#2154705
Maidir leis na ceanglais shubstainteacha le haghaidh thionscnaimh an imscrúduithe, mhaígh CCCME go ndearna an gearánach measúnú díobhála neamhiomlán sa ghearán, toisc nár chuir an gearánach figiúirí ar fáil i dtaca le sé cinn de na cúig tháscaire dhéag maidir le díobháil a áirítear in Airteagal 3.4 de Chomhaontú Frithdhumpála EDT (‘ADA’) (go háirithe: táirgiúlacht, toradh ar infheistíocht, sreabhadh airgid, pá, fás agus an cumas caipiteal nó infheistíochtaí a bhailiú).
On the substantive requirements for the initiation of the investigation, the CCCME claimed that the complainant performed an incomplete injury assessment in the complaint, as the complainant did not provide figures on six of the fifteen injury indicators enumerated in Article 3.4 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement (‘ADA’) (notably: productivity, return on investment, cash flow, wages, growth and the ability to raise capital or investments).