I gcásanna ina dtugann na Conarthaí ceart tionscnaimh don Pharlaimint, féadfaidh an coiste freagrach a chinneadh tuarascáil féintionscnaimh a tharraingt suas.
In cases where the Treaties confer a right of initiative on Parliament, the committee responsible may decide to draw up an own-initiative report.
Déanfaidh an Coimisiún an liosta grúpaí saineolaithe a chuirtear ar bun chun cabhrú leis an gCoimisiún i bhfeidhmiú a chirt tionscnaimh a chur in iúl don Pharlaimint.
The Commission shall inform Parliament of the list of its expert groups set up in order to assist the Commission in the exercise of its right of initiative.
Ní dochar an méid sin do Chinneadh (AE) Uimh. 2017/899 ná do cheart tionscnaimh an Choimisiúin gníomhartha reachtacha a thíolacadh.
This is without prejudice to Decision (EU) 2017/899 and to the Commission’s right of initiative to propose legislative acts.
I gcásanna ina dtugann na Conarthaí ceart tionscnaimh don Pharlaimint, féadfaidh an coiste freagrach a chinneadh tuarascáil féintionscnaimh a tharraingt suas i gcomhréir le Riail 54.
In cases where the Treaties confer a right of initiative on Parliament, the committee responsible may decide to draw up an own-initiative report in accordance with Rule 54.
D’fhéadfadh togra reachtach i gcomhréir le ceart tionscnaimh an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh a bheith mar thoradh ar an bpróiseas chun an gá le Comhpháirtíocht Eorpach Institiúidithe a mheas i gceann amháin de na Réimsí Comhpháirtíochta thuasluaite.
The process of assessing the need for an Institutionalised European Partnership in one of the abovementioned Partnership Areas may result in a legislative proposal in accordance with the Commission's right of initiative.
Bainfidh sé leas iomlán as an gceart tionscnaimh atá aige faoi na Conarthaí, agus aird chuí á tabhairt ar phrionsabail na coimhdeachta agus na comhréireachta agus ar rialacha maidir le reachtóireacht níos fearr.
It will make full use of its right of initiative under the Treaties, with due regard for the subsidiarity and proportionality principles and better law-making rules.
Féadfaidh aon Fheisire togra i gcomhair gnímh Aontais a chur síos ar bhonn an chirt tionscnaimh arna dheonú don Pharlaimint faoi Airteagal 225 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh.
Any Member may table a proposal for a Union act on the basis of the right of initiative granted to Parliament pursuant to Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Ní bheidh feidhm ag an mír seo i gcásanna ina gcáilíonn ábhar na tuarascála le haghaidh díospóireachta lárnaí i suí iomlánach, i gcás ina dtarraingítear suas an tuarascáil de bhun an chirt tionscnaimh dá dtagraítear i Riail 41 nó i Riail 42, nó i gcás inar féidir a mheas gur tuarascáil straitéiseach an tuarascáil de réir na gcritéar atá leagtha síos ag Comhdháil na nUachtarán [7].
This paragraph shall not apply in cases where the subject of the report qualifies for a key debate in plenary, where the report is drawn up pursuant to the right of initiative referred to in Rule 41 or 42, or where the report can be considered a strategic report according to the criteria set out by the Conference of Presidents [7].
I gcás ina dtagann ábhar na tuarascála faoi réim an chirt tionscnaimh dá dtagraítear i Riail 41, ní fhéadfar údarú a choinneáil siar ach amháin ar an bhforas nach bhfuil na coinníollacha atá leagtha amach sna Conarthaí arna gcomhlíonadh.
Where the subject of the report comes under the right of initiative referred to in Rule 41, authorisation may be withheld only on the grounds that the conditions set out in the Treaties are not met.
Déanfaidh an Coimisiún teagmhálacha den sórt sin a éascú agus feidhmeoidh sé a cheart tionscnaimh ar bhealach cuiditheach d’fhonn seasaimh ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle a thabhairt chun réitigh, agus aird cuí á tabhairt ar an gcóimheá idir na hinstitiúidí agus ar an ról a thugtar dó leis an gConradh.
The Commission shall facilitate such contacts and shall exercise its right of initiative in a constructive manner with a view to reconciling the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, with due regard for the balance between the institutions and the role conferred on it by the Treaty.
Déanfaidh an Coimisiún teagmhálacha den sórt sin a éascú agus feidhmeoidh sé a cheart tionscnaimh ar bhealach cuiditheach d’fhonn seasaimh ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle a thabhairt chun réitigh, agus aird cuí á tabhairt ar an gcóimheá idir na hinstitiúidí agus ar an ról a thugtar dó leis na Conarthaí.
The Commission shall facilitate such contacts and shall exercise its right of initiative in a constructive manner with a view to reconciling the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, with due regard for the balance between the institutions and the role conferred on it by the Treaty.
A mhéid is féidir, geallann na hinstitiúidí clásail chaighdeánacha atá inghlactha go frithpháirteach a úsáid, ar clásail iad a bheidh le hionchorprú sna gníomhartha arna nglacadh faoi comhchinnteoireacht, go háirithe maidir le forálacha i ndáil le feidhmiú cumhachtaí cur chun feidhme (i gcomhréir leis an gcinneadh ar "coisteolaíocht" [3]), i ndáil le teacht i bhfeidhm, trasuí agus cur i bhfeidhm na ngníomhartha agus i ndáil le hurraim do cheart tionscnaimh an Choimisiúin.
As far as possible, the institutions undertake to use mutually acceptable standard clauses to be incorporated in the acts adopted under codecision in particular as regards provisions concerning the exercise of implementing powers (in accordance with the "comitology" decision [3]), entry into force, transposition and the application of acts and respect for the Commission’s right of initiative.
Iarrann an Chomhairle agus Parlaimint na hEorpa ar an gCoimisiún smaoineamh ar Airteagal 8(4) den Athmhúnlú ar Rialachán Bhaile Átha Cliath a athbhreithniú, gan dochar dá cheart tionscnaimh, nuair a rialóidh an Chúirt Bhreithiúnais ar Chás C-648/11 MA agus Grúpaí Eile vs. An Rúnaí Stáit don Roinn Baile agus ar a dhéanaí faoi na teorainneacha ama a leagtar amach in Airteagal 46 de Rialachán Bhaile Átha Cliath.
The Council and the European Parliament invite the Commission to consider, without prejudice to its right of initiative, a revision of Article 8(4) of the Recast of the Dublin Regulation once the Court of Justice rules on case C-648/11 MA and Others vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department and at the latest by the time limits set in Article 46 of the Dublin Regulation.
Gan dochar dá cheart tionscnaimh de bhun an Chonartha, is mian leis an gCoimisiún sa chomhthéacs seo a dhearbhú, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 9, ina chéad mheastóireacht ar an Rialachán seo, atá dlite laistigh de 2 bhliain i ndiaidh theacht i bhfeidhm an Rialacháin, go ndéanfaidh sé measúnú críochnúil ar an gcaoi ar cuireadh an Rialachán chun feidhme agus ar an gcaoi ar chuir sé le feidhmiú éifeachtach an mhargaidh inmheánaigh.
Without prejudice to its right of initiative pursuant to the Treaty, the Commission wishes in this context to affirm that, in accordance with Article 9, in its first evaluation of this Regulation, due within two years after the entry into force of the Regulation, it will thoroughly assess the way in which the Regulation has been implemented and has contributed to the effective functioning of the internal market.
Agus urraim chuí á tabhairt acu don cheart maidir le tionscnamh atá ag an gCoimisiún, don ghnáthnós imeachta reachtach agus do chothromaíocht na gcumhachtaí atá idir na hinstitiúidí, ba cheart do Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus don Chomhairle aghaidh a thabhairt, ar bhonn bliantúil, ar an dul chun cinn atá bainte amach ag an Aontas Fuinnimh i dtaca le gach gné de na beartais Fuinnimh agus Aeráide.
With due respect to the Commission's right of initiative, the ordinary legislative procedure, and the institutional balance of power, the European Parliament and the Council should address, on an annual basis, the progress achieved by the Energy Union on all dimensions of Energy and Climate policies.
Féadfaidh aon Fheisire togra i gcomhair gníomh Aontais a chur síos ar bhonn an chirt tionscnaimh arna dheonú don Pharlaimint de bhun Airteagal 225 den Chonradh ar Fheidhmiú an Aontais Eorpaigh.
Any Member may table a proposal for a Union act on the basis of the right of initiative granted to Parliament pursuant to Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
I gcás ina dtiocfaidh ábhar na tuarascála laistigh de réim cheart tionscnaimh na Parlaiminte dá dtagraítear i Riail 46, ní fhéadfaidh Comhdháil na nUachtarán cinneadh a dhéanamh údarú den sórt sin a choinneáil siar ach amháin i gcás nach gcomhlíontar na coinníollacha a leagtar amach sna Conarthaí.
Where the subject matter of the report falls within Parliament's right of initiative referred to in Rule 46, the Conference of Presidents may only decide to withhold such authorisation if the conditions set out in the Treaties are not met.
Ní bheidh feidhm ag mír 4 i gcás ina gcáilíonn ábhar na tuarascála le haghaidh díospóireacht lárnach i suí iomlánach, i gcás ina dtarraingítear suas an tuarascáil de bhun an chirt tionscnaimh dá dtagraítear i Riail 46 nó i Riail 47, nó i gcás ina mbeidh an tuarascáil údaraithe mar thuarascáil straitéiseach.
Paragraph 4 shall not apply where the subject of the report qualifies for a key debate in plenary, where the report is drawn up pursuant to the right of initiative referred to in Rule 46 or 47, or where the report has been authorised as a strategic report.
Gan dochar dá cheart tionscnaimh, leanfaidh an Coimisiún d’athbhreithniú a dhéanamh an amhlaidh go bhfuil tagairtí do rátálacha creidmheasa i ndlí an Aontais ina n-údar nó an amhlaidh go bhféadfadh siad a bheith ina n-údar le spleáchas aonair nó le spleáchas meicníoch ar rátálacha creidmheasa ag na húdaráis inniúla, ag na húdaráis inniúla earnála, ag na heintitis dá dtagraítear sa chéad fhomhír d’Airteagal 4(1) nó ag rannpháirtithe eile sa mhargadh chun go ndéanfaí forálacha dhlí an Aontais lena n-éilítear nó lena gceadaítear úsáid nó eisiúint rátálacha creidmheasa chun críocha rialúcháin a scriosadh faoin 1 Eanáir 2020, ar choinníoll gur sainaithníodh malairtí iomchuí ar mheasúnú ar riosca creidmheasa agus gur cuireadh chun feidhme iad.
Without prejudice to its right of initiative, the Commission shall continue to review whether references to credit ratings in Union law trigger or have the potential to trigger sole or mechanistic reliance on credit ratings by the competent authorities, the sectoral competent authorities, the entities referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1) or other financial market participants with a view to deleting all references to credit ratings in Union law for regulatory purposes by 1 January 2020, provided that appropriate alternatives to credit risk assessment have been identified and implemented.
Gan dochar do cheart tionscnaimh an Choimisiúin, ba cheart togra reachtach a bheith ag gabháil leis an tuarascáil chun tréimhse chur i bhfeidhm Rialachán (AE) 2021/953 a ghiorrú, agus teacht chun cinn na staide eipidéimeolaíche maidir le paindéim COVID-19 agus aon mholtaí ó ECDC agus ón gCoiste Slándála Sláinte ina leith sin á gcur san áireamh.
Without prejudice to the Commission’s right of initiative, the report should be accompanied by a legislative proposal to shorten the period of application of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 taking into account the evolution of the epidemiological situation with regard to the COVID-19 pandemic and any recommendations from the ECDC and the Health Security Committee to that effect.
I gcás nach leanfaidh an Coimisiún tuairim an Bhoird um Ghéarchéimeanna Sláinte, déanfaidh sé na cúiseanna lena ghníomhaíocht a mhíniú don Bhord um Ghéarchéimeanna Sláinte, gan dochar do cheart tionscnaimh an Choimisiúin.
Where the Commission does not follow the opinion of the Health Crisis Board, it shall explain the reasons for its action to the Health Crisis Board, without prejudice to the Commission’s right of initiative.
An 17 Eanáir 2020, thug an Coimisiún caingean faoi Airteagal 263 CFAE lena n-iarrtar neamhniú páirteach Chinneadh (AE) 2019/1754 ar na forais go ndearnadh sárú ar Airteagal 218(6) agus Airteagal 293(1) CFAE, ar an bprionsabal tabhartha cumhachtaí a leagtar síos in Airteagal 13(2) CAE, ar phrionsabal na cothromaíochta institiúidí agus ar cheart tionscnaimh an Choimisiúin, agus, mar mhalairt air sin, ar na forais gur sáraíodh Airteagal 2(1) agus Airteagal 207 CFAE agus an dualgas cúiseanna a lua.
On 17 January 2020, the Commission brought an action under Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Decision (EU) 2019/1754 on the grounds of an infringement of Article 218(6) and Article 293(1) TFEU, of the principle of the conferral of powers laid down in Article 13(2) TEU, of the principle of institutional balance and of the Commission’s right of initiative, and, in the alternative, on the grounds of an infringement of Article 2(1) and Article 207 TFEU and the duty to state reasons.