#146173
T.F.ROE,
T.F. Roe
T.F.ROE,
T.F. Roe
T. F. Roe
T. F. Roe
T. F. Roe
T. F. ROE
Roe Phúinse
Punch's Row
Roe (= Glanioncam/Cothromas)
ROE (= Net Income/Equity)
Rosoboronexport (ROE), Cuideachta Comhstoic Oscailte
Rosoboronexport OJSC (ROE)
Rosoboronexport (ROE), Cuideachta Comhstoic Oscailte (An Rúis)
Rosoboronexport OJSC (ROE) (Russia)
Rosoboronexport OJSC (ROE) (An Rúis)
Rosoboronexport OJSC (ROE) (Russia)
Rosoboronexport OJSC (ROE) (An Rúis)
Rosoboronexport OJSC (ROE) (Russia)
In […], bheadh an ROCE […], agus bheadh an ROE […]% […]%.
In […], ROCE would be […], while ROE would […]% […]%.
Comhthacaítear filleadh an tairbhí ar an inmharthanacht le cur chuige malartach, eadhon an chomparáid idir an toradh ar chothromas (ROE) agus costas an chothromais.
The beneficiary’s return to viability is corroborated by an alternative approach, namely the comparison between the return on equity (ROE) and the cost of equity.
Ó thaobh na scairshealbhóirí de, tá cuideachta inmharthana is ea go gcruthaíonn sí ROE níos airde ná costas cothromais.
From the point of view of shareholders, a company is viable is it generates a ROE higher than the cost of equity.
Tá na tástálacha caighdeánacha maidir le filleadh ar inmharthanacht curtha i bhfeidhm ag an gCoimisiún bunaithe ar tháscairí ROCE, ROE, féichiúnas agus acmhainneacht creidmheasa.
The Commission has applied the standard tests for the return to viability based on indicators of ROCE, ROE, indebtedness and creditworthiness.
Triail inmharthanachta 1: ROCE > WACC 7,5 %-8 %; Triail 2: Roe > costas cothromais de 10,5 %-11 %
Viability test 1: ROCE > WACC of 7,5 %-8 %; test 2: ROE > cost of equity of 10,5 %-11 %
Ag deireadh an phlean athstruchtúraithe in 2025, tá súil ag TAP Air Portugal toradh […]% ar chothromas (ROE) agus toradh ar chaipiteal a úsáideadh (ROCE) de […]% a fháil.
At the end of the restructuring plan in 2025, TAP Air Portugal expects to attain a return on equity (ROE) of […]% and a return on capital employed (ROCE) of […]%.
Tugann an Coimisiún faoi deara go bhfuil fíor i gcás an tairbhí in 2025, ós rud é go bhfuil an ROE a bhfuiltear ag súil leis […]% agus go bhfuil costas […]% ar chothromas.
The Commission observes that holds true for the beneficiary in 2025, since the expected ROE is […]% and the cost of equity is […]%.
Ar an iomlán, ós rud é gurb é […] % ([…]%) an ROCE (ROE) a bhfuiltear ag súil leis in 2025, baineann an Coimisiún de thátal as gur baineadh amach tástálacha inmharthanachta fiú amháin faoi chur chuige malartach den sórt sin chun WACC agus costas cothromais a ríomh.
Overall, considering the expected ROCE (ROE) in 2025 is […]% ([…]%), the Commission concludes that the return to viability tests are met even under such an alternative approach to calculate the WACC and cost of equity.
Sa chás díobhálach le réamh-mheastacháin airgeadais nuashonraithe (aithris (53)), ROCE in 2025 […], agus laghdaíonn an ROE ó […] % go […]%.
In the adverse scenario with updated financial projections (recital 53), the ROCE in 2025 […], while the ROE decreases from […]% to […]%.
Le Rialachán (CE) Uimh. 314/2004 ón gComhairle, tugtar éifeacht do roinnt beart dá bhforáiltear i gCinneadh 2011/101/CBES ón gComhairle, lena n-áirítear roe cistí agus acmhainní eacnamaíocha daoine agus eintiteas ainmnithe i bhfianaise na staide sa tSiombáib.
Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 gives effect to several measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP, including the freezing of funds and economic resources of designated persons and entities in view of the situation in Zimbabwe.
Thairis sin, i dtreo dheireadh na tréimhse athstruchtúrúcháin in 2026, tá coinne leis go bhfaighidh CE Oltenia toradh ar chothromas (ROE) de thart ar […] % le haghaidh na tréimhse 2025 agus 2026, rud a mhéadódh a thuilleadh sa tréimhse iar-athstruchtúrúcháin nuair nach n-iompróidh an tairbhí ualach na n-ardchostas lamháltais CO2 a thuilleadh.
Moreover, towards the end of the restructuring period in 2026, CE Oltenia expects to attain a return on equity (ROE) in the range of […]% for the period 2025 and 2026, which would further increase in the post-restructuring period when the beneficiary will no longer bear the burden of the high CO2 allowance costs.