#2179441
GE Wind Energy GmbH, Salzbergen na Gearmáine (“GE”)
GE Wind Energy GmbH, Salzbergen, Germany (‘GE’)
GE Wind Energy GmbH, Salzbergen na Gearmáine (“GE”)
GE Wind Energy GmbH, Salzbergen, Germany (‘GE’)
Epipactis phyllanthes G.E. Sm.
Epipactis phyllanthes G.E.Sm.
I ndiaidh mhír (ge), an méid seo a leanas a chur isteach—
After paragraph (ge), insert—
b. Gearmáiniam (Ge);
b. Germanium (Ge);
an tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
b. Gearmáiniam (Ge);
b. Germanium (Ge);
an tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
Mhaígh GE agus Vestas gur cheart an corrlach sladghearrtha a mheas mar an corrlach díobhála.
GE and Vestas claimed that the undercutting margin should be considered as the injury margin.
Leathanach 6 de t21.000376 (EWTA) agus leathanach 17 de t21.008141 (GE), inter alia.
Page 6 of t21.000376 (EWTA) and page 17 of t21.008141 (GE), inter alia.
In t21.006703, leathanach 17, shonraigh GE go dtuairisceoidh sé brabús diúltach don tréimhse 2021-2022.
In t21.006703, page 17, GE stated that it will report a negative profit for the period 2021-2022.
Ar leathanach 4 de t21.000509, d’aithin GE go raibh sé ag allmhairiú ón tSín, ina bhfuil roinnt soláthróirí deimhnithe ag GE, agus ón Tuirc agus ón gCóiré Theas.
On page 4 of t21.000509 GE acknowledged to be importing from China, where several suppliers are certified by GE, and from Turkey and South Korea.
an tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
Seoladh idirlín: http://www.caucascert.ge
Internet address: http://www.caucascert.ge
b. Gearmáiniam (Ge);
b. Germanium (Ge);
(GE) An tSeoirsia (bia peataí próiseáilte seachas bia peataí stánaithe)
(GE) Georgia (only processed petfood other than canned petfood)
An tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
Gemeinde Gerswalde mit den Gemarkungen Gerswalde, Buchholz, Pinnow (GE), Kaakstedt und Fergitz
Gemeinde Gerswalde mit den Gemarkungen Gerswalde, Buchholz, Pinnow (GE), Kaakstedt und Fergitz
b. Gearmáiniam (Ge);
b. Germanium (Ge);
EDIH - GE
EDIH-GE
b. Gearmáiniam (Ge);
b. Germanium (Ge);
An tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
An tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
An tSeoirsia (GE)
Georgia (GE)
Shonraigh GE gur cheart anailís ar leith a dhéanamh ar acmhainneacht le haghaidh túir ar talamh agus túir eischósta agus líomhain sé go raibh na gearánaigh ag feidhmiú ar lánacmhainneacht nach mór chun SWT ar talamh a tháirgeadh agus, roinnt uaireanta, níorbh fhéidir leo freastal ar riachtanais GE maidir le ceanglais sonraíochta nó laistigh de na hagaí tionscanta riachtanacha (agus uaireanta níorbh fhéidir leo freastal ar na riachtanais ar chor ar bith).
GE stated that capacity should be analysed separately for onshore versus offshore towers and alleged that the complainants were operating at almost full capacity for the production of onshore SWT and that, on several occasions, they had been unable to meet GE’s needs with respect to specification requirements or within the necessary lead times (and sometimes not at all).
(2) Folóidh an có-luadh “na hAchtanna Toghcháin, 1923 ge 1943,” an tAcht so chun gach críche.
(2) The collective citation "the Electoral Acts, 1923 to 1943," shall for all purposes include this Act.
Thug an Coimisiún dá aire ar dtús nár mhol GE aga tionscanta malartach chun tomhaltas a shuí ar bonn sonraí suiteála WindEurope, ná bonn difriúil chun tomhaltas a ríomh.
The Commission first noted that GE neither proposed an alternative lead time to establish consumption on the basis of WindEurope installation data, nor a different basis to calculate consumption.
Ar na cúiseanna thuas, dhiúltaigh an Coimisiún do na maímh thuas a chuir EWTA, GE agus Suzhou Titan faoina bhráid.
For the above reasons, the Commission rejected the above claims submitted by EWTA, GE and Suzhou Titan.
D’áitigh páirtithe áirithe (CCCME, SGRE, GE) gur tháinig feabhas ar tháscairí áirithe sa tréimhse dheiridh den tréimhse thagartha a úsáideadh sa ghearán.
Some parties (CCCME, SGRE, GE) submitted that in the last part of the reference period used in the complaint, some indicators improved.
Thagair Vestas do luaineacht an éilimh eischósta mar fhoinse díobhála agus, fearacht GE, chuir sé an locht ar an tearc-úsáid a bhaintear as saoráidí táirgthe eischósta san Aontas.
Vestas referred to the volatility of offshore demand as a source of injury and, like GE, blamed injury on the underutilisation of offshore production facilities in the Union.
Maidir le SGRE agus GE, d’eascair an laghdú ar bhrabúsacht thionscal SWT an Aontais as laghdú ar an éileamh ar SWT eischósta.
For SGRE and GE, the drop in profitability of the Union SWT industry derived from a decline in demand for offshore SWT.
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, rinneadh GE na figiúirí a d’fhoilsigh WindEurope a léirmhíniú ar bhealach eile.
After final disclosure, GE interpreted WindEurope’s published figures differently.
Ina bharúlacha a ghabh leis an nochtadh deiridh, mheas GE go raibh locht ar an modheolaíocht ar a dtugtar tuairisc thuas.
In its comments to the final disclosure, GE found the methodology described above flawed.
Dar le GE, bhí éileamh ar SWT ón Aontas á bhrú ag GRI chuig a saoráidí táirgthe sa Tuirc agus san India.
According to GE, GRI was pushing Union SWT demand to its production facilities in Turkey and India.
Thairis sin, maidir leis an tréimhse thagartha, níor léiríodh san imscrúdú aon chaillteanas do GE agus Vestas ar úsáideoirí comhoibríocha iad.
Moreover, with regard to the reference period, the investigation showed no losses for the cooperating users GE and Vestas.
Maidir le táirgí ina gcuimsítear an táirge faoi imscrúdú, ina fhreagra ar an gceistneoir, thuairiscigh GE brabús sa raon 5 %-10 % in 2019 agus i dtréimhse an imscrúdaithe.
For products incorporating the product under investigation, in its questionnaire reply GE reported a profit in the range 5 % - 10 % in 2019 and the investigation period.
Ba cheart a thabhairt d’aire freisin nach mbíonn GE, Vestas, Nordex ná SGRE ag brath go heisiach ar allmhairí SWT ón tSín.
It should also be noted that neither GE, nor Vestas, nor Nordex, nor SGRE rely exclusively on Chinese imports of SWT.
D’áitigh GE freisin, bunaithe ar shonraí sa ghearán, go raibh na leibhéil allmhairí ón tSín inchomparáide in 2016, 2017 agus 2018.
GE also submitted, based on data in the complaint, that the levels of Chinese imports were comparable in 2016, 2017 and 2018.
I ndáil leis an méid sin, ba cheart tacaíocht ón Aontas faoin tSaoráid a chur in ionad na tacaíochta déthaobhaí a sholáthraítear faoi (ICFCI-GE - An Eoraip Dhomhanda).
In this regard, Union support under the Facility should replace the bilateral support provided under NDICI-Global Europe.
Nota.—I gcás daoine a deimhnítear a bheith ina gciotóga, beidh an cúiteamh as díth lámh-ghéi ge clé, láimhe clé, etc. díreach mar an gcúiteamh a híocfar as díth lámh-ghéige deise, láimhe deise, etc., ag us vice versa.
Note—In the case of left-handed men certified to be such, the compensation in respect of the left arm, hands, etc, and vice versa.
(b) má bhíonn comhshocraíochtaí chu ge déanta ag an bhfostóir, féadfar é a thabhairt trína sheachadadh do dhuine a bheidh ainmnithe ag an bhfostóir de bhun na gcomhshocraíochtaí, nó trína fhágáil do dhuine den sórt sin in áit a bheidh ainmnithe amhlaidh, nó trína chur leis an bpost chuig duine den sórt sin ag seoladh a bheidh ainmnithe amhlaidh.
( b ) if arrangements in that behalf have been made by the employer, may be given by being delivered to a person designated by the employer in pursuance of the arrangements, or left for such a person at a place so designated, or sent by post to such a person at a place so designated.
GE Avio S.r.l., atá cláraithe faoi dhlí na hIodáile (cláruimhir: 1170622CF10898340012), agus a bhfuil a oifig chláraithe in Rivalta di Torino (TO), Via I Maggio uimh. 99, an Iodáil
GE Avio S.r.l., registered under Italian law (registration number: 1170622CF10898340012), with its registered office in Rivalta di Torino (TO), Via I Maggio no. 99, Italy
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, mhaígh GE nach raibh mórán céille le figiúirí tomhaltais an Aontais a bhunú ar líon na suiteálacha san Aontas i rith na bliana ina dhiaidh sin, de bhrí go mbeadh sé dodhéanta dáta ceannaigh a athríomh go cruinn ó bhliain na suiteála.
Following final disclosure, GE claimed that basing Union consumption figures on the number of installations in the Union during the subsequent year made little sense as it would be impossible to accurately recalculate a purchase date from the year of installation.
Chun tacú leis an maíomh sin, luaigh GE go bhféadfaidh níos mó ná 1 bhliain amháin a bheith i gceist leis an aga tionscanta, mar a fuair an Coimisiún, ach níor thug sé barúil faoi cé chomh iomchuí atá sé meán-aga tionscanta 12 mhí a úsáid, mar a mhol EWTA agus a bhfuair an Coimisiún gur aga réasúnach é bunaithe ar an bhfaisnéis arna soláthar ag páirtithe leasmhara san imscrúdú seo.
In support of this claim, GE referred to the fact that the lead time can be longer than one year, as the Commission had found, but it did not comment on the appropriateness of using a 12 months average lead time as had been proposed by EWTA and found reasonable by the Commission based on the information provided by interested parties in this investigation.
Go deimhin, d’admhaigh GE féin go mbíonn éagsúlacht mhór i gceist leis na hamlínte ón am a gceannaítear túir ghaoithe cruach go dtí an t-am a suiteáiltear iad, ag brath ar an tionscadal feirme gaoithe agus an méid agus an áit a bhfuil sí, agus go dtagann athrú freisin ar na hamlínte ón am a bhfaightear imréiteach custaim do thúir ghaoithe chruach (nó an t-am a bhfágann siad monarchana tháirgeoirí an Aontais) go dtí an t-am a suiteáiltear iad.
In fact, GE itself acknowledged that timelines between purchasing and installing steel wind towers vary significantly depending on the windfarm project, its size and location, while timelines between customs clearing steel wind towers (or these leaving the Union producers’ factories) and installing them also fluctuate.
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, thug GE dá aire go ndearna an Coimisiún ríomh mícheart ar thomhaltas an Aontais ar thúir ghaoithe chruach agus, dá bharr sin, gur shuigh sé go mícheart sciar tháirgeoirí na Síne den mhargadh.
Following final disclosure, GE noted that the Commission incorrectly calculated the Union consumption of steel wind towers and, thus, incorrectly established the market shares of Chinese producers.
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, thug GE dá aire go ndearna an Coimisiún ríomh mícheart ar thomhaltas an Aontais maidir le túir ghaoithe chruach agus, dá bharr sin, gur shuigh sé go mícheart sciar táirgeoirí na Síne den mhargadh.
Following final disclosure, GE noted that the Commission calculated incorrectly the Union consumption of steel wind towers and, thus, established incorrectly the market shares of Union producers.
Shonraigh SGRE agus GE araon nach raibh aon comhghaol idir brabúis laghdaitheacha na ngearánach agus na hallmhairí dumpáilte líomhnaithe toisc gur tháinig laghdú mór ar bhrabúis ó 2018 amach agus tháinig méadú ar phraghsanna allmhairiúcháin ón tSín.
Both SGRE and GE stated that there was no correlation between the complainants’ declining profits and the alleged dumped imports as profits declined sharply as from 2018 and Chinese import prices increased.
Thug GE dá aire go ndearna táirgeoirí de chuid an Aontais infheistíochtaí móra i bhforbairt saoráidí táirgthe costasacha roimh 2017, d’fhonn freastal ar éileamh eischósta nár mhór iad a úsáid, ar deireadh, chun SWT a tháirgeadh ar talamh, nó a bhí díomhaoin.
GE noted that prior to 2017 Union producers had made strong investments in developing expensive production facilities with a view to serving offshore demand that, in the end, had to be used for producing onshore SWT or remained idle.
Mar sin féin, cé go ndearna an Coimisiún na figiúirí a choigeartú chun Ballstáit an Aontais amháin a áireamh, i.e. chuir sé as an áireamh na méideanna a tuairiscíodh maidir leis an Ríocht Aontaithe, is cosúil nach ndearna GE an rud céanna agus, ar an gcaoi sin, gur bhunaigh sé a chonclúid ar thacar sonraí mícheart.
However, whereas the Commission had adjusted the figures to include only Member States of the Union, i.e. it had excluded the reported volumes concerning the United Kingdom, it appeared that GE had failed to do so and thus that it based its conclusions on a wrong dataset.
Maidir le barúlacha GE a bhaineann le tearc-úsáid saoráidí táirgthe eischósta, bréagnaítear iad le barúlacha an pháirtí ina soiléirítear nach raibh i gceist leis na saoráidí a bhí curtha in áirithe go hiomlán dá dtagraítear in aithris (384) ach saoráidí aon táirgeora amháin de chuid an Aontais.
As to GE’s comments related to underutilisation of offshore production facilities, they are contradicted by the party’s comments clarifying that the fully booked facilities referred in recital (384) were those of only one Union producer.