#2741929
Sholáthair an Coimisiún soiléirithe breise freisin maidir le staid dhlíthiúil Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
It also provided further clarifications regarding the legal situation of Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
Sholáthair an Coimisiún soiléirithe breise freisin maidir le staid dhlíthiúil Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
It also provided further clarifications regarding the legal situation of Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
Sholáthair an Coimisiún soiléirithe breise freisin maidir le staid dhlíthiúil Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
It also provided further clarifications regarding the legal situation of Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd
Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd;
Tar éis an nochta, d’áitigh CRIA gur cheart laghdú a dhéanamh ar an leibhéal dleachta le haghaidh trí chuideachta, mar atá, Zhongce Rubber Grúpa Co., Ltd, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd, agus Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd, freisin toisc nach ndearna an Coimisiún míreanna 190-192 de bhreithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta a chur chun feidhme go hoiriúnach.
Following disclosure, CRIA also argued that the duty level for three companies, namely Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd, and Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd, should also be reduced as the Commission failed to adequately implement paragraphs 190-192 of the judgment of the General Court.
Tar éis an nochta, d”áitigh CRIA gur cheart laghdú a dhéanamh ar an leibhéal dleachta le haghaidh trí chuideachta, mar atá, Zhongce Rubber Grúpa Co., Ltd, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd, agus Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd, freisin toisc nach ndearna an Coimisiún míreanna 190-192 de bhreithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta a chur chun feidhme go hoiriúnach.
Following disclosure, CRIA also argued that the duty level for three companies, namely Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd, and Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd, should also be reduced as the Commission failed to adequately implement paragraphs 190-192 of the judgment of the General Court.
Ar an mbonn sin, shuigh an Coimisiún gur cheart gan athrú a dhéanamh fós ar na dleachtanna frithchúitimh agus frithdhumpála iarmharacha is infheidhme maidir le Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd agus Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd ná ar an dleacht frithchúitimh iarmharach is infheidhme maidir le Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd. Dá bhrí sin, mheas an Coimisiún go raibh a chuid torthaí i gcomhréir le míreanna 190-192 de bhreithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta agus dhiúltaigh sé don mhaíomh.
Consequently, the Commission considered that its findings were in line with paragraphs 190-192 of the judgment of the General Court and rejected the claim.
Tabhair do d’aire, i ndáil leis an táirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd, nach mbaineann sé seo ach leis an dliteanas dleachta frithchúitimh atá i gceist.
Please note that, in relation to the exporting producer Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd, this applies only to the countervailing duty liability at issue.
Sna rialacháin atá faoi cheist déantar Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd a nascadh le TARIC cód breise C999.
In the regulations at issue, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd is linked to TARIC additional code C999.
Tar éis nochtadh breise, mhaígh CRIA go ndearna an Coimisiún earráid agus leibhéal dleachta Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd á shuí.
Following additional disclosure, CRIA claimed that the Commission made an error when establishing the duty level of Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
Sa rialachán faoi chonspóid, déantar Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd a nascadh le cód breise TARIC C999.
In the contested regulation, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd is linked to TARIC additional code C999.
Chomhoibrigh Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ach níor chomhoibrigh an chuideachta san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd cooperated in anti-dumping investigation but not in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Dá bhrí sin, tá Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd fós faoi réir na ndleachtanna a forchuireadh leis an Rialachán faoi chonspóid
Therefore, Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd remains subject to the duties imposed by the contested Regulation.
Níor chomhoibrigh Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd ná Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ná san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd and Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd neither cooperated in the anti-dumping nor in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Tar éis nochtadh breise, mhaígh CRIA go ndearna an Coimisiún earráid agus leibhéal dleachta Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd á shuí.
Following additional disclosure, CRIA claimed that the Commission made an error when establishing the duty level of Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd.
Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd; Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd
Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd; Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd
Sa rialachán faoi chonspóid, déantar Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd a nascadh le cód breise TARIC C999.
In the contested regulation, Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd is linked to TARIC additional code C999.
Chomhoibrigh Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ach níor chomhoibrigh an chuideachta san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd cooperated in anti-dumping investigation but not in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Dá bhrí sin, tá Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd fós faoi réir na ndleachtanna a forchuireadh le Rialachán (AE) 2018/1579
Therefore, Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd remains subject to the duties imposed by Regulation (EU) 2018/1579.
Níor chomhoibrigh Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd ná Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd san imscrúdú frithdhumpála ná san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd and Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd neither cooperated in the anti-dumping nor in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Breithiúnas ón gCúirt Ghinearálta an 4 Bealtaine 2022, China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) agus China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v an Coimisiún, Cásanna T-30/19 and T-72/19, EU:T:2022:266, míreanna.
Judgement of the General Court of 4 May 2022, China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v Commission, Cases T-30/19 and T-72/19, EU:T:2022:266, paras.
Breithiúnas na Cúirte Ginearálta an 4 Bealtaine 2022, China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) agus China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v an Coimisiún, ECLI:EU:T:2022:266, míreanna (139)-(140).
Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2022, China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v European Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2022:266, paras (139)-(140).
Ina theannta sin, neamhnigh an Chúirt Ghinearálta Rialachán (AE) 2018/1690 a mhéid a bhain leis na cuideachtaí a raibh ionadaíocht á déanamh ag CRIA agus CCCMC thar a gceann (a liostaítear sa tábla thíos), agus a mhéid a bhain le Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd (cód breise TARIC C379).
In addition, the General Court annulled Regulation (EU) 2018/1690 insofar as the companies represented by CRIA and CCCMC (listed in the table above), and Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd (TARIC additional code C379) were concerned.
Sa nóta a ghabhann leis an gcomhad dar dáta an 31 Eanáir 2023, shoiléirigh an Coimisiún gur chuir sé san áireamh leibhéal díothaithe díobhála 32,39 % ab infheidhme maidir le Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd le linn na tréimhse sular tháinig an Rialachán lenar forchuireadh dleachtanna frithchúitimh i bhfeidhm (ón 8 Bealtaine 2018 go dtí an 12 Samhain 2018).
In the note to the file dated 31 January 2023, the Commission clarified that it took into account the injury elimination level of 32,39 % applicable to Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd’s during the period before the Regulation imposing countervailing duties entered into force (from 8 May 2018 to 12 November 2018).
Mar sin féin, ón 13 Samhain 2018, nuair a tháinig Rialachán (AE) 2018/1690 i bhfeidhm agus lenar leasaíodh an Rialachán faoi chonspóid dá réir, chuir an Choimisiún Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd faoi réir chorrlach díobhála níos airde 55,07 %, a mhéid a bhain leis an imscrúdú fóirdheontais, toisc gur chomhoibrigh sé san imscrúdú frithdhumpála, ach nár chomhoibrigh sé san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
However, from 13 November 2018, when Regulation (EU) 2018/1690 entered into force and amended accordingly the contested Regulation, the Commission made Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd subject to the higher injury margin of 55,07 %, as far the subsidy investigation was concerned, because it cooperated in the anti-dumping investigation, but not in the anti-subsidy investigation.
Ar an mbonn sin, shuigh an Coimisiún gur cheart gan athrú a dhéanamh fós ar na dleachtanna frithchúitimh agus frithdhumpála iarmharacha is infheidhme maidir le Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd agus Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd ná ar an dleacht frithchúitimh iarmharach is infheidhme maidir le Weifang Yueling.
On this basis, the Commission established that the residual anti-dumping and countervailing duties applicable to Weifang Yuelong Rubber Co., Ltd and Hefei Wanli Tire Co., Ltd and the residual countervailing duty applicable to Weifang Yueling should remain unchanged.
I gcás Aeolus Group, is iad seo a leanas na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin lena mbaineann: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd,; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd agus Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. I gcás Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd, is iad seo a leanas na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin lena mbaineann: Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd agus Shanghai Huayi Group Corp. Ltd.
For Aeolus Group the exporting producers concerned are: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd,; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd and Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. For Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd the exporting producers concerned are: Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd and Shanghai Huayi Group Corp. Ltd.
Sa rialachán faoi chonspóid, sainaithnítear le cód breise TARIC C333 na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin seo a leanas:Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd;Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd;Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd;Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd.Sannadh cód breise TARIC nua do Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd leis an Rialachán maidir le clárú dá dtagraítear in aithris (16) thíos
In the contested regulation, TARIC additional code C333 identifies the following exporting producers:Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd;Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd;Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd;Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd.A new TARIC additional code was assigned to Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd by the registration Regulation referred to in recital (16) below.
Bhí Aeolus/Pirelli comhdhéanta de na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin seo a leanas: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd; Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd agus Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. I Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2018/1690, suíodh go raibh na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin sin uile ina gcuid de China National Tire Group.
Aeolus/Pirelli consisted of the following exporting producers: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd; Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd and Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. In Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1690 it was found that all of these exporting producers were part of the China National Tire Group.
Ina theannta sin, measadh go raibh Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd ina chuid de China National Tire Group, toisc go raibh baint aige le China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd trí scairsheilbh de bhreis agus 5 % le linn na tréimhse imscrúdúcháin, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 127(d) de Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2015/2447 ón gCoimisiún an 24 Samhain 2015 lena leagtar síos rialacha mionsonraithe maidir le forálacha áirithe Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 952/2013 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle a chur chun feidhme lena leagtar síos Cód Custaim an Aontais.
In addition, Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd was considered as part of China National Tire Group, as it was related to China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd through a shareholding of more than 5 % during the investigation period, in accordance with Article 127(d) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code.
Ina theannta sin, neamhnigh an Chúirt Ghinearálta an Rialachán faoi chonspóid a mhéid a bhain leis na cuideachtaí a raibh ionadaíocht á déanamh ag CRIA agus CCCMC thar a gceann (a liostaítear sa tábla thíos), agus a mhéid a bhain le Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd (cód breise TARIC C379).
In addition, the General Court annulled the contested Regulation insofar as the companies represented by CRIA and CCCMC (listed in the table above), and Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd (TARIC additional code C379), were concerned.
Sa nóta a ghabhann leis an gcomhad dar dáta an 31 Eanáir 2023, shoiléirigh an Coimisiún gur chuir sé san áireamh leibhéal díothaithe díobhála 32,39 % ab infheidhme maidir le Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd le linn na tréimhse sular tháinig an Rialachán lenar forchuireadh dleachtanna frithchúitimh i bhfeidhm (ón 8 Bealtaine 2018 go dtí an 12 Samhain 2018).
In the note to the file dated 31 January 2023, the Commission clarified that it took into account the injury elimination level of 32,39 % applicable to Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd's during the period before the Regulation imposing countervailing duties entered into force (from 8 May 2018 to 12 November 2018).
Mar sin féin, ón 13 Samhain 2018, nuair a tháinig an Rialachán faoi chonspóid i bhfeidhm agus lenar leasaíodh Rialachán 2018/1579 dá réir, chuir an Choimisiún Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd faoi réir chorrlach díobhála níos airde 55,07 %, a mhéid a bhain leis an imscrúdú fóirdheontais, toisc gur chomhoibrigh sé san imscrúdú frithdhumpála, ach nár chomhoibrigh sé san imscrúdú frith-fhóirdheontais.
However, from 13 November 2018, when the contested Regulation entered into force and amended accordingly Regulation 2018/1579, the Commission made Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd subject to the higher injury margin of 55,07 %, as far the subsidy investigation was concerned, because it cooperated in the anti-dumping investigation, but not in the anti-subsidy investigation.
I gcás Aeolus Group, is iad seo a leanas na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin lena mbaineann: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd agus Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. I gcás Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd, is iad seo a leanas na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin lena mbaineann: Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd agus Shanghai Huayi Group Corp. Ltd.
For Aeolus Group the exporting producers concerned are: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd, Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd and Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. For Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd the exporting producers concerned are: Double Coin Group (Jiang Su) Tyre Co., Ltd and Shanghai Huayi Group Corp. Ltd.
Bhí Aeolus/Pirelli comhdhéanta de na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin seo a leanas: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd; Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd agus Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. Sa Rialachán faoi chonspóid, rinneadh amach go raibh na táirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin sin uile ina gcuid de China National Tire Group.
Aeolus/Pirelli consisted of the following exporting producers: Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd; Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co., Ltd; Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co., Ltd and Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd. In the contested Regulation it was found that all of these exporting producers were part of the China National Tire Group.
Ina theannta sin, measadh go raibh Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd mar chuid de China National Tire Group, toisc go raibh baint aige le China National Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd trí scairsheilbh de bhreis agus 5 % le linn na tréimhse imscrúdúcháin, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 127(d) de Rialachán Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2015/2447 ón gCoimisiún an 24 Samhain 2015 lena leagtar síos rialacha mionsonraithe maidir le forálacha áirithe Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 952/2013 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle lena leagtar síos Cód Custaim an Aontais.
In addition, Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd was considered as part of China National Tire Group, as it was related to China National Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd through a shareholding of more than 5 % during the investigation period, in accordance with Article 127(d) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015 laying down detailed rules for implementing certain provisions of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the Union Customs Code.