#2230872
Aung Saw Win (ar a dtugtar freisin U Aung Saw Win)
Aung Saw Win (a.k.a U Aung Saw Win)
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
78 toradh in 21 doiciméad
#2230877
Saw Ba Hline (ar a dtugtar freisin U Saw Ba Hline)
Saw Ba Hline (a.k.a U Saw Ba Hline)
#2305278
Aung Saw Win (ar a dtugtar freisin U Aung Saw Win)
Aung Saw Win (a.k.a U Aung Saw Win)
#2305283
Saw Ba Hline (ar a dtugtar freisin U Saw Ba Hline)
Saw Ba Hline (a.k.a U Saw Ba Hline)
#2733418
Cás T-300/16 Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v an Coimisiún.
Case T-300/16 Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission.
#2733685
Cás T-300/16 Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v an Coimisiún.
Case T-300/16 Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission.
#2137395
Cás T-301/16, Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission [Jindal Saw Ltd agus Jindal Saw Italia SpA v an Coimisiún Eorpach], Breithiúnas ón gCúirt Ghinearálta an 10 Aibreán 2019, EU:T:2019:234, mír 188.
Case T-301/16, Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission, Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019, EU:T:2019:234, para. 188.
#987512
The Conveyance shall include the existing Saw Mills and Turbine erected on The Estate.
The Conveyance shall include the existing Saw Mills and Turbine erected on The Estate.
#2230873
An 2 Feabhra 2021, ainmníodh Aung Saw Win ina chomhalta den Union Election Commission (UEC).
Aung Saw Win was nominated as a member the Union Election Commission (UEC) on 2 February 2021.
#2230878
An 9 Feabhra 2021, ainmníodh Saw Ba Hline ina chomhalta den Union Election Commission (UEC).
Saw Ba Hline was nominated as a member the Union Election Commission (UEC) on 9 February 2021.
#2305279
An 2 Feabhra 2021, ainmníodh Aung Saw Win ina chomhalta den Union Election Commission (UEC).
Aung Saw Win was nominated as a member the Union Election Commission (UEC) on 2 February 2021.
#2305284
An 9 Feabhra 2021, ainmníodh Saw Ba Hline ina chomhalta den Union Election Commission (UEC).
Saw Ba Hline was nominated as a member the Union Election Commission (UEC) on 9 February 2021.
#2345507
Breithiúnas an 10 Aibreán 2019, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v an Coimisiún, T-301/16, EU:T:234, mír 184.
Judgment of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-301/16, EU:T:234, para. 184.
#2561142
Breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta an 10 Aibreán 2019, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v an Coimisiún, T-301/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:234, mír (184).
Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-301/16, EU:T:2019:234, para. (184).
#2742455
Breithiúnais an 1 Meitheamh 2022, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v An Coimisiún, T-440/20 agus T-441/20, mír 156.
Judgments of 1 June 2022, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-440/20 and T-441/20, para. 156.
#2742466
Breithiúnais an 1 Meitheamh 2022, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v An Coimisiún, T-440/20 agus T-441/20.
Judgments of 1 June 2022, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-440/20 and T-441/20.
#2743096
Breithiúnais an 1 Meitheamh 2022, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v An Coimisiún, T-440/20 agus T-441/20, mír 156.
Judgments of 1 June 2022, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-440/20 and T-441/20, para. 156.
#2743097
Le haghaidh réasúnaíocht chomhchosúil, féach breithiúnas Jindal Saw atá luaite i bhfonóta 21 thuas, mír 158.
See for a similar reasoning, Jindal Saw judgment quoted in footnote 21 above, para 158.
#2743107
Breithiúnais an 1 Meitheamh 2022, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v An Coimisiún, T-440/20 agus T-441/20.
Judgments of 1 June 2022, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-440/20 and T-441/20.
#3106267
Chuaigh Nyo Saw ar scor ón arm in 2020 mar ardcheathrúnach.
Nyo Saw retired from the army in 2020 as quartermaster general.
#3106272
Tá baint ag Nyo Saw le hiarchomhaltaí réimeas an junta agus le comhaltaí reatha.
Nyo Saw is associated with former and current junta regime members.
#3132442
Chuaigh Nyo Saw ar scor ón arm in 2020 mar ardcheathrúnach.
Nyo Saw retired from the army in 2020 as quartermaster general.
#3132447
Tá baint ag Nyo Saw le hiarchomhaltaí réimeas an junta agus le comhaltaí reatha.
Nyo Saw is associated with former and current junta regime members.
#2156444
Rinne sí tagairt maidir leis sin do rialuithe na Cúirte Jindal agus Hansol (Cás T-301/16, Jindal Saw Ltd agus Jindal Saw Italia SpA v An Coimisiún Eorpach agus Cás T-383/17, Hansol Paper Co. Ltd v an Coimisiún Eorpach).
It referred in this regard to Jindal and Hansol Court rulings (Case T-301/16, Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission and Case T-383/17, Hansol Paper Co. Ltd v European Commission).
#2458419
Breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta an 10 Aibreán 2019, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia SpA v an Coimisiún, T-301/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:234 agus T-300/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:235.
Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission, T-301/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:234 and T-300/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:235.
#2459395
Breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta an 10 Aibreán 2019, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia SpA v an Coimisiún, T-301/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:234 agus T-300/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:235.
Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019, Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission, T-301/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:234 and T-300/16, ECLI:EU:T:2019:235.
#2560617
Dá bhrí sin, d’iarr Jintai ar an gCoimisiún comparáid a dhéanamh mar is cóir ar leibhéal trádála atá cothrom chun fíor phraghas chorrlach “tharghearrtha” Jintai a bhunú agus rinne sé tagairt do chinntí ó na cúirteanna Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v an Coimisiún agus Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v an Coimisiún chuige sin.
Therefore, Jintai requested the Commission to make a proper and fair level of trade comparison to establish Jintai’s correct price ‘over-cutting’ margin and referred to the Court decisions Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission and Giant Electric Vehicle Kunshan v Commission in this respect.
#2730880
D’áitigh sé freisin, in Jindal Saw, go raibh an chuideachta lena mbaineann, Jindal Saw, ar cheann de roinnt táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin agus go raibh roinnt tíortha lena mbaineann, ach gurb é Hansol an t-aon táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin sa chás faoi chaibidil a bhaineann leis an gCóiré amháin.
It also argued that in Jindal Saw the company concerned, Jindal Saw, was one of several exporting producers and there were several countries concerned, whereas Hansol is the sole exporting producer in the case at hand which concerns only Korea.
#2730883
Chuir ETPA i gcoinne freisin na ndifríochtaí a líomhain Hansol idir na breithiúnais in Jindal Saw agus an breithiúnas in T-383/17, mar sa chuid oibríochtúil de na breithiúnais in T- 300/16 agus T-301/16 (na cásanna roimh T-440/20 agus T-441/20 lena gcuirtear na rialacháin bhunaidh in Jindal Saw ar neamhní) mar a tharla in T-383/17, chuir an Chúirt Ghinearálta an rialachán ar cuireadh ina gcoinne ar neamhní ina iomláine, a mhéid a bhaineann sé leis an iarratasóir.
ETPA also disputed the differences alleged by Hansol between the judgments in Jindal Saw and that in T-383/17, as in the operative part of the judgments in T-300/16 and T-301/16 (the cases preceding T-440/20 and T-441/20 by which the original regulations in Jindal Saw were annulled), like in T-383/17, the General Court annulled the contested regulation in its entirety, in so far as it concerns the applicant.
#2742464
Féach breithiúnais an 1 Meitheamh 2022, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v An Coimisiún, T-440/20 agus T-441/20, mír 44; agus an 19 Meitheamh 2019, C & J Clark International, C-612/16, nár foilsíodh, EU:C:2019:508, mír 43; an 3 Nollaig 2020, Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Distillerie Bonollo agus Eile, C-461/18 P, EU:C:2020:979, mír 97; agus 9 Meitheamh 2021, Roland v An Coimisiún, T-132/18, nár foilsíodh, EU:T:2021:329, mír 76.
See judgments of 1 June 2022, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-440/20 and T-441/20, para 44; and of 19 June 2019, C & J Clark International, C-612/16, not published, EU:C:2019:508, paragraph 43; of 3 December 2020, Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Distillerie Bonollo and Others, C-461/18 P, EU:C:2020:979, paragraph 97; and of 9 June 2021, Roland v Commission, T-132/18, not published, EU:T:2021:329, paragraph 76.
#2743105
Féach breithiúnais an 1 Meitheamh 2022, Jindal Saw agus Jindal Saw Italia v An Coimisiún, T-440/20 agus T-441/20, mír 44; agus an 19 Meitheamh 2019, C & J Clark International, C-612/16, nár foilsíodh, EU:C:2019:508, mír 43; an 3 Nollaig 2020, Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Distillerie Bonollo agus Eile, C-461/18 P, EU:C:2020:979, mír 97; agus 9 Meitheamh 2021, Roland v An Coimisiún, T-132/18, nár foilsíodh, EU:T:2021:329, mír 76,
See judgments of 1 June 2022, Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission, T-440/20 and T-441/20, para 44; and of 19 June 2019, C & J Clark International, C-612/16, not published, EU:C:2019:508, paragraph 43; of 3 December 2020, Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Distillerie Bonollo and Others, C-461/18 P, EU:C:2020:979, paragraph 97; and of 9 June 2021, Roland v Commission, T-132/18, not published, EU:T:2021:329, paragraph 76,
#2457763
An dleacht frithdhumpála a forchuireadh, bhí idir 0 % le haghaidh Electrosteel Castings Ltd agus 14,1 % le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited agus “gach cuideachta eile” i gceist léi.
The anti-dumping duty imposed ranged from 0 % for Electrosteel Castings Ltd to 14,1 % for Jindal Saw Limited and ‘all other companies’.
#2457765
An dleacht frithchúitimh a forchuireadh, bhí idir 8,7 % le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited agus 9 % le haghaidh Electrosteel Castings Ltd agus “gach cuideachta eile” i gceist léi.
The countervailing duty imposed ranged from 8,7 % for Jindal Saw Limited to 9 % for Electrosteel Castings Ltd and ‘all other companies’.
#2457769
Na dleachtanna frithchúitimh atá i bhfeidhm faoi láthair is é 6 % le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited agus 9 % le haghaidh Electrosteel Castings Ltd agus “gach cuideachta eile” atá i gceist leo.
The countervailing duties currently in force are 6 % for Jindal Saw Limited and 9 % for Electrosteel Castings Ltd and ‘all other companies’.
#2458478
An dleacht frithchúitimh a forchuireadh, bhí idir 8,7 % le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited agus 9 % le haghaidh Electrosteel Castings Ltd agus “gach cuideachta eile” i gceist léi.
The countervailing duty imposed ranged from 8,7 % for Jindal Saw Limited to 9 % for Electrosteel Castings Ltd and ‘all other companies’.
#2458480
An dleacht frithdhumpála a forchuireadh, bhí idir 0 % le haghaidh Electrosteel Castings Ltd agus 14,1 % le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited agus “gach cuideachta eile” i gceist léi.
The anti-dumping duty imposed ranged from 0 % for Electrosteel Castings Ltd to 14,1 % for Jindal Saw Limited and ‘all other companies’.
#2458482
Trí Rialacháin (AE) 2020/526 agus (AE) 2020/527, d’ath-fhorchuir an Coimisiún dleacht frithdhumpála agus frithchúitimh chinntitheach nua le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited, ar rátaí 3 % agus 6 % faoi seach.
By Regulations (EU) 2020/526 and (EU) 2020/527, the Commission re-imposed a new definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duty for Jindal Saw Limited, at the rates of 3 % and 6 % respectively.
#2458483
Na dleachtanna frithchúitimh atá i bhfeidhm faoi láthair is é 6 % le haghaidh Jindal Saw Limited agus 9 % le haghaidh Electrosteel Castings Ltd agus “gach cuideachta eile” atá i gceist leo.
The countervailing duties currently in force are 6 % for Jindal Saw Limited and 9 % for Electrosteel Castings Ltd and ‘all other companies’.
#2470219
Cás T-440/20 Jindal Saw v an Coimisiún Eorpach, EU:T:2022:318, míreanna 154 – 159.
Case T-440/20 Jindal Saw v European Commission, EU:T:2022:318, paragraphs 154 – 159.
#2474164
Cás T-440/20 Jindal Saw v an Coimisiún Eorpach, EU:T:2022:318, míreanna 154 – 159.
Case T-440/20 Jindal Saw v European Commission, EU:T:2022:318 paragraphs 154 – 159.
#2730882
Maidir leis an bhfíoras go bhféadfaí breithiúnas Jindal Saw a achomharc fós, d’áitigh ETPA go ndéantar leis na breithiúnais seo cásdlí seanbhunaithe a mhacasamhlú.
Concerning the fact that the Jindal Saw judgment could still be appealed, ETPA submitted that these judgments replicate long-established case-law.
#2731041
Cás T-440/20, Jindal Saw v an Coimisiún Eorpach [2022] EU:T:2022:318, míreanna 154 – 159.
Case T-440/20, Jindal Saw v European Commission [2022] EU:T:2022:318, paragraphs 154 – 159.
#2742456
Le haghaidh réasúnaíocht chomhchosúil, féach breithiúnas Jindal Saw atá luaite i bhfonóta 18. thuas, mír 158.
See for a similar reasoning, Jindal Saw judgment quoted in footnote 18.above, para 158.
#2742489
Féach T-440/20 Jindal Saw v An Coimisiún Eorpach, EU:T:2022:318, míreanna 134 agus 135 agus breithiúnas a luaitear ann.
See T-440/20 Jindal Saw v European Commission, EU:T:2022:318, paragraphs 134 and 135 and judgment cited therein.
#2743128
Féach T-440/20 Jindal Saw v An Coimisiún Eorpach, EU:T:2022:318, míreanna 134 agus 135 agus breithiúnas a luaitear ann.
See T-440/20 Jindal Saw v European Commission, EU:T:2022:318, paragraphs 134 and 135 and judgment cited therein.
#3038724
Thug sí le fios san imscrúdú bunaidh, cé gur ríomhadh an corrlach dumpála 19 % do Jindal Saw, nach raibh corrlach dumpála ECL ach 4,1 %.
It pointed out that in the original investigation, while the 19 % dumping margin was calculated for Jindal Saw, ECL’s dumping margin was only 4,1 %.
#3038728
Dá bhrí sin, thug ECL le fios gur léir go raibh úsáid an chorrlaigh dumpála 19 % de Jindal Saw míchuí agus pionósach.
Hence, ECL indicated that using the 19 % dumping margin of Jindal Saw was manifestly inappropriate and punitive.
#2230874
Nuair a ghlac sé leis an ainmniúchán sin i ndiaidh coup míleata an 1 Feabhra 2021, agus trína ghníomhartha mar chomhalta den UEC, go háirithe trí thorthaí thoghcháin mhí na Samhna 2020 a neamhniú gan aon fhianaise chruthaithe ar chalaois, chomh maith le cúisimh a chomhdú as calaois toghcháin i gcás na dtoghchán céanna, agus an brú faoi chois i gcoinne iarchomhaltaí den UEC, bhí baint dhíreach ag Aung Saw Win le gníomhaíochtaí a bhaineann an bonn den daonlathas agus den smacht reachta i Maenmar/Burma.
By accepting this nomination in the aftermath of the military coup of 1st February 2021, and through his actions as a member of the UEC, notably the annulment of the results of the November 2020 elections without any proven evidence of fraud, the filing of charges for electoral fraud for the same elections, and the repression against former members of the UEC, Aung Saw Win has been directly involved in actions undermining democracy and the rule of law in Myanmar/Burma.
#2230879
Nuair a ghlac sé leis an ainmniúchán sin i ndiaidh coup míleata an 1 Feabhra 2021, agus trína ghníomhartha mar chomhalta den UEC, go háirithe trí thorthaí thoghcháin mhí na Samhna 2020 a neamhniú gan aon fhianaise chruthaithe ar chalaois, chomh maith le cúisimh a chomhdú as calaois toghcháin i gcás na dtoghchán céanna, agus an brú faoi chois i gcoinne iarchomhaltaí den UEC, bhí baint dhíreach ag Saw Ba Hline le gníomhaíochtaí a bhaineann an bonn den daonlathas agus den smacht reachta i Maenmar/Burma.
By accepting this nomination in the aftermath of the military coup of 1 February 2021, and through his actions as a member of the UEC, notably the annulment of the results of the November 2020 elections without any proven evidence of fraud, as well as the filing of charges for electoral fraud for the same elections, and the repression against former members of the UEC, Saw Ba Hline has been directly involved in actions undermining democracy and the rule of law in Myanmar/Burma.
#2305280
Nuair a ghlac sé leis an ainmniúchán sin i ndiaidh coup míleata an 1 Feabhra 2021, agus trína ghníomhartha mar chomhalta den UEC, go háirithe trí thorthaí thoghcháin mhí na Samhna 2020 a neamhniú gan aon fhianaise chruthaithe ar chalaois, chomh maith le cúisimh a chomhdú as calaois toghcháin i gcás na dtoghchán céanna, agus an brú faoi chois i gcoinne iarchomhaltaí den UEC, bhí baint dhíreach ag Aung Saw Win le gníomhaíochtaí a bhaineann an bonn den daonlathas agus den smacht reachta i Maenmar/Burma.
By accepting this nomination in the aftermath of the military coup of 1st February 2021, and through his actions as a member of the UEC, notably the annulment of the results of the November 2020 elections without any proven evidence of fraud, the filing of charges for electoral fraud for the same elections, and the repression against former members of the UEC, Aung Saw Win has been directly involved in actions undermining democracy and the rule of law in Myanmar/Burma.