Dar le Grúpa IRNC, sa chás seo, ba chóir gurb í an Indinéis nó an tSín an ‘tír soláthair nó ceannacháin’, i gcomhréir leis an gComhlacht Achomhairc in US – Softwood Lumber IV.
According to IRNC Group, in this case, the ‘country of provision or purchase’ should be Indonesia or China, in line with the Appellate Body in US – Softwood Lumber IV.
Tuarascáil an Phainéil, United States – Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS533/R, scaipthe ar Bhaill den ETD an 24 Lúnasa 2020, míreanna 7.600 agus 7.606.
Panel Report, United States – Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS533/R, circulated to WTO Members 24 August 2020, paras. and 7.606.
Dúirt sé freisin nach féidir an cúram agus an treoir a aimsiú fiú bunaithe ar na héifeachtaí eacnamaíocha a bheadh ag beart rialtais, ag tagairt don Phainéal in US - Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada.
It added that entrustment and direction cannot even be found based on the economic effects of a government measure, referring to the Panel in US - Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada.
Féach freisin Tuarascáil ón mBuanchomhlacht Achomhairc maidir le US – Hot-Rolled Steel (mír 73), inar thug an Buanchomhlacht Achomhairc le fios go bhfuil na teorainneacha ama maidir le himscrúduithe a thabhairt i gcrích a leagtar amach in Airteagal 5.10 “sainordaithe” faoin gComhaontú Frithdhumpála, agus an Tuarascáil ón bPainéal maidir le US – Softwood Lumber V (mír 7.333), áit ar thug an painéal “srian” ar na teorainneacha ama sin.
Also Appellate Body Report in US – Hot-Rolled Steel (para. 73), where the Appellate Body indicated that the time limits for concluding investigations set out in Article 5.10 are ‘mandated’ under the Anti-Dumping Agreement and the Panel Report in US – Softwood Lumber V (para. 7.333), where the panel described these time limits as ‘strict’.