D’úsáid an Coimisiún costais SG &A agus brabús ghrúpa Tenaris toisc nach raibh costais SG &A agus brabús Tamsa ar fáil, agus ós rud é gurbh iad sonraí ghrúpa Tenaris an rogha mhalartach ab fhearr a bhí ar fáil go héasca.
The Commission used the SG&A and profit of the Tenaris group as the SG&A and profit of Tamsa was not available, and because the data of the Tenaris group was the best readily available alternative.
Thairis sin, thug ECL le fios gur cuireadh deireadh le hathbhreithniú eatramhach roimhe sin i gcoinne ECL arna iarraidh sin do SG PAM tar éis do SG PAM an iarraidh a tharraingt siar.
Moreover, ECL pointed out that a previous interim review against ECL on request of SG PAM was terminated after the request was withdrawn by the latter.
Féadfaidh an t-údarás ceadaithe faisnéis bhreise iomchuí a iarraidh ón monaróir d'fhonn a léiriú gur gá cineál feithicle a chatagóiriú mar fheithicil shainchuspóireach den ghrúpa speisialta (“Cód SG”).
The approval authority may request from the manufacturer appropriate additional information with the aim of demonstrating that a type of vehicle needs to be categorised as special purpose vehicle in the special group (‘SG Code’).
Féadfaidh an túdarás ceadaithe faisnéis bhreise iomchuí a iarraidh ón monaróir d'fhonn a léiriú gur gá cineál feithicle a chatagóiriú mar fheithicil shainchuspóireach den ghrúpa speisialta ('Cód SG').
The approval authority may request from the manufacturer appropriate additional information with the aim of demonstrating that a type of vehicle needs to be categorised as special purpose vehicle in the special group (‘SG Code’).
Déanfar na hastaíochtaí sonracha CO2 in g/kmatá ag feithicil nua tromshaothair v (CO2v) atá sannta d’fhoghrúpafeithiclí sg a ríomh mar a leanas:
The specific CO2 emissions in g/km of a new heavy-duty vehicle v (CO2v), attributed to the vehicle sub-group sg shall be calculated as follows:
Le haghaidh gach monaróra agus gach tréimhse tuairiscithe, déanfarmeánastaíochtaí sonracha CO2 in g/tkm atá ag gachfeithicil nua tromshaothair i bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg (avgCO2sg) a ríomhmar seo a leanas:
For each manufacturer and each reporting period, the average specific CO2 emissions in g/tkm of all new heavy-duty vehicles in the vehicle sub-group sg (avgCO2sg) shall be calculated as follows:
suim thar gach feithicil nua tromshaothair an mhonarórai bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg seachas gach feithicilseirbhíse, i gcomhréir le pointe (a) den chéad mhír d’Airteagal 4;
is the sum over all new heavy-duty vehicles of the manufacturer in the vehicle sub-group sg, excluding vocational vehicles, in accordance with point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 4;
líon na bhfeithiclí nua tromshaothair atá ag an monaróiri bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg seachas gach feithicilseirbhíse i gcomhréir le pointe (a) den chéad mhír d’Airteagal 4;
is the number of new heavy-duty vehicles of the manufacturer in the vehicle sub-group sg, excluding vocational vehicles, in accordance with point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 4;
tairseach astaíochtaí ísle fhoghrúpa feithiclí sg lena mbaineann an fheithicil v mar a shainmhínítear i bpointe 2.3.3;
is the low-emission threshold of the vehicle sub-group sg to which the vehicle v belongs as defined in point 2.3.3;
Le haghaidh gach monaróra agus gach tréimhse tuairiscithe, déanfarsciar na bhfeithiclí nua tromshaothair i bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg (sharesg) a ríomh mar a leanas:
For each manufacturer and each reporting period, the share of new heavy-duty vehicles in the vehicle sub-group sg (sharesg) shall be calculated as follows:
an luach pálasta arna shannadh do na feithiclí i bhfoghrúpafeithiclí sg don phróifíl mhisin mp, mar a shonraítear i dTábla 3.
is the payload value attributed to the vehicles in the vehicle sub-group sg for the mission profile mp, as specified in Table 3.
Déanfar na hastaíochtaí tagartha CO2 (rCO2sg) a ríomh do gach foghrúpafeithiclí sg ar bhonn gach feithicle nua tromshaothairatá ag gach monaróir sa tréimhse tuairiscithe mar a leanas:
The reference CO2 emissions (rCO2sg) shall be calculated for each vehicle sub-group sg on the basis of all new heavy-duty vehicles of all manufacturers of the reference period as follows:
an tsuim thar gach feithicil nua tromshaothair arnaclárú sa tréimhse tuairiscithe i bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg, seachas feithiclí seirbhíse, i gcomhréir leis an dara fomhírd’Airteagal 1;
is the sum over all new heavy-duty vehicles registered in the reference period in the vehicle sub-group sg, excluding vocational vehicles, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 1;
líon na bhfeithiclí nua tromshaothair arna gclárú satréimhse tuairiscithe i bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg, seachas feithiclí seirbhíse, i gcomhréir leis an dara mír d’Airteagal1;
is the number of all new heavy-duty vehicles registered in the reference period in the vehicle sub-group sg, excluding vocational vehicles, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 1;
is é Σv an tsuim i leith na bhfeithiclí tromshaothair uile atá ag an monaróir san fhoghrúpa feithiclí sg, i gcomhréir le forálacha Airteagal 1(5);
Σv is the sum over all heavy-duty vehicles of the manufacturer in the vehicle sub-group sg, in accordance with the provisions of Article 1(5);
is é Vocsg líon na bhfeithiclí tromshaothair atá ag an monaróir san fhoghrúpa feithiclí sg, i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 1(5).
Vocsg is the number of heavy-duty vehicles of the manufacturer in the vehicle sub-group sg, in accordance with Article 1(5).
I gcás modúil eile (e.g. CF, SF, SG), beidh údar maith ann go mbeidh an fíorú a dhéanfar fós bailí;
For other modules (e.g. CF, SF, SG) it shall be justified that the verification performed remains valid;
Thug táirgeoir de chuid an Aontais, Saint-Gobain PAM Canalisations (‘SG PAM’), barúlacha tráth a tionscnaíodh an t-imscrúdú (féach Roinn1.8).
A Union producer, Saint-Gobain PAM Canalisations (‘SG PAM’), provided comments upon initiation (see Section 1.8).
Le litreacha an 24 Iúil 2023, chuir Rialtas na hIndia (‘GOI’), ECL agus SG PAM barúlacha ar fáil maidir le litir Airteagal 18, agus maidir leis an nochtadh.
By letters of 24 July 2023, the Government of India (‘GOI’), ECL and SG PAM provided comments on the Article 18 letter, and on the disclosure.
Fuair an Coimisiún barúlacha ina leith sin ó GOI, SG PAM, ECL, agus ó na cuideachtaí Eorpacha Deschacht, IBECO AB, VAPPtech Environmental Ltd (‘VAPPtech’) agus Vodoskok.
The Commission received comments in this regard from GOI, SG PAM, ECL, and from the European companies Deschacht, IBECO AB, VAPPtech Environrnental Ltd (‘VAPPtech’) and Vodoskok.
Thairis sin, dar leis, ní neartódh imeacht ECL ó mhargadh an Aontais ach seasamh gar-mhonaplach SG PAM ar an margadh sin lena ndéanfaí dochar do leas leathan an Aontais.
Moreover, in its view, the exit of ECL from the Union market would only strengthen the quasi-monopolistic position of SG PAM on this market to the detriment of the broader Union interest.
Chuir SG PAM in iúl go raibh sé i gcoinne deireadh a chur leis an imscrúdú ar bhonn na hiarrata ar athbhreithniú na tarraingthe siar a rinne ECL.
SG PAM submitted that it opposed termination of the investigation on the basis of the review request withdrawal by ECL.
Thairis sin, chosain SG PAM nár moladh le haon eilimint go mbeadh ar ECL margadh an Aontais a fhágáil dá dtiocfadh méadú ar a leibhéal dleachtanna.
Furthermore, SG PAM defended that no element suggested that ECL would have to leave the Union market if its level of duties would increase.
Mheas sí nár tugadh tacaíocht do líomhaintí maidir le hiompar frithiomaíoch SG PAM agus nach raibh sé mar aidhm acu ach damáiste a dhéanamh dá chlú.
It considered that allegations on SG PAM’s anti-competitive behaviour were unsupported and that they only aimed at damaging its reputation.
D’áitigh SG PAM freisin gurbh ‘il-ábhar’ an margadh do phíopaí insínte toisc go bhféadfaí cineálacha eile píopaí a bhí oiriúnach a chur in ionad píopaí insínte.
SG PAM further argued that the market for ductile pipes was ‘multi-material’ because ductile pipes could be substituted by other types of pipes which were a suitable alternative.
Chomh maith leis sin, fuair SG PAM amach nach raibh aon léiriú ann go raibh a gcás ionadaíoch don mhargadh le haghaidh píopaí insínte.
Also, SG PAM found that there was no indication that their situation was representative for the market for ductile pipes.
D’áitigh SG PAM freisin nach raibh aon fhaisnéis san iarraidh a thacaíonn leis an laghdú líomhnaithe ar dhumpáil nó ar an nasc idir an cumasc agus an éagsúlacht ar an leibhéal dumpála.
SG PAM also submitted that the request did not contain any information supporting the alleged reduction in dumping or of the link between the merger and the variation of the level of dumping.
Dar leis, tháinig méadú ar an sciar den mhargadh a bhí ag SG PAM ón imscrúdú bunaidh, agus tháinig laghdú ar mhéid iomlán díolachán ECL ar mhargadh an Aontais.
In its view, the market share of SG PAM increased since the original investigation, while ECL’s total sales volume on the Union market declined.
Ina thuairim, chruthaigh na torthaí airgeadais, infheistíochtaí nua, agus cruthaíodh mar gheall ar leibhéal méadaithe na ndíolachán go raibh ag éirí thar barr le SG PAM.
In its view, the financial results, new investments, and the increased level of sales proved an excellent performance of SG PAM.
Chiallaigh sé sin, de réir ECL, go raibh SG PAM den tuairim go raibh laghdú tagtha ar dhumpáil ECL.
This meant, according to ECL, that SG PAM was of the opinion that ECL’s dumping had decreased.
Dar le ECL, bhain SG PAM tairbhe as bearta frithdhumpála agus frithchúitimh a bhí i bhfad ró-ard os coinne tháirgeoirí onnmhairiúcháin na hIndia a rinne an táirge faoi athbhreithniú.
In ECL’s view, SG PAM benefitted from excessively high anti-dumping and countervailing measures against the Indian exporting producers of the product under review.
Thairis sin, thug sé faoi deara nár shonraigh SG PAM go nithiúil cén fhaisnéis sa chomhad oscailte a bhí ar iarraidh ina thuairim.
Moreover, it noted that SG PAM did not specify concretely what information in the open file was in its view missing.
Chuir SG PAM in iúl freisin gur cheart don Choimisiún síneadh a chur leis an tréimhse imscrúdúcháin chun an t-athrú líomhnaithe ar imthosca a chur san áireamh.
SG PAM further submitted that the Commission should extend the investigation period to account for the alleged change in circumstances.
De réir SG PAM, ba cheart don Choimisiún na difríochtaí idir na saintréithe idir na píopaí agus na feadáin a dhíoltar san India agus san Aontas a fhíorú freisin.
According to SG PAM, the Commission should also have verified the differences in the characteristics between the pipes and tubes sold in India and in the Union.
I dtuairim SG PAM, féadfaidh na difríochtaí sin údar a thabhairt le coigeartuithe chun comparáid chothrom a dhéanamh idir táirgí a dhíoltar ar mhargadh intíre na hIndia agus ar mhargadh an Aontais.
In SG PAM’s view, these differences may justify adjustments to allow a fair comparison between products sold on the Indian domestic market and the Union market.
Dá bhrí sin, cuireadh na difríochtaí a léirigh SG PAM san áireamh toisc gur measadh gur cineálacha éagsúla táirgí iad na haicmí brú éagsúla.
The differences pointed out by SG PAM were thus taken into consideration as the different pressure classes were considered as different product types.
Chuige sin, sholáthair SG PAM tuairisc achomair ar struchtúr corparáideach Ghrúpa ECL, chomh maith le tosca ar cheart don Choimisiún iad a mheas, dar leis, sa ríomh dumpála.
To that end, SG PAM provided a summary description of ECL Group’s corporate structure, as well as factors that should, in its view, be considered by the Commission in the dumping calculation.
Thagair SG PAM do sholáthar cóc arna tháirgeadh ag ceann de mhonarchana ECL in Haldia, agus d’allmhairí guail ón Astráil nuair a d’fhéadfadh roinnt páirtithe comhlachaithe in ECL a bheith bainteach leis.
SG PAM referred to the provision of coke produced by one of the factories of ECL in Haldia, and to imports of coal from Australia where some related parties of ECL may have been involved.
Bhí an rud céanna bailí de réir SG PAM maidir le margadh an Aontais, áit a ndíolann ECL trí roinnt páirtithe comhlachaithe.
The same was valid according to SG PAM concerning the Union market, where ECL sells through several related parties.
Ina theannta sin, chuir ECL tuarascálacha tástála ar fáil freisin do phíopaí arna dtáirgeadh ag SG PAM.
In addition, ECL also made test reports available for pipes produced by SG PAM.
Mheas SG PAM go raibh clú ar ECL le fada nár éirigh leis comhoibriú go leordhóthanach in imscrúduithe cosanta trádála, agus thagair sé d’imscrúduithe in 2020 agus 2021 ar cuireadh deireadh leo.
SG PAM considered that ECL had a long story of failing to adequately cooperate in trade defence investigations, and it referred to investigations in 2020 and 2021 that were terminated.
D’áitigh Deschacht inter alia gur fhorchuir SG PAM ceanglais cheannaigh eisiacha agus gur dhiúltaigh sé iad a dhíol leo.
Deschacht argued, inter alia, that SG PAM imposed exclusive purchasing requirements and refused to sell to them.
Tar éis an dara nochtadh ar bhonn nua na bhfíoras atá ar fáil, níor aontaigh SG PAM le rogha an Choimisiúin maidir leis na fíorais a bhí ar fáil.
After the second disclosure of the new basis for the facts available, SG PAM disagreed with the Commission’s choice of facts available.
D’áitigh SG PAM freisin go raibh an gnáthluach bunaithe ar dhíolacháin bhrabúsacha amháin nó ar ghnáthluach ríofa san imscrúdú bunaidh.
SG PAM also argued that in the original investigation, the normal value was based on profitable sales only or constructed normal value.
SG - Bewertungssystem für Makroalgen und Seegräser der Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer zur Umsetzung der EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland
SG – Bewertungssystem für Makroalgen und Seegräser der Küsten- und Übergangsgewässer zur Umsetzung der EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in Deutschland
Faireachán a dhéanamh ar leapacha SG in aghaidh an dobharlaigh ag baint úsáid as aerghrianghraif, fírinne talún agus an dromchla agus an dlús in aghaidh an speicis a shonrú
Monitoring beds of SG per waterbody using aerial photographs, ground truth and specifying surface and density per species
Sainmhínítear fachtóir míleáiste agus ualaithe pálasta (MPWsg) fhoghrúpa feithiclí sg marthoradh ar an míleáiste bliantúil a shonraítear i dTábla 4 agus anluach pálasta de réir foghrúpa feithiclí a shonraítear i dTábla 3de phointe 2.5, arna normalú go dtí an luach faoi seach d’fhoghrúpafeithiclí 5-LH, agus déanfar é a ríomh mar seo a leanas:
The mileage and payload weighting factor (MPWsg) of the vehicle sub-group sg is defined as the product of the annual mileage specified in Table 4 and the payload value per vehicle sub-group specified in Table 3 of point 2.5, normalised to the respective value for vehicle sub-group 5-LH, and shall be calculated as follows:
an luach pálasta, a sannadh d’fheithicil v i bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg ar phróifíl mhisin mp sa tréimhse tuairiscithe, i gcomhréir le Tábla 3 de phointe 2.5 d’Iarscríbhinn I, chun críocha na sonraí faireacháin le haghaidh na tréimhse tagartha a bhunú, sonraí arna dtuairisciú i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) 2018/956;
is the payload value, which was attributed to vehicle v in the vehicle sub-group sg on the mission profile mp in the reference period, in accordance with Table 3 of point 2.5 of Annex I, for the purposes of establishing the monitoring data for the reference period as reported in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/956;
an luach pálasta, a sannadh do na feithiclí i bhfoghrúpa feithiclí sg ar phróifíl mhisin mp sa tréimhse tuairiscithe nuair a thiocfaidh éifeacht leis na hathruithe dá dtagraítear i bpointe (c) d’Airteagal 14(1) le haghaidh gach feithicle nua tromshaothair, i gcomhréir le Tábla 3 i bpointe 2.5 d’Iarscríbhinn I;
is the payload value attributed to vehicles in the vehicle sub-group sg on the mission profile mp in the reporting period when the changes referred to in point (c) of Article 14(1) take effect for all new heavy-duty vehicles, in accordance with Table 3 of point 2.5 of Annex I;
Go háirithe, dhírigh táirgeoir an Aontais ar chuideachtaí a mhonaraíonn comhábhair do thionscal na dí, an ghlanta, an bhia, na sláinte agus na cógaisíochta sa Cholóim, ar léirigh a sonraí airgeadais leibhéal réasúnta de SG &A agus brabús i gcomhréir le forálacha an Bhunrialacháin.
In particular, the Union producer focused on companies manufacturing ingredients for the beverage, cleaning, food, health and pharmaceutical industry in Colombia whose financial data showed a reasonable level of SG&A and profits in line with the provisions of the basic Regulation.