#2728338
Bhd (“SPI”)
Bhd (‘SPI’)
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
13 toradh i ndoiciméad amháin
#2728455
Bhí cás an dá chuideachta eile (Pantech agus SPI) go hiomlán difriúil.
The situation of the other two companies (Pantech and SPI) was completely different.
#2728541
Pantech agus SPI
Pantech and SPI
#2728601
Mar sin, ba cheart Pantech agus SPI a dhíolmhú ó leathnú na mbeart.
Therefore, Pantech and SPI should be exempted from the extension of measures.
#2728340
Ina theannta sin, 4 chuideachta de chuid na Malaeisia a bhfuil baint acu le Pantech nó SPI, chuir siad freagraí ar an gceistneoir isteach.
In addition, four Malaysian companies, related to Pantech or SPI, submitted questionnaire replies.
#2728476
A mhéid a bhaineann le hacmhainneacht táirgeachta MAC agus táirgeacht líne iomlán iarbhír ó amhábhair, ní raibh aon difríocht ann le bunú Pantech agus SPI.
As regards both MAC’s production capability and actual full line production from raw materials, there was no difference with the set-up of Pantech and SPI.
#2728482
De bhrí a bhfuil thuas, faoi Airteagal 13(2) den bhun-Rialachán, suíodh leis an imscrúdú difríocht idir MAC, SPI agus Pantech.
It follows from the above that, under Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation, the investigation established a difference between MAC and SPI and Pantech.
#2728549
Cosúil le Pantech, bhí a chuid píobán táthaithe féin in úsáid ag SPI ina tháirgeacht (píobáin a cheannaigh sé ó tháirgeoir gaolmhar de chuid na Malaeisia).
Similar to Pantech, SPI was also using in its production its own welded pipes (purchased from a related Malaysian producer).
#2728552
Dá bhrí sin, is lú i bhfad ná 60 % de luach iomlán na bpáirteanna le haghaidh Pantech agus SPI na páirteanna ón tír atá faoi réir beart.
Therefore, the parts from the country subject to measures constitute much less than 60 % of the total value of parts for Pantech and SPI.
#2728554
Dá bhrí sin, níl imchéimniú i gceist le hoibríochtaí Pantech agus SPI dá bhforáiltear in Airteagal 13(2) den bhun-Rialachán
Therefore, the operations carried out by Pantech and SPI did not constitute circumvention as provided for in Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation
#2728599
Suíodh leis an imscrúdú gur fíortháirgeoirí SSTPFanna sa Mhalaeisia iad an dá tháirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin chomhoibríocha eile, Pantech agus SPI, agus nach raibh siad páirteach i gcleachtais imchéimniúcháin.
The investigation established that the two other co-operating exporting producers, Pantech and SPI, were genuine producers of SSTPF in Malaysia, and not engaged in circumvention practices.
#2728473
Líomhnaítear gurb í an chúis leis an aistriú ó tháirgeadh píobáin tháthaithe go píopaí gan uaim ná go raibh an margadh faoi cheannas dhá tháirgeoir eile de chuid na Malaeisia atá comhtháite go hingearach (Pantech agus SPI).
The shift from production from welded pipes to seamless pipes was allegedly due this market being dominated by two other, vertically-integrated Malaysian producers (Pantech and SPI).
#2728483
Mar a suíodh in aithrisí (87), (98) agus (99), tháinig 99,99 % de na páirteanna a d’úsáid MAC chun SSTPFanna a thairgeadh ón tSín, agus i gcás Pantech agus SPI, bhí an cion dá gcuid páirteanna faoi10 % agus 30 % faoi seach.
As established in recitals (87), (98) and (99), 99,99 % of the parts used by MAC in their production of SSTPF were from the PRC, while for Pantech and SPI the share was below 10 % and 30 % respectively.