#145822
Bogadhmad (1.4 mhéadar ciúbach -1 tona)
Softwood (1.4 cub. metres 1 tonne)
Scag na torthaí
Bailiúcháin
31 toradh in 16 doiciméad
#160278
Bogadhmad (1.4 mhéadar ciúbach = 1 tona)
Softwood (1.4 cub. metres =1 tonne)
#185934
Bogadhmad (1.4 mhéadar ciúbach –1 tona)
Softwood (1.4 cub. metres = 1 tonne)
#2153108
Tuarascáil ón bPainéal, Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá - Dumpáil Deiridh ar Bhogadhmad ó Cheanada a chinneadh (SAM – Bogadhmad V), WT/DS264/R, mír 7.87.
Panel Report, United States – Final Dumping Determination on Softwood Lumber from Canada (US – Softwood Lumber V), WT/DS264/R, para. 7.87.
#2194712
Tuarascáil Bhuanchomhlacht Achomhairc, SAM – Bogadhmad IV, míreanna.
Appellate Body Report, US – Softwood Lumber IV, paras.
#2795327
cláir struchtúracha a rinneadh a neart a ghrádú agus a siúntáladh le méaralt ag a bhfuil bonn méarailt dúnta acu — bogadhmad,
strength graded and finger jointed structural boards with closed finger base – softwood;
#2795328
leac adhmaid réamhdhéanta de bhogadhmad muilleáilte atá le húsáid mar eilimintí struchtúracha i bhfoirgnimh,
prefabricated wood slab of milled softwood timber to be used as structural elements in buildings;
#2795366
Cláir struchtúracha a rinneadh a neart a ghrádú agus a siúntáladh le méaralt ag a bhfuil bonn méarailt dúnta acu – bogadhmad’
Strength graded and finger jointed structural boards with closed finger base – softwood’
#2795367
Leac adhmaid réamhdhéanta de bhogadhmad muilleáilte atá le húsáid mar eilimintí struchtúracha i bhfoirgnimh’
Prefabricated wood slab of milled softwood timber to be used as structural elements in buildings’
#2827945
Faoi dhíon
Softwood
#2828068
Réimse (nó réimsí) úsáide
Indoor Softwood
#2879500
Laíon bog-adhmaid
Softwood pulp
#2334970
Dúirt sé freisin nach féidir an cúram agus an treoir a aimsiú fiú bunaithe ar na héifeachtaí eacnamaíocha a bheadh ag beart rialtais, ag tagairt don Phainéal in US - Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada.
It added that entrustment and direction cannot even be found based on the economic effects of a government measure, referring to the Panel in US - Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada.
#2335877
Dar le Grúpa IRNC, sa chás seo, ba chóir gurb í an Indinéis nó an tSín an ‘tír soláthair nó ceannacháin’, i gcomhréir leis an gComhlacht Achomhairc in US – Softwood Lumber IV.
According to IRNC Group, in this case, the ‘country of provision or purchase’ should be Indonesia or China, in line with the Appellate Body in US – Softwood Lumber IV.
#2336771
Tuarascáil an Phainéil, United States – Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS533/R, scaipthe ar Bhaill den ETD an 24 Lúnasa 2020, míreanna 7.600 agus 7.606.
Panel Report, United States – Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS533/R, circulated to WTO Members 24 August 2020, paras. and 7.606.
#1668452
Ba cheart an t-idirdhealú idir deannach crua-adhmaid agus deannach bogadhmaid a mheasúnú tuilleadh a mhéid a bhaineann sé leis an teorainnluach a leagtar amach san Iarscríbhinn sin, faoi mar a mhol SCOEL agus an Ghníomhaireacht Idirnáisiúnta um Thaighde ar Ailse.
The distinction between hardwood and softwood dust should be further assessed as regards the limit value set out in that Annex, as recommended by SCOEL and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
#1668454
Tá nochtadh do dheannach ó bhogadhmad agus ó chrua-adhmad coitianta i measc oibrithe san Aontas agus d’fhéadfadh sé a bheith ina chúis le siomptóim riospráide agus le galair riospráide, agus is é an éifeacht is tromchúisí ar an tsláinte an riosca ailsí sróine agus cuas-sróine.
Exposure to dust from softwood and hardwood is common among workers in the Union and may cause respiratory symptoms and diseases, with the most serious health effect being the risk of nasal and sinonasal cancers.
#2152244
Thairis sin, mhaígh Rialtas Ríocht na hAraibe Sádaí go raibh gníomhaíocht an Choimisiúin ar neamhréir le hAirteagal 5.3 den Chomhaontú Frithdhumpála toisc gur thionscain sé an t-imscrúdú sin bunaithe ar easpa fianaise sa ghearán agus thagair sé i ndáil leis sin don Tuarascáil ón bPainéal in SAM – Bogadhmad V. Áitíodh gur cheart amhras a bheith ar an gCoimisiún faoi chruinneas agus leordhóthanacht an mhéid a mhaígh an gearánach, go háirithe nuair nach dtacaítear le faisnéis iad, agus faoin bhfaisnéis a cuireadh isteach chun tacú leis an méid a mhaígh an ghearánaigh, nuair a bhí siad mícheart ar dhóigh fhollasach.
Furthermore, the GKSA claimed that by initiating this investigation based on the absence of evidence in the complaint, the Commission acted inconsistently with Article 5.3 of the ADA and it referred in this regard to the Panel Report in US – Softwood Lumber V. It was argued that the Commission should have questioned the accuracy and adequacy of the claims made by the complainant, in particular when unsupported by information, and the information submitted in support of the claims of the complainant, when manifestly incorrect.
#2152248
Go deimhin, mar a mheabhraigh Rialtas Ríocht na hAraibe Sádaí, shoiléirigh Tuarascáil ón bPainéal i SAM – Bogadhmad V: “go mbeidh faisnéis den sórt sin atá ar fáil go réasúnta don iarratasóir san iarratas chun bunús a thabhairt leis an maíomh, inter alia, go raibh dumpáil líomhnaithe ann, rud a chiallaíonn nach gá an fhaisnéis uile atá ar fáil go réasúnta don iarratasóir a bheith san iarratas ach gur gá an fhaisnéis chun tacú le cás prima facie a bheith ann”.
Indeed, as the GKSA recalls, the Panel Report in US – Softwood Lumber V clarified that: ‘the application shall contain such information which is reasonably available to the applicant to substantiate its claim of, inter alia, alleged dumping, meaning that the application need not contain all information reasonably available to the applicant, but only information to support a prima facie case’.
#2152253
Go deimhin, chuir an Painéal i SAM – Bogadhmad V in iúl go láidir nach gá an fhianaise riachtanach a chur isteach ach amháin “a mhéid a bhí ar fáil go réasúnta don iarratasóir” agus go raibh sé i gceist leis an teanga sin nach gcuirfí ualach míchuí ar an iarratasóir chun faisnéis nach bhfuil ar fáil dó go réasúnta a chur isteach”.
Indeed, the Panel in US – Softwood Lumber V emphasised that the required evidence needed only be submitted ‘to the extent reasonably available to the applicant’ and that this language ‘was intended to avoid putting an undue burden on the applicant to submit information which is not reasonably available to it’.
#2153109
Féach Tuarascáil ón bPainéal EDT, SAM – Bogadhmad V, WT/DS264/R, míreanna 7.54-7.55 (béim bhunaidh), agus Tuarascáil ó Phainéal EDT, Guatamala – Bearta Frithdhumpála Cinntitheacha ar Shuimint Grey Portland ó Mheicsiceo (“Guatamala – Suimint II”), WT/DS156/R, 24 Deireadh Fómhair 2001, mír 8.35, agus breithiúnas an 20 Meitheamh 2001, Euroalliages, T-188/99, ECLI:EU:T:2001:166, mír 52.
See WTO Panel Report, US – Softwood Lumber V, WT/DS264/R, paras. 7.54-7.55 (original emphasis), and WTO Panel Report, Guatemala – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Grey Portland Cement from Mexico (‘Guatemala – Cement II’), WT/DS156/R, 24 October 2001, para. 8.35, and judgment of 20 June 2001, Euroalliages, T-188/99, ECLI:EU:T:2001:166, para. 52.
#2282296
D’áitigh Rialtas na Síne thairis sin gur dheimhnigh an Buanchomhlacht Achomhairc in ‘SAM-Bogadhmad IV’ gurb ‘é atá i gceist le heisceacht shainráite ar an bprionsabal ginearálta gurb é a thiocfaidh as soláthar ‘earraí’ de chuid rialtais ranníocaíocht airgeadais nuair a sholáthraítear na hearraí sin i bhfoirm ‘bonneagar ginearálta.’
The GOC further argued that the Appellate Body in ‘US – Softwood Lumber IV’ confirmed that ‘only explicit exception to the general principle that the provision of “goods” by a government will result in a financial contribution is when those goods are provided in the form of “general infrastructure.”‘
#2307336
Tuarascáil ón gComhlacht Achomhairc EDT, Na Stáit Aontaithe — Cinneadh Deiridh i leith Dleacht Frithchúitimh i ndáil le Bogadhmad Áirithe ó Cheanada, WT/DS257/AB/R, 19 Eanáir 2004, mír 143).
WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Final Countervailing Duty Determination with respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS257/AB/R, 19 January 2004, para. 143)
#2334979
Mar a mheabhraigh an Coimisiún in aithris (448), ní mór na torthaí i SAM – Srianta Onnmhairiúcháin a léamh in éineacht le torthaí an Chomhlachta Achomhairc, mar a d’aithin an Painéal i mBeart Frithchúitimh SAM maidir le Coill Bogadh Lumber ó Cheanada.
As recalled by the Commission in recital (448), the findings in US – Export Restraints must be read together with the findings of the Appellate Body, as was also recognised by the Panel in US – Countervailing Measures on Softwood Lumber from Canada.
#2336839
Tuarascáil ón gComhlacht Achomhairc, Na Stáit Aontaithe – Cinneadh Deiridh i leith Dleacht Frithchúitimh i ndáil le Bogadhmad Áirithe ó Cheanada, WT/DS257/AB/R, glactha an 17 Feabhra 2004, DSR 2004:II, p. 571, mír 90.
Appellate Body Report, United States – Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS257/AB/R, adopted 17 February 2004, DSR 2004:II, p. 571, para. 90.
#2425747
Bithscagachán: cuirtear an sruth dramhgháis trí scair ábhar orgánaigh (amhail móin, fraoch, díleáiteán, adhmad fréimhe, coirt chrainn, adhmad bog agus cineálacha meascán difriúla) nó roinnt ábhar támh (amhail cré, carbón gníomhachtaithe agus polúireatán) i gcás ina ndéanann miocrorgánaigh a tharlaíonn go nádúrtha ocsaídiú ar bhonn bitheolaíoch air go dé-ocsaíd charbóin, uisce, salainn neamh-orgánach agus bithmhais.
Biofiltration: the waste gas stream is passed through a bed of organic material (such as peat, heather, compost, root wood, tree bark, peat, compost, softwood and different kinds of combinations) or some inert material (such as clay, activated carbon, and polyurethane), where it is biologically oxidised by naturally occurring microorganisms into carbon dioxide, water, inorganic salts and biomass.
#2515143
An 7 Meán Fómhair 2018, d’iarr Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá go gcuirfí síneadh leis an maolú faoi Chinneadh Cur Chun Feidhme (AE) 2015/179 maidir le hábhar pacáistíochta adhmaid déanta as bogadhmad agus raon feidhme an mhaolaithe a leathnú chuig ábhar pacáistíochta adhmaid a dhéantar as crua-adhmad.
On 7 September 2018, the United States of America requested a prolongation of the derogation under Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/179 for wood packaging material made of softwood and an extension of the scope of the derogation to wood packaging material made of hardwood.
#2515144
Chuir Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá sainchomhad leis an iarraidh thuasluaite arb ionann é agus obair leantach ar anailís chonaire a rinne Roinn Cosanta na Stát Aontaithe roimhe seo a mhéid a bhaineann le boscaí armlóin bogadhmaid, obair a chomhlánaítear le hanailís chonaire maidir le boscaí armlóin chrua-adhmaid.
The United States of America have accompanied the above-mentioned request with a dossier which represents a follow-up to a previous pathway analysis of the United States Department of Defence as regards softwood ammunition boxes, complementing it by a pathway analysis for hardwood ammunition boxes.
#2517395
Tuarascáil ó Chomhlacht Achomhairc EDT, Na Stáit Aontaithe — Cinneadh Deiridh i leith Dleacht Frithchúitimh i ndáil le Bogadhmad Áirithe ó Cheanada, WT/DS257/AB/R, 19 Eanáir 2004, mír 143).
WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Final Countervailing Duty Determination with respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, WT/DS257/AB/R, 19 January 2004, para. 143.
#2733414
Féach freisin Tuarascáil ón mBuanchomhlacht Achomhairc maidir le US – Hot-Rolled Steel (mír 73), inar thug an Buanchomhlacht Achomhairc le fios go bhfuil na teorainneacha ama maidir le himscrúduithe a thabhairt i gcrích a leagtar amach in Airteagal 5.10 “sainordaithe” faoin gComhaontú Frithdhumpála, agus an Tuarascáil ón bPainéal maidir le US – Softwood Lumber V (mír 7.333), áit ar thug an painéal “srian” ar na teorainneacha ama sin.
Also Appellate Body Report in US – Hot-Rolled Steel (para. 73), where the Appellate Body indicated that the time limits for concluding investigations set out in Article 5.10 are ‘mandated’ under the Anti-Dumping Agreement and the Panel Report in US – Softwood Lumber V (para. 7.333), where the panel described these time limits as ‘strict’.
#3105067
Cuirtear an sruth dramhgháis trí scair ábhair orgánaigh (amhail móin, fraoch, díleáiteán, fréamh, coirt chrainn, adhmad bog agus cineálacha meascán difriúla) nó roinnt ábhar támh (amhail cré, carbón gníomhachtaithe agus polúireatán) i gcás ina ndéanann miocrorgánaigh a tharlaíonn go nádúrtha ocsaídiú ar bhonn bitheolaíoch air go dé-ocsaíd charbóin, uisce, salainn neamh-orgánach agus bithmhais.
The waste gas stream is passed through a bed of organic material (such as peat, heather, compost, root, tree bark, softwood and different combinations) or some inert material (such as clay, activated carbon, and polyurethane), where it is biologically oxidised by naturally occurring microorganisms into carbon dioxide, water, inorganic salts and biomass.