#1612049
gamma ghathanna
gamma rays
gamma ghathanna
gamma rays
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, chuir ceithre pháirtí leasmhar, Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem, i gcoinne rogha an IP fionraí a rinne an Coimisiún.
Following the final disclosure four interested parties, Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem, contested the choice of the suspension IP made by the Commission.
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, chuir Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Cepi, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem i gcoinne chonclúid an Coimisiúin maidir le gnáthmhéideanna táirgeachta VAM a bheith ar ais.
Following the final disclosure, Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Cepi, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem contested the Commission’s conclusion as regards the return to normal production volumes of VAM.
Tar éis an nochta deiridh, chuir Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Cepi, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem i gcoinne chonclúid an Coimisiúin maidir le praghsanna díola thionscal an Aontais.
Following the final disclosure Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem contested the Commission’s conclusions as regards the sales prices of the Union industry.
Ina dtuairimí faoin nochtadh deiridh, chuir Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem i gcoinne na gconclúidí ón gCoimisiún maidir le tionchar na ndleachtanna frithdhumpála ar úsáideoirí PVA.
In their comments to the final disclosure, Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem contested the Commission’s conclusions on the impact of the anti-dumping duties on the users of PVA.
D’áitigh Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem go dtagann na corrlaigh a thuill allmhaireoirí agus úsáideoirí PVA ó dhíol stoic PVA a ceannaíodh roimh theacht i bhfeidhm na ndleachtanna frithdhumpála.
Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem argued that the margins earned by the importers and users of PVA comes from the sales of stock of PVA purchased before the entry into force of the anti-dumping duties.
Carbochem Srl, Cordial Adhesives B.V., EOC Belgium NV, FAR Polymers Srl„ Gamma Chimica SpA, Grünig KG, Jeniuschem SpA, Solutia Europe SPRL, Wacker Chemie AG, Wegochem Europe B.V..
Carbochem Srl, Cordial Adhesives B.V., EOC Belgium NV, FAR Polymers Srl, Gamma Chimica SpA, Grünig KG, Jeniuschem SpA, Solutia Europe SPRL, Wacker Chemie AG, Wegochem Europe B.V..
Ionstraimí braite radaíochta (agus páirteanna breise) d'aon chineál acu seo a leanas, atá ceaptha go speisialta, nó inchurtha in oiriúint, chun radaíocht núicléach a bhrath nó a thomhas, mar atá alfa- agus béata-cháithníní, gamma-ghathanna, neodróin agus prótóin:
Radiation detection instruments (and spare parts) of one of the following types, specially designed, or adaptable, for the detection of measurement of nuclear radiation, such as alpha and beta particles, gamma rays, neutrons and protons:
Tar éis an nochta chinntithigh, d’áitigh Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Cepi, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem, gur dhiúltaigh an Coimisiún a chur san áireamh mar dhála athraithe nach raibh tionscal an Aontais in ann éileamh an Aontais a sholáthar, fiú gur ghlac an Coimisiún go sainráite gur iarmhairt dhíreach ar ghanntanas VAM é neamhábaltacht thionscal an Aontais soláthar a dhéanamh.
Following the definitive disclosure, Ahlstrom-Munksjö, Carbochem, Cepi, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem, argued that the Commission refused to take into account the inability of the Union industry to supply European demand as a changed circumstance, even though the Commission explicitly accepted that this inability to supply was a direct consequence of the VAM shortage.
Mhaígh Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica agus Jeniuschem, gur bhunaigh an Coimisiún a mheastóireacht ar na sonraí a chuir táirgeoirí an Aontais ar fáil ina gcuid freagraí ar an gceistneoir ar thaobh amháin, ach nár chuir sé san áireamh an fhaisnéis a chuir na húsáideoirí comhoibríocha ar fáil maidir leis an bpraghas a chuireann tionscal an Aontais i bhfeidhm ar an taobh eile.
Carbochem, Far Polymers, Gamma Chimica and Jeniuschem, claimed that the Commission based its evaluation on the data provided by the Union producers in their questionnaire replies on one hand, but did not take into account the information provided by the cooperating users as regards the price applied by the Union industry on the other hand.