#2299944
Thagair ECAP do roinnt Doiciméad Eorpach um Measúnú (“EAD’) do na táirgí thuasluaite.
ECAP referred to several European Assessment Documents (‘EAD’) for the above mentioned products.
Thagair ECAP do roinnt Doiciméad Eorpach um Measúnú (“EAD’) do na táirgí thuasluaite.
ECAP referred to several European Assessment Documents (‘EAD’) for the above mentioned products.
Níorbh fhéidir le haon cheann de na hargóintí a rinne ECAP na torthaí sin a luacháil.
None of the arguments brought forward by ECAP could devaluate these findings.
Dá bhrí sin, diúltaíodh d’éilimh ECAP ina leith seo.
Therefore, the claims made by ECAP in this regard were rejected.
D’éiligh ECAP nár cheart go dtiocfadh táirgí áirithe faoi raon feidhme an imscrúdaithe, toisc go bhfuil bunúsáid deiridh éagsúil acu agus go dtéann siad faoi phróisis marcála CE éagsúla.
ECAP claimed that certain products should not fall within the scope of the investigation, as they have different basic end-used and undergo different CE marking processes.
Dá bhrí sin, d’éiligh ECAP nár cheart go dtiocfadh ancairí iarainn agus cruach faoi raon feidhme an táirge.
Therefore, ECAP claimed that iron and steel anchors should not fall within the product scope.
D’éiligh táirgeoir ancairí de chuid an Aontais agus a tháirgeoir onnmhairiúcháin gaolmhar sa tSín, ar an gcaoi chéanna le ECAP, gur cheart scriúnna nithiúla ancaire a eisiamh ó raon feidhme an imscrúdaithe.
One Union producer of anchors and its related exporting producer in China claimed, similarly to ECAP, that concrete anchor screws should be excluded from the product scope of the investigation.
Cosúil le ECAP, chuir siad in iúl go láidir go raibh ancairí le rangú faoi chód AC 73181900 nach raibh cumhdaithe ag an bhfógra tionscnaimh.
Like ECAP, they highlighted that anchors were to be classified under CN code 73181900 not covered by the notice of initiation.
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, chuir ECAP faisnéis ar fáil ó tháirgeoirí áirithe de chuid an Aontais lena ndeimhnítear nach raibh siad in ann scriúnna struchtúracha le haghaidh adhmaid a sholáthar.
Following final disclosure, ECAP provided information from certain Union producers confirming that they were unable to supply structural timber screws.
Dhearbhaigh ECAP freisin go bhfuil tuilleadh próiseála de dhíth ar chineálacha áirithe scriúnna le haghaidh adhmaid (cóireáil teasa speisialta, bratú) nach mbeadh ar fáil san Aontas.
ECAP also asserted that certain types of timber screws require further processing (special heat treatment, coating) that would not be available in the Union.
Bhain an fhaisnéis bhreise a sholáthair ECAP le táirgeoirí an Aontais nár ghearánaigh iad agus nár tháinig chun tosaigh le linn an imscrúdaithe.
The additional information provided by ECAP related to Union producers that were not complainants and did not come forward during the investigation.
Tar éis an nochta dheiridh, leag ECAP béim ar na téarmaí fada seachadta de dheasca ghéarchéim na loingseoireachta agus an mhéadaithe ar chostas iompar mara.
Following final disclosure, ECAP emphasised the prolonged delivery terms due to the shipping crisis and the increase of cost of ocean transport.
Ní raibh na hargóintí a rinne ECAP maidir le hearnáil na tógála teoranta go sonrach do cheanglóirí ach rinneadh tagairt don soláthair foriomlán amhábhair.
The arguments brought forward by ECAP concerning the construction sector were not specifically limited to fasteners but referred to the overall raw material supply.
Ar an gcaoi chéanna, d’éiligh Cuibhreannas Eorpach na dTáirgeoirí Ancaire (“ECAP”) gur cheart scriúnna lena n-úsáid i dtógáil adhmaid a chuirtear in ionad scriúnna cóiste agus, dá bhrí sin, chun oibreacha trom adhmaid a chur le chéile, a eisiamh ó raon feidhme an táirge ós rud é go bhfuil tréithe teicniúla, ceimiceacha agus fisiciúla comhchosúla acu agus go bhfuil úsáidí deiridh comhchosúla acu ná scriúnna cóiste.
Likewise, the European Consortium of Anchor Producers (‘ECAP’) claimed that screws for use in timber constructions replacing coach screws, and thus for assembling heavy woodworks, should be excluded from the product scope as they have similar technical, chemical and physical characteristics and similar end-uses than coach screws.
Níor thug ECAP sonraí, faisnéis ná fianaise ar bith eile don mhéid a léireodh na doiciméid sin nach dtiocfadh na táirgí a bhfuil cur síos orthu iontu faoi raon feidhme reatha an táirge.
ECAP did not provide any further details, information or evidence to what extend these documents would show that the products described therein would not fall within the definition of the current product scope.
D’éiligh ECAP agus an comhlachas a dhéanann ionadaíocht ar mhonaróirí Eorpacha ancairí miotail agus plaisteacha, Fosuithe Tógála na hEorpa (“CFE”), arna thacú ag EFDA, go mbeadh tionchar diúltach ag dleachtanna ar tháirgeoirí ancairí miotail agus plaisteacha agus ar a n-iomaíochas san Aontas agus ar fud an domhain.
ECAP and the association representing European manufacturers of metal and plastic anchors, Construction Fixing Europe (‘CFE’), supported by EFDA, claimed that duties would have a negative impact on the producers of metal and plastic anchors and their competitiveness in the Union and worldwide.
Tharraing ECAP aird freisin ar an easpa soláthair d’amhábhar tógála san Aontas go ginearálta agus ar an méadú suntasach ar chostais amhábhair in earnáil na tógála a raibh drochthionchar aige ar chuideachtaí tógála.
ECAP also pointed to the lack of supply of construction raw material in general in the Union and the substantial increase in raw material costs in the construction sector that was adversely affecting construction companies.
Thug ECAP faoi deara an margadh méadaitheach do thógáil adhmaid chun tithíocht atá inbhuanaithe ó thaobh an chomhshaoil de a bhaint amach agus leag sé béim ar an gcomhar idir earnáil an troscáin adhmaid agus institiúidí taighde chun adhmad a tháirgtear go hinbhuanaithe a fheabhsú agus a mhéadú.
ECAP noted the growing market for timber construction to achieve environmentally sustainable housing and emphasised the wood furniture sector’s collaboration with research institutes to improve and increase sustainably produced wood.