D’admhaigh údaráis na hIorua freisin nach raibh measúnú eacnamaíoch críochnúil sna páipéir ullmhúcháin mar a cheanglaítear faoi MEIP.
The Norwegian authorities further acknowledged that the preparatory papers lacked a thorough economic assessment as required under the MEIP.
Cé go n-éilíonn comhlíonadh MEIP anailís ex-ante, mheas siad go raibh torthaí ex-post mar ‘seiceáil fírinne’ chun an buntáiste a mheastar a bheith ann a thomhas.
Although compliance with the MEIP requires an ex-ante analysis, they considered ex-post results to serve as a ‘reality check’ to gauge the purported advantage.
Ní mór scrúdú a dhéanamh ar chomhlíonadh MEIP ar bhonn ex-ante ag féachaint don fhaisnéis a bhí ar fáil don chomhlacht poiblí tráth a cinneadh an idirghabháil.
Compliance with the MEIP must be examined on an ex-ante basis, having regard to the information that was available to the public body at the time the intervention was decided upon.
Is féidir comhlíonadh MEIP a léiriú trí phlean gnó ex-ante a bhí mar bhonn don chinneadh infheistíochta.
Compliance with the MEIP can be demonstrated through an ex-ante business plan, which formed the basis for the investment decision.
[159] Staidéar an 31.05.2013 arna dhéanamh ag Oxera, Economic MEIP assessment : profitability analysis – La Rochelle, atá i gceangal le barúlacha Ryanair an 31.5.2013, roinn 2.5, leathanaigh 10 agus 12.
[159] Study of 31.5.2013 carried out by Oxera, ‘Economic MEIP assessment : profitability analysis – La Rochelle’, annexed to Ryanair’s observations of 31.05.2013, section 2.5, pages 10 and 12.
De réir mar a líomhnaíodh níor cheannaigh Remiks Husholdning AS’ (‘Remiks Husholdning’) seirbhísí próiseála dramhaíola ó Remiks Produksjon AS (‘Remiks Produksjon’) ar théarmaí margaidh, agus cheistigh an gearánach cé acu a comhlíonadh nó nár comhlíonadh prionsabal an infheisteora phríobháidigh i ngeilleagar an mhargaidh (‘MEIP’) le caipitliú tosaigh Remiks Group.
Remiks Husholdning AS’ (‘Remiks Husholdning’) purchase of waste processing services from Remiks Produksjon AS (‘Remiks Produksjon’) was allegedly not on market terms, and the complainant questioned whether the initial capitalisation of the Remiks Group had complied with the market economy investor principle (the ‘MEIP’).
Chun a chinneadh, bunaithe ar MEIP, an státchabhair atá in infheistíocht comhlachta phoiblí, is gá a mheas an bhféadfaí, in imthosca comhchosúla, infheisteoir príobháideach de mhéid inchomparáide agus a oibríonn i ngnáthdhálaí geilleagair mhargaidh a spreagadh chun an infheistíocht atá i gceist a dhéanamh.
To determine, based on the MEIP, whether a public body’s investment constitutes State aid, it is necessary to assess whether, in similar circumstances, a private investor of a comparable size and operating in normal conditions of a market economy, could have been prompted to make the investment in question.
Maidir leis sin, tugann Údarás Faireacháin CSTE dá aire nach féidir éisteacht a thabhairt d’údaráis na hIorua faoin argóint maidir lena n-iarracht de mheon macánta gníomhú i gcomhréir le MEIP, féach mír (148).
In this regard, ESA notes that the Norwegian authorities cannot be heard on the argument concerning their good faith attempt to act in compliance with the MEIP, see paragraph (148).