#338478
comhaontuithe eadrána agus comhaontuithe maidir le rogha cúirte;
arbitration agreements and agreements on the choice of court;
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
12 toradh in 3 dhoiciméad
#521097
Comhaontú maidir le rogha cúirte
Choice-of-court agreement
#533174
Níor cheart go gcumhdófaí leis an eisceacht seo cásanna ina ndearna na páirtithe comhaontuithe eisiacha maidir le rogha cúirte atá contrártha dá chéile nó i gcás inarb í cúirt a ainmníodh i gcomhaontú eisiach maidir le rogha cúirte ar tugadh imeachtaí os a comhair ar dtús.
This exception should not cover situations where the parties have entered into conflicting exclusive choice-of-court agreements or where a court designated in an exclusive choice-of-court agreement has been seised first.
#338405
Ba cheart go mbeadh feidhm ag an riail sin cibé acu an raibh rogha cúirte nó rogha binse ag gabháil leis an rogha dlí nó nach raibh.
This rule should apply whether or not the choice of law was accompanied by a choice of court or tribunal.
#520900
(28) Ba cheart go n-áireofaí i measc na sásraí sin sásra ina ligfí do na páirtithe lena mbaineann comhaontú maidir le rogha cúirte a thabhairt i gcrích i bhfabhar na gcúirteanna i mBallstát an dlí a roghnaíodh.
(28) One such mechanism should be to allow the parties concerned to conclude a choice-of-court agreement in favour of the courts of the Member State of the chosen law.
#520901
Bheadh gá an sásra a chinneadh ar bhonn gach cáis faoi leith, ag brath go háirithe ar an tsaincheist a chumhdaítear tríd an gcomhaontú maidir le rogha cúirte, i dtaobh an mbeadh gá an comhaontú a thabhairt i gcrích idir na páirtithe ar fad a bhfuil baint acu leis an gcomharbas nó i dtaobh an bhféadfadh cuid acu comhaontú saincheist ar leith a thabhairt os comhair na cúirte a roghnaíodh i gcás nach ndéanfadh cinneadh ón gcúirt sin difear do na páirtithe eile sa chomharbas.
It would have to be determined on a case-by-case basis, depending in particular on the issue covered by the choice-of-court agreement, whether the agreement would have to be concluded between all parties concerned by the succession or whether some of them could agree to bring a specific issue before the chosen court in a situation where the decision by that court on that issue would not affect the rights of the other parties to the succession.
#521099
2. Cuirfear an comhaontú sin maidir le rogha cúirte in iúl i scríbhinn, beidh an dáta air agus beidh sé sínithe ag na tairbhithe lena mbaineann.
2. Such a choice-of-court agreement shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by the parties concerned.
#521119
1. I gcás ina ndealraítear, agus na himeachtaí os comhair chúirt an Bhallstáit atá ag feidhmiú dlínse de bhun Airteagal 7, nach raibh na páirtithe uile sna himeachtaí sin páirteach sa chomhaontú maidir le rogha cúirte, leanfaidh an chúirt de dhlínse a fheidhmiú má thagann na páirtithe sna himeachtaí nach raibh páirteach sa chomhaontú i láthair na cúirte gan dlínse na cúirte a chonspóid.
1. Where, in the course of proceedings before a court of a Member State exercising jurisdiction pursuant to Article 7, it appears that not all the parties to those proceedings were party to the choice-of-court agreement, the court shall continue to exercise jurisdiction if the parties to the proceedings who were not party to the agreement enter an appearance without contesting the jurisdiction of the court.
#533165
Más rud é go n-ardaítear ceist i dtaobh cé acu an bhfuil nó nach bhfuil comhaontú maidir le rogha cúirte atá i bhfabhar cúirte nó cúirteanna de chuid Ballstáit ar neamhní a mhéid a bhaineann lena bhailíocht shubstainteach, ba cheart an cheist sin a chinneadh i gcomhréir le dlí Bhallstát na cúirte nó na gcúirteanna atá ainmnithe sa chomhaontú, lena n-áirítear rialacha an Bhallstáit sin maidir le heasaontacht dlíthe.
Where a question arises as to whether a choice-of-court agreement in favour of a court or the courts of a Member State is null and void as to its substantive validity, that question should be decided in accordance with the law of the Member State of the court or courts designated in the agreement, including the conflict-of-laws rules of that Member State.
#533169
Chun éifeachtacht comhaontuithe eisiacha maidir le rogha cúirte a fheabhsú, áfach, agus chun míchleachtas dlíthíochta a sheachaint, is gá foráil a dhéanamh d’eisceacht ar an riail ghinearálta lis pendens chun déileáil go sásúil le cás ar leith ina bhféadfadh imeachtaí comhthráthacha teacht chun cinn.
However, in order to enhance the effectiveness of exclusive choice-of-court agreements and to avoid abusive litigation tactics, it is necessary to provide for an exception to the general lis pendens rule in order to deal satisfactorily with a particular situation in which concurrent proceedings may arise.
#533170
Seo é an cás nuair a dhéantar imeachtaí a thabhairt os comhair cúirte nach bhfuil ainmnithe i gcomhaontú eisiach maidir le rogha cúirte agus go ndéantar imeachtaí a thabhairt os comhair na cúirte ainmnithe ina dhiaidh sin ar an gcúis chéanna caingne agus idir na páirtithe céanna.
This is the situation where a court not designated in an exclusive choice-of-court agreement has been seised of proceedings and the designated court is seised subsequently of proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties.
#533171
I gcás den sórt sin, ba cheart go gceanglófaí ar an gcéad chúirt ar tugadh imeachtaí os a comhair a cuid imeachtaí a bhacadh a thúisce a thugtar imeachtaí os comhair na cúirte ainmnithe agus go dtí an tráth sin a dhearbhaíonn an chúirt ainmnithe nach bhfuil aon dlínse aici faoin gcomhaontú eisiach maidir le rogha cúirte.
In such a case, the court first seised should be required to stay its proceedings as soon as the designated court has been seised and until such time as the latter court declares that it has no jurisdiction under the exclusive choice-of-court agreement.