GOT questioned the Commission’s comments on the decrease in closing stocks as a percentage of production.
#2091821
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, mhaígh GOT gur leibhéil ollmhóra iad na leibhéil infheistíochta i dtábla 13 den Rialachán sealadach, agus gur cruthúnas soiléir iad nach ndearnadh díobháil.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT claimed that the investment levels in table 13 of the provisional Regulation were huge and a clear proof of lack on injury.
#2091827
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, infheistíochtaí áirithe a bhaineann le cúrsaí sláinte, sábháilteachta agus comhshaoil, dúirt GOT nach mbíonn brabús ná toradh dá mbarr.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT stated that certain investments linked to health, safety and environmental matters do not result in profit or return on investment.
#2091851
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, níor aontaigh ÇİB ná GOT leis na conclúidí atá i roinn 5.1 den Rialachán sealadach.
Following provisional disclosure, ÇİB and the GOT disagreed with the conclusions in section 5.1 of the provisional Regulation.
#2091858
Go deimhin féin, d’admhaigh GOT féin gur difríocht bheag sa phraghas ba chúis leis an méadú a tháinig ar an sciar den mhargadh atá ag allmhairí ón Tuirc.
Indeed, the GOT itself admitted that a small price difference explained the increase in the market share of Turkish imports.
#2091871
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, thug GOT faoi deara gur sa mhargadh saor thar aon áit eile a bhíonn tionscal an Aontais in iomaíocht le hallmhairí.
Following final disclosure, the GOT noted that it is essentially in the free market that the Union industry competes with imports.
#2091906
Méid carnach na n-allmhairí ó na tríú tíortha ar fad, seachas an Tuirc, dúirt GOT go raibh go raibh dhá oiread mhéid na n-allmhairí ón Tuirc ann.
The GOT stated that the cumulated volume of imports of all third countries except Turkey was almost twofold the volume of Turkish imports.
#2091907
Ós rud é go raibh a gcuid praghsanna níos ísle ná praghsanna allmhairí ón Tuirc, chuir GOT iúl nach bhféadfaí neamhaird a thabhairt ar an tionchar a bhí acu.
As their prices were lower than the prices of Turkish imports, the GOT submitted that their effect could not be ignored.
#2091934
I ndiaidh nochtadh sealadach, d’iarr GOT ar an gCoimisiún tuilleadh sonraí a bhailiú agus an t-éileamh sa mhargadh faoi chuing a scrúdú tuilleadh.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT asked the Commission to collect more data and further examine demand in the captive market.
#2091939
Na sonraí a chuir GOT ar aghaidh, níorbh fhéidir iad a úsáid chun measúnú a dhéanamh ar an éileamh sa réimse leathan earnálacha tomhaltais lena mbaineann.
Data put forward by the GOT did not allow for an assessment of demand in the wide range of consuming sectors concerned.
#2091944
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, líomhnaigh GOT nár scrúdaíodh éifeachtaí an tomhaltais faoi chuing, agus gur rud é atá neamh-chomhoiriúnach le EDT gan an scrúdú sin a dhéanamh.
Following final disclosure, the GOT alleged a WTO-incompatible lack of examination of the effects of captive consumption.
#2091945
Dúirt GOT go gur roghnaigh an Coimisiún “gan scrúdú a dhéanamh” ar an “meath neamhghnách sna tionscail ina n-úsáidtear cruach san Aontas”.
The GOT stated that the Commission ‘chose not to examine’ the ‘extraordinary deterioration in steel user industries in the EU’.
#2091947
Na foilseacháin i bhfonóta 16 den Rialachán sealadach, ní léirítear iontu an “meath neamhghnách sna tionscail ina n-úsáidtear cruach san Aontas” a líomhnaigh GOT.
The publications in footnote 16 of the provisional Regulation do not show the alleged ‘extraordinary deterioration in steel user industries in the EU’.
#2091996
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, dúirt GOT agus ÇİB go raibh cosaint ag táirgeoirí an Aontais ar allmhairí cheana.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT and ÇİB stated that Union producers were already protected from imports.
#2092208
Mar thaca leis an éileamh sin, chuir GOT in iúl go raibh allmhairithe ó na cúig thír sin fós cothrom le 26 % d’allmhairí HRFS in 2017.
In support of this claim the GOT underlined that in 2017, imports from these five countries still represented 26 % of HRFS imports.
#2092213
I dtuairim GOT, shíl an Coimisiún an scrúdú ar éifeachtaí díobhálacha den sórt sin a sheachaint trí bhrath ar fhigiúirí a léiríonn laghdú glan.
In the GOT’s views the Commission tried to avoid the examination of such injurious effects by relying on figures showing an absolute decrease.
#2092219
D’easaontaigh an Coimisiún le GOT, cé gur admhaigh sé gur rud é an méadú ar an bhfostaíocht idir 2016 agus 2017 a raibh lámh aige sa laghdú táirgiúlachta idir 2016 agus 2017.
The Commission disagreed with the GOT, although it acknowledged that the increase in employment between 2016 and 2017 played a role in the decrease in productivity between 2016 and 2017.
#2092231
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, dúirt GOT gur léirigh anailís ráithiúil gur thosaigh líon na n-allmhairí ón Tuirc ag dul i laghad go mór i dtús 2019.
Following final disclosure, the GOT stated that a quarterly analysis showed that imports from Turkey started to decrease significantly since the beginning of 2019.
#2091197
Tar éis nochtadh na bhfíoras agus na mbreithnithe riachtanacha ar an mbonn a forchuireadh dleacht shealadach frithdhumpála (“nochtadh sealadach”), rinne na gearánaigh, is é sin cuibhreannas a dhéanann ionadaíocht ar leasanna roinnt de na húsáideoirí, úsáideoir a d’allmhairigh táirgí fada cruach, na táirgeoirí onnmhairithe a sampláladh, allmhaireoir a bhain le ceann de na táirgeoirí onnmhairithe a sampláladh comhlachas na nOnnmhaireoirí Cruach Turcach (“cuibhreannas”) agus Rialtas na Tuirce (“GOT”) aighneachtaí i scríbhinn inar cuireadh a dtuairim in iúl maidir leis na torthaí sealadacha.
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (‘provisional disclosure’), the complainants, a Consortium representing the interests of some users, a user that imported long steel products, the sampled exporting producers, an importer related to one of the sampled exporting producers, the Turkish Steel Exporters association (‘ÇİB’) and the Government of Turkey (‘GOT’) made written submissions making their views known on the provisional findings.
#2091230
Mheas GOT gur fhága tarraingt siar na Ríochta Aontaithe nach bhfuil bunús leis na bearta sealadacha a forchuireadh an 7 Eanáir 2021 agus rud neamhdhleathach toisc gur ar shonraí AE28 a bhí siad bunaithe.
The GOT deemed that the UK withdrawal made the provisional measures imposed on 7 January 2021 unsubstantiated and unlawful because they were based on EU28 data.
#2091231
An 29 Eanáir 2021, d’iarr GOT ar an gCoimisiún deireadh a chur leis na bearta sealadacha agus anailís a dhéanamh a bheadh bunaithe ar shonraí nach mbeadh an Ríocht Aontaithe san áireamh iontu.
On 29 January 2021 the GOT asked the Commission to terminate the provisional measures and carry out an analysis based on data excluding the UK.
#2091232
Chinn an Coimisiún go raibh an iarraidh ó GOT gan bhunús mar na bearta sealadacha is as na torthaí a nochtadh do pháirtithe leasmhara in 2020 a tháinig siad, tráth a bhí 28 mBallstát fós ag an Aontas.
The Commission found the GOT’s request unfounded as the provisional measures derived from findings pre-disclosed to interested parties in 2020, at a time when the Union still had 28 Member States.
#2091233
Ina theannta sin, mhaígh GOT agus péire de na táirgeoirí onnmhairíochta a sampláladh nár cheart go bhfanfadh aon bhearta sealadacha i bhfeidhm níos faide ná 3 mhí i bhfianaise Airteagal 11(2) den Chomhaontú idir an Comhphobal Eorpach do Ghual agus Cruach agus Poblacht na Tuirce maidir le trádáil táirgí a chumhdaítear leis an gConradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh do Ghual agus Cruach (“Comhaontú na Tuirce/CEGC”).
Furthermore, the GOT and two of the sampled exporting producers claimed that any provisional measures should not remain in force more than three months in light of Article 11(2) of Agreement between the European Coal and Steel Community and the Republic of Turkey on trade in products covered by the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (‘the Turkey/ECSC Agreement’).
#2091565
I dtuairim GOT, bhí na mínithe an Choimisiúin in aghaidh an Phainéil i Maracó – cruach theo-rollta (an Tuirc) agus an Comhlacht Achomhairc i SAM – cruach theo-rollta, agus is dá réir sin ba cheart do na húdaráis imscrúdaithe scrúdú a dhéanamh, i bprionsabal, ar gach cuid de thionscal, chomh maith leis an tionscal ina iomláine, nó míniú sásúil a thabhairt ar cén fáth nach bhfuil.
In the GOT’s view, the explanations put forward by the Commission were contrary to the Panel in Morocco – Hot-rolled-steel (Turkey) and the Appellate Body in US – Hot-rolled steel, according to which investigating authorities should in principle examine in like manner all parts of an industry, as well as the industry as a whole, or provide a satisfactory explanation why not.
#2091570
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, d’áitigh GOT go raibh an Coimisiún tar éis gníomhú ar neamhréir le dlí-eolaíocht na hEagraíochta Domhanda Trádála toisc i) nach ndearna sé anailís ar leithligh ar shonraí maidir le praghsanna díola, costas táirgthe, fáis, toirte onnmhairithe agus praghsanna, brabúsacht, toradh ar infheistíocht agus sreabhadh airgid, ii) ná níor chuir sé aon mhíniú ar fáil cén fáth nár scrúdaigh sé ach sonraí an mhargaidh shaoir seachas scrúdú ar leith agus inchomparáide a dhéanamh.
Following final disclosure, the GOT insisted that the Commission had acted inconsistently with WTO jurisprudence because i) it did not analyse separately data for sales prices, cost of production, growth, export volume and prices, profitability, return on investment and cash flow, ii) nor provided any explanation why it only examined free market data instead of making a separate and comparable examination.
#2091622
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, dúirt GOT nach dtógann allmhairí as an Tuirc an sciar den mhargadh atá ag tionscal an Aontais, ach go dtógann siad sciar áirithe de ó na tríú tíortha, rud nach bhféadfadh aon éifeacht a imirt ar tháirgeoirí an Aontais.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT stated that imports from Turkey did not take the market share of the Union industry but only took certain share from the third countries, which could not have any effect on Union producers.
#2091623
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, dúirt GOT gur anailís ó chríochphointe go críochphointe a bhí in anailís an Choimisiúin ar an méid allmhairí as an Tuirc agus d’iarr sé ar an gCoimisiún anailís a dhéanamh ar an éabhlóid ar bhonn sonraí ráithiúla ó 2019 agus 2020 agus titim san allmhairiú tar éis na tréimhse imscrúdaithe.
Following final disclosure, the GOT added that the Commission analysis on import volume from Turkey was end-point to end-point and invited the Commission to analyse rather the evolution on the basis of quarterly data from 2019 and 2020 and drops in imports after the investigation period.
#2091624
Thug an Coimisiún dá aire nach féidir le cur chuige GOT amhras a chur ar an bhfíric gur tháinig méadú 196 % ar allmhairí ón Tuirc bliain i ndiaidh bliana idir 2016 agus 2018 le linn na tréimhse atá á breithniú agus gur beagnach méadú faoi thrí a bhí ar a sciar féin den mhargadh saor.
The Commission noted that the GOT’s approach cannot put in question the fact that imports from Turkey increased year-on-year between 2016 and 2018, by 196 % over the period considered and that they almost tripled their share on the free market.
#2091639
Dúirt GOT áfach nach raibh ann ach líomhain a rá gur corrlaigh shuntasacha a bhí sna corrlaigh dhumpála arae ní raibh aon mheastóireacht ná critéir chuí ann lena suífí na corrlaigh a measadh a bheith suntasach.
The GOT however stated that to qualify the undercutting margins found as significant was a mere allegation as it lacked a proper evaluation or criteria establishing what margin should be considered significant.
#2091656
Tar éis nochtadh sealadach, d’éiligh GOT, ar an gcaoi chéanna, gur ar an tréimhse 2016-2019 ba cheart an scrúdú ar an díobháil líomhnaithe ar an tionscal intíre a bhunú, rud nár tháinig i gceist i gcás gach táscaire díobhála de réir mar a mhaígh sé.
After provisional disclosure, the GOT claimed, in the same vein, that the examination of the alleged injury on the domestic industry should be based on the period 2016-2019, which it claimed was not case for all injury indicators.
#2091657
Go háirithe, mheas GOT go raibh sé dodhéanta san am a chuaigh thart aon fheabhas nó meath ar an tionscal a nascadh le bearta cosanta trádála arbh ann dóibh nó nárbh ann dóibh.
In particular, the GOT considered that in the recent past it was impossible to link any improvement or deterioration of the industry to an existence or non-existence of trade defence measures.
#2091665
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, mheabhraigh GOT a bharúlacha maidir le huainiú na mbeart cinntitheach frithdhumpála agus na ndleachtanna frithchúitimh i gcoinne na Síne, agus maidir leis na bearta cinntitheacha frithdhumpála i gcoinne na Brasaíle, na hIaráine, na Rúise agus na hÚcráine.
Following final disclosure the GOT recalled its comments regarding the timing of the definitive anti-dumping measures and countervailing duties against China and the definitive anti-dumping measures against Brazil, Iran, Russia and Ukraine.
#2091719
An míniú a thug an Coimisiún in aithris (109) den Rialachán sealadach ar an méadú a tháinig ar sciar thionscal an Aontais den mhargadh saor idir 2018 agus 2019, mar atá gurb é ba chúis leis sin na méideanna móra díolacháin a aistríodh ón margadh faoi chuing chuig an margadh saor i ngeall ar an dífheistiú, is rud é a cháin GOT tar éis nochtadh sealadach.
Following provisional disclosure, the GOT criticized the fact that the Commission, in recital (109) of the provisional Regulation, explained the increase of free market share by the Union industry between 2018 and 2019 by the fact that significant sales volumes shifted from the captive market to the free market due to divestment.
#2091724
Fiú más rud é, mar a luaigh GOT, gur tháinig méadú ar an sciar den mhargadh atá ag táirgeoirí an Aontais le linn na tréimhse atá á breithniú, thug an Coimisiún dá aire go raibh an méadú sin i bhfad níos ísle ná an méadú ar an sciar den mhargadh atá ag allmhairí ón Tuirc le linn na tréimhse atá á breithniú.
Even if, as stated by the GOT, the free market share of Union producers increased over the period considered, the Commission noted that such increase was of a significantly lower magnitude than the increase of the market share of Turkish imports during the same period.
#2091740
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, chuir GOT amhras in iúl go mb’fhéidir go raibh conclúidí áirithe maidir leis an bhfás ann nach raibh oibiachtúil, mar is laghdú “mór” a dúirt an Coimisiún roimhe sin a bhí sa laghdú ar an táirgeadh, agus os a choinne sin, dúirt sé roimhe sin gur méadú “beag” a bhí sa mhéadú ar dhíolachán margaidh shaoir.
Following final disclosure, the GOT wondered whether certain conclusions on growth were objective as the Commission had previously qualified the decrease in production as “strong” but the increase in free market sales as “slight”.